CERTA-2009-AVI-304
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2009-07-30 - Updated: 2009-07-30
Plusieurs vulnérabilités relatives au routage BGP présentes dans les équipements Cisco permettent à un utilisateur distant de provoquer un déni de service.
Description
Deux vulnérabilités relatives au routage BGP sont présentes dans certains équipements Cisco :
- la première concerne le traitement de certaines requêtes de mise à jour (update) incluant un chemin d'accès d'AS (Autonomous System) particulier ;
- la seconde, de nature non-précisée par le constructeur, est également relative à la gestion des messages de type update.
Toutes deux permettent à un utilisateur distant malintentionné de provoquer un déni de service par le biais de requêtes BGP particulières.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Cisco IOS XE 2.3.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "IOS XE",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cisco IOS R12.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "IOS",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cisco IOS 12.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "IOS",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cisco IOS XE 2.4.x.",
"product": {
"name": "IOS XE",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s relatives au routage BGP sont pr\u00e9sentes dans\ncertains \u00e9quipements Cisco :\n\n- la premi\u00e8re concerne le traitement de certaines requ\u00eates de mise \u00e0\n jour (update) incluant un chemin d\u0027acc\u00e8s d\u0027AS (Autonomous System)\n particulier ;\n- la seconde, de nature non-pr\u00e9cis\u00e9e par le constructeur, est\n \u00e9galement relative \u00e0 la gestion des messages de type update.\n\nToutes deux permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur distant malintentionn\u00e9 de\nprovoquer un d\u00e9ni de service par le biais de requ\u00eates BGP particuli\u00e8res.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2009-2049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-2049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2009-1168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-1168"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2009-07-30T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2009-07-30T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20090729-bgp du 29 juillet 2009 :",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090729-bgp.shtml"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2009-AVI-304",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2009-07-30T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s relatives au routage BGP pr\u00e9sentes dans les\n\u00e9quipements Cisco permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur distant de provoquer un\nd\u00e9ni de service.\n",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le routage BGP des \u00e9quipements Cisco",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco #110457 du 29 juillet 2009",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.