CERTA-2009-AVI-163
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2009-04-27 - Updated: 2009-04-27
Plusieurs vulnérabilités de HP StorageWorks Storage Mirroring permettent à un individu malintentionné et distant d'exécuter du code arbitraire, de réaliser un déni de service et de contourner la politique de sécurité.
Description
Il existe plusieurs vulnérabilités dans HP StorageWorks Storage Mirroring :
- la première concerne un débordement de mémoire dans le module Auto-Discovery, un individu malintentionné et distant peut exécuter du code arbitraire à l'aide d'un paquet UDP contruit de façon particulière ;
- la deuxième concerne la console de management (Management Console), un individu malintentionné et distant peut réaliser un déni de service à l'aide d'un paquet UDP contruit de façon particulière ;
- la dernière concerne une faiblesse de chiffrement présente dans le module d'authentification de HP StorageWorks Storage Mirroring, un individu malintentionné et distant peut contourner la politique de sécurité.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "HP StorageWorks Storage Mirroring versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.1.1.1090.15.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nIl existe plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans HP StorageWorks Storage\nMirroring :\n\n- la premi\u00e8re concerne un d\u00e9bordement de m\u00e9moire dans le module\n Auto-Discovery, un individu malintentionn\u00e9 et distant peut ex\u00e9cuter\n du code arbitraire \u00e0 l\u0027aide d\u0027un paquet UDP contruit de fa\u00e7on\n particuli\u00e8re ;\n- la deuxi\u00e8me concerne la console de management (Management Console),\n un individu malintentionn\u00e9 et distant peut r\u00e9aliser un d\u00e9ni de\n service \u00e0 l\u0027aide d\u0027un paquet UDP contruit de fa\u00e7on particuli\u00e8re ;\n- la derni\u00e8re concerne une faiblesse de chiffrement pr\u00e9sente dans le\n module d\u0027authentification de HP StorageWorks Storage Mirroring, un\n individu malintentionn\u00e9 et distant peut contourner la politique de\n s\u00e9curit\u00e9.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2009-0718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-0718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2009-0716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-0716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2009-0717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-0717"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2009-04-27T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2009-04-27T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTA-2009-AVI-163",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2009-04-27T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
}
],
"summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s de \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eHP StorageWorks Storage\nMirroring\u003c/span\u003e permettent \u00e0 un individu malintentionn\u00e9 et distant\nd\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire, de r\u00e9aliser un d\u00e9ni de service et de\ncontourner la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.\n",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans HP StorageWorks",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 HP c01707538 du 20 avril 2009",
"url": "http://itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=c01707538"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.