CERTA-2008-AVI-140
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2008-03-17 - Updated: 2008-03-17
Plusieurs vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans le module UCP (User Changeable Password).
Description
Le Module UCP est un CGI permettant aux utilisateurs de CISCO ACS (Access Control Server) de changer leur mot de passe via une page web. Des vulnérabilités de type dépassement de mémoire et injection de code indirecte ont été corrigées.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de CISCO 100519 du 14 mars 2008 pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Les versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la 4.2.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nLe Module UCP est un CGI permettant aux utilisateurs de CISCO ACS\n(Access Control Server) de changer leur mot de passe via une page web.\nDes vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s de type d\u00e9passement de m\u00e9moire et injection de code\nindirecte ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de CISCO 100519 du 14 mars 2008 pour\nl\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2008-0533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-0533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2008-0532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-0532"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2008-03-17T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2008-03-17T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20080312-ucp du 14 mars 2008 :",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20080312-ucp.shtml"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2008-AVI-140",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2008-03-17T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans le module UCP (\u003cspan\nclass=\"textit\"\u003eUser Changeable Password\u003c/span\u003e).\n",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans CISCO ACS UCP",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 CISCO 100519 du 14 mars 2008",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.