CERTA-2008-AVI-134
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2008-03-13 - Updated: 2008-03-13
Plusieurs vulnérabilités dans Adobe ColdFusion permettent à un utilisateur distant malintentionné de contourner la politique de sécurité ou de réaliser une attaque de type cross site scripting.
Description
Deux vulnérabilités dans certaines applications de ColdFusion, notamment celles mettant en œuvre la fonction setEncoding dans les fichiers Application.chm et Application.cfc, permettent à une personne malveillante de réaliser une attaque de type cross site scripting.
Une vulnérabilité dans Adobe ColdFusion permet de contourner la politique de sécurité appliquée à la journalisation des connexions à l'interface d'administration.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | ColdFusion | Adobe ColdFusion 8 ; | ||
| Adobe | ColdFusion | Adobe ColdFusion MX 7. |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Adobe ColdFusion 8 ;",
"product": {
"name": "ColdFusion",
"vendor": {
"name": "Adobe",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Adobe ColdFusion MX 7.",
"product": {
"name": "ColdFusion",
"vendor": {
"name": "Adobe",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans certaines applications de ColdFusion, notamment\ncelles mettant en \u0153uvre la fonction setEncoding dans les fichiers\nApplication.chm et Application.cfc, permettent \u00e0 une personne\nmalveillante de r\u00e9aliser une attaque de type cross site scripting.\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Adobe ColdFusion permet de contourner la\npolitique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e \u00e0 la journalisation des connexions \u00e0\nl\u0027interface d\u0027administration.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2008-1203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-1203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2008-0644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-0644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2008-0643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-0643"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2008-03-13T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2008-03-13T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Adobe apsb08-08 du 11 mars 2008 :",
"url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb08-08.html"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Adobe apsb08-07 du 11 mars 2008 :",
"url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb08-07.html"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Adobe apsb08-06 du 11 mars 2008 :",
"url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb08-06.html"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2008-AVI-134",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2008-03-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS)"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
}
],
"summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Adobe ColdFusion permettent \u00e0 un\nutilisateur distant malintentionn\u00e9 de contourner la politique de\ns\u00e9curit\u00e9 ou de r\u00e9aliser une attaque de type \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003ecross\nsite scripting\u003c/span\u003e.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Adobe ColdFusion",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Adobe du 11 mars 2008",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.