CERTA-2007-AVI-359
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2007-08-14 - Updated: 2007-08-14
Des vulnérabilités ont été identifiées dans les gadgets fournis avec Microsoft Windows Vista. L'exploitation de ces dernières permettrait d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance sur le système vulnérable.
Description
Des vulnérabilités ont été identifiées dans les gadgets fournis avec Microsoft Windows Vista. Les gadgets sont des applications, ou codes. Ils peuvent se présenter sous forme de contenu HTML qu'il est possible d'afficher sur le bureau de l'utilisateur. Le contenu HTML dans le gadget est téléchargé depuis un site distant sous forme d'un ensemble de scripts, ensuite exécutés localement.
Les vulnérabilités mentionnées concernent les gadgets suivants :
- gadget Météo ;
- gadget Contacts ;
- gadget Titres.
Il est possible, par le biais d'un flux RSS malveillant ou compromis, d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance sur le système vulnérable.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité MS07-048 de Microsoft pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Microsoft Windows Vista ;",
"product": {
"name": "Windows",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Microsoft Windows Vista \u00c9dition x64.",
"product": {
"name": "Windows",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nDes vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9es dans les gadgets fournis avec\nMicrosoft Windows Vista. Les gadgets sont des applications, ou codes.\nIls peuvent se pr\u00e9senter sous forme de contenu HTML qu\u0027il est possible\nd\u0027afficher sur le bureau de l\u0027utilisateur. Le contenu HTML dans le\ngadget est t\u00e9l\u00e9charg\u00e9 depuis un site distant sous forme d\u0027un ensemble de\nscripts, ensuite ex\u00e9cut\u00e9s localement.\n\nLes vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s mentionn\u00e9es concernent les gadgets suivants :\n\n- gadget M\u00e9t\u00e9o ;\n- gadget Contacts ;\n- gadget Titres.\n\nIl est possible, par le biais d\u0027un flux RSS malveillant ou compromis,\nd\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire \u00e0 distance sur le syst\u00e8me vuln\u00e9rable.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 MS07-048 de Microsoft pour\nl\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2007-3033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-3033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2007-3891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-3891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2007-3032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-3032"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2007-08-14T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2007-08-14T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTA-2007-AVI-359",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2007-08-14T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Des vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9es dans les gadgets fournis avec\nMicrosoft Windows Vista. L\u0027exploitation de ces derni\u00e8res permettrait\nd\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire \u00e0 distance sur le syst\u00e8me vuln\u00e9rable.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les Gadgets de Microsoft Windows Vista",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Microsoft MS07-048 du 14 ao\u00fbt 2007",
"url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS07-048.mspx"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.