CERTA-2007-AVI-331
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2007-07-25 - Updated: 2007-07-25
Une vulnérabilité dans CA Message Queuing permet à une personne malintentionnée d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.
Description
Une vulnérabilité de type débordement de mémoire a été identifiée dans plusieurs produits CA au niveau du serveur CA Message Queuing (CAM / CAFT). La faille est due à un mauvais traitement de paquets spécialement conçus envoyés vers le port 3104 TCP et peut être exploitée par un attaquant pour exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Les logiciels suivants sur Windows et Netware sont affectés :
- Advantage Data Transport 3.0 ;
- BrightStor SAN Manager 11.1, 11.5 ;
- BrightStor Portal 11.1 ;
- CleverPath OLAP 5.1 ;
- CleverPath ECM 3.5 ;
- CleverPath Predictive Analysis Server 2.0, 3.0 ;
- CleverPath Aion 10.0 ;
- eTrust Admin 2.01, 2.04, 2.07, 2.09, 8.0, 8.1 ;
- Unicenter Application Performance Monitor 3.0, 3.5 ;
- Unicenter Asset Management 3.1, 3.2, 3.2 SP1, 3.2 SP2, 4.0, 4.0 SP1 ;
- Unicenter Data Transport Option 2.0 ;
- Unicenter Enterprise Job Manager 1.0 SP1, 1.0 SP2 ;
- Unicenter Jasmine 3.0 ;
- Unicenter Management for WebSphere MQ 3.5 ;
- Unicenter Management for Microsoft Exchange 4.0, 4.1 ;
- Unicenter Management for Lotus Notes / Domino 4.0 ;
- Unicenter Management for Web Servers 5, 5.01 ;
- Unicenter NSM 3.0, 3.1 ;
- Unicenter NSM Wireless Network Management Option 3.0 ;
- Unicenter Remote Control 6.0, 6.0 SP1 ;
- Unicenter Service Level Management 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.5 ;
- Unicenter Software Delivery 3.0, 3.1, 3.1 SP1, 3.1 SP2, 4.0, 4.0 SP1 ;
- Unicenter TNG 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.4.2 ;
- Unicenter TNG JPN 2.2.
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eLes logiciels suivants sur Windows et Netware sont affect\u00e9s :\u003c/P\u003e \u003cUL\u003e \u003cLI\u003eAdvantage Data Transport 3.0 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eBrightStor SAN Manager 11.1, 11.5 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eBrightStor Portal 11.1 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eCleverPath OLAP 5.1 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eCleverPath ECM 3.5 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eCleverPath Predictive Analysis Server 2.0, 3.0 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eCleverPath Aion 10.0 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eeTrust Admin 2.01, 2.04, 2.07, 2.09, 8.0, 8.1 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Application Performance Monitor 3.0, 3.5 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Asset Management 3.1, 3.2, 3.2 SP1, 3.2 SP2, 4.0, 4.0 SP1 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Data Transport Option 2.0 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Enterprise Job Manager 1.0 SP1, 1.0 SP2 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Jasmine 3.0 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Management for WebSphere MQ 3.5 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Management for Microsoft Exchange 4.0, 4.1 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Management for Lotus Notes / Domino 4.0 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Management for Web Servers 5, 5.01 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter NSM 3.0, 3.1 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter NSM Wireless Network Management Option 3.0 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Remote Control 6.0, 6.0 SP1 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Service Level Management 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.5 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter Software Delivery 3.0, 3.1, 3.1 SP1, 3.1 SP2, 4.0, 4.0 SP1 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter TNG 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.4.2 ;\u003c/LI\u003e \u003cLI\u003eUnicenter TNG JPN 2.2.\u003c/LI\u003e \u003c/UL\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de type d\u00e9bordement de m\u00e9moire a \u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9e dans\nplusieurs produits CA au niveau du serveur CA Message Queuing (CAM /\nCAFT). La faille est due \u00e0 un mauvais traitement de paquets sp\u00e9cialement\ncon\u00e7us envoy\u00e9s vers le port 3104 TCP et peut \u00eatre exploit\u00e9e par un\nattaquant pour ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2007-0060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-0060"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2007-07-25T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2007-07-25T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTA-2007-AVI-331",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2007-07-25T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans CA Message Queuing permet \u00e0 une personne\nmalintentionn\u00e9e d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans CA Message Queuing",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 CA du 24 juillet 2007",
"url": "http://supportconnectw.ca.com/public/dto_transportit/infodocs/camsgquevul-secnot.asp"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.