CERTA-2007-AVI-272
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2007-06-20 - Updated: 2007-06-20
Une vulnérabilité dans le traitement des archives LHA et RAR par les produits F-Secure permet de contourner le mécanisme de détection des codes malveillants.
Description
Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans le traitement des archives LHA et RAR par les produits F-Secure. Un utilisateur malintentionné peut modifier les en-têtes d'un fichier archive LHA ou RAR de telle sorte que celui-ci échappera à la détection par les produits F-Secure des codes malveillants.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESET | N/A | F-Secure Anti-Virus for MIMEsweeper versions 5.61 et antérieures ; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Anti-Virus for Workstations versions 7.00 et antérieures ; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux Servers versions 4.65 et antérieures ; | ||
| ESET | N/A | solutions basées sur F-Secure Protection Service for Consumers versions 7.00 et antérieures ; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper for Linux versions 2.16 et antérieures. | ||
| Citrix | N/A | F-Secure Anti-Virus for Citrix Servers version 5.52 ; | ||
| ESET | Security | F-Secure Client Security versions 7.00 et antérieures ; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper versions 6.61 et antérieures ; | ||
| Microsoft | Windows | F-Secure Anti-Virus for Windows Servers versions 7.00 et antérieures ; | ||
| ESET | Security | F-Secure Linux Client Security versions 5.52 et antérieures ; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Anti-Virus for MS Exchange versions 7.00 et antérieures ; | ||
| ESET | Internet Security | F-Secure Internet Security 2005, 2006 et 2007 ; | ||
| ESET | Server Security | F-Secure Linux Server Security versions 5.52 et antérieures ; | ||
| ESET | N/A | F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux Gateways versions 4.65 et antérieures ; |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus for MIMEsweeper versions 5.61 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus for Workstations versions 7.00 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux Servers versions 4.65 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "solutions bas\u00e9es sur F-Secure Protection Service for Consumers versions 7.00 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper for Linux versions 2.16 et ant\u00e9rieures.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus for Citrix Servers version 5.52 ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Client Security versions 7.00 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "Security",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper versions 6.61 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus for Windows Servers versions 7.00 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "Windows",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Linux Client Security versions 5.52 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "Security",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus for MS Exchange versions 7.00 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Internet Security 2005, 2006 et 2007 ;",
"product": {
"name": "Internet Security",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Linux Server Security versions 5.52 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "Server Security",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux Gateways versions 4.65 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couverte dans le traitement des archives LHA\net RAR par les produits F-Secure. Un utilisateur malintentionn\u00e9 peut\nmodifier les en-t\u00eates d\u0027un fichier archive LHA ou RAR de telle sorte que\ncelui-ci \u00e9chappera \u00e0 la d\u00e9tection par les produits F-Secure des codes\nmalveillants.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [],
"initial_release_date": "2007-06-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2007-06-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTA-2007-AVI-272",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2007-06-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans le traitement des archives LHA et RAR par les\nproduits \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eF-Secure\u003c/span\u003e permet de contourner le\nm\u00e9canisme de d\u00e9tection des codes malveillants.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les produits F-Secure",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 F-Secure FSC-2007-5 du 19 juin 2007",
"url": "http://www.f-secure.com/security/fsc-2007-5.shtml"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.