CERTA-2007-AVI-145

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2007-03-28 - Updated: 2007-03-28

None

Description

Une vulnérabilité a été identifiée dans l'application bureautique Evolution, pouvant servir de client de messagerie, de carnet d'adresses ou de calendrier. Le fichier calendar/gui/e-cal-component-memo-preview.c met en œuvre une fonction nommée write_html() qui ne manipulerait pas correctement certaines chaînes de caractères.

Une personne malveillante pourrait ainsi, en incitant sa victime à ouvrir un « memo » spécialement conçu, exécuter du code arbitraire sur le système ayant une version vulnérable.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
N/A N/A Les versions d'Evolution antérieures à 2.8.2.1 (comprise).
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Les versions d\u0027Evolution ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.8.2.1 (comprise).",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9e dans l\u0027application bureautique\nEvolution, pouvant servir de client de messagerie, de carnet d\u0027adresses\nou de calendrier. Le fichier calendar/gui/e-cal-component-memo-preview.c\nmet en \u0153uvre une fonction nomm\u00e9e write_html() qui ne manipulerait pas\ncorrectement certaines cha\u00eenes de caract\u00e8res.\n\nUne personne malveillante pourrait ainsi, en incitant sa victime \u00e0\nouvrir un \u00ab memo \u00bb sp\u00e9cialement con\u00e7u, ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire sur\nle syst\u00e8me ayant une version vuln\u00e9rable.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2007-1002",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-1002"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2007-03-28T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2007-03-28T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-442-1 du 26 mars 2007 :",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-442-1"
    },
    {
      "title": "Avis de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de Secunia Research 2007-44 du 21 mars    2007 :",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2007-44/advisory/"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandriva MDKSA-2007:070 du 27 mars    2007 :",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2007:070"
    },
    {
      "title": "Site du projet Evolution :",
      "url": "http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2007-AVI-145",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2007-03-28T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": null,
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Evolution",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Avis de S\u00e9cunia Research 2007-44 du 21 mars 2007",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.