CERTA-2007-AVI-030
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2007-01-12 - Updated: 2007-01-12
Un ActiveX installé par défaut sur les ordinateurs portables Acer permet l'exécution de commande à distance.
Description
L'ActiveX LunchApp.APlunch est installé par défaut sur les ordinateurs portables Acer. L'une des ses méthodes, Run(), permet l'exécution des commandes en ligne. Cet ActiveX est marqué comme sûr et peut être invoqué par une page web, sans confirmation par l'utilisateur, avec Internet Explorer 6, si l'active scripting est autorisé. Cette invocation permet à un utilisateur malveillant d'exécuter du code à distance.
Avec Internet Explorer 7, l'utilisateur doit confirmer l'exécution.
Contournement provisoire
Désactiver LunchApp.APlunch sous Internet Explorer par les menus Outils, Options Internet, Programmes, Gérer les modules complémentaires.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Acer Aspire 5600 ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "potentiellement d\u0027autres versions.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Acer TravelMate 4150 ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nL\u0027ActiveX LunchApp.APlunch est install\u00e9 par d\u00e9faut sur les ordinateurs\nportables Acer. L\u0027une des ses m\u00e9thodes, Run(), permet l\u0027ex\u00e9cution des\ncommandes en ligne. Cet ActiveX est marqu\u00e9 comme s\u00fbr et peut \u00eatre\ninvoqu\u00e9 par une page web, sans confirmation par l\u0027utilisateur, avec\nInternet Explorer 6, si l\u0027active scripting est autoris\u00e9. Cette\ninvocation permet \u00e0 un utilisateur malveillant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code \u00e0\ndistance.\n\nAvec Internet Explorer 7, l\u0027utilisateur doit confirmer l\u0027ex\u00e9cution.\n\n## Contournement provisoire\n\nD\u00e9sactiver LunchApp.APlunch sous Internet Explorer par les menus Outils,\nOptions Internet, Programmes, G\u00e9rer les modules compl\u00e9mentaires.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2006-6121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-6121"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2007-01-12T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2007-01-12T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Support Acer :",
"url": "http://support.acer-euro.com/drivers/utilities.html"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2007-AVI-030",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2007-01-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Un \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eActiveX\u003c/span\u003e install\u00e9 par d\u00e9faut sur les\nordinateurs portables \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eAcer\u003c/span\u003e permet\nl\u0027ex\u00e9cution de commande \u00e0 distance.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 d\u0027ordinateurs portables Acer",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin Heise du 09 janvier 2007",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.