CERTA-2006-AVI-471
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2006-11-06 - Updated: 2006-11-06None
Description
Plusieurs vulnérabilités présentes dans OpenSSL peuvent être utilisées par un utilisateur mal intentionné pour compromettre les produits CISCO.
Pour plus de détail sur les vulnérabilités d'OpenSSL, se référer au bulletin de sécurité CERTA-2006-AVI-421 du CERTA (cf. section Documentation).
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | N/A | Nortel VPN Router Contivity 2500, 4500, 4600 ; | ||
| OpenSSL | N/A | Nortel Self-Service Media Processing Svr 500 ; | ||
| OpenSSL | N/A | Nortel ENSM IP Adress Manager ; | ||
| OpenSSL | N/A | Nortel VPN Router 600, 1010, 1050, 1100, 1700, 1740, 1750, 2700, 5000 ; | ||
| OpenSSL | N/A | Nortel Wlan Wireless Gateway 7250 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Nortel VPN Router Contivity 2500, 4500, 4600 ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Nortel Self-Service Media Processing Svr 500 ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Nortel ENSM IP Adress Manager ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Nortel VPN Router 600, 1010, 1050, 1100, 1700, 1740, 1750, 2700, 5000 ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Nortel Wlan Wireless Gateway 7250",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nPlusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s pr\u00e9sentes dans OpenSSL peuvent \u00eatre utilis\u00e9es\npar un utilisateur mal intentionn\u00e9 pour compromettre les produits CISCO.\n\nPour plus de d\u00e9tail sur les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s d\u0027OpenSSL, se r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au\nbulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 CERTA-2006-AVI-421 du CERTA (cf. section\nDocumentation).\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2006-2738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-2738"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2006-11-06T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2006-11-06T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 CERTA-2006-AVI-421 du 03 octobre 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.certa.ssi.gouv.fr/site/CERTA-2006-AVI-421/index.html"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2006-AVI-471",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2006-11-06T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": null,
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 OpenSSL sur les produits Nortel",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Nortel",
"url": "http://www130.nortelnetworks.com/cgi-bin/go/main.jsp?cscat=BLTNDETAIL\u0026DocumentOID=498093\u0026RenditionID=\u0026poid=8881"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.