CERTA-2006-AVI-298
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2006-07-18 - Updated: 2006-07-19
Une vulnérabilité dans le noyau Linux permet à un utilisateur local au système d'élever ses privilèges.
Description
Une erreur dans la mise en œuvre du système de fichier virtuel /proc permet à un utilisateur local au système d'élever ses privilèges. Ceci lui est possible en modifiant les attributs d'un processus qu'il contrôle via le système de fichier /proc puis en mettant ce même processus dans un état particulier.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité des éditeurs pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Les noyaux Linux versions 2.6.17.4 et antérieures.
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eLes noyaux Linux versions 2.6.17.4 et ant\u00e9rieures.\u003c/p\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nUne erreur dans la mise en \u0153uvre du syst\u00e8me de fichier virtuel /proc\npermet \u00e0 un utilisateur local au syst\u00e8me d\u0027\u00e9lever ses privil\u00e8ges. Ceci\nlui est possible en modifiant les attributs d\u0027un processus qu\u0027il\ncontr\u00f4le via le syst\u00e8me de fichier /proc puis en mettant ce m\u00eame\nprocessus dans un \u00e9tat particulier.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des \u00e9diteurs pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2006-3626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-3626"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2006-07-18T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2006-07-19T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Debian DSA 1111 du 18 juillet 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1111"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-319-2 du 18 juillet 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-319-2"
},
{
"title": "Liste des changements apport\u00e9s \u00e0 la version 2.6.17.5 du noyau Linux :",
"url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.17.5"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2006-AVI-298",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale ;",
"revision_date": "2006-07-18T00:00:00.000000"
},
{
"description": "ajout de la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu.",
"revision_date": "2006-07-19T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans le noyau Linux permet \u00e0 un utilisateur local au\nsyst\u00e8me d\u0027\u00e9lever ses privil\u00e8ges.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 du noyau Linux",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Liste des changements apport\u00e9s \u00e0 la version 2.6.17.5 du noyau Linux",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.