CERTA-2006-AVI-035
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2006-01-19 - Updated: 2006-01-19
Deux vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans plusieurs produits F-Secure. Ces vulnérabilités peuvent conduire au contournement de la politique anti-virale et/ou à l'exécution de code arbitraire à distance.
Description
Deux vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans plusieurs produit F-Secure :
- La première consiste en une mauvaise gestion des archives ZIP. Cette vulnérabilité peut être exploitée via une archive ZIP malicieusement construite, et ainsi provoquer un débordement de mémoire permettant l'exécution de code arbitraire ;
- La seconde consiste en une mauvaise gestion des archives ZIP et RAR. Cette vulnérabilité peut être exploitée afin de passer outre la détection de logiciel malveillant.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus 5.x; | ||
| Microsoft | Windows | F-Secure Anti-virus for Windows Servers 5.x; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus for Linux 4.x; | ||
| ESET | Security | F-Secure Anti-virus Client Security 6.x; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper 6.x ; | ||
| Microsoft | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus for MIMEsweeper 5.x; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Personal Expresse. | ||
| ESET | Internet Security | F-Secure Internet Security 2004, 2005 et 2006 ; | ||
| Microsoft | N/A | F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper for linux 2.x ; | ||
| Samba | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus for Samba Servers 5.x; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus 2004, 2005 et 2006; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus for Firewalls 6.x; | ||
| N/A | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus for Workstations 5.x; | ||
| ESET | Security | F-Secure Anti-virus Client Security 5.x; | ||
| Citrix | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus for Citrix Servers 5.x; | ||
| Microsoft | N/A | F-Secure Anti-virus for Microsoft Exchange 6.x; |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus 5.x;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus for Windows Servers 5.x;",
"product": {
"name": "Windows",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus for Linux 4.x;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus Client Security 6.x;",
"product": {
"name": "Security",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper 6.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus for MIMEsweeper 5.x;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Personal Expresse.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Internet Security 2004, 2005 et 2006 ;",
"product": {
"name": "Internet Security",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper for linux 2.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus for Samba Servers 5.x;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Samba",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus 2004, 2005 et 2006;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus for Firewalls 6.x;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus for Workstations 5.x;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus Client Security 5.x;",
"product": {
"name": "Security",
"vendor": {
"name": "ESET",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus for Citrix Servers 5.x;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "F-Secure Anti-virus for Microsoft Exchange 6.x;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Microsoft",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans plusieurs produit F-Secure\n:\n\n- La premi\u00e8re consiste en une mauvaise gestion des archives ZIP. Cette\n vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 peut \u00eatre exploit\u00e9e via une archive ZIP malicieusement\n construite, et ainsi provoquer un d\u00e9bordement de m\u00e9moire permettant\n l\u0027ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire ;\n- La seconde consiste en une mauvaise gestion des archives ZIP et RAR.\n Cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 peut \u00eatre exploit\u00e9e afin de passer outre la\n d\u00e9tection de logiciel malveillant.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [],
"initial_release_date": "2006-01-19T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2006-01-19T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de F-Secure FSC-2006-1 :",
"url": "http://www.f-secure.com/security/fsc-2006-1.shtml"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2006-AVI-035",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2006-01-19T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
}
],
"summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans plusieurs produits\nF-Secure. Ces vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s peuvent conduire au contournement de la\npolitique anti-virale et/ou \u00e0 l\u0027ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s des logiciels antivirus F-Secure",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 F-Secure num\u00e9ro FSC-2006-1",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.