CERTA-2005-AVI-472

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2005-11-30 - Updated: 2005-11-30

Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans FUSE permettant d'élever ses privilèges en local sur un système vulnérable.

Description

FUSE est un outil permettant d'implémenter un système de fichier dans l'espace de travail d'un programme.

FUSE présente une vulnérabilité permettant à un utilisateur local mal intentionné de corrompre le fichier /etc/mtab.

L'exploitation de cette vulnérabilité n'est possible que si le programme est installé avec le drapeau suid root.

Contournement provisoire

Retirer de l'application le drapeau suid root.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

FUSE version 2.4.1 et versions antérieures.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eFUSE version 2.4.1 et versions  ant\u00e9rieures.\u003c/p\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nFUSE est un outil permettant d\u0027impl\u00e9menter un syst\u00e8me de fichier dans\nl\u0027espace de travail d\u0027un programme.\n\nFUSE pr\u00e9sente une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 permettant \u00e0 un utilisateur local mal\nintentionn\u00e9 de corrompre le fichier /etc/mtab.\n\nL\u0027exploitation de cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 n\u0027est possible que si le programme\nest install\u00e9 avec le drapeau suid root.\n\n## Contournement provisoire\n\nRetirer de l\u0027application le drapeau suid root.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2005-3531",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2005-3531"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2005-11-30T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2005-11-30T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo GLSA-200511-17 du 22 novembre    2005 :",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200511-17.xml"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 FUSE du 17 novembre 2005:",
      "url": "http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=373087"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandriva MDKSA-2005:216 du 24 novembre    2005 :",
      "url": "http://frontal2.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:216"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2005-AVI-472",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2005-11-30T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couverte dans FUSE permettant d\u0027\u00e9lever ses\nprivil\u00e8ges en local sur un syst\u00e8me vuln\u00e9rable.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans le logiciel FUSE",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de FUSE",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.