CERTA-2004-AVI-365

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2004-11-10 - Updated: 2004-11-10

Une vulnérabilité découverte dans les systèmes affectés de Microsoft permet à un utilisateur mal intentionné d'usurper l'adresse réticulaire (URL) d'un site web.

Description

Les produits ISA Server 2000 et Proxy Server 2.0 enregistrent dans un cache les réponses des réquêtes DNS inverse, et utilisent ce cache pour résoudre les requêtes DNS. Une personne mal intentionnée peut, par le biais d'une requête DNS inverse malicieusement construite, polluer le cache en vue de duper un internaute en lui faisant croire qu'il accède à un site web de confiance tandis qu'il sera dirigé vers un site web malicieux.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
ESET Internet Security Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration Server 2000 Service Pack 1 & 2 ;
Microsoft N/A Microsoft Proxy Server 2.0 Service Pack 1 ;
Cisco Small Business Microsoft Small Business Server 2000 ;
Cisco Small Business Microsoft Small Business Server 2003 Premium Edition.
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration Server 2000 Service Pack 1 \u0026 2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Internet Security",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "ESET",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Microsoft Proxy Server 2.0 Service Pack 1 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Microsoft Small Business Server 2000 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Small Business",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Microsoft Small Business Server 2003 Premium Edition.",
      "product": {
        "name": "Small Business",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nLes produits ISA Server 2000 et Proxy Server 2.0 enregistrent dans un\ncache les r\u00e9ponses des r\u00e9qu\u00eates DNS inverse, et utilisent ce cache pour\nr\u00e9soudre les requ\u00eates DNS. Une personne mal intentionn\u00e9e peut, par le\nbiais d\u0027une requ\u00eate DNS inverse malicieusement construite, polluer le\ncache en vue de duper un internaute en lui faisant croire qu\u0027il acc\u00e8de \u00e0\nun site web de confiance tandis qu\u0027il sera dirig\u00e9 vers un site web\nmalicieux.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [],
  "initial_release_date": "2004-11-10T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2004-11-10T00:00:00",
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2004-AVI-365",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2004-11-10T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Usurpation d\u0027adresse r\u00e9ticulaire (url)"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 d\u00e9couverte dans les syst\u00e8mes affect\u00e9s de Microsoft\npermet \u00e0 un utilisateur mal intentionn\u00e9 d\u0027usurper l\u0027adresse r\u00e9ticulaire\n(URL) d\u0027un site web.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans ISA Server / Proxy Server",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Microsoft MS04-039",
      "url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS04-039.mspx"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.