BREW-OPENCLAW-CLI-CVE-20… (GHSA-4GC7-QCVF-38WG)

Vulnerability from osv_homebrew – Published: 2026-08-13 17:21 – Updated: 2026-11-10 08:58 – Source website
VLAI
Summary
In OpenClaw, manually adding sort to tools.exec.safeBins could bypass allowlist approval via --compress-program
Details

Summary

This issue applies to a non-default configuration only. If sort is manually added to tools.exec.safeBins, OpenClaw could treat sort --compress-program=<prog> as valid safe-bin usage. In security=allowlist + ask=on-miss, this could satisfy allowlist checks and skip operator approval, while GNU sort may invoke an external program via --compress-program.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Ecosystem: npm
  • Package: openclaw
  • Affected: <= 2026.2.21-2
  • Patched (planned next release): >= 2026.2.22

Default Installations

Default installs are not impacted by this specific path because sort is not included in default tools.exec.safeBins.

Impact

  • Type: approval/allowlist bypass in optional safe-bin configuration
  • Scope: deployments that explicitly include sort in tools.exec.safeBins and use allowlist + ask=on-miss
  • Consequence: an external program may run under the OpenClaw process context without expected approval

Technical Details

  • sort safe-bin profile allowed --compress-program as a value flag.
  • Safe-bin satisfaction could therefore mark allowlist checks as satisfied.
  • In ask=on-miss, satisfied allowlist checks skip approval prompts.

Fix

  • Block --compress-program in safe-bin sort policy.
  • Add unit and e2e regression coverage for sort --compress-program denial in safe-bin mode.

Fix Commit(s)

  • 57fbbaebca4d34d17549accf6092ae26eb7b605c

OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "fix": "bump",
        "range_state": "fixed",
        "upstream_fixed_in": "2026.2.22"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Homebrew",
        "name": "openclaw-cli",
        "purl": "pkg:brew/openclaw-cli"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.7.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "confidence": "high",
    "source": "matched",
    "strategy": "registry",
    "upstream_evidence": [
      {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "key": "pkg:npm/openclaw@2026.11.2",
        "name": "openclaw",
        "strategy": "registry",
        "subject_version": "2026.11.2"
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nThis issue applies to a **non-default configuration** only.\nIf `sort` is manually added to `tools.exec.safeBins`, OpenClaw could treat `sort --compress-program=\u003cprog\u003e` as valid safe-bin usage.\nIn `security=allowlist` + `ask=on-miss`, this could satisfy allowlist checks and skip operator approval, while GNU `sort` may invoke an external program via `--compress-program`.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- Ecosystem: npm\n- Package: `openclaw`\n- Affected: `\u003c= 2026.2.21-2`\n- Patched (planned next release): `\u003e= 2026.2.22`\n\n### Default Installations\nDefault installs are not impacted by this specific path because `sort` is not included in default `tools.exec.safeBins`.\n\n### Impact\n- Type: approval/allowlist bypass in optional safe-bin configuration\n- Scope: deployments that explicitly include `sort` in `tools.exec.safeBins` and use `allowlist + ask=on-miss`\n- Consequence: an external program may run under the OpenClaw process context without expected approval\n\n### Technical Details\n- `sort` safe-bin profile allowed `--compress-program` as a value flag.\n- Safe-bin satisfaction could therefore mark allowlist checks as satisfied.\n- In `ask=on-miss`, satisfied allowlist checks skip approval prompts.\n\n### Fix\n- Block `--compress-program` in safe-bin sort policy.\n- Add unit and e2e regression coverage for `sort --compress-program` denial in safe-bin mode.\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `57fbbaebca4d34d17549accf6092ae26eb7b605c`\n\nOpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.",
  "id": "BREW-openclaw-cli-CVE-2026-32010",
  "modified": "2026-11-10T08:58:12Z",
  "published": "2026-08-13T17:21:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-4gc7-qcvf-38wg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32010"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/57fbbaebca4d34d17549accf6092ae26eb7b605c"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-allowlist-bypass-via-sort-compress-program-parameter"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.3",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "In OpenClaw, manually adding sort to tools.exec.safeBins could bypass allowlist approval via --compress-program",
  "upstream": [
    "GHSA-4gc7-qcvf-38wg",
    "CVE-2026-32010"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.