BREW-CF2TF-CVE-2026-73623 (GHSA-6P8H-3WGX-97GF)
Vulnerability from osv_homebrew – Published: 2026-08-14 08:53 – Updated: 2026-10-26 08:56 – Source websiteSummary
GitPython's unsafe_git_clone_options denylist omits --template. git clone --template=<dir> copies <dir>/hooks/ into the new repository and runs them (post-checkout fires during clone), so a caller who can influence clone options can achieve arbitrary command execution in the default allow_unsafe_options=False configuration.
Root Cause
base.py:145-152 defines unsafe_git_clone_options = ["--upload-pack","-u","--config","-c"] — --template is absent. The guard candidate ['--template'] passes check_unsafe_options (verified). git copies the hook directory and executes post-checkout at checkout time. git's protocol.allow/GIT_ALLOW_PROTOCOL do not gate --template; the incomplete denylist is the only defense.
Impact
Arbitrary OS command execution during clone (default config). Requires an attacker-readable directory containing an executable hook — a genuine second precondition (realistic via shared filesystems, upload dirs, /tmp, or attacker-writable network paths), reflected as AC:H.
Proof of Concept
# attacker stages <dir>/hooks/post-checkout (chmod +x)
from git import Repo
Repo.clone_from(src, dst, template='<dir>') # post-checkout hook executes -> marker created (verified)
Attack Chain
- Setup: attacker stages
<dir>/hooks/post-checkout(chmod +x). Guard: n/a (filesystem). - Entry:
Repo.clone_from(url, path, template='<dir>'). Guard:check_unsafe_options(candidates=['--template'], unsafe=unsafe_git_clone_options). Bypass proof:--templatenot on the denylist -> passes (verified candidate['--template'], no error). - Sink: git copies the hook and executes
post-checkoutat checkout. Impact: ACE, default config (verified marker created).
Bypass Evidence
Live-verified on HEAD (tag 3.1.53): guard candidate ['--template'] passed with no error; staged post-checkout hook executed during clone_from, creating the marker. Independent of the value-smuggle bypass (--template is a legitimate long option that survives any single-char-value fix). Not covered by any existing advisory.
Affected Versions
<= 3.1.53
Suggested Fix
Add --template (and audit for other hook/exec-influencing options) to unsafe_git_clone_options.
Reported by zx (Jace) — GitHub: @manus-use
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"fix": "bump",
"range_state": "fixed",
"resource": "gitpython",
"resource_purl": "pkg:pypi/gitpython@3.2.1",
"upstream_fixed_in": "3.1.54"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Homebrew",
"name": "cf2tf",
"purl": "pkg:brew/cf2tf"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.6.1"
},
{
"fixed": "0.9.2_6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"confidence": "high",
"source": "matched",
"strategy": "registry",
"upstream_evidence": [
{
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"key": "pkg:pypi/gitpython@3.2.1",
"name": "gitpython",
"resource": "gitpython",
"strategy": "registry",
"subject_version": "3.2.1"
}
]
},
"details": "## Summary\nGitPython\u0027s `unsafe_git_clone_options` denylist omits `--template`. `git clone --template=\u003cdir\u003e` copies `\u003cdir\u003e/hooks/` into the new repository and runs them (`post-checkout` fires during clone), so a caller who can influence clone options can achieve arbitrary command execution in the default `allow_unsafe_options=False` configuration.\n\n## Root Cause\n`base.py:145-152` defines `unsafe_git_clone_options = [\"--upload-pack\",\"-u\",\"--config\",\"-c\"]` \u2014 `--template` is absent. The guard candidate `[\u0027--template\u0027]` passes `check_unsafe_options` (verified). git copies the hook directory and executes `post-checkout` at checkout time. git\u0027s `protocol.allow`/`GIT_ALLOW_PROTOCOL` do not gate `--template`; the incomplete denylist is the only defense.\n\n## Impact\nArbitrary OS command execution during clone (default config). Requires an attacker-readable directory containing an executable hook \u2014 a genuine second precondition (realistic via shared filesystems, upload dirs, `/tmp`, or attacker-writable network paths), reflected as AC:H.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n```python\n# attacker stages \u003cdir\u003e/hooks/post-checkout (chmod +x)\nfrom git import Repo\nRepo.clone_from(src, dst, template=\u0027\u003cdir\u003e\u0027) # post-checkout hook executes -\u003e marker created (verified)\n```\n\n## Attack Chain\n1. Setup: attacker stages `\u003cdir\u003e/hooks/post-checkout` (chmod +x). Guard: n/a (filesystem).\n2. Entry: `Repo.clone_from(url, path, template=\u0027\u003cdir\u003e\u0027)`. Guard: `check_unsafe_options(candidates=[\u0027--template\u0027], unsafe=unsafe_git_clone_options)`. Bypass proof: `--template` not on the denylist -\u003e passes (verified candidate `[\u0027--template\u0027]`, no error).\n3. Sink: git copies the hook and executes `post-checkout` at checkout. Impact: ACE, default config (verified marker created).\n\n## Bypass Evidence\nLive-verified on HEAD (tag 3.1.53): guard candidate `[\u0027--template\u0027]` passed with no error; staged `post-checkout` hook executed during `clone_from`, creating the marker. Independent of the value-smuggle bypass (`--template` is a legitimate long option that survives any single-char-value fix). Not covered by any existing advisory.\n\n## Affected Versions\n`\u003c= 3.1.53`\n\n## Suggested Fix\nAdd `--template` (and audit for other hook/exec-influencing options) to `unsafe_git_clone_options`.\n\n---\nReported by **zx (Jace)** \u2014 GitHub: @manus-use",
"id": "BREW-cf2tf-CVE-2026-73623",
"modified": "2026-10-26T08:56:37Z",
"published": "2026-08-14T08:53:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/2180"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/ffcb5359e87619f4fe4a70a4aff5f08c5580ba97"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.54"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.3",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "GitPython: Incomplete unsafe_git_clone_options denylist omits --template enabling arbitrary command execution via clone hooks",
"upstream": [
"GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf",
"CVE-2026-73623",
"PYSEC-2026-3952"
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.