GHSA-WX7C-8J35-MPG8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:49 – Updated: 2023-01-23 14:26Fat Free CRM before 0.13.6 allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a request without the authenticity_token, as demonstrated by a crafted HTML page that creates a new administrator account.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "fat_free_crm"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.13.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-1585"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-01-23T14:26:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2015-02-19T15:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Fat Free CRM before 0.13.6 allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a request without the authenticity_token, as demonstrated by a crafted HTML page that creates a new administrator account.",
"id": "GHSA-wx7c-8j35-mpg8",
"modified": "2023-01-23T14:26:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:49:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-1585"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fatfreecrm/fat_free_crm/commit/86fd7f98c9583fd36384987282d1c086fdcecd7c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100925"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/fatfreecrm/fat_free_crm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fatfreecrm/fat_free_crm/wiki/CSRF-Vulnerability-%28CVE-2015-1585%29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/fat_free_crm/CVE-2015-1585.yml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130410/Fat-Free-CRM-0.13.5-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Fat Free CRM Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.