GHSA-VMGJ-9CWM-CF3H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-21 17:05 – Updated: 2026-10-21 17:05Summary
The color field accepts any string that begins with a valid rgb() / hsl() color, because TinyColor.isValid does not anchor its match at the end of the string. An authenticated user with edit rights can store arbitrary HTML after a valid color prefix. When the stored value is rendered , the payload executes, resulting in stored XSS.
Details
Server-side validation of the color field relies on TinyColor:
const { TinyColor } = require('@ctrl/tinycolor');
if (!new TinyColor(value).isValid) throw self.apos.error('invalid');
TinyColor's rgb/hsl matchers are not anchored at the end of the string, while hex matchers are. Tested with @ctrl/tinycolor
| Input | isValid |
|---|---|
rgb(1,2,3)<img src=x onerror=alert(1)> |
true |
rgb(1,2,3)</textarea><script>alert(1)</script> |
true |
hsl(0,100%,50%);--x:1}</style><script>alert(1)</script> |
true |
#ff0000<img src=x onerror=alert(1)> |
false |
The value is saved to MongoDB unchanged (not normalized to hex8).
Relation to GHSA-97v6-998m-fp4g
GHSA-97v6 addressed CSS custom property injection escaping a <style> context. The root cause (validation that accepts trailing content after a valid color) still exists in <= 4.32.2, so [FILL IN: either "the style-tag sink remains exploitable via </style>" OR "a separate HTML sink at X is exploitable"]. Fixing the validation (requiring the full string to be a color, or storing only TinyColor's normalized output) would close both.
Impact
Any user with edit permission can plant persistent JavaScript that runs in the browser of visitors and administrators viewing the affected page, enabling session hijacking and actions as an admin.
Suggested fix
Reject values unless the entire string is a valid color, e.g. normalize on save:
const c = new TinyColor(value);
if (!c.isValid) throw self.apos.error('invalid');
value = c.toHex8String(); // store only normalized output
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "apostrophe"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.34.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-112951"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-21T17:05:44Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-20T16:17:05Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe color field accepts any string that *begins* with a valid `rgb()` / `hsl()` color, because `TinyColor.isValid` does not anchor its match at the end of the string. An authenticated user with edit rights can store arbitrary HTML after a valid color prefix. When the stored value is rendered , the payload executes, resulting in stored XSS.\n\n### Details\nServer-side validation of the color field relies on TinyColor:\n\n```js\nconst { TinyColor } = require(\u0027@ctrl/tinycolor\u0027);\nif (!new TinyColor(value).isValid) throw self.apos.error(\u0027invalid\u0027);\n```\n\nTinyColor\u0027s `rgb`/`hsl` matchers are not anchored at the end of the string, while hex matchers are. Tested with @ctrl/tinycolor\n\n| Input | `isValid` |\n|---|---|\n| `rgb(1,2,3)\u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e` | `true` |\n| `rgb(1,2,3)\u003c/textarea\u003e\u003cscript\u003ealert(1)\u003c/script\u003e` | `true` |\n| `hsl(0,100%,50%);--x:1}\u003c/style\u003e\u003cscript\u003ealert(1)\u003c/script\u003e` | `true` |\n| `#ff0000\u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e` | `false` |\n\nThe value is saved to MongoDB unchanged (not normalized to hex8).\n\n### Relation to GHSA-97v6-998m-fp4g\nGHSA-97v6 addressed CSS custom property injection escaping a `\u003cstyle\u003e` context. The root cause (validation that accepts trailing content after a valid color) still exists in \u003c= 4.32.2, so [FILL IN: either \"the style-tag sink remains exploitable via `\u003c/style\u003e`\" OR \"a separate HTML sink at X is exploitable\"]. Fixing the validation (requiring the full string to be a color, or storing only TinyColor\u0027s normalized output) would close both.\n\n### Impact\nAny user with edit permission can plant persistent JavaScript that runs in the browser of visitors and administrators viewing the affected page, enabling session hijacking and actions as an admin.\n\n### Suggested fix\nReject values unless the entire string is a valid color, e.g. normalize on save:\n```js\nconst c = new TinyColor(value);\nif (!c.isValid) throw self.apos.error(\u0027invalid\u0027);\nvalue = c.toHex8String(); // store only normalized output\n```",
"id": "GHSA-vmgj-9cwm-cf3h",
"modified": "2026-10-21T17:05:44Z",
"published": "2026-10-21T17:05:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apostrophecms/apostrophe/security/advisories/GHSA-vmgj-9cwm-cf3h"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-112951"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apostrophecms/apostrophe/commit/06e4b377f3c360f9e89c32dccd7e505ad5ddf498"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apostrophecms/apostrophe/commit/40b989b1a9dd23d30029b8ce7668634265cfe5ea"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apostrophecms/apostrophe"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apostrophecms/apostrophe/releases/tag/apostrophe@4.34.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "ApostropheCMS: Color field validation bypass allows stored XSS via HTML appended after rgb()/hsl() prefix"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.