GHSA-P44J-XRQG-4XRR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-03-08 21:06 – Updated: 2024-10-21 19:59Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
Open redirect vulnerability - a maliciously crafted link to the login form and login functionality could redirect the browser to a different website.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
The problem has been fixed in version 2.6.1. Depending on how you have installed Products.PluggableAuthService, you should change the buildout version pin to 2.6.1 and re-run the buildout, or if you used pip simply do pip install "Products.PluggableAuthService>=2.6.1"
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
There is no workaround. Users are encouraged to upgrade.
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in the Products.PluggableAuthService issue tracker * Email us at security@plone.org
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "Products.PluggableAuthService"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.6.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-21337"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-03-08T21:06:09Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-03-08T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\n\nOpen redirect vulnerability - a maliciously crafted link to the login form and login functionality could redirect the browser to a different website.\n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\n\nThe problem has been fixed in version 2.6.1. Depending on how you have installed Products.PluggableAuthService, you should change the buildout version pin to `2.6.1` and re-run the buildout, or if you used `pip` simply do `pip install \"Products.PluggableAuthService\u003e=2.6.1\"`\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\nThere is no workaround. Users are encouraged to upgrade.\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n\n- [GHSA-p44j-xrqg-4xrr](https://github.com/zopefoundation/Products.PluggableAuthService/security/advisories/GHSA-p44j-xrqg-4xrr)\n- [Products.PluggableAuthService on PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/Products.PluggableAuthService/)\n- [OWASP page on open redirects](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Unvalidated_Redirects_and_Forwards_Cheat_Sheet.html)\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in the [Products.PluggableAuthService issue tracker](https://github.com/zopefoundation/Products.PluggableAuthService/issues)\n* Email us at [security@plone.org](mailto:security@plone.org)",
"id": "GHSA-p44j-xrqg-4xrr",
"modified": "2024-10-21T19:59:54Z",
"published": "2021-03-08T21:06:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/Products.PluggableAuthService/security/advisories/GHSA-p44j-xrqg-4xrr"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21337"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/Products.PluggableAuthService/commit/7eead067898852ebd3e0f143bc51295928528dfa"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/products-pluggableauthservice/PYSEC-2021-45.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/Products.PluggableAuthService"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/Products.PluggableAuthService"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/162911/Products.PluggableAuthService-2.6.0-Open-Redirect.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "URL Redirection to Untrusted Site (\u0027Open Redirect\u0027) in Products.PluggableAuthService"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.