GHSA-MJ3G-7XCC-X4VH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-31 17:49 – Updated: 2026-07-31 17:49Impact
A prototype pollution vulnerability exists in @phun-ky/defaults-deep prior to version 2.0.5.
The library recursively merged user-supplied objects without filtering unsafe property names such as __proto__, constructor, and prototype. An attacker able to supply crafted input could cause properties to be written to Object.prototype, resulting in prototype pollution affecting all objects within the running process.
Applications that pass untrusted input to defaultsDeep() may be impacted. Depending on how the application uses merged objects, this could lead to unexpected behavior, logic bypasses, denial of service, or other security issues.
Patches
This issue has been fixed in version 2.0.5.
Users should upgrade to version 2.0.5 or later.
The fix prevents unsafe prototype-related keys (__proto__, constructor, and prototype) from being processed during recursive merge operations and includes regression tests covering known prototype pollution vectors.
Workarounds
Users unable to upgrade should ensure that untrusted input is sanitized before being passed to defaultsDeep().
At a minimum, applications should reject or remove the following property names from all levels of user-controlled objects:
__proto__constructorprototype
Upgrading to a patched version remains the recommended mitigation.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@phun-ky/defaults-deep"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-54737"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31T17:49:08Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nA prototype pollution vulnerability exists in @phun-ky/defaults-deep prior to version 2.0.5.\n\nThe library recursively merged user-supplied objects without filtering unsafe property names such as `__proto__`, `constructor`, and `prototype`. An attacker able to supply crafted input could cause properties to be written to `Object.prototype`, resulting in prototype pollution affecting all objects within the running process.\n\nApplications that pass untrusted input to `defaultsDeep()` may be impacted. Depending on how the application uses merged objects, this could lead to unexpected behavior, logic bypasses, denial of service, or other security issues.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue has been fixed in version 2.0.5.\n\nUsers should upgrade to version 2.0.5 or later.\n\nThe fix prevents unsafe prototype-related keys (`__proto__`, `constructor`, and `prototype`) from being processed during recursive merge operations and includes regression tests covering known prototype pollution vectors.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUsers unable to upgrade should ensure that untrusted input is sanitized before being passed to `defaultsDeep()`.\n\nAt a minimum, applications should reject or remove the following property names from all levels of user-controlled objects:\n\n- `__proto__`\n- `constructor`\n- `prototype`\n\nUpgrading to a patched version remains the recommended mitigation.",
"id": "GHSA-mj3g-7xcc-x4vh",
"modified": "2026-07-31T17:49:09Z",
"published": "2026-07-31T17:49:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/phun-ky/defaults-deep/security/advisories/GHSA-mj3g-7xcc-x4vh"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/phun-ky/defaults-deep/pull/49"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/phun-ky/defaults-deep/commit/807dba930f8718f9126cad59d949b8fd3539b059"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/phun-ky/defaults-deep"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/phun-ky/defaults-deep/releases/tag/2.0.5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "@phun-ky/defaults-deep Has a Prototype Pollution issue via Unsafe Recursive Property Merging"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.