GHSA-GFHX-HW2G-V5HG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-30 15:40 – Updated: 2026-09-30 15:40
VLAI
Summary
Serialize JavaScript: Cross-site scripting (XSS) via unescaped </script> in serialized function bodies
Details
Impact
serialize-javascript escapes its output so it is safe to embed inside a
<script> element. In 7.1.1 that guarantee does not hold for function
values: a crafted function body can carry a literal, unescaped </script>
into the output, terminating the script element early so the remainder is
parsed as HTML.
SCRIPT_CLOSE_REGEXP used <\/script[^>]*> as its first alternative. The
character class excludes only >, so a single match could run from one
`
Severity
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "serialize-javascript"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "7.1.1"
},
{
"fixed": "7.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-97711"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79",
"CWE-80"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-30T15:40:05Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-29T16:17:19Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n`serialize-javascript` escapes its output so it is safe to embed inside a\n`\u003cscript\u003e` element. In 7.1.1 that guarantee does not hold for **function\nvalues**: a crafted function body can carry a literal, unescaped `\u003c/script\u003e`\ninto the output, terminating the script element early so the remainder is\nparsed as HTML.\n\n`SCRIPT_CLOSE_REGEXP` used `\u003c\\/script[^\u003e]*\u003e` as its first alternative. The\ncharacter class excludes only `\u003e`, so a single match could run from one\n`\u003c/script` all the way to the next `\u003e` anywhere in the source \u2014 swallowing a\nsecond, complete `\u003c/script\u003e` along the way. Only one replacement is emitted\nper match, and the plain-code branch neutralizes just the leading `\u003c`\n(`\u0027\u003c \u0027 + match.slice(1)`), so the swallowed tag was re-emitted verbatim.\n\nReaching that shape requires `\u003c/script` in code position, which is legal\nJavaScript: `x\u003c/script=+/` parses as `x \u003c /script=+/`, a comparison against a\nregex literal.\n\n```js\nconst serialize = require(\u0027serialize-javascript\u0027);\nconst src = \"function f(x){ return x\u003c/script=+/ + \u0027\u003c/script\u003e\u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e\u0027 }\";\nconst out = serialize({ h: new Function(\u0027return \u0027 + src)() });\n// {\"h\":function f(x){ return x\u003c /script=+/ + \u0027\u003c/script\u003e\u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e\u0027 }}\n```\n\nEmbedded as the README documents (`\u003cscript\u003ewindow.S = \u003c%= serialize(state) %\u003e\u003c/script\u003e`)\nand parsed by Chromium, the script element ends at the injected tag and the\n`\u003cimg\u003e` becomes a live DOM node with its `onerror` handler executing in the\npage origin.\n\nOnly the function path is affected. The same payload passed as **data** is\nescaped correctly, and `options.isJSON` / non-function values are unaffected.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in **7.1.2**. The wildcard now excludes `\u003c` as well as `\u003e`\n(`[^\u003c\u003e]*`), so a match can never reach past a second `\u003c`. Every `\u003c/script`\nin the source therefore either begins its own match or is followed by a\ncharacter the HTML tokenizer does not accept as ending a tag name \u2014 it ends\nthe tag name only on TAB, LF, FF, CR, SPACE, `/` or `\u003e`, and emits anything\nelse as text.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUpgrade to **7.1.2**. If you cannot upgrade, 7.1.0 and earlier are\nunaffected, or avoid serializing functions whose source text is\nattacker-influenced.\n\n### Regression note\n\nThis is a regression specific to 7.1.1, not a long-standing issue. 7.1.0 and\nearlier applied the same wildcard but escaped the **entire** match, so no tag\nsurvived. Downstream scanners defaulting to a `\u003e= 7.1.0` range would be\noverly broad.",
"id": "GHSA-gfhx-hw2g-v5hg",
"modified": "2026-09-30T15:40:06Z",
"published": "2026-09-30T15:40:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/security/advisories/GHSA-gfhx-hw2g-v5hg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97711"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/commit/2bdbaaff9cb8a4639135eb24cfcd383d3fefb534"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/releases/tag/v7.1.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Serialize JavaScript: Cross-site scripting (XSS) via unescaped \u003c/script\u003e in serialized function bodies"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…