GHSA-G55J-C2V4-PJCG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-04 20:06 – Updated: 2026-02-06 21:43Summary
An unauthenticated local client could use the Gateway WebSocket API to write config via config.apply and set unsafe cliPath values that were later used for command discovery, enabling command injection as the gateway user.
Impact
A local process on the same machine could execute arbitrary commands as the gateway process user.
Details
config.applyaccepted raw JSON and wrote it to disk after schema validation.cliPathvalues were not constrained to safe executable names/paths.- Command discovery used a shell invocation when resolving executables.
Mitigation
Upgrade to a patched release. If projects cannot upgrade immediately, set gateway.auth and avoid custom cliPath values.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.1.20"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25593"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-306",
"CWE-78"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-04T20:06:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-06T21:16:17Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nAn unauthenticated local client could use the Gateway WebSocket API to write config via `config.apply` and set unsafe `cliPath` values that were later used for command discovery, enabling command injection as the gateway user.\n\n### Impact\n\nA local process on the same machine could execute arbitrary commands as the gateway process user.\n\n### Details\n\n- `config.apply` accepted raw JSON and wrote it to disk after schema validation.\n- `cliPath` values were not constrained to safe executable names/paths.\n- Command discovery used a shell invocation when resolving executables.\n\n### Mitigation\n\nUpgrade to a patched release. If projects cannot upgrade immediately, set `gateway.auth` and avoid custom `cliPath` values.",
"id": "GHSA-g55j-c2v4-pjcg",
"modified": "2026-02-06T21:43:41Z",
"published": "2026-02-04T20:06:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-g55j-c2v4-pjcg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25593"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw vulnerable to Unauthenticated Local RCE via WebSocket config.apply"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.