GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-75C5-XW7C-P5PM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-02 18:34 – Updated: 2024-12-02 18:34
VLAI
Summary
PyJWT Issuer field partial matches allowed
Details

Summary

The wrong string if check is run for iss checking, resulting in "acb" being accepted for "_abc_".

Details

This is a bug introduced in version 2.10.0: checking the "iss" claim changed from isinstance(issuer, list) to isinstance(issuer, Sequence).

-        if isinstance(issuer, list):
+        if isinstance(issuer, Sequence):
            if payload["iss"] not in issuer:
                raise InvalidIssuerError("Invalid issuer")
        else:

Since str is a Sequnce, but not a list, in is also used for string comparison. This results in if "abc" not in "__abcd__": being checked instead of if "abc" != "__abc__":.

PoC

Check out the unit tests added here: https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt-ghsa-75c5-xw7c-p5pm

        issuer = "urn:expected"

        payload = {"iss": "urn:"}

        token = jwt.encode(payload, "secret")

        # decode() succeeds, even though `"urn:" != "urn:expected". No exception is raised.
        with pytest.raises(InvalidIssuerError):
            jwt.decode(token, "secret", issuer=issuer, algorithms=["HS256"])

Impact

I would say the real world impact is not that high, seeing as the signature still has to match. We should still fix it.

Severity
2.2 (Low)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
2.1 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "PyJWT"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.10.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.10.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "2.10.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-53861"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-697"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-12-02T18:34:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-29T19:15:09Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nThe wrong string if check is run for `iss` checking, resulting in `\"acb\"` being accepted for `\"_abc_\"`.\n\n### Details\nThis is a bug introduced in version [2.10.0](https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/commit/1570e708672aa9036bc772476beae8bfa48f4131#diff-6893ad4a1c5a36b8af3028db8c8bc3b62418149843fc382faf901eaab008e380R366): checking the \"iss\" claim\nchanged from `isinstance(issuer, list)` to `isinstance(issuer,\nSequence)`.\n\n```diff\n-        if isinstance(issuer, list):\n+        if isinstance(issuer, Sequence):\n            if payload[\"iss\"] not in issuer:\n                raise InvalidIssuerError(\"Invalid issuer\")\n        else:\n```\n\nSince str is a Sequnce, but not a list, `in` is also used for string\ncomparison. This results in `if \"abc\" not in \"__abcd__\":` being\nchecked instead of `if \"abc\" != \"__abc__\":`.\n### PoC\nCheck out the unit tests added here: https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt-ghsa-75c5-xw7c-p5pm\n```python\n        issuer = \"urn:expected\"\n\n        payload = {\"iss\": \"urn:\"}\n\n        token = jwt.encode(payload, \"secret\")\n\n        # decode() succeeds, even though `\"urn:\" != \"urn:expected\". No exception is raised.\n        with pytest.raises(InvalidIssuerError):\n            jwt.decode(token, \"secret\", issuer=issuer, algorithms=[\"HS256\"])\n```\n\n\n### Impact\n\nI would say the real world impact is not that high, seeing as the signature still has to match. We should still fix it.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-75c5-xw7c-p5pm",
  "modified": "2024-12-02T18:34:11Z",
  "published": "2024-12-02T18:34:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/security/advisories/GHSA-75c5-xw7c-p5pm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53861"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/commit/1570e708672aa9036bc772476beae8bfa48f4131#diff-6893ad4a1c5a36b8af3028db8c8bc3b62418149843fc382faf901eaab008e380R366"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/commit/33022c25525c1020869c71ce2a4109e44ae4ced1"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "PyJWT Issuer field partial matches allowed"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.