GHSA-6F4G-XM8V-PGV6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-10 15:56 – Updated: 2026-11-10 15:56Impact
The GitHub Actions runner treats certain text in a step's output as commands. The legacy form, ##[command], is recognized anywhere in a line. compose-lint's text report prints service names, environment keys and lines of the Compose file, and it does not neutralize ##[. Inside the compose-lint Action, a Compose file from a pull request can therefore:
- create fake error or warning annotations on the pull request (
##[error],##[warning]) - fold the rest of the log, including the real verdict, out of sight (
##[group]) - blank out chosen strings for the rest of the log (
##[add-mask])
GitHub has postponed removing the deprecated set-output log command, so the runner still honors it. A test run of the Action on a GitHub-hosted runner confirmed that a ::set-output line from a Compose file is processed. Whether it can override the Action's own sarif-written output, which decides whether the SARIF upload step runs, has not been tested.
The exit code and the pass/fail result are not affected. Azure Pipelines parses the same ##[ syntax, so the pip package is listed for anyone printing the text report in other CI systems.
Found during an internal pre-1.0 security review.
Patches
Fixed in 0.31.0. The Action stops the runner from processing workflow commands while compose-lint's output is printed, using a random stop-commands token. The text report also escapes ##[, and :: at the start of a line, in anything taken from the Compose file.
Workarounds
- In your own workflow, wrap the compose-lint step in
::stop-commands::<random token>and::<random token>::. - Use
--format jsonor--format sarifrather than the text report when linting untrusted pull requests.
Reproduction
services:
web:
image: "nginx:1.25"
environment:
"##[error]DB_PASSWORD": placeholder
"##[group]svc":
image: "nginx:1.25"
privileged: true
Run through the Action, this produces a fake error annotation and folds the remaining log lines, including the FAIL verdict, into a collapsed group.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.30.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "GitHub Actions",
"name": "tmatens/compose-lint"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.30.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "compose-lint"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-123369"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-117",
"CWE-150"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-11-10T15:56:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-11-09T18:17:25Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nThe GitHub Actions runner treats certain text in a step\u0027s output as commands. The legacy form, `##[command]`, is recognized anywhere in a line. compose-lint\u0027s text report prints service names, environment keys and lines of the Compose file, and it does not neutralize `##[`. Inside the compose-lint Action, a Compose file from a pull request can therefore:\n\n- create fake error or warning annotations on the pull request (`##[error]`, `##[warning]`)\n- fold the rest of the log, including the real verdict, out of sight (`##[group]`)\n- blank out chosen strings for the rest of the log (`##[add-mask]`)\n\nGitHub has postponed removing the deprecated `set-output` log command, so the runner still honors it. A test run of the Action on a GitHub-hosted runner confirmed that a `::set-output` line from a Compose file is processed. Whether it can override the Action\u0027s own `sarif-written` output, which decides whether the SARIF upload step runs, has not been tested.\n\nThe exit code and the pass/fail result are not affected. Azure Pipelines parses the same `##[` syntax, so the pip package is listed for anyone printing the text report in other CI systems.\n\nFound during an internal pre-1.0 security review.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in 0.31.0. The Action stops the runner from processing workflow commands while compose-lint\u0027s output is printed, using a random `stop-commands` token. The text report also escapes `##[`, and `::` at the start of a line, in anything taken from the Compose file.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- In your own workflow, wrap the compose-lint step in `::stop-commands::\u003crandom token\u003e` and `::\u003crandom token\u003e::`.\n- Use `--format json` or `--format sarif` rather than the text report when linting untrusted pull requests.\n\n### Reproduction\n\n```yaml\nservices:\n web:\n image: \"nginx:1.25\"\n environment:\n \"##[error]DB_PASSWORD\": placeholder\n \"##[group]svc\":\n image: \"nginx:1.25\"\n privileged: true\n```\n\nRun through the Action, this produces a fake error annotation and folds the remaining log lines, including the FAIL verdict, into a collapsed group.",
"id": "GHSA-6f4g-xm8v-pgv6",
"modified": "2026-11-10T15:56:59Z",
"published": "2026-11-10T15:56:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tmatens/compose-lint/security/advisories/GHSA-6f4g-xm8v-pgv6"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-123369"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tmatens/compose-lint/pull/918"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tmatens/compose-lint/commit/672bd11145621f787c295fb11f3a859cdec1b38d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/tmatens/compose-lint"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tmatens/compose-lint/releases/tag/v0.31.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "compose-lint: Compose file text can issue GitHub Actions workflow commands through the compose-lint Action"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.