GHSA-526J-MV3P-F4VV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-24 14:19 – Updated: 2025-07-29 23:38
VLAI
Summary
eKuiper API endpoints handling SQL queries with user-controlled table names.
Details

Summary

A critical SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the getLast API functionality of the eKuiper project. This flaw allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL statements on the underlying SQLite database by manipulating the table name input in an API request. Exploitation can lead to data theft, corruption, or deletion, and full database compromise.

Details

The root cause lies in the use of unsanitized user-controlled input when constructing SQL queries using fmt.Sprintf, without validating the table parameter. Specifically, in:

query := fmt.Sprintf("SELECT * FROM %s ORDER BY rowid DESC LIMIT 1", table)

Any value passed as the table parameter is directly interpolated into the SQL string, enabling injection attacks. This is reachable via API interfaces that expose time-series queries.

PoC

  1. Deploy eKuiper instance (default config is sufficient).
  2. Send a crafted request to the SQL query endpoint:
   curl -X POST http://localhost:9081/sql-query \
     -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
     -d '{
       "table": "sensors; DROP TABLE users; --",
       "operation": "getLast"
     }'
  1. Effect: Executes two SQL queries — the first selects data, the second drops the users table.
  2. Verify Result:
   sqlite3 etc/kuiper/data/kuiper.db ".tables"

Impact

CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Refferences

  • https://github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/commit/72c4918744934deebf04e324ae66933ec089ebd3
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.14.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-54379"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-89"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-07-24T14:19:17Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-24T23:15:26Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA critical SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the `getLast` API functionality of the eKuiper project. This flaw allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL statements on the underlying SQLite database by manipulating the table name input in an API request. Exploitation can lead to data theft, corruption, or deletion, and full database compromise.\n\n\n### Details\nThe root cause lies in the use of unsanitized user-controlled input when constructing SQL queries using `fmt.Sprintf`, without validating the `table` parameter. Specifically, in:\n\n```go\nquery := fmt.Sprintf(\"SELECT * FROM %s ORDER BY rowid DESC LIMIT 1\", table)\n```\nAny value passed as the `table` parameter is directly interpolated into the SQL string, enabling injection attacks. This is reachable via API interfaces that expose time-series queries.\n\n\n### PoC\n1. **Deploy eKuiper instance** (default config is sufficient).\n2. **Send a crafted request to the SQL query endpoint**:\n```bash\n   curl -X POST http://localhost:9081/sql-query \\\n     -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n     -d \u0027{\n       \"table\": \"sensors; DROP TABLE users; --\",\n       \"operation\": \"getLast\"\n     }\u0027\n```\n3. **Effect**: Executes two SQL queries \u2014 the first selects data, the second drops the `users` table.\n4. **Verify Result**:\n```bash\n   sqlite3 etc/kuiper/data/kuiper.db \".tables\"\n```\n\n### Impact\nCWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)\n\n\n### Refferences\n- https://github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/commit/72c4918744934deebf04e324ae66933ec089ebd3",
  "id": "GHSA-526j-mv3p-f4vv",
  "modified": "2025-07-29T23:38:53Z",
  "published": "2025-07-24T14:19:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/security/advisories/GHSA-526j-mv3p-f4vv"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-54379"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/commit/72c4918744934deebf04e324ae66933ec089ebd3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "eKuiper API endpoints handling SQL queries with user-controlled table names. "
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.