CVE-2026-12372 (GCVE-0-2026-12372)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-09 22:45 – Updated: 2026-08-12 17:48
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in nltk/nltk
Summary
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-12 17:45 UTC
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12372",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-12T17:45:59.173613Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T17:48:54.679Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "nltk/nltk",
"vendor": "nltk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python\u0027s `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK\u0027s network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-09T22:45:52.799Z",
"orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"shortName": "@huntr_ai"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in nltk/nltk"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12372",
"datePublished": "2026-08-09T22:45:52.799Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-16T06:05:39.765Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T17:48:54.679Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-12372",
"date": "2026-11-01",
"epss": "0.0026",
"percentile": "0.17727"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "nltk/nltk",
"vendor": "nltk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@huntr.dev"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nltk:nltk:3.9.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0F7C7D0-ADBA-409B-9E84-D8C569B4BFB2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python\u0027s `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK\u0027s network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Una vulnerabilidad de falsificaci\u00f3n de petici\u00f3n del lado del servidor (SSRF) existe en las versiones 3.9.4 de nltk/nltk y en la rama de desarrollo actual. La funci\u00f3n \u2019nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()\u2019, destinada a prevenir SSRF al rechazar direcciones de red internas, no logra rechazar IPs en el espacio de direcciones compartidas RFC 6598 (\u2019100.64.0.0/10\u2019). Esto ocurre porque el m\u00f3dulo \u2019ipaddress\u2019 de Python no clasifica dichas direcciones como \u2019is_private\u2019 o \u2019is_global\u2019, y la protecci\u00f3n actual solo verifica \u2019is_private\u2019 y algunas categor\u00edas expl\u00edcitas. Un atacante que puede influir en una URL pasada a las funciones de ayuda de carga de red de NLTK puede explotar esta vulnerabilidad para hacer que una aplicaci\u00f3n en modo estricto env\u00ede peticiones a hosts del espacio de direcciones compartidas, exponiendo potencialmente infraestructura no p\u00fablica accesible desde el host de la aplicaci\u00f3n. El impacto se limita a la exposici\u00f3n de confidencialidad de tipo SSRF, sin ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo reclamada."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-12372",
"lastModified": "2026-10-23T20:10:00.160",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@huntr.dev",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12372",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-12T17:45:59.173613Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-09T23:16:35.793",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@huntr.dev",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required"
],
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required"
],
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@huntr.dev",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "security@huntr.dev",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Low",
"current_release_date": "2026-10-15T12:19:23+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-12372",
"id": "CVE-2026-12372",
"initial_release_date": "2026-08-09T22:45:52.799000+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "14",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "nltk: NLTK: Server-Side Request Forgery via improper network URL validation",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-12372.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12372",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-12T17:45:59.173613Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T17:46:50.952Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "nltk/nltk",
"vendor": "nltk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python\u0027s `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK\u0027s network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-09T22:45:52.799Z",
"orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"shortName": "@huntr_ai"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in nltk/nltk"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12372",
"datePublished": "2026-08-09T22:45:52.799Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-16T06:05:39.765Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T17:48:54.679Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.