CVE-2026-93647 (GCVE-0-2026-93647)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:58 – Updated: 2026-09-25 13:58
VLAI
Title
Zimbra Collaboration Suite Classic Web Client Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Crafted Calendar COUNTER Message From Address
Summary
An unauthenticated calendar sender can place active markup in a COUNTER message's RFC From address. Selecting the message in Zimbra Classic triggers stored XSS, allowing the attacker to access mailbox data and act as the victim.
Severity
9.3 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Zimbra Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Affected: 0 , < 10.1.21 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-09-25 13:53
Credits
Jonah Burgess (CryptoCat), Senior Security Researcher, Rapid7
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)",
          "vendor": "Zimbra",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.1.21",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jonah Burgess (CryptoCat), Senior Security Researcher, Rapid7"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-09-25T13:53:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "An unauthenticated calendar sender can place active markup in a COUNTER message\u0027s RFC\u0026nbsp;\u003ccode\u003eFrom\u003c/code\u003e\u0026nbsp;address. Selecting the message in Zimbra Classic triggers stored XSS, allowing the attacker to access mailbox data and act as the victim."
            }
          ],
          "value": "An unauthenticated calendar sender can place active markup in a COUNTER message\u0027s RFC\u00a0From\u00a0address. Selecting the message in Zimbra Classic triggers stored XSS, allowing the attacker to access mailbox data and act as the victim."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 9.3,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper neutralization of input during web page generation (\u0027cross-site scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:58:05.368Z",
        "orgId": "9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7",
        "shortName": "rapid7"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Zimbra Collaboration Suite Classic Web Client Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Crafted Calendar COUNTER Message From Address",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7",
    "assignerShortName": "rapid7",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-93647",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:58:05.368Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-18T12:22:43.194Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:58:05.368Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)",
                "vendor": "Zimbra",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "10.1.21",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "cve@rapid7.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "An unauthenticated calendar sender can place active markup in a COUNTER message\u0027s RFC\u00a0From\u00a0address. Selecting the message in Zimbra Classic triggers stored XSS, allowing the attacker to access mailbox data and act as the victim."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-93647",
        "lastModified": "2026-09-25T14:17:23.673",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 9.3,
                "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "CHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 5.8,
              "source": "cve@rapid7.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-09-25T14:17:23.673",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cve@rapid7.com",
            "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve@rapid7.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Received",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-79"
              }
            ],
            "source": "cve@rapid7.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.