CVE-2026-92681 (GCVE-0-2026-92681)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 15:09 – Updated: 2026-10-12 15:09
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
@neo4j/graphql: schema-level and type-level @authentication not enforced on top-level @cypher fields
Summary
In @neo4j/graphql versions up to and including 7.6.3, @authentication directives applied at the schema level or on the Query or Mutation types are silently ignored for top-level fields annotated with @cypher. Only @authentication directives placed directly on the individual fields are enforced. An application that exposes a top-level @cypher field and relies on schema-level or type-level @authentication to protect it allows unauthenticated callers to invoke the field and run the configured Cypher statement with the privileges of the GraphQL service account, which may permit reading and modifying data. Fixed in 7.6.4.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-306 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisor… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/commit/ef69cc69f… | patch |
| https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/releases/tag/%40… | release-notes |
| https://www.npmjs.com/package/@neo4j/graphql | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neo4j | @neo4j/graphql |
Affected:
3.23.0 , < 7.6.4
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "@neo4j/graphql",
"product": "@neo4j/graphql",
"repo": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql",
"vendor": "Neo4j",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.23.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In @neo4j/graphql versions up to and including 7.6.3, \u003ccode\u003e@authentication\u003c/code\u003e directives applied at the schema level or on the \u003ccode\u003eQuery\u003c/code\u003e or \u003ccode\u003eMutation\u003c/code\u003e types are silently ignored for top-level fields annotated with \u003ccode\u003e@cypher\u003c/code\u003e. Only \u003ccode\u003e@authentication\u003c/code\u003e directives placed directly on the individual fields are enforced. An application that exposes a top-level \u003ccode\u003e@cypher\u003c/code\u003e field and relies on schema-level or type-level \u003ccode\u003e@authentication\u003c/code\u003e to protect it allows unauthenticated callers to invoke the field and run the configured Cypher statement with the privileges of the GraphQL service account, which may permit reading and modifying data. Fixed in 7.6.4."
}
],
"value": "In @neo4j/graphql versions up to and including 7.6.3, @authentication directives applied at the schema level or on the Query or Mutation types are silently ignored for top-level fields annotated with @cypher. Only @authentication directives placed directly on the individual fields are enforced. An application that exposes a top-level @cypher field and relies on schema-level or type-level @authentication to protect it allows unauthenticated callers to invoke the field and run the configured Cypher statement with the privileges of the GraphQL service account, which may permit reading and modifying data. Fixed in 7.6.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T15:09:49.653Z",
"orgId": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"shortName": "Neo4j"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GHSA-8xj4-8gg9-fx9h",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-8xj4-8gg9-fx9h"
},
{
"name": "Fix commit ef69cc6",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/commit/ef69cc69ff5e97c60d64aa524005f939c5ba3633"
},
{
"name": "@neo4j/graphql 7.6.4 release notes",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/releases/tag/%40neo4j%2Fgraphql%407.6.4"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/package/@neo4j/graphql"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eUpgrade @neo4j/graphql to version 7.6.4 or later.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade @neo4j/graphql to version 7.6.4 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "@neo4j/graphql: schema-level and type-level @authentication not enforced on top-level @cypher fields",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eApply @authentication directly to each top-level @cypher field. Where possible, run the GraphQL service account with least-privilege database permissions.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Apply @authentication directly to each top-level @cypher field. Where possible, run the GraphQL service account with least-privilege database permissions."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"assignerShortName": "Neo4j",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-92681",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T15:09:49.653Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-16T16:17:17.929Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T15:09:49.653Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-92681",
"date": "2026-10-13",
"epss": "0.0037",
"percentile": "0.291"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "@neo4j/graphql",
"product": "@neo4j/graphql",
"repo": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql",
"vendor": "Neo4j",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.23.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In @neo4j/graphql versions up to and including 7.6.3, @authentication directives applied at the schema level or on the Query or Mutation types are silently ignored for top-level fields annotated with @cypher. Only @authentication directives placed directly on the individual fields are enforced. An application that exposes a top-level @cypher field and relies on schema-level or type-level @authentication to protect it allows unauthenticated callers to invoke the field and run the configured Cypher statement with the privileges of the GraphQL service account, which may permit reading and modifying data. Fixed in 7.6.4."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-92681",
"lastModified": "2026-10-12T16:17:07.323",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-12T16:17:07.323",
"references": [
{
"source": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/commit/ef69cc69ff5e97c60d64aa524005f939c5ba3633"
},
{
"source": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/releases/tag/%40neo4j%2Fgraphql%407.6.4"
},
{
"source": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-8xj4-8gg9-fx9h"
},
{
"source": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/package/@neo4j/graphql"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-306"
}
],
"source": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…