CVE-2026-9201 (GCVE-0-2026-9201)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-05 18:26 – Updated: 2026-08-17 18:07
VLAI
Title
Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling
Summary
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA‑256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-05 00:00 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-326 - Inadequate Encryption Strength
Assigner
ibm CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard B 88/100 over 1630 records in the last 180 days details
References
URL Tags
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282646 vendor-advisorypatch
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
IBM Langflow OSS Affected: 1.0.0 , ≤ 1.10.3 (semver)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-9201",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-05T00:00:00+00:00",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T03:55:54.982Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Langflow OSS",
          "vendor": "IBM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.10.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "CVE-2026-9201 was reported to IBM by Harish Kolla (GitHub: Har1sh-k (https://github.com/Har1sh-k))."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-326",
              "description": "CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-17T18:07:08.874Z",
        "orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
        "shortName": "ibm"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282646"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer \u003ca href=\"https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "IBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer  https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
    "assignerShortName": "ibm",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-9201",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-05T18:26:16.925Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-21T15:47:59.523Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-17T18:07:08.874Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-9201",
      "date": "2026-11-11",
      "epss": "0.00375",
      "percentile": "0.3189"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "cpes": [
                  "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
                ],
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "Langflow OSS",
                "vendor": "IBM",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThanOrEqual": "1.10.3",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "1.0.0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com"
          }
        ],
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:langflow:langflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "9D820E7E-FD86-4EE6-9F29-E8DF9EC23F30",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "1.11.0",
                    "versionStartIncluding": "1.0.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 hasta 1.10.3 podr\u00eda permitir a un atacante autenticado ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario debido a una debilidad criptogr\u00e1fica en el mecanismo de validaci\u00f3n de componentes personalizados. Cuando el modo de endurecimiento opcional que restringe la ejecuci\u00f3n a plantillas de componentes de confianza est\u00e1 habilitado, la aplicaci\u00f3n valida el c\u00f3digo del componente utilizando un hash SHA?256 truncado. Debido a que la comparaci\u00f3n del hash se basa solo en una porci\u00f3n del resumen, un atacante puede crear c\u00f3digo de componente malicioso que colisiona con un hash de plantilla de confianza y omite la validaci\u00f3n. La explotaci\u00f3n exitosa permite al atacante introducir y ejecutar c\u00f3digo Python no autorizado dentro del proceso de Langflow, derrotando el control de seguridad previsto y potencialmente llevando a un compromiso total de la instancia afectada."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-9201",
        "lastModified": "2026-10-24T13:10:00.147",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.8,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-9201",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-05T00:00:00+00:00",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-08-05T19:17:48.657",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
            "tags": [
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282646"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-326"
              }
            ],
            "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-9201",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "no"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "total"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-08-05T19:19:43.973548Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T19:19:48.774Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "cpes": [
                "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
              ],
              "product": "Langflow OSS",
              "vendor": "IBM",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThanOrEqual": "1.10.3",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "1.0.0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "supportingMedia": [
                {
                  "base64": false,
                  "type": "text/html",
                  "value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.\u003c/p\u003e"
                }
              ],
              "value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.8,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "format": "CVSS",
              "scenarios": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "GENERAL"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-326",
                  "description": "CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T18:26:16.925Z",
            "orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
            "shortName": "ibm"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "tags": [
                "vendor-advisory",
                "patch"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282646"
            }
          ],
          "solutions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "supportingMedia": [
                {
                  "base64": false,
                  "type": "text/html",
                  "value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer \u003ca href=\"https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
                }
              ],
              "value": "IBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer  https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases"
            }
          ],
          "title": "Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
        "assignerShortName": "ibm",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-9201",
        "datePublished": "2026-08-05T18:26:16.925Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-05-21T15:47:59.523Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T03:55:54.982Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.