CVE-2026-85959 (GCVE-0-2026-85959)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 16:08 – Updated: 2026-10-12 16:08
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Insufficient authentication logging in Progress MarkLogic Server
Summary
Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 do not consistently record successful authentication events in audit logs, which could limit customers' ability to detect and investigate unauthorized access or credential misuse.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-778 - Insufficient Logging
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://community.progress.com/s/article/Marklogi… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progress Software Corporation | MarkLogic Server |
Affected:
11.0.0 , < 11.3.7
(custom)
Affected: 12.0.0 , < 12.1.0 (custom) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MarkLogic Server",
"vendor": "Progress Software Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "11.3.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "12.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eProgress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 do not consistently record successful authentication events in audit logs, which could limit customers\u0027 ability to detect and investigate unauthorized access or credential misuse.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 do not consistently record successful authentication events in audit logs, which could limit customers\u0027 ability to detect and investigate unauthorized access or credential misuse."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-778",
"description": "CWE-778: Insufficient Logging",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T16:08:48.107Z",
"orgId": "f9fea0b6-671e-4eea-8fde-31911902ae05",
"shortName": "ProgressSoftware"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://community.progress.com/s/article/Marklogic-Critical-Security-Alert-Bulletin-October-2026"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Insufficient authentication logging in Progress MarkLogic Server",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f9fea0b6-671e-4eea-8fde-31911902ae05",
"assignerShortName": "ProgressSoftware",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-85959",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T16:08:48.107Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-04T18:43:01.396Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T16:08:48.107Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MarkLogic Server",
"vendor": "Progress Software Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "11.3.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "12.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@progress.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 do not consistently record successful authentication events in audit logs, which could limit customers\u0027 ability to detect and investigate unauthorized access or credential misuse."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-85959",
"lastModified": "2026-10-12T17:17:36.247",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "security@progress.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-12T17:17:36.247",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@progress.com",
"url": "https://community.progress.com/s/article/Marklogic-Critical-Security-Alert-Bulletin-October-2026"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@progress.com",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-778"
}
],
"source": "security@progress.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…