CVE-2026-82441 (GCVE-0-2026-82441)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-14 13:58 – Updated: 2026-09-14 19:44
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Apache Storm Nimbus: Cross-Tenant Blob Deletion and Cluster Denial of Service via Unvalidated Topology Dependency Keys
Summary
Description
A submitted topology carries two lists of blobstore keys, `dependency_jars` and `dependency_artifacts`,
which the client fills in after uploading the corresponding blobs. Nimbus performed no validation of their
contents on the submission path, yet acts on them in two places.
During cleanup of a finished topology, Nimbus deletes the keys named in those lists, and the deletion is
performed as the Nimbus subject, for which the blobstore short-circuits its ACL check. A submitter who
listed a key belonging to another topology, such as its `-stormjar.jar`, could therefore cause
that blob to be deleted when their own topology was cleaned up.
Separately, on acquiring leadership a Nimbus compares the dependency keys of all active topologies against
the blobstore contents and surrenders leadership if any is missing. A single key that does not exist, on a
single active topology, therefore causes every Nimbus to acquire leadership, surrender it and requeue
indefinitely, leaving the cluster without a leader and unable to schedule, clean up or accept submissions.
Mitigation
Upgrade to 3.1.0, where a submission is refused unless every entry in both lists is a dependency blob key
and exists in the blobstore.
Note that this validates new submissions only; a topology stored by an affected version with an invalid list
is unaffected by the upgrade. An operator whose cluster is failing to retain a leader should inspect the
Nimbus log for the dependency keys reported as missing and remove or resubmit the topology naming them.
Users who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict topology submission to trusted principals.
Credit
This issue was discovered by rzo1 while investigating an unrelated blobstore defect.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-14 19:44 UTC
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/qzh245bczoxw4mfny… | vendor-advisory |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/0… |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Storm Nimbus |
Affected:
3.0.0 , < 3.1.0
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T14:13:47.952Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/19"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82441",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T19:44:09.400617Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T19:44:33.448Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.storm:storm-server",
"product": "Apache Storm Nimbus",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "rzo1"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cb\u003eDescription\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA submitted topology carries two lists of blobstore keys, `dependency_jars` and `dependency_artifacts`,\u003cbr\u003ewhich the client fills in after uploading the corresponding blobs. Nimbus performed no validation of their\u003cbr\u003econtents on the submission path, yet acts on them in two places.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDuring cleanup of a finished topology, Nimbus deletes the keys named in those lists, and the deletion is\u003cbr\u003eperformed as the Nimbus subject, for which the blobstore short-circuits its ACL check. A submitter who\u003cbr\u003elisted a key belonging to another topology, such as its `-stormjar.jar`, could therefore cause\u003cbr\u003ethat blob to be deleted when their own topology was cleaned up.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSeparately, on acquiring leadership a Nimbus compares the dependency keys of all active topologies against\u003cbr\u003ethe blobstore contents and surrenders leadership if any is missing. A single key that does not exist, on a\u003cbr\u003esingle active topology, therefore causes every Nimbus to acquire leadership, surrender it and requeue\u003cbr\u003eindefinitely, leaving the cluster without a leader and unable to schedule, clean up or accept submissions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eMitigation\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUpgrade to 3.1.0, where a submission is refused unless every entry in both lists is a dependency blob key\u003cbr\u003eand exists in the blobstore.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNote that this validates new submissions only; a topology stored by an affected version with an invalid list\u003cbr\u003eis unaffected by the upgrade. An operator whose cluster is failing to retain a leader should inspect the\u003cbr\u003eNimbus log for the dependency keys reported as missing and remove or resubmit the topology naming them.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUsers who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict topology submission to trusted principals.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eCredit\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue was discovered by rzo1 while investigating an unrelated blobstore defect.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Description\n\nA submitted topology carries two lists of blobstore keys, `dependency_jars` and `dependency_artifacts`,\nwhich the client fills in after uploading the corresponding blobs. Nimbus performed no validation of their\ncontents on the submission path, yet acts on them in two places.\n\nDuring cleanup of a finished topology, Nimbus deletes the keys named in those lists, and the deletion is\nperformed as the Nimbus subject, for which the blobstore short-circuits its ACL check. A submitter who\nlisted a key belonging to another topology, such as its `-stormjar.jar`, could therefore cause\nthat blob to be deleted when their own topology was cleaned up.\n\nSeparately, on acquiring leadership a Nimbus compares the dependency keys of all active topologies against\nthe blobstore contents and surrenders leadership if any is missing. A single key that does not exist, on a\nsingle active topology, therefore causes every Nimbus to acquire leadership, surrender it and requeue\nindefinitely, leaving the cluster without a leader and unable to schedule, clean up or accept submissions.\n\nMitigation\n\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where a submission is refused unless every entry in both lists is a dependency blob key\nand exists in the blobstore.\n\nNote that this validates new submissions only; a topology stored by an affected version with an invalid list\nis unaffected by the upgrade. An operator whose cluster is failing to retain a leader should inspect the\nNimbus log for the dependency keys reported as missing and remove or resubmit the topology naming them.\n\nUsers who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict topology submission to trusted principals.\n\nCredit\n\nThis issue was discovered by rzo1 while investigating an unrelated blobstore defect."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "moderate"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20 Improper input validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T13:58:56.249Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/qzh245bczoxw4mfnyvrj3dj2crtzdso8"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Storm Nimbus: Cross-Tenant Blob Deletion and Cluster Denial of Service via Unvalidated Topology Dependency Keys",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82441",
"datePublished": "2026-09-14T13:58:56.249Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-29T10:43:56.799Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T19:44:33.448Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-82441",
"date": "2026-11-08",
"epss": "0.00265",
"percentile": "0.18504"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.storm:storm-server",
"product": "Apache Storm Nimbus",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Description\n\nA submitted topology carries two lists of blobstore keys, `dependency_jars` and `dependency_artifacts`,\nwhich the client fills in after uploading the corresponding blobs. Nimbus performed no validation of their\ncontents on the submission path, yet acts on them in two places.\n\nDuring cleanup of a finished topology, Nimbus deletes the keys named in those lists, and the deletion is\nperformed as the Nimbus subject, for which the blobstore short-circuits its ACL check. A submitter who\nlisted a key belonging to another topology, such as its `-stormjar.jar`, could therefore cause\nthat blob to be deleted when their own topology was cleaned up.\n\nSeparately, on acquiring leadership a Nimbus compares the dependency keys of all active topologies against\nthe blobstore contents and surrenders leadership if any is missing. A single key that does not exist, on a\nsingle active topology, therefore causes every Nimbus to acquire leadership, surrender it and requeue\nindefinitely, leaving the cluster without a leader and unable to schedule, clean up or accept submissions.\n\nMitigation\n\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where a submission is refused unless every entry in both lists is a dependency blob key\nand exists in the blobstore.\n\nNote that this validates new submissions only; a topology stored by an affected version with an invalid list\nis unaffected by the upgrade. An operator whose cluster is failing to retain a leader should inspect the\nNimbus log for the dependency keys reported as missing and remove or resubmit the topology naming them.\n\nUsers who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict topology submission to trusted principals.\n\nCredit\n\nThis issue was discovered by rzo1 while investigating an unrelated blobstore defect."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-82441",
"lastModified": "2026-09-14T20:58:48.430",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82441",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T19:44:09.400617Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-14T14:17:12.590",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/qzh245bczoxw4mfnyvrj3dj2crtzdso8"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/19"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-639"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T14:13:47.952Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/19"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82441",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T19:44:09.400617Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T19:44:26.926Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.storm:storm-server",
"product": "Apache Storm Nimbus",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "rzo1"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cb\u003eDescription\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA submitted topology carries two lists of blobstore keys, `dependency_jars` and `dependency_artifacts`,\u003cbr\u003ewhich the client fills in after uploading the corresponding blobs. Nimbus performed no validation of their\u003cbr\u003econtents on the submission path, yet acts on them in two places.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDuring cleanup of a finished topology, Nimbus deletes the keys named in those lists, and the deletion is\u003cbr\u003eperformed as the Nimbus subject, for which the blobstore short-circuits its ACL check. A submitter who\u003cbr\u003elisted a key belonging to another topology, such as its `-stormjar.jar`, could therefore cause\u003cbr\u003ethat blob to be deleted when their own topology was cleaned up.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSeparately, on acquiring leadership a Nimbus compares the dependency keys of all active topologies against\u003cbr\u003ethe blobstore contents and surrenders leadership if any is missing. A single key that does not exist, on a\u003cbr\u003esingle active topology, therefore causes every Nimbus to acquire leadership, surrender it and requeue\u003cbr\u003eindefinitely, leaving the cluster without a leader and unable to schedule, clean up or accept submissions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eMitigation\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUpgrade to 3.1.0, where a submission is refused unless every entry in both lists is a dependency blob key\u003cbr\u003eand exists in the blobstore.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNote that this validates new submissions only; a topology stored by an affected version with an invalid list\u003cbr\u003eis unaffected by the upgrade. An operator whose cluster is failing to retain a leader should inspect the\u003cbr\u003eNimbus log for the dependency keys reported as missing and remove or resubmit the topology naming them.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUsers who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict topology submission to trusted principals.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eCredit\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue was discovered by rzo1 while investigating an unrelated blobstore defect.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Description\n\nA submitted topology carries two lists of blobstore keys, `dependency_jars` and `dependency_artifacts`,\nwhich the client fills in after uploading the corresponding blobs. Nimbus performed no validation of their\ncontents on the submission path, yet acts on them in two places.\n\nDuring cleanup of a finished topology, Nimbus deletes the keys named in those lists, and the deletion is\nperformed as the Nimbus subject, for which the blobstore short-circuits its ACL check. A submitter who\nlisted a key belonging to another topology, such as its `-stormjar.jar`, could therefore cause\nthat blob to be deleted when their own topology was cleaned up.\n\nSeparately, on acquiring leadership a Nimbus compares the dependency keys of all active topologies against\nthe blobstore contents and surrenders leadership if any is missing. A single key that does not exist, on a\nsingle active topology, therefore causes every Nimbus to acquire leadership, surrender it and requeue\nindefinitely, leaving the cluster without a leader and unable to schedule, clean up or accept submissions.\n\nMitigation\n\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where a submission is refused unless every entry in both lists is a dependency blob key\nand exists in the blobstore.\n\nNote that this validates new submissions only; a topology stored by an affected version with an invalid list\nis unaffected by the upgrade. An operator whose cluster is failing to retain a leader should inspect the\nNimbus log for the dependency keys reported as missing and remove or resubmit the topology naming them.\n\nUsers who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict topology submission to trusted principals.\n\nCredit\n\nThis issue was discovered by rzo1 while investigating an unrelated blobstore defect."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "moderate"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20 Improper input validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T13:58:56.249Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/qzh245bczoxw4mfnyvrj3dj2crtzdso8"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Storm Nimbus: Cross-Tenant Blob Deletion and Cluster Denial of Service via Unvalidated Topology Dependency Keys",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82441",
"datePublished": "2026-09-14T13:58:56.249Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-29T10:43:56.799Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T19:44:33.448Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.