CVE-2026-72889 (GCVE-0-2026-72889)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-19 07:20 – Updated: 2026-08-26 18:03
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify
Summary
Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify.
verify resolves the signature method class from the signature_method parameter of the incoming message. signature_method is required on every request, so the algorithm used to check a signature is chosen by whoever sent it, and nothing lets the verifying party pin the method instead. When a message names HMAC-SHA1 or HMAC-SHA256, the key is derived from consumer_secret and token_secret rather than from the key the provider deployed.
A provider deployed on RSA-SHA1 holds only the consumer public key, and RFC 5849 does not use consumer_secret for that method, so the required parameter is filled with a placeholder. A client that names HMAC-SHA1 instead has its signature checked against that placeholder, so a guessable one is enough to forge requests for any consumer key and token.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-26 18:02 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/security/adv… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/commit/c467a… | patch |
| https://metacpan.org/release/RRWO/Net-OAuth-0.33/… | release-notes |
| https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5849#sec… | technical-description |
| https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5849#sec… | technical-description |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/19/2 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-19T21:07:38.218Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/19/2"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-72889",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-26T18:02:49.745063Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T18:03:05.016Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://cpan.org/modules",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Net::OAuth"
],
"packageName": "Net-OAuth",
"packageURL": "pkg:cpan/Net-OAuth",
"programFiles": [
"lib/Net/OAuth/Message.pm",
"lib/Net/OAuth/Request.pm"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "Net::OAuth::Message::verify"
},
{
"name": "Net::OAuth::Message::_signature_method_class"
},
{
"name": "Net::OAuth::Request::signature_key"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.33",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify.\n\nverify resolves the signature method class from the signature_method parameter of the incoming message. signature_method is required on every request, so the algorithm used to check a signature is chosen by whoever sent it, and nothing lets the verifying party pin the method instead. When a message names HMAC-SHA1 or HMAC-SHA256, the key is derived from consumer_secret and token_secret rather than from the key the provider deployed.\n\nA provider deployed on RSA-SHA1 holds only the consumer public key, and RFC 5849 does not use consumer_secret for that method, so the required parameter is filled with a placeholder. A client that names HMAC-SHA1 instead has its signature checked against that placeholder, so a guessable one is enough to forge requests for any consumer key and token."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-757",
"description": "CWE-757 Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation (\u0027Algorithm Downgrade\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-19T07:20:09.095Z",
"orgId": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
"shortName": "CPANSec"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/security/advisories/GHSA-c8rm-g5cm-4pf5"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/commit/c467adf45c8d77ac4b92ad78b3eebf949252ba7f.patch"
},
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://metacpan.org/release/RRWO/Net-OAuth-0.33/changes"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5849#section-3.4.2"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5849#section-3.4.3"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to Net-OAuth 0.33 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cpansec-cna-tool 0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
"assignerShortName": "CPANSec",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-72889",
"datePublished": "2026-08-19T07:20:09.095Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-10T15:44:58.172Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T18:03:05.016Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-72889",
"date": "2026-08-26",
"epss": "0.00137",
"percentile": "0.03329"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-72889\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\",\"published\":\"2026-08-19T08:17:13.833\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-26T19:17:00.557\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify.\\n\\nverify resolves the signature method class from the signature_method parameter of the incoming message. signature_method is required on every request, so the algorithm used to check a signature is chosen by whoever sent it, and nothing lets the verifying party pin the method instead. When a message names HMAC-SHA1 or HMAC-SHA256, the key is derived from consumer_secret and token_secret rather than from the key the provider deployed.\\n\\nA provider deployed on RSA-SHA1 holds only the consumer public key, and RFC 5849 does not use consumer_secret for that method, so the required parameter is filled with a placeholder. A client that names HMAC-SHA1 instead has its signature checked against that placeholder, so a guessable one is enough to forge requests for any consumer key and token.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\",\"affectedData\":[{\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://cpan.org/modules\",\"packageName\":\"Net-OAuth\",\"modules\":[\"Net::OAuth\"],\"programFiles\":[\"lib/Net/OAuth/Message.pm\",\"lib/Net/OAuth/Request.pm\"],\"programRoutines\":[{\"name\":\"Net::OAuth::Message::verify\"},{\"name\":\"Net::OAuth::Message::_signature_method_class\"},{\"name\":\"Net::OAuth::Request::signature_key\"}],\"repo\":\"https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth\",\"packageURL\":\"pkg:cpan/Net-OAuth\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"0.33\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-08-26T18:02:49.745063Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-72889\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-757\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5849#section-3.4.2\",\"source\":\"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\"},{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5849#section-3.4.3\",\"source\":\"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/commit/c467adf45c8d77ac4b92ad78b3eebf949252ba7f.patch\",\"source\":\"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/security/advisories/GHSA-c8rm-g5cm-4pf5\",\"source\":\"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\"},{\"url\":\"https://metacpan.org/release/RRWO/Net-OAuth-0.33/changes\",\"source\":\"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/19/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/19/2\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-19T21:07:38.218Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-72889\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-08-26T18:02:49.745063Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-26T18:02:58.878Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth\", \"modules\": [\"Net::OAuth\"], \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"0.33\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:cpan/Net-OAuth\", \"packageName\": \"Net-OAuth\", \"programFiles\": [\"lib/Net/OAuth/Message.pm\", \"lib/Net/OAuth/Request.pm\"], \"collectionURL\": \"https://cpan.org/modules\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"programRoutines\": [{\"name\": \"Net::OAuth::Message::verify\"}, {\"name\": \"Net::OAuth::Message::_signature_method_class\"}, {\"name\": \"Net::OAuth::Request::signature_key\"}]}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Upgrade to Net-OAuth 0.33 or later.\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/security/advisories/GHSA-c8rm-g5cm-4pf5\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/commit/c467adf45c8d77ac4b92ad78b3eebf949252ba7f.patch\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://metacpan.org/release/RRWO/Net-OAuth-0.33/changes\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5849#section-3.4.2\", \"tags\": [\"technical-description\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5849#section-3.4.3\", \"tags\": [\"technical-description\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cpansec-cna-tool 0.1\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify.\\n\\nverify resolves the signature method class from the signature_method parameter of the incoming message. signature_method is required on every request, so the algorithm used to check a signature is chosen by whoever sent it, and nothing lets the verifying party pin the method instead. When a message names HMAC-SHA1 or HMAC-SHA256, the key is derived from consumer_secret and token_secret rather than from the key the provider deployed.\\n\\nA provider deployed on RSA-SHA1 holds only the consumer public key, and RFC 5849 does not use consumer_secret for that method, so the required parameter is filled with a placeholder. A client that names HMAC-SHA1 instead has its signature checked against that placeholder, so a guessable one is enough to forge requests for any consumer key and token.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-347\", \"description\": \"CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-757\", \"description\": \"CWE-757 Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation (\u0027Algorithm Downgrade\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\", \"shortName\": \"CPANSec\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-19T07:20:09.095Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-72889\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-26T18:03:05.016Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-08-10T15:44:58.172Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-19T07:20:09.095Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"CPANSec\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…