CVE-2026-51235 (GCVE-0-2026-51235)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-27 00:00 – Updated: 2026-07-31 14:33
VLAI

DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-31T14:33:57.338Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-51235",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateRejected": "2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-07T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-31T14:33:57.338Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-51235",
      "date": "2026-07-31",
      "epss": "0.00267",
      "percentile": "0.18711"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-51235\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2026-07-27T18:16:56.117\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-31T15:16:28.533\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-08-06T18:05:18+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-51235",
      "id": "CVE-2026-51235",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-07-27T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "33",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "13",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "LibRaw: LibRaw: Buffer Overflow vulnerability in image processing",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-51235.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-31T14:33:57.338Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-51235\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-31T14:33:57.338Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-07T00:00:00.000Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.