CVE-2026-48078 (GCVE-0-2026-48078)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-06 20:56 – Updated: 2026-08-08 02:37- CWE-200 - Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-boo… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-boo… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| open-reception | appointment-booking-software |
Affected:
< 1.0.5
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-48078",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-08T02:37:43.089161Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-08T02:37:55.108Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "appointment-booking-software",
"vendor": "open-reception",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.0.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenReception\u0027s appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the unauthenticated `/api/tenants/{id}/schedule` endpoint returns every non-archived channel for a tenant regardless of the channel\u0027s `isPublic` flag. Channels marked `isPublic = false` are intended to be invisible to public callers; the dashboard creates them deliberately to hide internal-only services from the patient booking UI. The schedule endpoint ignores the flag entirely and discloses channel names, descriptions, IDs, agent associations, pause status, confirmation requirements, and computed slot availability for the requested date range. The asymmetry between `addAppointmentToTunnel` (which enforces `eq(channel.isPublic, true)`) and the schedule endpoint (which does not) confirms the design intent: private channels exist as a real access boundary in the booking flow, just not in the schedule disclosure. Version 1.0.5 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-200",
"description": "CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T20:56:24.799Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-v6fw-m2mg-5gr9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-v6fw-m2mg-5gr9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/f47320dd8a236750442a60cb32829b04e99eb8df",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/f47320dd8a236750442a60cb32829b04e99eb8df"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-v6fw-m2mg-5gr9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenReception\u0027s schedule endpoint discloses isPublic=false channels and slot availability to unauthenticated callers"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-48078",
"datePublished": "2026-08-06T20:56:24.799Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-20T18:25:25.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-08T02:37:55.108Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-48078",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.00343",
"percentile": "0.28209"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "appointment-booking-software",
"vendor": "open-reception",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.0.5"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenReception\u0027s appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the unauthenticated `/api/tenants/{id}/schedule` endpoint returns every non-archived channel for a tenant regardless of the channel\u0027s `isPublic` flag. Channels marked `isPublic = false` are intended to be invisible to public callers; the dashboard creates them deliberately to hide internal-only services from the patient booking UI. The schedule endpoint ignores the flag entirely and discloses channel names, descriptions, IDs, agent associations, pause status, confirmation requirements, and computed slot availability for the requested date range. The asymmetry between `addAppointmentToTunnel` (which enforces `eq(channel.isPublic, true)`) and the schedule endpoint (which does not) confirms the design intent: private channels exist as a real access boundary in the booking flow, just not in the schedule disclosure. Version 1.0.5 patches the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El software de reserva de citas de OpenReception proporciona una plataforma de reserva de citas cifrada de extremo a extremo. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 1.0.5, el endpoint no autenticado \u201c/API/tenants/{id}/schedule\u201d devuelve cada canal no archivado para un inquilino, independientemente del indicador \u2019isPublic\u2019 del canal. Los canales marcados como \u2019isPublic = false\u2019 est\u00e1n destinados a ser invisibles para los llamantes p\u00fablicos; el panel de control los crea deliberadamente para ocultar servicios solo internos de la interfaz de usuario de reserva de pacientes. El endpoint de programaci\u00f3n ignora el indicador por completo y divulga nombres de canales, descripciones, IDs, asociaciones de agentes, estado de pausa, requisitos de confirmaci\u00f3n y la disponibilidad de franjas horarias calculada para el rango de fechas solicitado. La asimetr\u00eda entre \u2019addAppointmentToTunnel\u2019 (que aplica \u2019eq(channel.isPublic, true)\u2019) y el endpoint de programaci\u00f3n (que no lo hace) confirma la intenci\u00f3n del dise\u00f1o: los canales privados existen como un l\u00edmite de acceso real en el flujo de reserva, solo que no en la divulgaci\u00f3n de la programaci\u00f3n. La versi\u00f3n 1.0.5 corrige el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-48078",
"lastModified": "2026-10-23T21:10:00.157",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-48078",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-08T02:37:43.089161Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-06T22:17:10.420",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/f47320dd8a236750442a60cb32829b04e99eb8df"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-v6fw-m2mg-5gr9"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-48078",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-08T02:37:43.089161Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-08T02:37:50.337Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "appointment-booking-software",
"vendor": "open-reception",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.0.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenReception\u0027s appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the unauthenticated `/api/tenants/{id}/schedule` endpoint returns every non-archived channel for a tenant regardless of the channel\u0027s `isPublic` flag. Channels marked `isPublic = false` are intended to be invisible to public callers; the dashboard creates them deliberately to hide internal-only services from the patient booking UI. The schedule endpoint ignores the flag entirely and discloses channel names, descriptions, IDs, agent associations, pause status, confirmation requirements, and computed slot availability for the requested date range. The asymmetry between `addAppointmentToTunnel` (which enforces `eq(channel.isPublic, true)`) and the schedule endpoint (which does not) confirms the design intent: private channels exist as a real access boundary in the booking flow, just not in the schedule disclosure. Version 1.0.5 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-200",
"description": "CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T20:56:24.799Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-v6fw-m2mg-5gr9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-v6fw-m2mg-5gr9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/f47320dd8a236750442a60cb32829b04e99eb8df",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/f47320dd8a236750442a60cb32829b04e99eb8df"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-v6fw-m2mg-5gr9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenReception\u0027s schedule endpoint discloses isPublic=false channels and slot availability to unauthenticated callers"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-48078",
"datePublished": "2026-08-06T20:56:24.799Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-20T18:25:25.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-08T02:37:55.108Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.