CVE-2026-46403 (GCVE-0-2026-46403)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-21 19:51 – Updated: 2026-07-22 14:28- CWE-693 - Protection Mechanism Failure
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/333… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/68b… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46403",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:26:16.323007Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:28:22.326Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "klever-go",
"vendor": "klever-io",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.7.17"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.17, KVM exposes `ExecuteReadOnlyWithTypedArguments` as a read-only execution mechanism. The hook saves the previous read-only state, sets `runtime.SetReadOnly(true)`, executes the destination context, and then restores the previous read-only state. However, the indirect contract delete and upgrade paths do not reject execution when `runtime.ReadOnly()` is true. As a result, a contract reached through read-only execution can call the production delete hook for a target contract it owns. The delete path appends the target address to `vmOutput.DeletedAccounts`, the output context merges `DeletedAccounts` into the caller output, and the smart contract processor later processes the VM output by deleting accounts listed in that field. The root cause is that read-only mode is applied as runtime state, but not enforced by the state-changing delete and upgrade host-core paths. This breaks the expected isolation boundary for workflows that rely on read-only calls to inspect another contract without allowing that callee to produce state-changing VM output. The issue is fixed in v1.7.17. Contract delete and upgrade host-core paths now reject execution when `runtime.ReadOnly()` is true. The invariant is regression-tested for delete, upgrade, storage writes, value transfers, and any VM output field that can later mutate chain state."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-693",
"description": "CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T19:51:18.745Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/333f6ec910906e227705fc5767dc897d8fbfc862",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/333f6ec910906e227705fc5767dc897d8fbfc862"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/68b94a40824fac2d848a4ded6eb7c91ada6ce9ef",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/68b94a40824fac2d848a4ded6eb7c91ada6ce9ef"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Klever-Go KVM read-only execution can commit contract delete and upgrade side effects"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-46403",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T19:51:18.745Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-13T21:04:10.932Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:28:22.326Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-46403",
"date": "2026-11-11",
"epss": "0.00478",
"percentile": "0.41703"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "klever-go",
"vendor": "klever-io",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.7.17"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.17, KVM exposes `ExecuteReadOnlyWithTypedArguments` as a read-only execution mechanism. The hook saves the previous read-only state, sets `runtime.SetReadOnly(true)`, executes the destination context, and then restores the previous read-only state. However, the indirect contract delete and upgrade paths do not reject execution when `runtime.ReadOnly()` is true. As a result, a contract reached through read-only execution can call the production delete hook for a target contract it owns. The delete path appends the target address to `vmOutput.DeletedAccounts`, the output context merges `DeletedAccounts` into the caller output, and the smart contract processor later processes the VM output by deleting accounts listed in that field. The root cause is that read-only mode is applied as runtime state, but not enforced by the state-changing delete and upgrade host-core paths. This breaks the expected isolation boundary for workflows that rely on read-only calls to inspect another contract without allowing that callee to produce state-changing VM output. The issue is fixed in v1.7.17. Contract delete and upgrade host-core paths now reject execution when `runtime.ReadOnly()` is true. The invariant is regression-tested for delete, upgrade, storage writes, value transfers, and any VM output field that can later mutate chain state."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Klever-Go es la implementaci\u00f3n en Go del protocolo de blockchain de Klever. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 1.7.17, KVM expone \u2019ExecuteReadOnlyWithTypedArguments\u2019 como un mecanismo de ejecuci\u00f3n de solo lectura. El gancho guarda el estado de solo lectura anterior, establece \u2019runtime.SetReadOnly(true)\u2019, ejecuta el contexto de destino y luego restaura el estado de solo lectura anterior. Sin embargo, las rutas indirectas de eliminaci\u00f3n y actualizaci\u00f3n de contratos no rechazan la ejecuci\u00f3n cuando \u2019runtime.ReadOnly()\u2019 es verdadero. Como resultado, un contrato alcanzado a trav\u00e9s de la ejecuci\u00f3n de solo lectura puede llamar al gancho de eliminaci\u00f3n de producci\u00f3n para un contrato de destino que posee. La ruta de eliminaci\u00f3n a\u00f1ade la direcci\u00f3n de destino a \u2019vmOutput.DeletedAccounts\u2019, el contexto de salida fusiona \u2019DeletedAccounts\u2019 en la salida del llamador, y el procesador de contratos inteligentes procesa posteriormente la salida de la VM eliminando las cuentas listadas en ese campo. La causa ra\u00edz es que el modo de solo lectura se aplica como estado de tiempo de ejecuci\u00f3n, pero no es forzado por las rutas host-core de eliminaci\u00f3n y actualizaci\u00f3n que cambian el estado. Esto rompe el l\u00edmite de aislamiento esperado para los flujos de trabajo que dependen de llamadas de solo lectura para inspeccionar otro contrato sin permitir que ese llamado produzca una salida de VM que cambie el estado. El problema est\u00e1 solucionado en la versi\u00f3n 1.7.17. Las rutas host-core de eliminaci\u00f3n y actualizaci\u00f3n de contratos ahora rechazan la ejecuci\u00f3n cuando \u2019runtime.ReadOnly()\u2019 es verdadero. El invariante se prueba con pruebas de regresi\u00f3n para eliminaci\u00f3n, actualizaci\u00f3n, escrituras de almacenamiento, transferencias de valor y cualquier campo de salida de la VM que pueda mutar posteriormente el estado de la cadena."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-46403",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T19:10:00.127",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 4.0,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46403",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:26:16.323007Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-21T20:17:01.067",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/333f6ec910906e227705fc5767dc897d8fbfc862"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/68b94a40824fac2d848a4ded6eb7c91ada6ce9ef"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-693"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46403",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:26:16.323007Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:27:46.153Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "klever-go",
"vendor": "klever-io",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.7.17"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.17, KVM exposes `ExecuteReadOnlyWithTypedArguments` as a read-only execution mechanism. The hook saves the previous read-only state, sets `runtime.SetReadOnly(true)`, executes the destination context, and then restores the previous read-only state. However, the indirect contract delete and upgrade paths do not reject execution when `runtime.ReadOnly()` is true. As a result, a contract reached through read-only execution can call the production delete hook for a target contract it owns. The delete path appends the target address to `vmOutput.DeletedAccounts`, the output context merges `DeletedAccounts` into the caller output, and the smart contract processor later processes the VM output by deleting accounts listed in that field. The root cause is that read-only mode is applied as runtime state, but not enforced by the state-changing delete and upgrade host-core paths. This breaks the expected isolation boundary for workflows that rely on read-only calls to inspect another contract without allowing that callee to produce state-changing VM output. The issue is fixed in v1.7.17. Contract delete and upgrade host-core paths now reject execution when `runtime.ReadOnly()` is true. The invariant is regression-tested for delete, upgrade, storage writes, value transfers, and any VM output field that can later mutate chain state."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-693",
"description": "CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T19:51:18.745Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/333f6ec910906e227705fc5767dc897d8fbfc862",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/333f6ec910906e227705fc5767dc897d8fbfc862"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/68b94a40824fac2d848a4ded6eb7c91ada6ce9ef",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/68b94a40824fac2d848a4ded6eb7c91ada6ce9ef"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Klever-Go KVM read-only execution can commit contract delete and upgrade side effects"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-46403",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T19:51:18.745Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-13T21:04:10.932Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:28:22.326Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.