CVE-2026-45575 (GCVE-0-2026-45575)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-26 21:01 – Updated: 2026-05-28 14:11
VLAI
Title
epa4all-client: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Summary
epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.2, an attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects uri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker's encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker's auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.2.
Severity
7.4 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-05-28 14:11 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Assigner
GitHub_M CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 72/100 over 7795 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-45575",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-28T14:11:18.105155Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:11:30.565Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "epa4all-client",
          "vendor": "oviva-ag",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "product": "epa4all-client",
          "vendor": "com.oviva.telematik",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.2, an attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects uri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker\u0027s encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker\u0027s auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.2."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.4,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-347",
              "description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T21:01:51.745Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "epa4all-client: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-45575",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-26T21:01:51.745Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-12T19:00:14.600Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:11:30.565Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-45575",
      "date": "2026-11-11",
      "epss": "0.00118",
      "percentile": "0.01728"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "product": "epa4all-client",
                "vendor": "oviva-ag",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "product": "epa4all-client",
                "vendor": "com.oviva.telematik",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.2, an attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects uri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker\u0027s encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker\u0027s auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.2."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "epa4all-client es el Cliente Java para epa4all / ePA 3.0 en la Telematik Infrastruktur. Anterior a la 1.2.2, un atacante que puede realizar un MitM a la conexi\u00f3n TLS entre el cliente y el IDP (dentro de la red TI) puede sustituir un documento de descubrimiento falsificado. El documento falsificado redirige uri_puk_idp_enc y uri_puk_idp_sig a URLs controladas por el atacante. El cliente entonces cifra la respuesta al desaf\u00edo firmada con SMC-B con la clave de cifrado del atacante y la env\u00eda mediante POST al endpoint de autenticaci\u00f3n del atacante. Esto captura el material de autenticaci\u00f3n firmado. Esta vulnerabilidad est\u00e1 corregida en la versi\u00f3n 1.2.2."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-45575",
        "lastModified": "2026-07-24T11:10:00.170",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 7.4,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
              "impactScore": 5.2,
              "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-45575",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-28T14:11:18.105155Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-05-26T21:16:40.373",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
            "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36"
          },
          {
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
            "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-347"
              }
            ],
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-05-28T20:12:51+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-45575",
      "id": "CVE-2026-45575",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "epa4all-client: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-45575.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-45575",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "no"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "total"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-05-28T14:11:18.105155Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:11:26.946Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "product": "epa4all-client",
              "vendor": "oviva-ag",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "product": "epa4all-client",
              "vendor": "com.oviva.telematik",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.2, an attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects uri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker\u0027s encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker\u0027s auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.2."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 7.4,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              }
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-347",
                  "description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T21:01:51.745Z",
            "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
            "shortName": "GitHub_M"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_MISC"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36"
            }
          ],
          "source": {
            "advisory": "GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf",
            "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
          },
          "title": "epa4all-client: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-45575",
        "datePublished": "2026-05-26T21:01:51.745Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-05-12T19:00:14.600Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:11:30.565Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.