CVE-2026-44687 (GCVE-0-2026-44687)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-22 13:06 – Updated: 2026-07-22 14:19
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Off-by-one error in 'harden-below-nxdomain' logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legitimate parent's NXDOMAIN
Summary
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.13.2 up to and including 1.25.1, stub or forward zones where the name is below an intermediate labed below a DNSSEC signed zone could be shadowed by the intermediate label's secure NXDOMAIN answer from the parent. This is caused by an off-by-one error in 'harden-below-nxdomain' logic; enabled by default. It effectively bypasses the configuration and the configured stub/forward zone is never contacted. 'harden-below-nxdomain' does an upward DNS cache walk together with a delegation point guard that does not allow NXDOMAIN synthesis above stub/forward zones. The guard tests the domain name but before stripping a label. This results in an iteration where the domain name equals the configured stub/forward zone apex that passes the guard, strips one more label, and probes the cache at the apex's immediate public parent. If that parent has a cached DNSSEC-secure NXDOMAIN, which it will for any private namespace nested two or more labels under a signed public name, the walk returns it and the configured stub/forward upstream is never contacted. This can only be triggered by the query for the intermediate label (between the stub/forward apex and the DNSSEC parent zone).
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-22 14:19 UTC
CWE
- CWE-193 - Off-by-one Error
Assigner
NLnet Labs
CNA
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-20… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs | Unbound |
Affected:
1.13.2 , < 1.25.2
(semver)
|
guessed |
Date Public
2026-07-22 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44687",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:19:38.843549Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:19:53.266Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Unbound",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.13.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.13.2 up to and including 1.25.1, stub or forward zones where the name is below an intermediate labed below a DNSSEC signed zone could be shadowed by the intermediate label\u0027s secure NXDOMAIN answer from the parent. This is caused by an off-by-one error in \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 logic; enabled by default. It effectively bypasses the configuration and the configured stub/forward zone is never contacted. \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 does an upward DNS cache walk together with a delegation point guard that does not allow NXDOMAIN synthesis above stub/forward zones. The guard tests the domain name but before stripping a label. This results in an iteration where the domain name equals the configured stub/forward zone apex that passes the guard, strips one more label, and probes the cache at the apex\u0027s immediate public parent. If that parent has a cached DNSSEC-secure NXDOMAIN, which it will for any private namespace nested two or more labels under a signed public name, the walk returns it and the configured stub/forward upstream is never contacted. This can only be triggered by the query for the intermediate label (between the stub/forward apex and the DNSSEC parent zone)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-193",
"description": "CWE-193: Off-by-one Error",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T13:06:42.751Z",
"orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"shortName": "NLnet Labs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44687.txt"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "NLnet Labs shares patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Qifan Zhang verifies patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fixes released with version 1.25.2"
}
],
"title": "Off-by-one error in \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legitimate parent\u0027s NXDOMAIN",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44687",
"datePublished": "2026-07-22T13:06:42.751Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-22T12:35:21.340Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:19:53.266Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-44687",
"date": "2026-10-22",
"epss": "0.00218",
"percentile": "0.11591"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-07-23T14:42:25.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2026-44687",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2026-44687",
"initial_release_date": "2026-07-23T01:03:11.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "1",
"product_status:known_affected": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Off-by-one error in \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legitimate parent\u0027s NXDOMAIN",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-44687.json",
"version": "2"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Unbound",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.13.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0694F190-599A-4953-9758-0155C53510E2",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.25.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.13.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.13.2 up to and including 1.25.1, stub or forward zones where the name is below an intermediate labed below a DNSSEC signed zone could be shadowed by the intermediate label\u0027s secure NXDOMAIN answer from the parent. This is caused by an off-by-one error in \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 logic; enabled by default. It effectively bypasses the configuration and the configured stub/forward zone is never contacted. \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 does an upward DNS cache walk together with a delegation point guard that does not allow NXDOMAIN synthesis above stub/forward zones. The guard tests the domain name but before stripping a label. This results in an iteration where the domain name equals the configured stub/forward zone apex that passes the guard, strips one more label, and probes the cache at the apex\u0027s immediate public parent. If that parent has a cached DNSSEC-secure NXDOMAIN, which it will for any private namespace nested two or more labels under a signed public name, the walk returns it and the configured stub/forward upstream is never contacted. This can only be triggered by the query for the intermediate label (between the stub/forward apex and the DNSSEC parent zone)."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-44687",
"lastModified": "2026-07-24T13:56:10.167",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44687",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:19:38.843549Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-22T14:17:19.040",
"references": [
{
"source": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44687.txt"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-193"
}
],
"source": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Low",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-31T11:48:39+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-44687",
"id": "CVE-2026-44687",
"initial_release_date": "2026-07-22T13:06:42.751000+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "4",
"product_status:known_affected": "20",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "11",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "unbound: Unbound: Denial of Service due to \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 logic bypass",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44687.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44687",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:19:38.843549Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:19:48.184Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Unbound",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.13.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.13.2 up to and including 1.25.1, stub or forward zones where the name is below an intermediate labed below a DNSSEC signed zone could be shadowed by the intermediate label\u0027s secure NXDOMAIN answer from the parent. This is caused by an off-by-one error in \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 logic; enabled by default. It effectively bypasses the configuration and the configured stub/forward zone is never contacted. \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 does an upward DNS cache walk together with a delegation point guard that does not allow NXDOMAIN synthesis above stub/forward zones. The guard tests the domain name but before stripping a label. This results in an iteration where the domain name equals the configured stub/forward zone apex that passes the guard, strips one more label, and probes the cache at the apex\u0027s immediate public parent. If that parent has a cached DNSSEC-secure NXDOMAIN, which it will for any private namespace nested two or more labels under a signed public name, the walk returns it and the configured stub/forward upstream is never contacted. This can only be triggered by the query for the intermediate label (between the stub/forward apex and the DNSSEC parent zone)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-193",
"description": "CWE-193: Off-by-one Error",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T13:06:42.751Z",
"orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"shortName": "NLnet Labs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44687.txt"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "NLnet Labs shares patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Qifan Zhang verifies patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fixes released with version 1.25.2"
}
],
"title": "Off-by-one error in \u0027harden-below-nxdomain\u0027 logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legitimate parent\u0027s NXDOMAIN",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44687",
"datePublished": "2026-07-22T13:06:42.751Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-22T12:35:21.340Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:19:53.266Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.