CVE-2026-41481 (GCVE-0-2026-41481)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 20:54 – Updated: 2026-06-30 12:08
VLAI
Title
LangChain: HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url SSRF Redirect Bypass
Summary
LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-41481",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-04-25T01:54:07.352480Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-04-25T01:54:16.304Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "affected",
            "product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
            "vendor": "Red Hat"
          },
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "affected",
            "product": "OpenShift Lightspeed",
            "vendor": "Red Hat"
          },
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "affected",
            "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
            "vendor": "Red Hat"
          },
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "affected",
            "product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
            "vendor": "Red Hat"
          }
        ],
        "datePublic": "2026-04-24T20:54:27.713Z",
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "A flaw was found in LangChain and langchain-text-splitters. This vulnerability, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) bypass, allows a remote attacker to redirect a seemingly safe URL to internal network resources. By exploiting unvalidated redirects, an attacker could access sensitive data from internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints. This could result in information disclosure or data exfiltration if the application processes and exposes the content from these redirected requests."
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
                "value": "Important"
              },
              "type": "Red Hat severity rating"
            }
          },
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 6.5,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            },
            "format": "CVSS"
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-918",
                "description": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T12:08:48.076Z",
          "orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
          "shortName": "redhat-SADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41481"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHBZ#2461733",
            "tags": [
              "issue-tracking",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461733"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_sadp-csaf-vex"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-41481.json"
          }
        ],
        "timeline": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "time": "2026-04-24T22:00:57.208Z",
            "value": "Reported to Red Hat."
          },
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "time": "2026-04-24T20:54:27.713Z",
            "value": "Made public."
          }
        ],
        "title": "langchain-text-splitters: LangChain: Information Disclosure via Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Redirect Bypass",
        "workarounds": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "To mitigate this issue, Red Hat customers should ensure that applications utilizing LangChain\u0027s HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() function do not process untrusted or unvalidated URLs. Implement strict input validation for all URL inputs to prevent redirection to internal network resources. If an application exposes the content of processed Document objects to external requesters, consider reconfiguring the application to restrict such exposure."
          }
        ],
        "x_adpType": "supplier",
        "x_generator": {
          "engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
        }
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "langchain-text-splitters",
          "vendor": "langchain-ai",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.1.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters\n 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T20:55:32.916Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/security/advisories/GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/security/advisories/GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "LangChain: HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url SSRF Redirect Bypass"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-41481",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-24T20:54:27.713Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-04-20T16:14:19.006Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T12:08:48.076Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-41481",
      "date": "2026-07-11",
      "epss": "0.0026",
      "percentile": "0.17441"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-41481\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-04-24T21:16:19.490\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-30T03:19:26.313\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters\\n 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"langchain-ai\",\"product\":\"langchain-text-splitters\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 1.1.2\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]},{\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Red Hat\",\"product\":\"Migration Toolkit for Applications 8\",\"defaultStatus\":\"affected\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8\"]},{\"vendor\":\"Red Hat\",\"product\":\"OpenShift Lightspeed\",\"defaultStatus\":\"affected\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed\"]},{\"vendor\":\"Red Hat\",\"product\":\"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2\",\"defaultStatus\":\"affected\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2\"]},{\"vendor\":\"Red Hat\",\"product\":\"Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)\",\"defaultStatus\":\"affected\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai\"]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6},{\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-04-25T01:54:07.352480Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-41481\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]},{\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:langchain:langchain-text-splitters:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.1.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6B5FD4DD-C579-4824-8988-4C702E1B2D24\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/security/advisories/GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41481\",\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461733\",\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\"},{\"url\":\"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-41481.json\",\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\"}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-06-30T03:56:15+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-41481",
      "id": "CVE-2026-41481",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-04-24T20:54:27.713000+00:00",
      "product_status:known_affected": "7",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "langchain-text-splitters: LangChain: Information Disclosure via Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Redirect Bypass",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-41481.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-41481\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-04-25T01:54:07.352480Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-25T01:54:12.851Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"LangChain: HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url SSRF Redirect Bypass\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"langchain-ai\", \"product\": \"langchain-text-splitters\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 1.1.2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/security/advisories/GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/security/advisories/GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters\\n 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-918\", \"description\": \"CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-24T20:55:32.916Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-41481\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-25T01:54:16.304Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-04-20T16:14:19.006Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-24T20:54:27.713Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.