CVE-2026-40574 (GCVE-0-2026-40574)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-21 16:32 – Updated: 2026-04-21 20:37- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/secu… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| oauth2-proxy | oauth2-proxy |
Affected:
< 7.15.2
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-40574",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-21T20:18:57.843784Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T20:37:28.072Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "oauth2-proxy",
"vendor": "oauth2-proxy",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 7.15.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OAuth2 Proxy is a reverse proxy that provides authentication using OAuth2 providers. Prior to 7.15.2, an authorization bypass exists in OAuth2 Proxy as part of the email_domain enforcement option. An attacker may be able to authenticate with an email claim such as attacker@evil.com@company.com and satisfy an allowed domain check for company.com, even though the claim is not a valid email address. The issue ONLY affects deployments that rely on email_domain restrictions and accept email claim values from identity providers or claim mappings that do not strictly enforce normal email syntax. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.15.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T16:32:34.537Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-c5c4-8r6x-56w3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-c5c4-8r6x-56w3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c5c4-8r6x-56w3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OAuth2 Proxy has an Authorization Bypass in Email Domain Validation via Malformed Multi-@ Email Claims"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-40574",
"datePublished": "2026-04-21T16:32:34.537Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-14T13:24:29.474Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T20:37:28.072Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-40574",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.00209",
"percentile": "0.11094"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "oauth2-proxy",
"vendor": "oauth2-proxy",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 7.15.2"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:oauth2_proxy_project:oauth2_proxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8ECD42F0-BA8D-4BA5-A347-1CAD636DCF70",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.15.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OAuth2 Proxy is a reverse proxy that provides authentication using OAuth2 providers. Prior to 7.15.2, an authorization bypass exists in OAuth2 Proxy as part of the email_domain enforcement option. An attacker may be able to authenticate with an email claim such as attacker@evil.com@company.com and satisfy an allowed domain check for company.com, even though the claim is not a valid email address. The issue ONLY affects deployments that rely on email_domain restrictions and accept email claim values from identity providers or claim mappings that do not strictly enforce normal email syntax. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.15.2."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "OAuth2 Proxy es un proxy inverso que proporciona autenticaci\u00f3n utilizando proveedores OAuth2. Anterior a la versi\u00f3n 7.15.2, existe un bypass de autorizaci\u00f3n en OAuth2 Proxy como parte de la opci\u00f3n de aplicaci\u00f3n de email_domain. Un atacante podr\u00eda autenticarse con una declaraci\u00f3n de correo electr\u00f3nico como attacker@evil.com@company.com y satisfacer una verificaci\u00f3n de dominio permitido para company.com, aunque la declaraci\u00f3n no sea una direcci\u00f3n de correo electr\u00f3nico v\u00e1lida. El problema SOLO afecta a las implementaciones que dependen de restricciones de email_domain y aceptan valores de declaraci\u00f3n de correo electr\u00f3nico de proveedores de identidad o mapeos de declaraciones que no aplican estrictamente la sintaxis normal de correo electr\u00f3nico. Esta vulnerabilidad est\u00e1 corregida en la versi\u00f3n 7.15.2."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-40574",
"lastModified": "2026-11-11T23:10:00.263",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-40574",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-21T20:18:57.843784Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-04-21T17:16:55.730",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-c5c4-8r6x-56w3"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-04-23T22:52:11+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-40574",
"id": "CVE-2026-40574",
"initial_release_date": "2026-04-21T16:32:34.537000+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy: OAuth2 Proxy: Authorization Bypass via malicious email claim",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-40574.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-40574",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-21T20:18:57.843784Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T20:20:47.257Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "oauth2-proxy",
"vendor": "oauth2-proxy",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 7.15.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OAuth2 Proxy is a reverse proxy that provides authentication using OAuth2 providers. Prior to 7.15.2, an authorization bypass exists in OAuth2 Proxy as part of the email_domain enforcement option. An attacker may be able to authenticate with an email claim such as attacker@evil.com@company.com and satisfy an allowed domain check for company.com, even though the claim is not a valid email address. The issue ONLY affects deployments that rely on email_domain restrictions and accept email claim values from identity providers or claim mappings that do not strictly enforce normal email syntax. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.15.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T16:32:34.537Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-c5c4-8r6x-56w3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-c5c4-8r6x-56w3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c5c4-8r6x-56w3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OAuth2 Proxy has an Authorization Bypass in Email Domain Validation via Malformed Multi-@ Email Claims"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-40574",
"datePublished": "2026-04-21T16:32:34.537Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-14T13:24:29.474Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T20:37:28.072Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.