CVE-2026-32698 (GCVE-0-2026-32698)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-18 21:01 – Updated: 2026-03-19 14:22- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/opf/openproject/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| opf | openproject |
Affected:
< 16.6.9
Affected: >= 17.0.0, < 17.0.6 Affected: >= 17.1.0, < 17.1.3 Affected: >= 17.2.0, < 17.2.1 |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32698",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-19T14:22:08.058735Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-19T14:22:17.046Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openproject",
"vendor": "opf",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 16.6.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.0.0, \u003c 17.0.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.1.0, \u003c 17.1.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.2.0, \u003c 17.2.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. Versions prior to 16.6.9, 17.0.6, 17.1.3, and 17.2.1 are vulnerable to an SQL injection attack via a custom field\u0027s name. When that custom field was used in a Cost Report, the custom field\u0027s name was injected into the SQL query without proper sanitation. This allowed an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands during the generation of a Cost Report. As custom fields can only be generated by users with full administrator privileges, the attack surface is somewhat reduced. Together with another bug in the Repositories_module, that used the project identifier without sanitation to generate the checkout path for a git repository in the filesystem, this allowed an attacker to checkout a git repository to an arbitrarily chosen path on the server. If the checkout is done within certain paths within the OpenProject application, upon the next restart of the application, this allows the attacker to inject ruby code into the application. As the project identifier cannot be manually edited to any string containing special characters like dots or slashes, this needs to be changed via the SQL injection described above. Versions 16.6.9, 17.0.6, 17.1.3, and 17.2.1 fix the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-18T21:01:53.366Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/opf/openproject/security/advisories/GHSA-jqhf-rf9x-9rhx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/opf/openproject/security/advisories/GHSA-jqhf-rf9x-9rhx"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jqhf-rf9x-9rhx",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenProject has a SQL Injection via Custom Field Name that can be chained to Remote Code Execution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32698",
"datePublished": "2026-03-18T21:01:53.366Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-13T14:33:42.822Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-19T14:22:17.046Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-32698",
"date": "2026-11-15",
"epss": "0.00306",
"percentile": "0.23679"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "openproject",
"vendor": "opf",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 16.6.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.0.0, \u003c 17.0.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.1.0, \u003c 17.1.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.2.0, \u003c 17.2.1"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openproject:openproject:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7FD9C4C4-FFDC-4EE6-AAB2-901C1C6CB6BE",
"versionEndExcluding": "16.6.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openproject:openproject:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E1003FD4-BC22-4AB4-91B4-EB63FFF41C2A",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.0.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openproject:openproject:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "86B90D5D-1A3D-4524-A3CC-F7B7274A4E26",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.1.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openproject:openproject:17.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C2D1F069-BA78-4F8A-8FF9-DAE63BFB39CF",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. Versions prior to 16.6.9, 17.0.6, 17.1.3, and 17.2.1 are vulnerable to an SQL injection attack via a custom field\u0027s name. When that custom field was used in a Cost Report, the custom field\u0027s name was injected into the SQL query without proper sanitation. This allowed an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands during the generation of a Cost Report. As custom fields can only be generated by users with full administrator privileges, the attack surface is somewhat reduced. Together with another bug in the Repositories_module, that used the project identifier without sanitation to generate the checkout path for a git repository in the filesystem, this allowed an attacker to checkout a git repository to an arbitrarily chosen path on the server. If the checkout is done within certain paths within the OpenProject application, upon the next restart of the application, this allows the attacker to inject ruby code into the application. As the project identifier cannot be manually edited to any string containing special characters like dots or slashes, this needs to be changed via the SQL injection described above. Versions 16.6.9, 17.0.6, 17.1.3, and 17.2.1 fix the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "OpenProject es un software de gesti\u00f3n de proyectos de c\u00f3digo abierto, basado en la web. Las versiones anteriores a 16.6.9, 17.0.6, 17.1.3 y 17.2.1 son vulnerables a un ataque de inyecci\u00f3n SQL a trav\u00e9s del nombre de un campo personalizado. Cuando ese campo personalizado se utilizaba en un Informe de Costos, el nombre del campo personalizado se inyectaba en la consulta SQL sin la sanitizaci\u00f3n adecuada. Esto permit\u00eda a un atacante ejecutar comandos SQL arbitrarios durante la generaci\u00f3n de un Informe de Costos. Dado que los campos personalizados solo pueden ser generados por usuarios con privilegios de administrador completos, la superficie de ataque se reduce un poco. Junto con otro error en el m\u00f3dulo Repositories, que utilizaba el identificador del proyecto sin sanitizaci\u00f3n para generar la ruta de extracci\u00f3n para un repositorio git en el sistema de archivos, esto permit\u00eda a un atacante extraer un repositorio git a una ruta elegida arbitrariamente en el servidor. Si la extracci\u00f3n se realiza dentro de ciertas rutas dentro de la aplicaci\u00f3n OpenProject, tras el siguiente reinicio de la aplicaci\u00f3n, esto permite al atacante inyectar c\u00f3digo ruby en la aplicaci\u00f3n. Dado que el identificador del proyecto no puede ser editado manualmente a ninguna cadena que contenga caracteres especiales como puntos o barras, esto necesita ser cambiado a trav\u00e9s de la inyecci\u00f3n SQL descrita anteriormente. Las versiones 16.6.9, 17.0.6, 17.1.3 y 17.2.1 corrigen el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-32698",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:36:13.670",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32698",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-19T14:22:08.058735Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-18T22:16:24.223",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/opf/openproject/security/advisories/GHSA-jqhf-rf9x-9rhx"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-89"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T07:40:33+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-32698",
"id": "CVE-2026-32698",
"initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "OpenProject has a SQL Injection via Custom Field Name that can be chained to Remote Code Execution",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-32698.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32698",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-19T14:22:08.058735Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-19T14:22:10.972Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openproject",
"vendor": "opf",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 16.6.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.0.0, \u003c 17.0.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.1.0, \u003c 17.1.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 17.2.0, \u003c 17.2.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. Versions prior to 16.6.9, 17.0.6, 17.1.3, and 17.2.1 are vulnerable to an SQL injection attack via a custom field\u0027s name. When that custom field was used in a Cost Report, the custom field\u0027s name was injected into the SQL query without proper sanitation. This allowed an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands during the generation of a Cost Report. As custom fields can only be generated by users with full administrator privileges, the attack surface is somewhat reduced. Together with another bug in the Repositories_module, that used the project identifier without sanitation to generate the checkout path for a git repository in the filesystem, this allowed an attacker to checkout a git repository to an arbitrarily chosen path on the server. If the checkout is done within certain paths within the OpenProject application, upon the next restart of the application, this allows the attacker to inject ruby code into the application. As the project identifier cannot be manually edited to any string containing special characters like dots or slashes, this needs to be changed via the SQL injection described above. Versions 16.6.9, 17.0.6, 17.1.3, and 17.2.1 fix the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-18T21:01:53.366Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/opf/openproject/security/advisories/GHSA-jqhf-rf9x-9rhx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/opf/openproject/security/advisories/GHSA-jqhf-rf9x-9rhx"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jqhf-rf9x-9rhx",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenProject has a SQL Injection via Custom Field Name that can be chained to Remote Code Execution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32698",
"datePublished": "2026-03-18T21:01:53.366Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-13T14:33:42.822Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-19T14:22:17.046Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.