Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2026-31515 (GCVE-0-2026-31515)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-22 13:54 – Updated: 2026-09-08 08:47| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece , < d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e
(git)
Affected: 08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece , < e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8 (git) Affected: 08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece , < 8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16 (git) Affected: 08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece , < d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5 (git) Affected: 08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece , < 7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028 (git) Affected: 08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece , < 83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34 (git) Affected: 08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece , < ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4 (git) Affected: 08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece , < eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.21
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.21 (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.253 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.203 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.168 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.131 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.80 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.18.21 , ≤ 6.18.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.19.11 , ≤ 6.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 7.0 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.6 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.5 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.6 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.5 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.6 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.5 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T08:47:35.688Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/key/af_key.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/key/af_key.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.21"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.21",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.253",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.203",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.168",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.131",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.80",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.21",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.253",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.203",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.168",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.131",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.80",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.21",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]\n\nIssue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families,\nand that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated,\nthus possibly overfilling the skb.\n\nValidate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().\n\n[1]\n\nskbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:\u003cNULL\u003e\n kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 !\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline]\n skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655\n skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline]\n set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline]\n pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636\n km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848\n xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705\n xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T22:10:17.324Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786"
}
],
"title": "af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-31515",
"datePublished": "2026-04-22T13:54:32.194Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-09T15:48:24.107Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T08:47:35.688Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-31515",
"date": "2026-09-21",
"epss": "0.00129",
"percentile": "0.02879"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-04-30T01:05:39.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2026-31515",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2026-31515",
"initial_release_date": "2026-04-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "1",
"product_status:known_affected": "2",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-31515.json",
"version": "4"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/key/af_key.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/key/af_key.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.21"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.21",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.253",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.203",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.168",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.131",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.80",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.21",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "36EBE72B-44B5-4850-AE2E-90E94D179AE3",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.253",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21.1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "20DDB3E9-AABF-4107-ADB0-5362AA067045",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.203",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E2DDDCA1-6DAB-4018-B920-8F045DDD8D3B",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.168",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CE6ED4D4-0046-4573-BFA9-D64143B6A89F",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.131",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "97EB19EC-A11E-49C6-9D2F-6F6EC6CB98B6",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.80",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ED39847A-3B46-4729-B7CA-B2C30B9FA8FE",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.21",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4CA2E747-A9EC-4518-9AA2-B4247FC748B7",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A509AAC2-C059-4798-8B5E-AC4313926FD9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "02259FDA-961B-47BC-AE7F-93D7EC6E90C2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "58A9FEFF-C040-420D-8F0A-BFDAAA1DF258",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1D2315C0-D46F-4F85-9754-F9E5E11374A6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "512EE3A8-A590-4501-9A94-5D4B268D6138",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]\n\nIssue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families,\nand that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated,\nthus possibly overfilling the skb.\n\nValidate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().\n\n[1]\n\nskbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:\u003cNULL\u003e\n kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 !\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline]\n skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655\n skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline]\n set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline]\n pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636\n km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848\n xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705\n xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-31515",
"lastModified": "2026-07-14T13:18:44.487",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-04-22T14:16:50.940",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-476"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-28T07:25:55+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-31515",
"id": "CVE-2026-31515",
"initial_release_date": "2026-04-22T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "260",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "14",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-31515.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-08-21 - Updated: 2026-08-21
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 26.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53083"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-08-21T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-08-21T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-08-21T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8660-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8660-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8662-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8662-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8636-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8636-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8664-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8664-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8663-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8663-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8630-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8630-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8665-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8665-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8643-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8643-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8645-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8645-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8629-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8629-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8644-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8644-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8666-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8666-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8659-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8659-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8631-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8631-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8661-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8661-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8646-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8646-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8630-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8630-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8644-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8644-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8629-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8629-3"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-08-28 - Updated: 2026-08-28
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 26.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-08-28T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-08-28T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-08-28T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-08-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8666-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8666-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8643-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8643-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8659-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8659-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu LSN-0121-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/LSN-0121-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8669-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8669-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8667-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8667-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8643-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8643-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8662-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8662-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8666-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8666-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8659-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8659-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8630-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8630-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8658-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8658-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8668-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8668-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8661-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8661-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8659-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8659-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8658-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8658-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8644-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8644-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8643-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8643-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8661-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8661-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-08-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8658-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8658-3"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2026-31515
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-22 14:16 - Updated: 2026-07-14 13:18| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4 | Patch | |
| 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e | https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html | ||
| 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e | https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 2.6.21 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/key/af_key.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786",
"status": "affected",
"version": "08de61beab8a21c8e0b3906a97defda5f1f66ece",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/key/af_key.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.21"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.21",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.253",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.203",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.168",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.131",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.80",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.21",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "36EBE72B-44B5-4850-AE2E-90E94D179AE3",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.253",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21.1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "20DDB3E9-AABF-4107-ADB0-5362AA067045",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.203",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E2DDDCA1-6DAB-4018-B920-8F045DDD8D3B",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.168",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CE6ED4D4-0046-4573-BFA9-D64143B6A89F",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.131",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "97EB19EC-A11E-49C6-9D2F-6F6EC6CB98B6",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.80",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ED39847A-3B46-4729-B7CA-B2C30B9FA8FE",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.21",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4CA2E747-A9EC-4518-9AA2-B4247FC748B7",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A509AAC2-C059-4798-8B5E-AC4313926FD9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "02259FDA-961B-47BC-AE7F-93D7EC6E90C2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "58A9FEFF-C040-420D-8F0A-BFDAAA1DF258",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1D2315C0-D46F-4F85-9754-F9E5E11374A6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "512EE3A8-A590-4501-9A94-5D4B268D6138",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]\n\nIssue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families,\nand that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated,\nthus possibly overfilling the skb.\n\nValidate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().\n\n[1]\n\nskbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:\u003cNULL\u003e\n kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 !\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline]\n skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655\n skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline]\n set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline]\n pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636\n km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848\n xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705\n xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-31515",
"lastModified": "2026-07-14T13:18:44.487",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-04-22T14:16:50.940",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-476"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-9285-5JPF-MWR6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 15:31 – Updated: 2026-07-14 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()
syzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]
Issue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families, and that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated, thus possibly overfilling the skb.
Validate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().
[1]
skbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 ! Call Trace: skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline] skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655 skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline] set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline] pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636 km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848 xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705 xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-31515"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T14:16:50Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]\n\nIssue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families,\nand that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated,\nthus possibly overfilling the skb.\n\nValidate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().\n\n[1]\n\nskbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:\u003cNULL\u003e\n kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 !\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline]\n skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655\n skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline]\n set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline]\n pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636\n km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848\n xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705\n xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150",
"id": "GHSA-9285-5jpf-mwr6",
"modified": "2026-07-14T15:31:53Z",
"published": "2026-04-22T15:31:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b18692c59afb8e5c364c8e3ac01e51dd6b52028"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83f644ea92987c100b82d8481ae2230faeed3d34"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ddf8de7e758f6888988467af9ffc8adf589fb16"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0c5aa8dd38887714f1aad04236a3620b56a5e4e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3225e6b9bd51ec177970a628fe4b11237ce87d5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e06b596fc4eb01936a2e5dccad17c946d660bab8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb2d16a7d599dc9d4df391b5e660df9949963786"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee836e820a40e2ca4da8af7310bff92d586772d4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-26-209-04
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2026-07-14 00:00 - Updated: 2026-07-28 06:00In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate() syzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1] Issue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families, and that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated, thus possibly overfilling the skb. Validate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest(). [1] skbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:<NULL> kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 ! Call Trace: <TASK> skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline] skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655 skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline] set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline] pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636 km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848 xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705 xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150
MSRC_CVE-2026-31515
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2026-04-02 00:00 - Updated: 2026-04-30 01:05OESA-2026-2310 (CVE-2026-31504)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-05-15 11:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:11 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race
packet_release() has a race window where NETDEV_UP can re-register a
socket into a fanout group's arr[] array. The re-registration is not
cleaned up by fanout_release(), leaving a dangling pointer in the fanout
array.
packet_release() does NOT zero po->num in its bind_lock section.
After releasing bind_lock, po->num is still non-zero and po->ifindex
still matches the bound device. A concurrent packet_notifier(NETDEV_UP)
that already found the socket in sklist can re-register the hook.
For fanout sockets, this re-registration calls __fanout_link(sk, po)
which adds the socket back into f->arr[] and increments f->num_members,
but does NOT increment f->sk_ref.
The fix sets po->num to zero in packet_release while bind_lock is
held to prevent NETDEV_UP from linking, preventing the race window.
This bug was found following an additional audit with Claude Code based on CVE-2025-38617.(CVE-2026-31504)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()
syzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]
Issue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families, and that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated, thus possibly overfilling the skb.
Validate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().
[1]
skbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:<NULL> kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 ! Call Trace: <TASK> skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline] skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655 skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline] set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline] pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636 km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848 xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705 xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150(CVE-2026-31515)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output
The AF_RXRPC procfs helpers format local and remote socket addresses into fixed 50-byte stack buffers with "%pISpc".
That is too small for the longest current-tree IPv6-with-port form the formatter can produce. In lib/vsprintf.c, the compressed IPv6 path uses a dotted-quad tail not only for v4mapped addresses, but also for ISATAP addresses via ipv6_addr_is_isatap().
As a result, a case such as
is possible with the current formatter. That is 50 visible characters, so 51 bytes including the trailing NUL, which does not fit in the existing char[50] buffers used by net/rxrpc/proc.c.
Size the buffers from the formatter's maximum textual form and switch the call sites to scnprintf().
Changes since v1: - correct the changelog to cite the actual maximum current-tree case explicitly - frame the proof around the ISATAP formatting path instead of the earlier mapped-v4 example(CVE-2026-31630)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_unix: read UNIX_DIAG_VFS data under unix_state_lock
Exact UNIX diag lookups hold a reference to the socket, but not to u->path. Meanwhile, unix_release_sock() clears u->path under unix_state_lock() and drops the path reference after unlocking.
Read the inode and device numbers for UNIX_DIAG_VFS while holding unix_state_lock(), then emit the netlink attribute after dropping the lock.
This keeps the VFS data stable while the reply is being built.(CVE-2026-31673)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ip6t_rt: reject oversized addrnr in rt_mt6_check()
Reject rt match rules whose addrnr exceeds IP6T_RT_HOPS.
rt_mt6() expects addrnr to stay within the bounds of rtinfo->addrs[]. Validate addrnr during rule installation so malformed rules are rejected before the match logic can use an out-of-range value.(CVE-2026-31674)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bridge: br_nd_send: linearize skb before parsing ND options
br_nd_send() parses neighbour discovery options from ns->opt[] and assumes that these options are in the linear part of request.
Its callers only guarantee that the ICMPv6 header and target address are available, so the option area can still be non-linear. Parsing ns->opt[] in that case can access data past the linear buffer.
Linearize request before option parsing and derive ns from the linear network header.(CVE-2026-31682)
In the Linux kernel xfrm/ESP (IPsec) subsystem, when appending pipe pages to network packets (skb) via zero-copy mechanisms such as splice() / MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, IPv4/IPv6 datagram paths are not correctly marked with the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG flag. The ESP receive path incorrectly treats these externally owned shared pages as private data, skipping the COW (copy-on-write) step and performing in-place decryption directly, allowing an attacker to pollute otherwise read-only pages in the page cache. Combined with CVE-2026-43500, a complete exploit chain can be formed, allowing local unprivileged users to obtain root privileges. This vulnerability affects almost all Linux distributions since 2017 (kernel ~ 4.10), including Ubuntu, RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian, Fedora, etc. A public PoC has been released and signs of active exploitation have been observed.(CVE-2026-43284)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2605.3.0.0372.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race\n\n`packet_release()` has a race window where `NETDEV_UP` can re-register a\nsocket into a fanout group\u0026apos;s `arr[]` array. The re-registration is not\ncleaned up by `fanout_release()`, leaving a dangling pointer in the fanout\narray.\n`packet_release()` does NOT zero `po-\u0026gt;num` in its `bind_lock` section.\nAfter releasing `bind_lock`, `po-\u0026gt;num` is still non-zero and `po-\u0026gt;ifindex`\nstill matches the bound device. A concurrent `packet_notifier(NETDEV_UP)`\nthat already found the socket in `sklist` can re-register the hook.\nFor fanout sockets, this re-registration calls `__fanout_link(sk, po)`\nwhich adds the socket back into `f-\u0026gt;arr[]` and increments `f-\u0026gt;num_members`,\nbut does NOT increment `f-\u0026gt;sk_ref`.\n\nThe fix sets `po-\u0026gt;num` to zero in `packet_release` while `bind_lock` is\nheld to prevent NETDEV_UP from linking, preventing the race window.\n\nThis bug was found following an additional audit with Claude Code based\non CVE-2025-38617.(CVE-2026-31504)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]\n\nIssue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families,\nand that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated,\nthus possibly overfilling the skb.\n\nValidate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().\n\n[1]\n\nskbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:\u0026lt;NULL\u0026gt;\n kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 !\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline]\n skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655\n skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline]\n set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline]\n pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636\n km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848\n xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705\n xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150(CVE-2026-31515)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output\n\nThe AF_RXRPC procfs helpers format local and remote socket addresses into\nfixed 50-byte stack buffers with \u0026quot;%pISpc\u0026quot;.\n\nThat is too small for the longest current-tree IPv6-with-port form the\nformatter can produce. In lib/vsprintf.c, the compressed IPv6 path uses a\ndotted-quad tail not only for v4mapped addresses, but also for ISATAP\naddresses via ipv6_addr_is_isatap().\n\nAs a result, a case such as\n\n [ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:0:5efe:255.255.255.255]:65535\n\nis possible with the current formatter. That is 50 visible characters, so\n51 bytes including the trailing NUL, which does not fit in the existing\nchar[50] buffers used by net/rxrpc/proc.c.\n\nSize the buffers from the formatter\u0026apos;s maximum textual form and switch the\ncall sites to scnprintf().\n\nChanges since v1:\n- correct the changelog to cite the actual maximum current-tree case\n explicitly\n- frame the proof around the ISATAP formatting path instead of the earlier\n mapped-v4 example(CVE-2026-31630)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_unix: read UNIX_DIAG_VFS data under unix_state_lock\n\nExact UNIX diag lookups hold a reference to the socket, but not to\nu-\u0026gt;path. Meanwhile, unix_release_sock() clears u-\u0026gt;path under\nunix_state_lock() and drops the path reference after unlocking.\n\nRead the inode and device numbers for UNIX_DIAG_VFS while holding\nunix_state_lock(), then emit the netlink attribute after dropping the\nlock.\n\nThis keeps the VFS data stable while the reply is being built.(CVE-2026-31673)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ip6t_rt: reject oversized addrnr in rt_mt6_check()\n\nReject rt match rules whose addrnr exceeds IP6T_RT_HOPS.\n\nrt_mt6() expects addrnr to stay within the bounds of rtinfo-\u0026gt;addrs[].\nValidate addrnr during rule installation so malformed rules are rejected\nbefore the match logic can use an out-of-range value.(CVE-2026-31674)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: br_nd_send: linearize skb before parsing ND options\n\nbr_nd_send() parses neighbour discovery options from ns-\u0026gt;opt[] and\nassumes that these options are in the linear part of request.\n\nIts callers only guarantee that the ICMPv6 header and target address\nare available, so the option area can still be non-linear. Parsing\nns-\u0026gt;opt[] in that case can access data past the linear buffer.\n\nLinearize request before option parsing and derive ns from the linear\nnetwork header.(CVE-2026-31682)\n\nIn the Linux kernel xfrm/ESP (IPsec) subsystem, when appending pipe pages to network packets (skb) via zero-copy mechanisms such as splice() / MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, IPv4/IPv6 datagram paths are not correctly marked with the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG flag. The ESP receive path incorrectly treats these externally owned shared pages as private data, skipping the COW (copy-on-write) step and performing in-place decryption directly, allowing an attacker to pollute otherwise read-only pages in the page cache. Combined with CVE-2026-43500, a complete exploit chain can be formed, allowing local unprivileged users to obtain root privileges. This vulnerability affects almost all Linux distributions since 2017 (kernel ~ 4.10), including Ubuntu, RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian, Fedora, etc. A public PoC has been released and signs of active exploitation have been observed.(CVE-2026-43284)",
"id": "OESA-2026-2310",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:11:16Z",
"published": "2026-05-15T11:11:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2310"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31504"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31630"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31673"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31674"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31682"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43284"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-31504",
"CVE-2026-31515",
"CVE-2026-31630",
"CVE-2026-31673",
"CVE-2026-31674",
"CVE-2026-31682",
"CVE-2026-43284"
]
}
OESA-2026-2311 (CVE-2026-23317)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-05-15 11:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:11 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vmwgfx: Return the correct value in vmw_translate_ptr functions
Before the referenced fixes these functions used a lookup function that returned a pointer. This was changed to another lookup function that returned an error code with the pointer becoming an out parameter.
The error path when the lookup failed was not changed to reflect this change and the code continued to return the PTR_ERR of the now uninitialized pointer. This could cause the vmw_translate_ptr functions to return success when they actually failed causing further uninitialized and OOB accesses.(CVE-2026-23317)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFSD: Defer sub-object cleanup in export put callbacks
svc_export_put() calls path_put() and auth_domain_put() immediately when the last reference drops, before the RCU grace period. RCU readers in e_show() and c_show() access both ex_path (via seq_path/d_path) and ex_client->name (via seq_escape) without holding a reference. If cache_clean removes the entry and drops the last reference concurrently, the sub-objects are freed while still in use, producing a NULL pointer dereference in d_path.
Commit 2530766492ec ("nfsd: fix UAF when access ex_uuid or ex_stats") moved kfree of ex_uuid and ex_stats into the call_rcu callback, but left path_put() and auth_domain_put() running before the grace period because both may sleep and call_rcu callbacks execute in softirq context.
Replace call_rcu/kfree_rcu with queue_rcu_work(), which defers the callback until after the RCU grace period and executes it in process context where sleeping is permitted. This allows path_put() and auth_domain_put() to be moved into the deferred callback alongside the other resource releases. Apply the same fix to expkey_put(), which has the identical pattern with ek_path and ek_client.
A dedicated workqueue scopes the shutdown drain to only NFSD export release work items; flushing the shared system_unbound_wq would stall on unrelated work from other subsystems. nfsd_export_shutdown() uses rcu_barrier() followed by flush_workqueue() to ensure all deferred release callbacks complete before the export caches are destroyed.
Reviwed-by: Jeff Layton <(CVE-2026-31404)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: bonding: fix use-after-free in bond_xmit_broadcast()
bond_xmit_broadcast() reuses the original skb for the last slave (determined by bond_is_last_slave()) and clones it for others. Concurrent slave enslave/release can mutate the slave list during RCU-protected iteration, changing which slave is "last" mid-loop. This causes the original skb to be double-consumed (double-freed).
Replace the racy bond_is_last_slave() check with a simple index comparison (i + 1 == slaves_count) against the pre-snapshot slave count taken via READ_ONCE() before the loop. This preserves the zero-copy optimization for the last slave while making the "last" determination stable against concurrent list mutations.
The UAF can trigger the following crash:
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in skb_clone Read of size 8 at addr ffff888100ef8d40 by task exploit/147
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 147 Comm: exploit Not tainted 7.0.0-rc3+ #4 PREEMPTLAZY Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:379 mm/kasan/report.c:482) kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:597) skb_clone (include/linux/skbuff.h:1724 include/linux/skbuff.h:1792 include/linux/skbuff.h:3396 net/core/skbuff.c:2108) bond_xmit_broadcast (drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:5334) bond_start_xmit (drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:5567 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:5593) dev_hard_start_xmit (include/linux/netdevice.h:5325 include/linux/netdevice.h:5334 net/core/dev.c:3871 net/core/dev.c:3887) __dev_queue_xmit (include/linux/netdevice.h:3601 net/core/dev.c:4838) ip6_finish_output2 (include/net/neighbour.h:540 include/net/neighbour.h:554 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:136) ip6_finish_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:208 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:219) ip6_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:250) ip6_send_skb (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1985) udp_v6_send_skb (net/ipv6/udp.c:1442) udpv6_sendmsg (net/ipv6/udp.c:1733) __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:730 net/socket.c:742 net/socket.c:2206) __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2209) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) </TASK>
Allocated by task 147:
Freed by task 147:
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888100ef8c80 which belongs to the cache skbuff_head_cache of size 224 The buggy address is located 192 bytes inside of freed 224-byte region [ffff888100ef8c80, ffff888100ef8d60)
Memory state around the buggy address: ffff888100ef8c00: fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ffff888100ef8c80: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb >ffff888100ef8d00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc ^ ffff888100ef8d80: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff888100ef8e00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ==================================================================(CVE-2026-31419)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: idxd: Fix memory leak when a wq is reset
idxd_wq_disable_cleanup() which is called from the reset path for a workqueue, sets the wq type to NONE, which for other parts of the driver mean that the wq is empty (all its resources were released).
Only set the wq type to NONE after its resources are released.(CVE-2026-31441)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data
On the mkdir/mknod path, when mapping logical blocks to physical blocks, if inserting a new extent into the extent tree fails (in this example, because the file system disabled the huge file feature when marking the inode as dirty), ext4_ext_map_blocks() only calls ext4_free_blocks() to reclaim the physical block without deleting the corresponding data in the extent tree. This causes subsequent mkdir operations to reference the previously reclaimed physical block number again, even though this physical block is already being used by the xattr block. Therefore, a situation arises where both the directory and xattr are using the same buffer head block in memory simultaneously.
The above causes ext4_xattr_block_set() to enter an infinite loop about "inserted" and cannot release the inode lock, ultimately leading to the 143s blocking problem mentioned in [1].
If the metadata is corrupted, then trying to remove some extent space can do even more harm. Also in case EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE was passed, remove space wrongly update quota information. Jan Kara suggests distinguishing between two cases:
1) The error is ENOSPC or EDQUOT - in this case the filesystem is fully consistent and we must maintain its consistency including all the accounting. However these errors can happen only early before we've inserted the extent into the extent tree. So current code works correctly for this case.
2) Some other error - this means metadata is corrupted. We should strive to do as few modifications as possible to limit damage. So I'd just skip freeing of allocated blocks.
[1] INFO: task syz.0.17:5995 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Call Trace: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:1073 [inline] __start_dirop fs/namei.c:2923 [inline] start_dirop fs/namei.c:2934 inline
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: do not expire session on binding failure
When a multichannel session binding request fails (e.g. wrong password), the error path unconditionally sets sess->state = SMB2_SESSION_EXPIRED. However, during binding, sess points to the target session looked up via ksmbd_session_lookup_slowpath() -- which belongs to another connection's user. This allows a remote attacker to invalidate any active session by simply sending a binding request with a wrong password (DoS).
Fix this by skipping session expiration when the failed request was a binding attempt, since the session does not belong to the current connection. The reference taken by ksmbd_session_lookup_slowpath() is still correctly released via ksmbd_user_session_put().(CVE-2026-31476)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race
packet_release() has a race window where NETDEV_UP can re-register a
socket into a fanout group's arr[] array. The re-registration is not
cleaned up by fanout_release(), leaving a dangling pointer in the fanout
array.
packet_release() does NOT zero po->num in its bind_lock section.
After releasing bind_lock, po->num is still non-zero and po->ifindex
still matches the bound device. A concurrent packet_notifier(NETDEV_UP)
that already found the socket in sklist can re-register the hook.
For fanout sockets, this re-registration calls __fanout_link(sk, po)
which adds the socket back into f->arr[] and increments f->num_members,
but does NOT increment f->sk_ref.
The fix sets po->num to zero in packet_release while bind_lock is
held to prevent NETDEV_UP from linking, preventing the race window.
This bug was found following an additional audit with Claude Code based on CVE-2025-38617.(CVE-2026-31504)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()
syzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]
Issue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families, and that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated, thus possibly overfilling the skb.
Validate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().
[1]
skbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:<NULL> kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 ! Call Trace: <TASK> skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline] skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655 skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline] set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline] pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636 km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848 xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705 xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150(CVE-2026-31515)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
module: Fix kernel panic when a symbol st_shndx is out of bounds
The module loader doesn't check for bounds of the ELF section index in simplify_symbols():
for (i = 1; i < symsec->sh_size / sizeof(Elf_Sym); i++) {
const char *name = info->strtab + sym[i].st_name;
switch (sym[i].st_shndx) {
case SHN_COMMON:
[...]
default:
/* Divert to percpu allocation if a percpu var. */
if (sym[i].st_shndx == info->index.pcpu)
secbase = (unsigned long)mod_percpu(mod);
else
/ HERE --> / secbase = info->sechdrs[sym[i].st_shndx].sh_addr; sym[i].st_value += secbase; break; } }
A symbol with an out-of-bounds st_shndx value, for example 0xffff (known as SHN_XINDEX or SHN_HIRESERVE), may cause a kernel panic:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ... RIP: 0010:simplify_symbols+0x2b2/0x480 ... Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
This can happen when module ELF is legitimately using SHN_XINDEX or when it is corrupted.
Add a bounds check in simplify_symbols() to validate that st_shndx is within the valid range before using it.
This issue was discovered due to a bug in llvm-objcopy, see relevant discussion for details [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-modules/(CVE-2026-31521)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-pci: ensure we're polling a polled queue
A user can change the polled queue count at run time. There's a brief window during a reset where a hipri task may try to poll that queue before the block layer has updated the queue maps, which would race with the now interrupt driven queue and may cause double completions.(CVE-2026-31523)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
futex: Clear stale exiting pointer in futex_lock_pi() retry path
Fuzzying/stressing futexes triggered:
WARNING: kernel/futex/core.c:825 at wait_for_owner_exiting+0x7a/0x80, CPU#11: futex_lock_pi_s/524
When futex_lock_pi_atomic() sees the owner is exiting, it returns -EBUSY and stores a refcounted task pointer in 'exiting'.
After wait_for_owner_exiting() consumes that reference, the local pointer is never reset to nil. Upon a retry, if futex_lock_pi_atomic() returns a different error, the bogus pointer is passed to wait_for_owner_exiting().
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 futex_lock_pi(uaddr) // acquires the PI futex exit() futex_cleanup_begin() futex_state = EXITING; futex_lock_pi(uaddr) futex_lock_pi_atomic() attach_to_pi_owner() // observes EXITING exiting = owner; // takes ref return -EBUSY wait_for_owner_exiting(-EBUSY, owner) put_task_struct(); // drops ref // exiting still points to owner goto retry; futex_lock_pi_atomic() lock_pi_update_atomic() cmpxchg(uaddr) uaddr ^= WAITERS // whatever // value changed return -EAGAIN; wait_for_owner_exiting(-EAGAIN, exiting) // stale WARN_ON_ONCE(exiting)
Fix this by resetting upon retry, essentially aligning it with requeue_pi.(CVE-2026-31555)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spi: spi-dw-dma: fix print error log when wait finish transaction
If an error occurs, the device may not have a current message. In this case, the system will crash.
In this case, it's better to use dev from the struct ctlr (struct spi_controller*).(CVE-2026-31560)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: SEV: Protect all of sev_mem_enc_register_region() with kvm->lock
Take and hold kvm->lock for before checking sev_guest() in sev_mem_enc_register_region(), as sev_guest() isn't stable unless kvm->lock is held (or KVM can guarantee KVM_SEV_INIT{2} has completed and can't rollack state). If KVM_SEV_INIT{2} fails, KVM can end up trying to add to a not-yet-initialized sev->regions_list, e.g. triggering a #GP
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 110 UID: 0 PID: 72717 Comm: syz.15.11462 Tainted: G U W O 6.16.0-smp-DEV #1 NONE Tainted: [U]=USER, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 12.52.0-0 10/28/2024 RIP: 0010:sev_mem_enc_register_region+0x3f0/0x4f0 ../include/linux/list.h:83 Code: <41> 80 3c 04 00 74 08 4c 89 ff e8 f1 c7 a2 00 49 39 ed 0f 84 c6 00 RSP: 0018:ffff88838647fbb8 EFLAGS: 00010256 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 1ffff92015cf1e0b RCX: dffffc0000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffff888367870000 RBP: ffffc900ae78f050 R08: ffffea000d9e0007 R09: 1ffffd4001b3c000 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff94001b3c001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff8982ab0bde00 R14: ffffc900ae78f058 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f34e9dc66c0(0000) GS:ffff89ee64d33000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe180adef98 CR3: 000000047210e000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_arch_vm_ioctl+0xa72/0x1240 ../arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:7371 kvm_vm_ioctl+0x649/0x990 ../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:5363 __se_sys_ioctl+0x101/0x170 ../fs/ioctl.c:51 do_syscall_x64 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x1f0 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f34e9f7e9a9 Code: <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f34e9dc6038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f34ea1a6080 RCX: 00007f34e9f7e9a9 RDX: 0000200000000280 RSI: 000000008010aebb RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 00007f34ea000d69 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f34ea1a6080 R15: 00007ffce77197a8 </TASK>
with a syzlang reproducer that looks like:
syz_kvm_add_vcpu$x86(0x0, &(0x7f0000000040)={0x0, &(0x7f0000000180)=ANY=[], 0x70}) (async) syz_kvm_add_vcpu$x86(0x0, &(0x7f0000000080)={0x0, &(0x7f0000000180)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="..."], 0x4f}) (async) r0 = openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000200), 0x0, 0x0) r1 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VM(r0, 0xae01, 0x0) r2 = openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000240), 0x0, 0x0) r3 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VM(r2, 0xae01, 0x0) ioctl$KVM_SET_CLOCK(r3, 0xc008aeba, &(0x7f0000000040)={0x1, 0x8, 0x0, 0x5625e9b0}) (async) ioctl$KVM_SET_PIT2(r3, 0x8010aebb, &(0x7f0000000280)={[...], 0x5}) (async) ioctl$KVM_SET_PIT2(r1, 0x4070aea0, 0x0) (async) r4 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VM(0xffffffffffffffff, 0xae01, 0x0) openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) (async) ioctl$KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION(r4, 0x4020ae46, &(0x7f0000000400)={0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x2000, &(0x7f0000001000/0x2000)=nil}) (async) r5 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VCPU(r4, 0xae41, 0x2) close(r0) (async) openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000000), 0x8000, 0x0) (async) ioctl$KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG(r5, 0x4048ae9b, &(0x7f0000000300)={0x4376ea830d46549b, 0x0, [0x46, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1000]}) (async) ioctl$KVM_RUN(r5, 0xae80, 0x0)
Opportunistically use guard() to avoid having to define a new error label and goto usage.(CVE-2026-31592)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/CPU: Fix FPDSS on Zen1
Zen1's hardware divider can leave, under certain circumstances, partial results from previous operations. Those results can be leaked by another, attacker thread.
Fix that with a chicken bit.(CVE-2026-31628)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output
The AF_RXRPC procfs helpers format local and remote socket addresses into fixed 50-byte stack buffers with "%pISpc".
That is too small for the longest current-tree IPv6-with-port form the formatter can produce. In lib/vsprintf.c, the compressed IPv6 path uses a dotted-quad tail not only for v4mapped addresses, but also for ISATAP addresses via ipv6_addr_is_isatap().
As a result, a case such as
is possible with the current formatter. That is 50 visible characters, so 51 bytes including the trailing NUL, which does not fit in the existing char[50] buffers used by net/rxrpc/proc.c.
Size the buffers from the formatter's maximum textual form and switch the call sites to scnprintf().
Changes since v1: - correct the changelog to cite the actual maximum current-tree case explicitly - frame the proof around the ISATAP formatting path instead of the earlier mapped-v4 example(CVE-2026-31630)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Input: uinput - fix circular locking dependency with ff-core
A lockdep circular locking dependency warning can be triggered reproducibly when using a force-feedback gamepad with uinput (for example, playing ELDEN RING under Wine with a Flydigi Vader 5 controller):
ff->mutex -> udev->mutex -> input_mutex -> dev->mutex -> ff->mutex
The cycle is caused by four lock acquisition paths:
-
ff upload: input_ff_upload() holds ff->mutex and calls uinput_dev_upload_effect() -> uinput_request_submit() -> uinput_request_send(), which acquires udev->mutex.
-
device create: uinput_ioctl_handler() holds udev->mutex and calls uinput_create_device() -> input_register_device(), which acquires input_mutex.
-
device register: input_register_device() holds input_mutex and calls kbd_connect() -> input_register_handle(), which acquires dev->mutex.
-
evdev release: evdev_release() calls input_flush_device() under dev->mutex, which calls input_ff_flush() acquiring ff->mutex.
Fix this by introducing a new state_lock spinlock to protect udev->state and udev->dev access in uinput_request_send() instead of acquiring udev->mutex. The function only needs to atomically check device state and queue an input event into the ring buffer via uinput_dev_event() -- both operations are safe under a spinlock (ktime_get_ts64() and wake_up_interruptible() do not sleep). This breaks the ff->mutex -> udev->mutex link since a spinlock is a leaf in the lock ordering and cannot form cycles with mutexes.
To keep state transitions visible to uinput_request_send(), protect writes to udev->state in uinput_create_device() and uinput_destroy_device() with the same state_lock spinlock.
Additionally, move init_completion(&request->done) from uinput_request_send() to uinput_request_submit() before uinput_request_reserve_slot(). Once the slot is allocated, uinput_flush_requests() may call complete() on it at any time from the destroy path, so the completion must be initialised before the request becomes visible.
Lock ordering after the fix:
ff->mutex -> state_lock (spinlock, leaf) udev->mutex -> state_lock (spinlock, leaf) udev->mutex -> input_mutex -> dev->mutex -> ff->mutex (no back-edge)(CVE-2026-31667)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_unix: read UNIX_DIAG_VFS data under unix_state_lock
Exact UNIX diag lookups hold a reference to the socket, but not to u->path. Meanwhile, unix_release_sock() clears u->path under unix_state_lock() and drops the path reference after unlocking.
Read the inode and device numbers for UNIX_DIAG_VFS while holding unix_state_lock(), then emit the netlink attribute after dropping the lock.
This keeps the VFS data stable while the reply is being built.(CVE-2026-31673)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ip6t_rt: reject oversized addrnr in rt_mt6_check()
Reject rt match rules whose addrnr exceeds IP6T_RT_HOPS.
rt_mt6() expects addrnr to stay within the bounds of rtinfo->addrs[]. Validate addrnr during rule installation so malformed rules are rejected before the match logic can use an out-of-range value.(CVE-2026-31674)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
openvswitch: validate MPLS set/set_masked payload length
validate_set() accepted OVS_KEY_ATTR_MPLS as variable-sized payload for SET/SET_MASKED actions. In action handling, OVS expects fixed-size MPLS key data (struct ovs_key_mpls).
Use the already normalized key_len (masked case included) and reject non-matching MPLS action key sizes.
Reject invalid MPLS action payload lengths early.(CVE-2026-31679)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bridge: br_nd_send: linearize skb before parsing ND options
br_nd_send() parses neighbour discovery options from ns->opt[] and assumes that these options are in the linear part of request.
Its callers only guarantee that the ICMPv6 header and target address are available, so the option area can still be non-linear. Parsing ns->opt[] in that case can access data past the linear buffer.
Linearize request before option parsing and derive ns from the linear network header.(CVE-2026-31682)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: ccp: Don't attempt to copy ID to userspace if PSP command failed
When retrieving the ID for the CPU, don't attempt to copy the ID blob to userspace if the firmware command failed. If the failure was due to an invalid length, i.e. the userspace buffer+length was too small, copying the number of bytes firmware requires will overflow the kernel-allocated buffer and leak data to userspace.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26 Read of size 64 at addr ffff8881867f5960 by task syz.0.906/24388
CPU: 130 UID: 0 PID: 24388 Comm: syz.0.906 Tainted: G U O 7.0.0-smp-DEV #28 PREEMPTLAZY Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 12.62.0-0 11/19/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x110 ../lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description ../mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xbc/0x260 ../mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0xa2/0xe0 ../mm/kasan/report.c:595 check_region_inline ../mm/kasan/generic.c:-1 [inline] kasan_check_range+0x264/0x2c0 ../mm/kasan/generic.c:200 instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline] _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline] _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26 copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:236 [inline] sev_ioctl_do_get_id2+0x361/0x490 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2222 sev_ioctl+0x25f/0x490 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2575 vfs_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x11d/0x1b0 ../fs/ioctl.c:583 do_syscall_x64 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x800 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e </TASK>
WARN if the driver says the command succeeded, but the firmware error code says otherwise, as __sev_do_cmd_locked() is expected to return -EIO on any firwmware error.(CVE-2026-31697)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: ccp: Don't attempt to copy PDH cert to userspace if PSP command failed
When retrieving the PDH cert, don't attempt to copy the blobs to userspace if the firmware command failed. If the failure was due to an invalid length, i.e. the userspace buffer+length was too small, copying the number of bytes firmware requires will overflow the kernel-allocated buffer and leak data to userspace.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26 Read of size 2084 at addr ffff8885c4ab8aa0 by task syz.0.186/21033
CPU: 51 UID: 0 PID: 21033 Comm: syz.0.186 Tainted: G U O 7.0.0-smp-DEV #28 PREEMPTLAZY Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 34.84.12-0 11/17/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x110 ../lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description ../mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xbc/0x260 ../mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0xa2/0xe0 ../mm/kasan/report.c:595 check_region_inline ../mm/kasan/generic.c:-1 [inline] kasan_check_range+0x264/0x2c0 ../mm/kasan/generic.c:200 instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline] _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline] _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26 copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:236 [inline] sev_ioctl_do_pdh_export+0x3d3/0x7c0 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2347 sev_ioctl+0x2a2/0x490 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2568 vfs_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x11d/0x1b0 ../fs/ioctl.c:583 do_syscall_x64 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x800 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e </TASK>
WARN if the driver says the command succeeded, but the firmware error code says otherwise, as __sev_do_cmd_locked() is expected to return -EIO on any firwmware error.(CVE-2026-31698)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: ccp: Don't attempt to copy CSR to userspace if PSP command failed
When retrieving the PEK CSR, don't attempt to copy the blob to userspace if the firmware command failed. If the failure was due to an invalid length, i.e. the userspace buffer+length was too small, copying the number of bytes firmware requires will overflow the kernel-allocated buffer and leak data to userspace.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26 Read of size 2084 at addr ffff898144612e20 by task syz.9.219/21405
CPU: 14 UID: 0 PID: 21405 Comm: syz.9.219 Tainted: G U O 7.0.0-smp-DEV #28 PREEMPTLAZY Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 12.62.0-0 11/19/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x110 ../lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description ../mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xbc/0x260 ../mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0xa2/0xe0 ../mm/kasan/report.c:595 check_region_inline ../mm/kasan/generic.c:-1 [inline] kasan_check_range+0x264/0x2c0 ../mm/kasan/generic.c:200 instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline] _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline] _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26 copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:236 [inline] sev_ioctl_do_pek_csr+0x31f/0x590 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:1872 sev_ioctl+0x3a4/0x490 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2562 vfs_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x11d/0x1b0 ../fs/ioctl.c:583 do_syscall_x64 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x800 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e </TASK>
WARN if the driver says the command succeeded, but the firmware error code says otherwise, as __sev_do_cmd_locked() is expected to return -EIO on any firwmware error.(CVE-2026-31699)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: SMP: derive legacy responder STK authentication from MITM state
The legacy responder path in smp_random() currently labels the stored STK as authenticated whenever pending_sec_level is BT_SECURITY_HIGH. That reflects what the local service requested, not what the pairing flow actually achieved.
For Just Works/Confirm legacy pairing, SMP_FLAG_MITM_AUTH stays clear and the resulting STK should remain unauthenticated even if the local side requested HIGH security. Use the established MITM state when storing the responder STK so the key metadata matches the pairing result.
This also keeps the legacy path aligned with the Secure Connections code, which already treats JUST_WORKS/JUST_CFM as unauthenticated.(CVE-2026-31773)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xen/privcmd: fix double free via VMA splitting
privcmd_vm_ops defines .close (privcmd_close), but neither .may_split nor .open. When userspace does a partial munmap() on a privcmd mapping, the kernel splits the VMA via __split_vma(). Since may_split is NULL, the split is allowed. vm_area_dup() copies vm_private_data (a pages array allocated in alloc_empty_pages()) into the new VMA without any fixup, because there is no .open callback.
Both VMAs now point to the same pages array. When the unmapped portion is closed, privcmd_close() calls: - xen_unmap_domain_gfn_range() - xen_free_unpopulated_pages() - kvfree(pages)
The surviving VMA still holds the dangling pointer. When it is later destroyed, the same sequence runs again, which leads to a double free.
Fix this issue by adding a .may_split callback denying the VMA split.
This is XSA-487 / CVE-2026-31787(CVE-2026-31787)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: MGMT: validate LTK enc_size on load
Load Long Term Keys stores the user-provided enc_size and later uses it to size fixed-size stack operations when replying to LE LTK requests. An enc_size larger than the 16-byte key buffer can therefore overflow the reply stack buffer.
Reject oversized enc_size values while validating the management LTK record so invalid keys never reach the stored key state.(CVE-2026-43020)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: logitech-hidpp: Prevent use-after-free on force feedback initialisation failure
Presently, if the force feedback initialisation fails when probing the Logitech G920 Driving Force Racing Wheel for Xbox One, an error number will be returned and propagated before the userspace infrastructure (sysfs and /dev/input) has been torn down. If userspace ignores the errors and continues to use its references to these dangling entities, a UAF will promptly follow.
We have 2 options; continue to return the error, but ensure that all of the infrastructure is torn down accordingly or continue to treat this condition as a warning by emitting the message but returning success. It is thought that the original author's intention was to emit the warning but keep the device functional, less the force feedback feature, so let's go with that.(CVE-2026-43049)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: idxd: Fix not releasing workqueue on .release()
The workqueue associated with an DSA/IAA device is not released when the object is freed.(CVE-2026-43064)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/x86/intel/uncore: Skip discovery table for offline dies
This warning can be triggered if NUMA is disabled and the system boots with fewer CPUs than the number of CPUs in die 0.
WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 7257 at uncore.c:1157 uncore_pci_pmu_register+0x136/0x160 [intel_uncore]
Currently, the discovery table continues to be parsed even if all CPUs in the associated die are offline. This can lead to an array overflow at "pmu->boxes[die] = box" in uncore_pci_pmu_register(), which may trigger the warning above or cause other issues.(CVE-2026-43079)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pstore: ram_core: fix incorrect success return when vmap() fails
In persistent_ram_vmap(), vmap() may return NULL on failure.
If offset is non-zero, adding offset_in_page(start) causes the function to return a non-NULL pointer even though the mapping failed. persistent_ram_buffer_map() therefore incorrectly returns success.
Subsequent access to prz->buffer may dereference an invalid address and cause crashes.
Add proper NULL checking for vmap() failures.(CVE-2026-43124)
In the Linux kernel xfrm/ESP (IPsec) subsystem, when appending pipe pages to network packets (skb) via zero-copy mechanisms such as splice() / MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, IPv4/IPv6 datagram paths are not correctly marked with the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG flag. The ESP receive path incorrectly treats these externally owned shared pages as private data, skipping the COW (copy-on-write) step and performing in-place decryption directly, allowing an attacker to pollute otherwise read-only pages in the page cache. Combined with CVE-2026-43500, a complete exploit chain can be formed, allowing local unprivileged users to obtain root privileges. This vulnerability affects almost all Linux distributions since 2017 (kernel ~ 4.10), including Ubuntu, RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian, Fedora, etc. A public PoC has been released and signs of active exploitation have been observed.(CVE-2026-43284)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-314.0.0.217.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/vmwgfx: Return the correct value in vmw_translate_ptr functions\n\nBefore the referenced fixes these functions used a lookup function that\nreturned a pointer. This was changed to another lookup function that\nreturned an error code with the pointer becoming an out parameter.\n\nThe error path when the lookup failed was not changed to reflect this\nchange and the code continued to return the PTR_ERR of the now\nuninitialized pointer. This could cause the vmw_translate_ptr functions\nto return success when they actually failed causing further uninitialized\nand OOB accesses.(CVE-2026-23317)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFSD: Defer sub-object cleanup in export put callbacks\n\nsvc_export_put() calls path_put() and auth_domain_put() immediately\nwhen the last reference drops, before the RCU grace period. RCU\nreaders in e_show() and c_show() access both ex_path (via\nseq_path/d_path) and ex_client-\u0026gt;name (via seq_escape) without\nholding a reference. If cache_clean removes the entry and drops the\nlast reference concurrently, the sub-objects are freed while still\nin use, producing a NULL pointer dereference in d_path.\n\nCommit 2530766492ec (\u0026quot;nfsd: fix UAF when access ex_uuid or\nex_stats\u0026quot;) moved kfree of ex_uuid and ex_stats into the\ncall_rcu callback, but left path_put() and auth_domain_put() running\nbefore the grace period because both may sleep and call_rcu\ncallbacks execute in softirq context.\n\nReplace call_rcu/kfree_rcu with queue_rcu_work(), which defers the\ncallback until after the RCU grace period and executes it in process\ncontext where sleeping is permitted. This allows path_put() and\nauth_domain_put() to be moved into the deferred callback alongside\nthe other resource releases. Apply the same fix to expkey_put(),\nwhich has the identical pattern with ek_path and ek_client.\n\nA dedicated workqueue scopes the shutdown drain to only NFSD\nexport release work items; flushing the shared\nsystem_unbound_wq would stall on unrelated work from other\nsubsystems. nfsd_export_shutdown() uses rcu_barrier() followed\nby flush_workqueue() to ensure all deferred release callbacks\ncomplete before the export caches are destroyed.\n\nReviwed-by: Jeff Layton \u0026lt;(CVE-2026-31404)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: bonding: fix use-after-free in bond_xmit_broadcast()\n\nbond_xmit_broadcast() reuses the original skb for the last slave\n(determined by bond_is_last_slave()) and clones it for others.\nConcurrent slave enslave/release can mutate the slave list during\nRCU-protected iteration, changing which slave is \u0026quot;last\u0026quot; mid-loop.\nThis causes the original skb to be double-consumed (double-freed).\n\nReplace the racy bond_is_last_slave() check with a simple index\ncomparison (i + 1 == slaves_count) against the pre-snapshot slave\ncount taken via READ_ONCE() before the loop. This preserves the\nzero-copy optimization for the last slave while making the \u0026quot;last\u0026quot;\ndetermination stable against concurrent list mutations.\n\nThe UAF can trigger the following crash:\n\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in skb_clone\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff888100ef8d40 by task exploit/147\n\nCPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 147 Comm: exploit Not tainted 7.0.0-rc3+ #4 PREEMPTLAZY\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)\n print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:379 mm/kasan/report.c:482)\n kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:597)\n skb_clone (include/linux/skbuff.h:1724 include/linux/skbuff.h:1792 include/linux/skbuff.h:3396 net/core/skbuff.c:2108)\n bond_xmit_broadcast (drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:5334)\n bond_start_xmit (drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:5567 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:5593)\n dev_hard_start_xmit (include/linux/netdevice.h:5325 include/linux/netdevice.h:5334 net/core/dev.c:3871 net/core/dev.c:3887)\n __dev_queue_xmit (include/linux/netdevice.h:3601 net/core/dev.c:4838)\n ip6_finish_output2 (include/net/neighbour.h:540 include/net/neighbour.h:554 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:136)\n ip6_finish_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:208 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:219)\n ip6_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:250)\n ip6_send_skb (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1985)\n udp_v6_send_skb (net/ipv6/udp.c:1442)\n udpv6_sendmsg (net/ipv6/udp.c:1733)\n __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:730 net/socket.c:742 net/socket.c:2206)\n __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2209)\n do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nAllocated by task 147:\n\nFreed by task 147:\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888100ef8c80\n which belongs to the cache skbuff_head_cache of size 224\nThe buggy address is located 192 bytes inside of\n freed 224-byte region [ffff888100ef8c80, ffff888100ef8d60)\n\nMemory state around the buggy address:\n ffff888100ef8c00: fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n ffff888100ef8c80: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n\u0026gt;ffff888100ef8d00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc\n ^\n ffff888100ef8d80: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ffff888100ef8e00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n==================================================================(CVE-2026-31419)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndmaengine: idxd: Fix memory leak when a wq is reset\n\nidxd_wq_disable_cleanup() which is called from the reset path for a\nworkqueue, sets the wq type to NONE, which for other parts of the\ndriver mean that the wq is empty (all its resources were released).\n\nOnly set the wq type to NONE after its resources are released.(CVE-2026-31441)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data\n\nOn the mkdir/mknod path, when mapping logical blocks to physical blocks,\nif inserting a new extent into the extent tree fails (in this example,\nbecause the file system disabled the huge file feature when marking the\ninode as dirty), ext4_ext_map_blocks() only calls ext4_free_blocks() to\nreclaim the physical block without deleting the corresponding data in\nthe extent tree. This causes subsequent mkdir operations to reference\nthe previously reclaimed physical block number again, even though this\nphysical block is already being used by the xattr block. Therefore, a\nsituation arises where both the directory and xattr are using the same\nbuffer head block in memory simultaneously.\n\nThe above causes ext4_xattr_block_set() to enter an infinite loop about\n\u0026quot;inserted\u0026quot; and cannot release the inode lock, ultimately leading to the\n143s blocking problem mentioned in [1].\n\nIf the metadata is corrupted, then trying to remove some extent space\ncan do even more harm. Also in case EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE\nwas passed, remove space wrongly update quota information.\nJan Kara suggests distinguishing between two cases:\n\n1) The error is ENOSPC or EDQUOT - in this case the filesystem is fully\nconsistent and we must maintain its consistency including all the\naccounting. However these errors can happen only early before we\u0026apos;ve\ninserted the extent into the extent tree. So current code works correctly\nfor this case.\n\n2) Some other error - this means metadata is corrupted. We should strive to\ndo as few modifications as possible to limit damage. So I\u0026apos;d just skip\nfreeing of allocated blocks.\n\n[1]\nINFO: task syz.0.17:5995 blocked for more than 143 seconds.\nCall Trace:\n inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:1073 [inline]\n __start_dirop fs/namei.c:2923 [inline]\n start_dirop fs/namei.c:2934 [inline](CVE-2026-31448)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: do not expire session on binding failure\n\nWhen a multichannel session binding request fails (e.g. wrong password),\nthe error path unconditionally sets sess-\u0026gt;state = SMB2_SESSION_EXPIRED.\nHowever, during binding, sess points to the target session looked up via\nksmbd_session_lookup_slowpath() -- which belongs to another connection\u0026apos;s\nuser. This allows a remote attacker to invalidate any active session by\nsimply sending a binding request with a wrong password (DoS).\n\nFix this by skipping session expiration when the failed request was\na binding attempt, since the session does not belong to the current\nconnection. The reference taken by ksmbd_session_lookup_slowpath() is\nstill correctly released via ksmbd_user_session_put().(CVE-2026-31476)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race\n\n`packet_release()` has a race window where `NETDEV_UP` can re-register a\nsocket into a fanout group\u0026apos;s `arr[]` array. The re-registration is not\ncleaned up by `fanout_release()`, leaving a dangling pointer in the fanout\narray.\n`packet_release()` does NOT zero `po-\u0026gt;num` in its `bind_lock` section.\nAfter releasing `bind_lock`, `po-\u0026gt;num` is still non-zero and `po-\u0026gt;ifindex`\nstill matches the bound device. A concurrent `packet_notifier(NETDEV_UP)`\nthat already found the socket in `sklist` can re-register the hook.\nFor fanout sockets, this re-registration calls `__fanout_link(sk, po)`\nwhich adds the socket back into `f-\u0026gt;arr[]` and increments `f-\u0026gt;num_members`,\nbut does NOT increment `f-\u0026gt;sk_ref`.\n\nThe fix sets `po-\u0026gt;num` to zero in `packet_release` while `bind_lock` is\nheld to prevent NETDEV_UP from linking, preventing the race window.\n\nThis bug was found following an additional audit with Claude Code based\non CVE-2025-38617.(CVE-2026-31504)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]\n\nIssue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families,\nand that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated,\nthus possibly overfilling the skb.\n\nValidate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().\n\n[1]\n\nskbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:\u0026lt;NULL\u0026gt;\n kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 !\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline]\n skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655\n skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline]\n set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline]\n pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636\n km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848\n xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705\n xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150(CVE-2026-31515)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmodule: Fix kernel panic when a symbol st_shndx is out of bounds\n\nThe module loader doesn\u0026apos;t check for bounds of the ELF section index in\nsimplify_symbols():\n\n for (i = 1; i \u0026lt; symsec-\u0026gt;sh_size / sizeof(Elf_Sym); i++) {\n\t\tconst char *name = info-\u0026gt;strtab + sym[i].st_name;\n\n\t\tswitch (sym[i].st_shndx) {\n\t\tcase SHN_COMMON:\n\n\t\t[...]\n\n\t\tdefault:\n\t\t\t/* Divert to percpu allocation if a percpu var. */\n\t\t\tif (sym[i].st_shndx == info-\u0026gt;index.pcpu)\n\t\t\t\tsecbase = (unsigned long)mod_percpu(mod);\n\t\t\telse\n /** HERE --\u0026gt; **/\t\tsecbase = info-\u0026gt;sechdrs[sym[i].st_shndx].sh_addr;\n\t\t\tsym[i].st_value += secbase;\n\t\t\tbreak;\n\t\t}\n\t}\n\nA symbol with an out-of-bounds st_shndx value, for example 0xffff\n(known as SHN_XINDEX or SHN_HIRESERVE), may cause a kernel panic:\n\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ...\n RIP: 0010:simplify_symbols+0x2b2/0x480\n ...\n Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception\n\nThis can happen when module ELF is legitimately using SHN_XINDEX or\nwhen it is corrupted.\n\nAdd a bounds check in simplify_symbols() to validate that st_shndx is\nwithin the valid range before using it.\n\nThis issue was discovered due to a bug in llvm-objcopy, see relevant\ndiscussion for details [1].\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-modules/(CVE-2026-31521)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvme-pci: ensure we\u0026apos;re polling a polled queue\n\nA user can change the polled queue count at run time. There\u0026apos;s a brief\nwindow during a reset where a hipri task may try to poll that queue\nbefore the block layer has updated the queue maps, which would race with\nthe now interrupt driven queue and may cause double completions.(CVE-2026-31523)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfutex: Clear stale exiting pointer in futex_lock_pi() retry path\n\nFuzzying/stressing futexes triggered:\n\n WARNING: kernel/futex/core.c:825 at wait_for_owner_exiting+0x7a/0x80, CPU#11: futex_lock_pi_s/524\n\nWhen futex_lock_pi_atomic() sees the owner is exiting, it returns -EBUSY\nand stores a refcounted task pointer in \u0026apos;exiting\u0026apos;.\n\nAfter wait_for_owner_exiting() consumes that reference, the local pointer\nis never reset to nil. Upon a retry, if futex_lock_pi_atomic() returns a\ndifferent error, the bogus pointer is passed to wait_for_owner_exiting().\n\n CPU0\t\t\t CPU1\t\t CPU2\n futex_lock_pi(uaddr)\n // acquires the PI futex\n exit()\n futex_cleanup_begin()\n futex_state = EXITING;\n\t\t\t futex_lock_pi(uaddr)\n\t\t\t futex_lock_pi_atomic()\n\t\t\t\t attach_to_pi_owner()\n\t\t\t\t // observes EXITING\n\t\t\t\t *exiting = owner; // takes ref\n\t\t\t\t return -EBUSY\n\t\t\t wait_for_owner_exiting(-EBUSY, owner)\n\t\t\t\t put_task_struct(); // drops ref\n\t\t\t // exiting still points to owner\n\t\t\t goto retry;\n\t\t\t futex_lock_pi_atomic()\n\t\t\t\t lock_pi_update_atomic()\n\t\t\t\t cmpxchg(uaddr)\n\t\t\t\t\t*uaddr ^= WAITERS // whatever\n\t\t\t\t // value changed\n\t\t\t\t return -EAGAIN;\n\t\t\t wait_for_owner_exiting(-EAGAIN, exiting) // stale\n\t\t\t\t WARN_ON_ONCE(exiting)\n\nFix this by resetting upon retry, essentially aligning it with requeue_pi.(CVE-2026-31555)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nspi: spi-dw-dma: fix print error log when wait finish transaction\n\nIf an error occurs, the device may not have a current message. In this\ncase, the system will crash.\n\nIn this case, it\u0026apos;s better to use dev from the struct ctlr (struct spi_controller*).(CVE-2026-31560)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: SEV: Protect *all* of sev_mem_enc_register_region() with kvm-\u0026gt;lock\n\nTake and hold kvm-\u0026gt;lock for before checking sev_guest() in\nsev_mem_enc_register_region(), as sev_guest() isn\u0026apos;t stable unless kvm-\u0026gt;lock\nis held (or KVM can guarantee KVM_SEV_INIT{2} has completed and can\u0026apos;t\nrollack state). If KVM_SEV_INIT{2} fails, KVM can end up trying to add to\na not-yet-initialized sev-\u0026gt;regions_list, e.g. triggering a #GP\n\n Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI\n KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\n CPU: 110 UID: 0 PID: 72717 Comm: syz.15.11462 Tainted: G U W O 6.16.0-smp-DEV #1 NONE\n Tainted: [U]=USER, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE\n Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 12.52.0-0 10/28/2024\n RIP: 0010:sev_mem_enc_register_region+0x3f0/0x4f0 ../include/linux/list.h:83\n Code: \u0026lt;41\u0026gt; 80 3c 04 00 74 08 4c 89 ff e8 f1 c7 a2 00 49 39 ed 0f 84 c6 00\n RSP: 0018:ffff88838647fbb8 EFLAGS: 00010256\n RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 1ffff92015cf1e0b RCX: dffffc0000000000\n RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffff888367870000\n RBP: ffffc900ae78f050 R08: ffffea000d9e0007 R09: 1ffffd4001b3c000\n R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff94001b3c001 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: ffff8982ab0bde00 R14: ffffc900ae78f058 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 00007f34e9dc66c0(0000) GS:ffff89ee64d33000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007fe180adef98 CR3: 000000047210e000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_arch_vm_ioctl+0xa72/0x1240 ../arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:7371\n kvm_vm_ioctl+0x649/0x990 ../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:5363\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x101/0x170 ../fs/ioctl.c:51\n do_syscall_x64 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x1f0 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n RIP: 0033:0x7f34e9f7e9a9\n Code: \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\n RSP: 002b:00007f34e9dc6038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f34ea1a6080 RCX: 00007f34e9f7e9a9\n RDX: 0000200000000280 RSI: 000000008010aebb RDI: 0000000000000007\n RBP: 00007f34ea000d69 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f34ea1a6080 R15: 00007ffce77197a8\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nwith a syzlang reproducer that looks like:\n\n syz_kvm_add_vcpu$x86(0x0, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000040)={0x0, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000180)=ANY=[], 0x70}) (async)\n syz_kvm_add_vcpu$x86(0x0, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000080)={0x0, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000180)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB=\u0026quot;...\u0026quot;], 0x4f}) (async)\n r0 = openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000200), 0x0, 0x0)\n r1 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VM(r0, 0xae01, 0x0)\n r2 = openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000240), 0x0, 0x0)\n r3 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VM(r2, 0xae01, 0x0)\n ioctl$KVM_SET_CLOCK(r3, 0xc008aeba, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000040)={0x1, 0x8, 0x0, 0x5625e9b0}) (async)\n ioctl$KVM_SET_PIT2(r3, 0x8010aebb, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000280)={[...], 0x5}) (async)\n ioctl$KVM_SET_PIT2(r1, 0x4070aea0, 0x0) (async)\n r4 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VM(0xffffffffffffffff, 0xae01, 0x0)\n openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) (async)\n ioctl$KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION(r4, 0x4020ae46, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000400)={0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x2000, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000001000/0x2000)=nil}) (async)\n r5 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VCPU(r4, 0xae41, 0x2)\n close(r0) (async)\n openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000000), 0x8000, 0x0) (async)\n ioctl$KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG(r5, 0x4048ae9b, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000300)={0x4376ea830d46549b, 0x0, [0x46, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1000]}) (async)\n ioctl$KVM_RUN(r5, 0xae80, 0x0)\n\nOpportunistically use guard() to avoid having to define a new error label\nand goto usage.(CVE-2026-31592)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/CPU: Fix FPDSS on Zen1\n\nZen1\u0026apos;s hardware divider can leave, under certain circumstances, partial\nresults from previous operations. Those results can be leaked by\nanother, attacker thread.\n\nFix that with a chicken bit.(CVE-2026-31628)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output\n\nThe AF_RXRPC procfs helpers format local and remote socket addresses into\nfixed 50-byte stack buffers with \u0026quot;%pISpc\u0026quot;.\n\nThat is too small for the longest current-tree IPv6-with-port form the\nformatter can produce. In lib/vsprintf.c, the compressed IPv6 path uses a\ndotted-quad tail not only for v4mapped addresses, but also for ISATAP\naddresses via ipv6_addr_is_isatap().\n\nAs a result, a case such as\n\n [ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:0:5efe:255.255.255.255]:65535\n\nis possible with the current formatter. That is 50 visible characters, so\n51 bytes including the trailing NUL, which does not fit in the existing\nchar[50] buffers used by net/rxrpc/proc.c.\n\nSize the buffers from the formatter\u0026apos;s maximum textual form and switch the\ncall sites to scnprintf().\n\nChanges since v1:\n- correct the changelog to cite the actual maximum current-tree case\n explicitly\n- frame the proof around the ISATAP formatting path instead of the earlier\n mapped-v4 example(CVE-2026-31630)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nInput: uinput - fix circular locking dependency with ff-core\n\nA lockdep circular locking dependency warning can be triggered\nreproducibly when using a force-feedback gamepad with uinput (for\nexample, playing ELDEN RING under Wine with a Flydigi Vader 5\ncontroller):\n\n ff-\u0026gt;mutex -\u0026gt; udev-\u0026gt;mutex -\u0026gt; input_mutex -\u0026gt; dev-\u0026gt;mutex -\u0026gt; ff-\u0026gt;mutex\n\nThe cycle is caused by four lock acquisition paths:\n\n1. ff upload: input_ff_upload() holds ff-\u0026gt;mutex and calls\n uinput_dev_upload_effect() -\u0026gt; uinput_request_submit() -\u0026gt;\n uinput_request_send(), which acquires udev-\u0026gt;mutex.\n\n2. device create: uinput_ioctl_handler() holds udev-\u0026gt;mutex and calls\n uinput_create_device() -\u0026gt; input_register_device(), which acquires\n input_mutex.\n\n3. device register: input_register_device() holds input_mutex and\n calls kbd_connect() -\u0026gt; input_register_handle(), which acquires\n dev-\u0026gt;mutex.\n\n4. evdev release: evdev_release() calls input_flush_device() under\n dev-\u0026gt;mutex, which calls input_ff_flush() acquiring ff-\u0026gt;mutex.\n\nFix this by introducing a new state_lock spinlock to protect\nudev-\u0026gt;state and udev-\u0026gt;dev access in uinput_request_send() instead of\nacquiring udev-\u0026gt;mutex. The function only needs to atomically check\ndevice state and queue an input event into the ring buffer via\nuinput_dev_event() -- both operations are safe under a spinlock\n(ktime_get_ts64() and wake_up_interruptible() do not sleep). This\nbreaks the ff-\u0026gt;mutex -\u0026gt; udev-\u0026gt;mutex link since a spinlock is a leaf in\nthe lock ordering and cannot form cycles with mutexes.\n\nTo keep state transitions visible to uinput_request_send(), protect\nwrites to udev-\u0026gt;state in uinput_create_device() and\nuinput_destroy_device() with the same state_lock spinlock.\n\nAdditionally, move init_completion(\u0026amp;request-\u0026gt;done) from\nuinput_request_send() to uinput_request_submit() before\nuinput_request_reserve_slot(). Once the slot is allocated,\nuinput_flush_requests() may call complete() on it at any time from\nthe destroy path, so the completion must be initialised before the\nrequest becomes visible.\n\nLock ordering after the fix:\n\n ff-\u0026gt;mutex -\u0026gt; state_lock (spinlock, leaf)\n udev-\u0026gt;mutex -\u0026gt; state_lock (spinlock, leaf)\n udev-\u0026gt;mutex -\u0026gt; input_mutex -\u0026gt; dev-\u0026gt;mutex -\u0026gt; ff-\u0026gt;mutex (no back-edge)(CVE-2026-31667)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_unix: read UNIX_DIAG_VFS data under unix_state_lock\n\nExact UNIX diag lookups hold a reference to the socket, but not to\nu-\u0026gt;path. Meanwhile, unix_release_sock() clears u-\u0026gt;path under\nunix_state_lock() and drops the path reference after unlocking.\n\nRead the inode and device numbers for UNIX_DIAG_VFS while holding\nunix_state_lock(), then emit the netlink attribute after dropping the\nlock.\n\nThis keeps the VFS data stable while the reply is being built.(CVE-2026-31673)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ip6t_rt: reject oversized addrnr in rt_mt6_check()\n\nReject rt match rules whose addrnr exceeds IP6T_RT_HOPS.\n\nrt_mt6() expects addrnr to stay within the bounds of rtinfo-\u0026gt;addrs[].\nValidate addrnr during rule installation so malformed rules are rejected\nbefore the match logic can use an out-of-range value.(CVE-2026-31674)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nopenvswitch: validate MPLS set/set_masked payload length\n\nvalidate_set() accepted OVS_KEY_ATTR_MPLS as variable-sized payload for\nSET/SET_MASKED actions. In action handling, OVS expects fixed-size\nMPLS key data (struct ovs_key_mpls).\n\nUse the already normalized key_len (masked case included) and reject\nnon-matching MPLS action key sizes.\n\nReject invalid MPLS action payload lengths early.(CVE-2026-31679)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: br_nd_send: linearize skb before parsing ND options\n\nbr_nd_send() parses neighbour discovery options from ns-\u0026gt;opt[] and\nassumes that these options are in the linear part of request.\n\nIts callers only guarantee that the ICMPv6 header and target address\nare available, so the option area can still be non-linear. Parsing\nns-\u0026gt;opt[] in that case can access data past the linear buffer.\n\nLinearize request before option parsing and derive ns from the linear\nnetwork header.(CVE-2026-31682)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncrypto: ccp: Don\u0026apos;t attempt to copy ID to userspace if PSP command failed\n\nWhen retrieving the ID for the CPU, don\u0026apos;t attempt to copy the ID blob to\nuserspace if the firmware command failed. If the failure was due to an\ninvalid length, i.e. the userspace buffer+length was too small, copying\nthe number of bytes _firmware_ requires will overflow the kernel-allocated\nbuffer and leak data to userspace.\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26\n Read of size 64 at addr ffff8881867f5960 by task syz.0.906/24388\n\n CPU: 130 UID: 0 PID: 24388 Comm: syz.0.906 Tainted: G U O 7.0.0-smp-DEV #28 PREEMPTLAZY\n Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE\n Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 12.62.0-0 11/19/2025\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x110 ../lib/dump_stack.c:120\n print_address_description ../mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]\n print_report+0xbc/0x260 ../mm/kasan/report.c:482\n kasan_report+0xa2/0xe0 ../mm/kasan/report.c:595\n check_region_inline ../mm/kasan/generic.c:-1 [inline]\n kasan_check_range+0x264/0x2c0 ../mm/kasan/generic.c:200\n instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline]\n _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline]\n _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26\n copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:236 [inline]\n sev_ioctl_do_get_id2+0x361/0x490 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2222\n sev_ioctl+0x25f/0x490 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2575\n vfs_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x11d/0x1b0 ../fs/ioctl.c:583\n do_syscall_x64 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x800 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nWARN if the driver says the command succeeded, but the firmware error code\nsays otherwise, as __sev_do_cmd_locked() is expected to return -EIO on any\nfirwmware error.(CVE-2026-31697)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncrypto: ccp: Don\u0026apos;t attempt to copy PDH cert to userspace if PSP command failed\n\nWhen retrieving the PDH cert, don\u0026apos;t attempt to copy the blobs to userspace\nif the firmware command failed. If the failure was due to an invalid\nlength, i.e. the userspace buffer+length was too small, copying the number\nof bytes _firmware_ requires will overflow the kernel-allocated buffer and\nleak data to userspace.\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26\n Read of size 2084 at addr ffff8885c4ab8aa0 by task syz.0.186/21033\n\n CPU: 51 UID: 0 PID: 21033 Comm: syz.0.186 Tainted: G U O 7.0.0-smp-DEV #28 PREEMPTLAZY\n Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE\n Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 34.84.12-0 11/17/2025\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x110 ../lib/dump_stack.c:120\n print_address_description ../mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]\n print_report+0xbc/0x260 ../mm/kasan/report.c:482\n kasan_report+0xa2/0xe0 ../mm/kasan/report.c:595\n check_region_inline ../mm/kasan/generic.c:-1 [inline]\n kasan_check_range+0x264/0x2c0 ../mm/kasan/generic.c:200\n instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline]\n _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline]\n _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26\n copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:236 [inline]\n sev_ioctl_do_pdh_export+0x3d3/0x7c0 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2347\n sev_ioctl+0x2a2/0x490 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2568\n vfs_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x11d/0x1b0 ../fs/ioctl.c:583\n do_syscall_x64 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x800 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nWARN if the driver says the command succeeded, but the firmware error code\nsays otherwise, as __sev_do_cmd_locked() is expected to return -EIO on any\nfirwmware error.(CVE-2026-31698)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncrypto: ccp: Don\u0026apos;t attempt to copy CSR to userspace if PSP command failed\n\nWhen retrieving the PEK CSR, don\u0026apos;t attempt to copy the blob to userspace\nif the firmware command failed. If the failure was due to an invalid\nlength, i.e. the userspace buffer+length was too small, copying the number\nof bytes _firmware_ requires will overflow the kernel-allocated buffer and\nleak data to userspace.\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26\n Read of size 2084 at addr ffff898144612e20 by task syz.9.219/21405\n\n CPU: 14 UID: 0 PID: 21405 Comm: syz.9.219 Tainted: G U O 7.0.0-smp-DEV #28 PREEMPTLAZY\n Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE\n Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 12.62.0-0 11/19/2025\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x110 ../lib/dump_stack.c:120\n print_address_description ../mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]\n print_report+0xbc/0x260 ../mm/kasan/report.c:482\n kasan_report+0xa2/0xe0 ../mm/kasan/report.c:595\n check_region_inline ../mm/kasan/generic.c:-1 [inline]\n kasan_check_range+0x264/0x2c0 ../mm/kasan/generic.c:200\n instrument_copy_to_user ../include/linux/instrumented.h:129 [inline]\n _inline_copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:205 [inline]\n _copy_to_user+0x66/0xa0 ../lib/usercopy.c:26\n copy_to_user ../include/linux/uaccess.h:236 [inline]\n sev_ioctl_do_pek_csr+0x31f/0x590 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:1872\n sev_ioctl+0x3a4/0x490 ../drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:2562\n vfs_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl ../fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x11d/0x1b0 ../fs/ioctl.c:583\n do_syscall_x64 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xe0/0x800 ../arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nWARN if the driver says the command succeeded, but the firmware error code\nsays otherwise, as __sev_do_cmd_locked() is expected to return -EIO on any\nfirwmware error.(CVE-2026-31699)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: SMP: derive legacy responder STK authentication from MITM state\n\nThe legacy responder path in smp_random() currently labels the stored\nSTK as authenticated whenever pending_sec_level is BT_SECURITY_HIGH.\nThat reflects what the local service requested, not what the pairing\nflow actually achieved.\n\nFor Just Works/Confirm legacy pairing, SMP_FLAG_MITM_AUTH stays clear\nand the resulting STK should remain unauthenticated even if the local\nside requested HIGH security. Use the established MITM state when\nstoring the responder STK so the key metadata matches the pairing result.\n\nThis also keeps the legacy path aligned with the Secure Connections code,\nwhich already treats JUST_WORKS/JUST_CFM as unauthenticated.(CVE-2026-31773)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxen/privcmd: fix double free via VMA splitting\n\nprivcmd_vm_ops defines .close (privcmd_close), but neither .may_split\nnor .open. When userspace does a partial munmap() on a privcmd mapping,\nthe kernel splits the VMA via __split_vma(). Since may_split is NULL,\nthe split is allowed. vm_area_dup() copies vm_private_data (a pages\narray allocated in alloc_empty_pages()) into the new VMA without any\nfixup, because there is no .open callback.\n\nBoth VMAs now point to the same pages array. When the unmapped portion\nis closed, privcmd_close() calls:\n - xen_unmap_domain_gfn_range()\n - xen_free_unpopulated_pages()\n - kvfree(pages)\n\nThe surviving VMA still holds the dangling pointer. When it is later\ndestroyed, the same sequence runs again, which leads to a double free.\n\nFix this issue by adding a .may_split callback denying the VMA split.\n\nThis is XSA-487 / CVE-2026-31787(CVE-2026-31787)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: MGMT: validate LTK enc_size on load\n\nLoad Long Term Keys stores the user-provided enc_size and later uses\nit to size fixed-size stack operations when replying to LE LTK\nrequests. An enc_size larger than the 16-byte key buffer can therefore\noverflow the reply stack buffer.\n\nReject oversized enc_size values while validating the management LTK\nrecord so invalid keys never reach the stored key state.(CVE-2026-43020)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: logitech-hidpp: Prevent use-after-free on force feedback initialisation failure\n\nPresently, if the force feedback initialisation fails when probing the\nLogitech G920 Driving Force Racing Wheel for Xbox One, an error number\nwill be returned and propagated before the userspace infrastructure\n(sysfs and /dev/input) has been torn down. If userspace ignores the\nerrors and continues to use its references to these dangling entities, a\nUAF will promptly follow.\n\nWe have 2 options; continue to return the error, but ensure that all of\nthe infrastructure is torn down accordingly or continue to treat this\ncondition as a warning by emitting the message but returning success.\nIt is thought that the original author\u0026apos;s intention was to emit the\nwarning but keep the device functional, less the force feedback feature,\nso let\u0026apos;s go with that.(CVE-2026-43049)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndmaengine: idxd: Fix not releasing workqueue on .release()\n\nThe workqueue associated with an DSA/IAA device is not released when\nthe object is freed.(CVE-2026-43064)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/x86/intel/uncore: Skip discovery table for offline dies\n\nThis warning can be triggered if NUMA is disabled and the system\nboots with fewer CPUs than the number of CPUs in die 0.\n\nWARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 7257 at uncore.c:1157 uncore_pci_pmu_register+0x136/0x160 [intel_uncore]\n\nCurrently, the discovery table continues to be parsed even if all CPUs\nin the associated die are offline. This can lead to an array overflow\nat \u0026quot;pmu-\u0026gt;boxes[die] = box\u0026quot; in uncore_pci_pmu_register(), which may\ntrigger the warning above or cause other issues.(CVE-2026-43079)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npstore: ram_core: fix incorrect success return when vmap() fails\n\nIn persistent_ram_vmap(), vmap() may return NULL on failure.\n\nIf offset is non-zero, adding offset_in_page(start) causes the function\nto return a non-NULL pointer even though the mapping failed.\npersistent_ram_buffer_map() therefore incorrectly returns success.\n\nSubsequent access to prz-\u0026gt;buffer may dereference an invalid address\nand cause crashes.\n\nAdd proper NULL checking for vmap() failures.(CVE-2026-43124)\n\nIn the Linux kernel xfrm/ESP (IPsec) subsystem, when appending pipe pages to network packets (skb) via zero-copy mechanisms such as splice() / MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, IPv4/IPv6 datagram paths are not correctly marked with the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG flag. The ESP receive path incorrectly treats these externally owned shared pages as private data, skipping the COW (copy-on-write) step and performing in-place decryption directly, allowing an attacker to pollute otherwise read-only pages in the page cache. Combined with CVE-2026-43500, a complete exploit chain can be formed, allowing local unprivileged users to obtain root privileges. This vulnerability affects almost all Linux distributions since 2017 (kernel ~ 4.10), including Ubuntu, RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian, Fedora, etc. A public PoC has been released and signs of active exploitation have been observed.(CVE-2026-43284)",
"id": "OESA-2026-2311",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:11:16Z",
"published": "2026-05-15T11:11:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2311"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23317"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31404"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31419"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31441"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31448"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31476"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31504"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31521"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31523"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31555"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31560"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31592"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31628"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31630"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31667"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31673"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31674"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31679"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31682"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31697"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31698"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31699"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31773"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31787"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43020"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43049"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43064"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43079"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43124"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43284"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-23317",
"CVE-2026-31404",
"CVE-2026-31419",
"CVE-2026-31441",
"CVE-2026-31448",
"CVE-2026-31476",
"CVE-2026-31504",
"CVE-2026-31515",
"CVE-2026-31521",
"CVE-2026-31523",
"CVE-2026-31555",
"CVE-2026-31560",
"CVE-2026-31592",
"CVE-2026-31628",
"CVE-2026-31630",
"CVE-2026-31667",
"CVE-2026-31673",
"CVE-2026-31674",
"CVE-2026-31679",
"CVE-2026-31682",
"CVE-2026-31697",
"CVE-2026-31698",
"CVE-2026-31699",
"CVE-2026-31773",
"CVE-2026-31787",
"CVE-2026-43020",
"CVE-2026-43049",
"CVE-2026-43064",
"CVE-2026-43079",
"CVE-2026-43124",
"CVE-2026-43284"
]
}
OESA-2026-2312 (CVE-2026-31436)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-05-15 11:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:11 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: idxd: fix possible wrong descriptor completion in llist_abort_desc()
At the end of this function, d is the traversal cursor of flist, but the code completes found instead. This can lead to issues such as NULL pointer dereferences, double completion, or descriptor leaks.
Fix this by completing d instead of found in the final list_for_each_entry_safe() loop.(CVE-2026-31436)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hwmon: (pmbus/core) Protect regulator operations with mutex
The regulator operations pmbus_regulator_get_voltage(), pmbus_regulator_set_voltage(), and pmbus_regulator_list_voltage() access PMBus registers and shared data but were not protected by the update_lock mutex. This could lead to race conditions.
However, adding mutex protection directly to these functions causes a deadlock because pmbus_regulator_notify() (which calls regulator_notifier_call_chain()) is often called with the mutex already held (e.g., from pmbus_fault_handler()). If a regulator callback then calls one of the now-protected voltage functions, it will attempt to acquire the same mutex.
Rework pmbus_regulator_notify() to utilize a worker function to send notifications outside of the mutex protection. Events are stored as atomics in a per-page bitmask and processed by the worker.
Initialize the worker and its associated data during regulator registration, and ensure it is cancelled on device removal using devm_add_action_or_reset().
While at it, remove the unnecessary include of linux/of.h.(CVE-2026-31486)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race
packet_release() has a race window where NETDEV_UP can re-register a
socket into a fanout group's arr[] array. The re-registration is not
cleaned up by fanout_release(), leaving a dangling pointer in the fanout
array.
packet_release() does NOT zero po->num in its bind_lock section.
After releasing bind_lock, po->num is still non-zero and po->ifindex
still matches the bound device. A concurrent packet_notifier(NETDEV_UP)
that already found the socket in sklist can re-register the hook.
For fanout sockets, this re-registration calls __fanout_link(sk, po)
which adds the socket back into f->arr[] and increments f->num_members,
but does NOT increment f->sk_ref.
The fix sets po->num to zero in packet_release while bind_lock is
held to prevent NETDEV_UP from linking, preventing the race window.
This bug was found following an additional audit with Claude Code based on CVE-2025-38617.(CVE-2026-31504)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()
syzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]
Issue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families, and that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated, thus possibly overfilling the skb.
Validate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().
[1]
skbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:<NULL> kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 ! Call Trace: <TASK> skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline] skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655 skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline] set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline] pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636 km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848 xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705 xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150(CVE-2026-31515)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/userfaultfd: fix hugetlb fault mutex hash calculation
In mfill_atomic_hugetlb(), linear_page_index() is used to calculate the page index for hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(). However, linear_page_index() returns the index in PAGE_SIZE units, while hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() expects the index in huge page units. This mismatch means that different addresses within the same huge page can produce different hash values, leading to the use of different mutexes for the same huge page. This can cause races between faulting threads, which can corrupt the reservation map and trigger the BUG_ON in resv_map_release().
Fix this by introducing hugetlb_linear_page_index(), which returns the page index in huge page granularity, and using it in place of linear_page_index().(CVE-2026-31575)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: core: clamp report_size in s32ton() to avoid undefined shift
s32ton() shifts by n-1 where n is the field's report_size, a value that comes directly from a HID device. The HID parser bounds report_size only to <= 256, so a broken HID device can supply a report descriptor with a wide field that triggers shift exponents up to 256 on a 32-bit type when an output report is built via hid_output_field() or hid_set_field().
Commit ec61b41918587 ("HID: core: fix shift-out-of-bounds in hid_report_raw_event") added the same n > 32 clamp to the function snto32(), but s32ton() was never given the same fix as I guess syzbot hadn't figured out how to fuzz a device the same way.
Fix this up by just clamping the max value of n, just like snto32() does.(CVE-2026-31624)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: alps: fix NULL pointer dereference in alps_raw_event()
Commit ecfa6f34492c ("HID: Add HID_CLAIMED_INPUT guards in raw_event callbacks missing them") attempted to fix up the HID drivers that had missed the previous fix that was done in 2ff5baa9b527 ("HID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle"), but the alps driver was missed.
Fix this up by properly checking in the hid-alps driver that it had been claimed correctly before attempting to process the raw event.(CVE-2026-31625)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_unix: read UNIX_DIAG_VFS data under unix_state_lock
Exact UNIX diag lookups hold a reference to the socket, but not to u->path. Meanwhile, unix_release_sock() clears u->path under unix_state_lock() and drops the path reference after unlocking.
Read the inode and device numbers for UNIX_DIAG_VFS while holding unix_state_lock(), then emit the netlink attribute after dropping the lock.
This keeps the VFS data stable while the reply is being built.(CVE-2026-31673)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ip6t_rt: reject oversized addrnr in rt_mt6_check()
Reject rt match rules whose addrnr exceeds IP6T_RT_HOPS.
rt_mt6() expects addrnr to stay within the bounds of rtinfo->addrs[]. Validate addrnr during rule installation so malformed rules are rejected before the match logic can use an out-of-range value.(CVE-2026-31674)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bridge: br_nd_send: linearize skb before parsing ND options
br_nd_send() parses neighbour discovery options from ns->opt[] and assumes that these options are in the linear part of request.
Its callers only guarantee that the ICMPv6 header and target address are available, so the option area can still be non-linear. Parsing ns->opt[] in that case can access data past the linear buffer.
Linearize request before option parsing and derive ns from the linear network header.(CVE-2026-31682)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: lag: Check for LAG device before creating debugfs
__mlx5_lag_dev_add_mdev() may return 0 (success) even when an error occurs that is handled gracefully. Consequently, the initialization flow proceeds to call mlx5_ldev_add_debugfs() even when there is no valid LAG context.
mlx5_ldev_add_debugfs() blindly created the debugfs directory and attributes. This exposed interfaces (like the members file) that rely on a valid ldev pointer, leading to potential NULL pointer dereferences if accessed when ldev is NULL.
Add a check to verify that mlx5_lag_dev(dev) returns a valid pointer before attempting to create the debugfs entries.(CVE-2026-43013)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: MGMT: validate mesh send advertising payload length
mesh_send() currently bounds MGMT_OP_MESH_SEND by total command length, but it never verifies that the bytes supplied for the flexible adv_data[] array actually match the embedded adv_data_len field. MGMT_MESH_SEND_SIZE only covers the fixed header, so a truncated command can still pass the existing 20..50 byte range check and later drive the async mesh send path past the end of the queued command buffer.
Keep rejecting zero-length and oversized advertising payloads, but validate adv_data_len explicitly and require the command length to exactly match the flexible array size before queueing the request.(CVE-2026-43017)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_event: fix potential UAF in hci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt
hci_conn lookup and field access must be covered by hdev lock in hci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt, otherwise it's possible it is freed concurrently.
Extend the hci_dev_lock critical section to cover all conn usage.(CVE-2026-43018)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_conn: fix potential UAF in set_cig_params_sync
hci_conn lookup and field access must be covered by hdev lock in set_cig_params_sync, otherwise it's possible it is freed concurrently.
Take hdev lock to prevent hci_conn from being deleted or modified concurrently. Just RCU lock is not suitable here, as we also want to avoid "tearing" in the configuration.(CVE-2026-43019)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: Add SRCU protection for reading PDPTRs in __get_sregs2()
Add SRCU read-side protection when reading PDPTR registers in __get_sregs2().
Reading PDPTRs may trigger access to guest memory: kvm_pdptr_read() -> svm_cache_reg() -> load_pdptrs() -> kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page() -> kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot()
kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot() dereferences memslots via __kvm_memslots(), which uses srcu_dereference_check() and requires either kvm->srcu or kvm->slots_lock to be held. Currently only vcpu->mutex is held, triggering lockdep warning:
============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot 6.12.59+ #3 Not tainted
include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by syz.5.1717/15100: #0: ff1100002f4b00b0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x1d5/0x1590
Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xf0/0x120 lib/dump_stack.c:120 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x1e3/0x270 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6824 __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 [inline] __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1059 [inline] kvm_vcpu_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1076 [inline] kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x518/0x5e0 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:2617 kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x27/0x50 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3302 load_pdptrs+0xff/0x4b0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1065 svm_cache_reg+0x1c9/0x230 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c:1688 kvm_pdptr_read arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h:141 [inline] __get_sregs2 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11784 [inline] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x3e20/0x4aa0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:6279 kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x856/0x1590 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4663 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:893 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18b/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xbd/0x1d0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2026-43214)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events from vcpu_block()
Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events after exiting a blocking state while L2 is active, as exiting to userspace will generate a spurious userspace exit, usually with KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN, and likely lead to the VM's demise. Continuing with the wakeup isn't perfect either, as something has gone sideways if a vCPU is awakened in L2 with an injected event (or worse, a nested run pending), but continuing on gives the VM a decent chance of surviving without any major side effects.
As explained in the Fixes commits, it should be impossible for a vCPU to be put into a blocking state with an already-injected event (exception, IRQ, or NMI). Unfortunately, userspace can stuff MP_STATE and/or injected events, and thus put the vCPU into what should be an impossible state.
Don't bother trying to preserve the WARN, e.g. with an anti-syzkaller Kconfig, as WARNs can (hopefully) be added in paths where KVM would be violating x86 architecture, e.g. by WARNing if KVM attempts to inject an exception or interrupt while the vCPU isn't running.(CVE-2026-43265)
In the Linux kernel xfrm/ESP (IPsec) subsystem, when appending pipe pages to network packets (skb) via zero-copy mechanisms such as splice() / MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, IPv4/IPv6 datagram paths are not correctly marked with the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG flag. The ESP receive path incorrectly treats these externally owned shared pages as private data, skipping the COW (copy-on-write) step and performing in-place decryption directly, allowing an attacker to pollute otherwise read-only pages in the page cache. Combined with CVE-2026-43500, a complete exploit chain can be formed, allowing local unprivileged users to obtain root privileges. This vulnerability affects almost all Linux distributions since 2017 (kernel ~ 4.10), including Ubuntu, RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian, Fedora, etc. A public PoC has been released and signs of active exploitation have been observed.(CVE-2026-43284)
A NULL-pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the ACPI processor driver of the Linux kernel. In the acpi_processor_errata_piix4() function, the pointer dev is first assigned an IDE device and then reassigned an ISA device. If the first lookup succeeds but the second fails, dev becomes NULL. This leads to a potential null-pointer dereference when dev_dbg() is called. The fix is to use two temporary pointers and retrieve each device independently, avoiding overwriting dev with a possible NULL value.(CVE-2026-43313)
In the Linux kernel x86 APIC (Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller) subsystem, when the system resumes from suspend (s2ram/suspend-to-RAM) state, if the kernel expects to disable x2APIC mode at startup, but the BIOS/firmware re-enables x2APIC during the recovery process, the kernel and hardware status will be inconsistent. This status mismatch may cause interrupt handling exceptions, system instability, or denial of service. The vulnerability belongs to CWE-372 (Internal State Corruption).(CVE-2026-43363)
In the Linux kernel, there is a race condition vulnerability in the Ceph filesystem. During async unlink, the i_nlink counter is dropped before receiving the completion (that will eventually update the i_nlink) because "we assume that the unlink will succeed". That is not a bad idea, but it races against deletions by other clients (or against the completion of our own unlink) and can lead to an underrun which emits a WARNING like this one:
WARNING: CPU: 85 PID: 25093 at fs/inode.c:407 drop_nlink+0x50/0x68 Modules linked in: CPU: 85 UID: 3221252029 PID: 25093 Comm: php-cgi8.1 Not tainted 6.14.11-cm4all1-ampere #655 Hardware name: Supermicro ARS-110M-NR/R12SPD-A, BIOS 1.1b 10/17/2023
In ceph_unlink(), a call to ceph_mdsc_submit_request() submits the CEPH_MDS_OP_UNLINK to the MDS, but does not wait for completion. Meanwhile, between this call and the following drop_nlink() call, a worker thread may process a CEPH_CAP_OP_IMPORT, CEPH_CAP_OP_GRANT or just a CEPH_MSG_CLIENT_REPLY (the latter of which could be our own completion). These will lead to a set_nlink() call, updating the i_nlink counter to the value received from the MDS. If that new i_nlink value happens to be zero, it is illegal to decrement it further. But that is exactly what ceph_unlink() will do then.
The root cause of this vulnerability is updating the i_nlink counter without proper lock protection, creating a TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) race condition. Since ceph_fill_inode() and handle_cap_grant() both hold the ceph_inode_info.i_ceph_lock spinlock while set_nlink() runs, this seems like the proper lock to protect the i_nlink updates.(CVE-2026-43420)
In the Linux kernel, there is a security vulnerability in the USB Test and Measurement Class driver (usbtmc). The driver accepts timeout values specified by the user via an ioctl command and uses these timeouts for usb_bulk_msg() calls. Since the user can specify arbitrarily long timeouts and usb_bulk_msg() uses unkillable waits, this may cause kernel threads to hang indefinitely.(CVE-2026-43429)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-145.0.10.137.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndmaengine: idxd: fix possible wrong descriptor completion in llist_abort_desc()\n\nAt the end of this function, d is the traversal cursor of flist, but the\ncode completes found instead. This can lead to issues such as NULL pointer\ndereferences, double completion, or descriptor leaks.\n\nFix this by completing d instead of found in the final\nlist_for_each_entry_safe() loop.(CVE-2026-31436)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhwmon: (pmbus/core) Protect regulator operations with mutex\n\nThe regulator operations pmbus_regulator_get_voltage(),\npmbus_regulator_set_voltage(), and pmbus_regulator_list_voltage()\naccess PMBus registers and shared data but were not protected by\nthe update_lock mutex. This could lead to race conditions.\n\nHowever, adding mutex protection directly to these functions causes\na deadlock because pmbus_regulator_notify() (which calls\nregulator_notifier_call_chain()) is often called with the mutex\nalready held (e.g., from pmbus_fault_handler()). If a regulator\ncallback then calls one of the now-protected voltage functions,\nit will attempt to acquire the same mutex.\n\nRework pmbus_regulator_notify() to utilize a worker function to\nsend notifications outside of the mutex protection. Events are\nstored as atomics in a per-page bitmask and processed by the worker.\n\nInitialize the worker and its associated data during regulator\nregistration, and ensure it is cancelled on device removal using\ndevm_add_action_or_reset().\n\nWhile at it, remove the unnecessary include of linux/of.h.(CVE-2026-31486)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race\n\n`packet_release()` has a race window where `NETDEV_UP` can re-register a\nsocket into a fanout group\u0026apos;s `arr[]` array. The re-registration is not\ncleaned up by `fanout_release()`, leaving a dangling pointer in the fanout\narray.\n`packet_release()` does NOT zero `po-\u0026gt;num` in its `bind_lock` section.\nAfter releasing `bind_lock`, `po-\u0026gt;num` is still non-zero and `po-\u0026gt;ifindex`\nstill matches the bound device. A concurrent `packet_notifier(NETDEV_UP)`\nthat already found the socket in `sklist` can re-register the hook.\nFor fanout sockets, this re-registration calls `__fanout_link(sk, po)`\nwhich adds the socket back into `f-\u0026gt;arr[]` and increments `f-\u0026gt;num_members`,\nbut does NOT increment `f-\u0026gt;sk_ref`.\n\nThe fix sets `po-\u0026gt;num` to zero in `packet_release` while `bind_lock` is\nheld to prevent NETDEV_UP from linking, preventing the race window.\n\nThis bug was found following an additional audit with Claude Code based\non CVE-2025-38617.(CVE-2026-31504)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]\n\nIssue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families,\nand that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated,\nthus possibly overfilling the skb.\n\nValidate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().\n\n[1]\n\nskbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:\u0026lt;NULL\u0026gt;\n kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 !\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline]\n skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655\n skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline]\n set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline]\n pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636\n km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848\n xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705\n xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150(CVE-2026-31515)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/userfaultfd: fix hugetlb fault mutex hash calculation\n\nIn mfill_atomic_hugetlb(), linear_page_index() is used to calculate the\npage index for hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(). However, linear_page_index()\nreturns the index in PAGE_SIZE units, while hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash()\nexpects the index in huge page units. This mismatch means that different\naddresses within the same huge page can produce different hash values,\nleading to the use of different mutexes for the same huge page. This can\ncause races between faulting threads, which can corrupt the reservation\nmap and trigger the BUG_ON in resv_map_release().\n\nFix this by introducing hugetlb_linear_page_index(), which returns the\npage index in huge page granularity, and using it in place of\nlinear_page_index().(CVE-2026-31575)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: core: clamp report_size in s32ton() to avoid undefined shift\n\ns32ton() shifts by n-1 where n is the field\u0026apos;s report_size, a value that\ncomes directly from a HID device. The HID parser bounds report_size\nonly to \u0026lt;= 256, so a broken HID device can supply a report descriptor\nwith a wide field that triggers shift exponents up to 256 on a 32-bit\ntype when an output report is built via hid_output_field() or\nhid_set_field().\n\nCommit ec61b41918587 (\u0026quot;HID: core: fix shift-out-of-bounds in\nhid_report_raw_event\u0026quot;) added the same n \u0026gt; 32 clamp to the function\nsnto32(), but s32ton() was never given the same fix as I guess syzbot\nhadn\u0026apos;t figured out how to fuzz a device the same way.\n\nFix this up by just clamping the max value of n, just like snto32()\ndoes.(CVE-2026-31624)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: alps: fix NULL pointer dereference in alps_raw_event()\n\nCommit ecfa6f34492c (\u0026quot;HID: Add HID_CLAIMED_INPUT guards in raw_event\ncallbacks missing them\u0026quot;) attempted to fix up the HID drivers that had\nmissed the previous fix that was done in 2ff5baa9b527 (\u0026quot;HID: appleir:\nFix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle\u0026quot;), but the alps\ndriver was missed.\n\nFix this up by properly checking in the hid-alps driver that it had been\nclaimed correctly before attempting to process the raw event.(CVE-2026-31625)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_unix: read UNIX_DIAG_VFS data under unix_state_lock\n\nExact UNIX diag lookups hold a reference to the socket, but not to\nu-\u0026gt;path. Meanwhile, unix_release_sock() clears u-\u0026gt;path under\nunix_state_lock() and drops the path reference after unlocking.\n\nRead the inode and device numbers for UNIX_DIAG_VFS while holding\nunix_state_lock(), then emit the netlink attribute after dropping the\nlock.\n\nThis keeps the VFS data stable while the reply is being built.(CVE-2026-31673)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ip6t_rt: reject oversized addrnr in rt_mt6_check()\n\nReject rt match rules whose addrnr exceeds IP6T_RT_HOPS.\n\nrt_mt6() expects addrnr to stay within the bounds of rtinfo-\u0026gt;addrs[].\nValidate addrnr during rule installation so malformed rules are rejected\nbefore the match logic can use an out-of-range value.(CVE-2026-31674)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: br_nd_send: linearize skb before parsing ND options\n\nbr_nd_send() parses neighbour discovery options from ns-\u0026gt;opt[] and\nassumes that these options are in the linear part of request.\n\nIts callers only guarantee that the ICMPv6 header and target address\nare available, so the option area can still be non-linear. Parsing\nns-\u0026gt;opt[] in that case can access data past the linear buffer.\n\nLinearize request before option parsing and derive ns from the linear\nnetwork header.(CVE-2026-31682)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5: lag: Check for LAG device before creating debugfs\n\n__mlx5_lag_dev_add_mdev() may return 0 (success) even when an error\noccurs that is handled gracefully. Consequently, the initialization\nflow proceeds to call mlx5_ldev_add_debugfs() even when there is no\nvalid LAG context.\n\nmlx5_ldev_add_debugfs() blindly created the debugfs directory and\nattributes. This exposed interfaces (like the members file) that rely on\na valid ldev pointer, leading to potential NULL pointer dereferences if\naccessed when ldev is NULL.\n\nAdd a check to verify that mlx5_lag_dev(dev) returns a valid pointer\nbefore attempting to create the debugfs entries.(CVE-2026-43013)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: MGMT: validate mesh send advertising payload length\n\nmesh_send() currently bounds MGMT_OP_MESH_SEND by total command\nlength, but it never verifies that the bytes supplied for the\nflexible adv_data[] array actually match the embedded adv_data_len\nfield. MGMT_MESH_SEND_SIZE only covers the fixed header, so a\ntruncated command can still pass the existing 20..50 byte range\ncheck and later drive the async mesh send path past the end of the\nqueued command buffer.\n\nKeep rejecting zero-length and oversized advertising payloads, but\nvalidate adv_data_len explicitly and require the command length to\nexactly match the flexible array size before queueing the request.(CVE-2026-43017)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: hci_event: fix potential UAF in hci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt\n\nhci_conn lookup and field access must be covered by hdev lock in\nhci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt, otherwise it\u0026apos;s possible it is freed\nconcurrently.\n\nExtend the hci_dev_lock critical section to cover all conn usage.(CVE-2026-43018)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: hci_conn: fix potential UAF in set_cig_params_sync\n\nhci_conn lookup and field access must be covered by hdev lock in\nset_cig_params_sync, otherwise it\u0026apos;s possible it is freed concurrently.\n\nTake hdev lock to prevent hci_conn from being deleted or modified\nconcurrently. Just RCU lock is not suitable here, as we also want to\navoid \u0026quot;tearing\u0026quot; in the configuration.(CVE-2026-43019)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86: Add SRCU protection for reading PDPTRs in __get_sregs2()\n\nAdd SRCU read-side protection when reading PDPTR registers in\n__get_sregs2().\n\nReading PDPTRs may trigger access to guest memory:\nkvm_pdptr_read() -\u0026gt; svm_cache_reg() -\u0026gt; load_pdptrs() -\u0026gt;\nkvm_vcpu_read_guest_page() -\u0026gt; kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot()\n\nkvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot() dereferences memslots via __kvm_memslots(),\nwhich uses srcu_dereference_check() and requires either kvm-\u0026gt;srcu or\nkvm-\u0026gt;slots_lock to be held. Currently only vcpu-\u0026gt;mutex is held,\ntriggering lockdep warning:\n\n=============================\nWARNING: suspicious RCU usage in kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot\n6.12.59+ #3 Not tainted\n\ninclude/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\nrcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n1 lock held by syz.5.1717/15100:\n #0: ff1100002f4b00b0 (\u0026amp;vcpu-\u0026gt;mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x1d5/0x1590\n\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xf0/0x120 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x1e3/0x270 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6824\n __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 [inline]\n __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1059 [inline]\n kvm_vcpu_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1076 [inline]\n kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x518/0x5e0 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:2617\n kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x27/0x50 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3302\n load_pdptrs+0xff/0x4b0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1065\n svm_cache_reg+0x1c9/0x230 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c:1688\n kvm_pdptr_read arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h:141 [inline]\n __get_sregs2 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11784 [inline]\n kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x3e20/0x4aa0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:6279\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x856/0x1590 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4663\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:893 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18b/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:893\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xbd/0x1d0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2026-43214)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86: Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events from vcpu_block()\n\nIgnore -EBUSY when checking nested events after exiting a blocking state\nwhile L2 is active, as exiting to userspace will generate a spurious\nuserspace exit, usually with KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN, and likely lead to the VM\u0026apos;s\ndemise. Continuing with the wakeup isn\u0026apos;t perfect either, as *something*\nhas gone sideways if a vCPU is awakened in L2 with an injected event (or\nworse, a nested run pending), but continuing on gives the VM a decent\nchance of surviving without any major side effects.\n\nAs explained in the Fixes commits, it _should_ be impossible for a vCPU to\nbe put into a blocking state with an already-injected event (exception,\nIRQ, or NMI). Unfortunately, userspace can stuff MP_STATE and/or injected\nevents, and thus put the vCPU into what should be an impossible state.\n\nDon\u0026apos;t bother trying to preserve the WARN, e.g. with an anti-syzkaller\nKconfig, as WARNs can (hopefully) be added in paths where _KVM_ would be\nviolating x86 architecture, e.g. by WARNing if KVM attempts to inject an\nexception or interrupt while the vCPU isn\u0026apos;t running.(CVE-2026-43265)\n\nIn the Linux kernel xfrm/ESP (IPsec) subsystem, when appending pipe pages to network packets (skb) via zero-copy mechanisms such as splice() / MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, IPv4/IPv6 datagram paths are not correctly marked with the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG flag. The ESP receive path incorrectly treats these externally owned shared pages as private data, skipping the COW (copy-on-write) step and performing in-place decryption directly, allowing an attacker to pollute otherwise read-only pages in the page cache. Combined with CVE-2026-43500, a complete exploit chain can be formed, allowing local unprivileged users to obtain root privileges. This vulnerability affects almost all Linux distributions since 2017 (kernel ~ 4.10), including Ubuntu, RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian, Fedora, etc. A public PoC has been released and signs of active exploitation have been observed.(CVE-2026-43284)\n\nA NULL-pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the ACPI processor driver of the Linux kernel. In the acpi_processor_errata_piix4() function, the pointer dev is first assigned an IDE device and then reassigned an ISA device. If the first lookup succeeds but the second fails, dev becomes NULL. This leads to a potential null-pointer dereference when dev_dbg() is called. The fix is to use two temporary pointers and retrieve each device independently, avoiding overwriting dev with a possible NULL value.(CVE-2026-43313)\n\nIn the Linux kernel x86 APIC (Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller) subsystem, when the system resumes from suspend (s2ram/suspend-to-RAM) state, if the kernel expects to disable x2APIC mode at startup, but the BIOS/firmware re-enables x2APIC during the recovery process, the kernel and hardware status will be inconsistent. This status mismatch may cause interrupt handling exceptions, system instability, or denial of service. The vulnerability belongs to CWE-372 (Internal State Corruption).(CVE-2026-43363)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, there is a race condition vulnerability in the Ceph filesystem. During async unlink, the `i_nlink` counter is dropped before receiving the completion (that will eventually update the `i_nlink`) because \u0026quot;we assume that the unlink will succeed\u0026quot;. That is not a bad idea, but it races against deletions by other clients (or against the completion of our own unlink) and can lead to an underrun which emits a WARNING like this one:\n\nWARNING: CPU: 85 PID: 25093 at fs/inode.c:407 drop_nlink+0x50/0x68\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 85 UID: 3221252029 PID: 25093 Comm: php-cgi8.1 Not tainted 6.14.11-cm4all1-ampere #655\nHardware name: Supermicro ARS-110M-NR/R12SPD-A, BIOS 1.1b 10/17/2023\n\nIn ceph_unlink(), a call to ceph_mdsc_submit_request() submits the CEPH_MDS_OP_UNLINK to the MDS, but does not wait for completion. Meanwhile, between this call and the following drop_nlink() call, a worker thread may process a CEPH_CAP_OP_IMPORT, CEPH_CAP_OP_GRANT or just a CEPH_MSG_CLIENT_REPLY (the latter of which could be our own completion). These will lead to a set_nlink() call, updating the `i_nlink` counter to the value received from the MDS. If that new `i_nlink` value happens to be zero, it is illegal to decrement it further. But that is exactly what ceph_unlink() will do then.\n\nThe root cause of this vulnerability is updating the `i_nlink` counter without proper lock protection, creating a TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) race condition. Since ceph_fill_inode() and handle_cap_grant() both hold the `ceph_inode_info.i_ceph_lock` spinlock while set_nlink() runs, this seems like the proper lock to protect the `i_nlink` updates.(CVE-2026-43420)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, there is a security vulnerability in the USB Test and Measurement Class driver (usbtmc). The driver accepts timeout values specified by the user via an ioctl command and uses these timeouts for usb_bulk_msg() calls. Since the user can specify arbitrarily long timeouts and usb_bulk_msg() uses unkillable waits, this may cause kernel threads to hang indefinitely.(CVE-2026-43429)",
"id": "OESA-2026-2312",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:11:17Z",
"published": "2026-05-15T11:11:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2312"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31436"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31486"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31504"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31575"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31624"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31625"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31673"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31674"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31682"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43013"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43017"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43018"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43019"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43214"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43284"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43363"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43420"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43429"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-31436",
"CVE-2026-31486",
"CVE-2026-31504",
"CVE-2026-31515",
"CVE-2026-31575",
"CVE-2026-31624",
"CVE-2026-31625",
"CVE-2026-31673",
"CVE-2026-31674",
"CVE-2026-31682",
"CVE-2026-43013",
"CVE-2026-43017",
"CVE-2026-43018",
"CVE-2026-43019",
"CVE-2026-43214",
"CVE-2026-43265",
"CVE-2026-43284",
"CVE-2026-43313",
"CVE-2026-43363",
"CVE-2026-43420",
"CVE-2026-43429"
]
}
OESA-2026-2313 (CVE-2026-31436)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-05-15 11:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:11 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: idxd: fix possible wrong descriptor completion in llist_abort_desc()
At the end of this function, d is the traversal cursor of flist, but the code completes found instead. This can lead to issues such as NULL pointer dereferences, double completion, or descriptor leaks.
Fix this by completing d instead of found in the final list_for_each_entry_safe() loop.(CVE-2026-31436)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hwmon: (pmbus/core) Protect regulator operations with mutex
The regulator operations pmbus_regulator_get_voltage(), pmbus_regulator_set_voltage(), and pmbus_regulator_list_voltage() access PMBus registers and shared data but were not protected by the update_lock mutex. This could lead to race conditions.
However, adding mutex protection directly to these functions causes a deadlock because pmbus_regulator_notify() (which calls regulator_notifier_call_chain()) is often called with the mutex already held (e.g., from pmbus_fault_handler()). If a regulator callback then calls one of the now-protected voltage functions, it will attempt to acquire the same mutex.
Rework pmbus_regulator_notify() to utilize a worker function to send notifications outside of the mutex protection. Events are stored as atomics in a per-page bitmask and processed by the worker.
Initialize the worker and its associated data during regulator registration, and ensure it is cancelled on device removal using devm_add_action_or_reset().
While at it, remove the unnecessary include of linux/of.h.(CVE-2026-31486)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race
packet_release() has a race window where NETDEV_UP can re-register a
socket into a fanout group's arr[] array. The re-registration is not
cleaned up by fanout_release(), leaving a dangling pointer in the fanout
array.
packet_release() does NOT zero po->num in its bind_lock section.
After releasing bind_lock, po->num is still non-zero and po->ifindex
still matches the bound device. A concurrent packet_notifier(NETDEV_UP)
that already found the socket in sklist can re-register the hook.
For fanout sockets, this re-registration calls __fanout_link(sk, po)
which adds the socket back into f->arr[] and increments f->num_members,
but does NOT increment f->sk_ref.
The fix sets po->num to zero in packet_release while bind_lock is
held to prevent NETDEV_UP from linking, preventing the race window.
This bug was found following an additional audit with Claude Code based on CVE-2025-38617.(CVE-2026-31504)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()
syzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]
Issue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families, and that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated, thus possibly overfilling the skb.
Validate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().
[1]
skbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:<NULL> kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 ! Call Trace: <TASK> skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline] skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655 skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline] set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline] pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636 km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848 xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705 xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150(CVE-2026-31515)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/userfaultfd: fix hugetlb fault mutex hash calculation
In mfill_atomic_hugetlb(), linear_page_index() is used to calculate the page index for hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(). However, linear_page_index() returns the index in PAGE_SIZE units, while hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() expects the index in huge page units. This mismatch means that different addresses within the same huge page can produce different hash values, leading to the use of different mutexes for the same huge page. This can cause races between faulting threads, which can corrupt the reservation map and trigger the BUG_ON in resv_map_release().
Fix this by introducing hugetlb_linear_page_index(), which returns the page index in huge page granularity, and using it in place of linear_page_index().(CVE-2026-31575)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: core: clamp report_size in s32ton() to avoid undefined shift
s32ton() shifts by n-1 where n is the field's report_size, a value that comes directly from a HID device. The HID parser bounds report_size only to <= 256, so a broken HID device can supply a report descriptor with a wide field that triggers shift exponents up to 256 on a 32-bit type when an output report is built via hid_output_field() or hid_set_field().
Commit ec61b41918587 ("HID: core: fix shift-out-of-bounds in hid_report_raw_event") added the same n > 32 clamp to the function snto32(), but s32ton() was never given the same fix as I guess syzbot hadn't figured out how to fuzz a device the same way.
Fix this up by just clamping the max value of n, just like snto32() does.(CVE-2026-31624)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: alps: fix NULL pointer dereference in alps_raw_event()
Commit ecfa6f34492c ("HID: Add HID_CLAIMED_INPUT guards in raw_event callbacks missing them") attempted to fix up the HID drivers that had missed the previous fix that was done in 2ff5baa9b527 ("HID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle"), but the alps driver was missed.
Fix this up by properly checking in the hid-alps driver that it had been claimed correctly before attempting to process the raw event.(CVE-2026-31625)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_unix: read UNIX_DIAG_VFS data under unix_state_lock
Exact UNIX diag lookups hold a reference to the socket, but not to u->path. Meanwhile, unix_release_sock() clears u->path under unix_state_lock() and drops the path reference after unlocking.
Read the inode and device numbers for UNIX_DIAG_VFS while holding unix_state_lock(), then emit the netlink attribute after dropping the lock.
This keeps the VFS data stable while the reply is being built.(CVE-2026-31673)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ip6t_rt: reject oversized addrnr in rt_mt6_check()
Reject rt match rules whose addrnr exceeds IP6T_RT_HOPS.
rt_mt6() expects addrnr to stay within the bounds of rtinfo->addrs[]. Validate addrnr during rule installation so malformed rules are rejected before the match logic can use an out-of-range value.(CVE-2026-31674)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bridge: br_nd_send: linearize skb before parsing ND options
br_nd_send() parses neighbour discovery options from ns->opt[] and assumes that these options are in the linear part of request.
Its callers only guarantee that the ICMPv6 header and target address are available, so the option area can still be non-linear. Parsing ns->opt[] in that case can access data past the linear buffer.
Linearize request before option parsing and derive ns from the linear network header.(CVE-2026-31682)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: lag: Check for LAG device before creating debugfs
__mlx5_lag_dev_add_mdev() may return 0 (success) even when an error occurs that is handled gracefully. Consequently, the initialization flow proceeds to call mlx5_ldev_add_debugfs() even when there is no valid LAG context.
mlx5_ldev_add_debugfs() blindly created the debugfs directory and attributes. This exposed interfaces (like the members file) that rely on a valid ldev pointer, leading to potential NULL pointer dereferences if accessed when ldev is NULL.
Add a check to verify that mlx5_lag_dev(dev) returns a valid pointer before attempting to create the debugfs entries.(CVE-2026-43013)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: MGMT: validate mesh send advertising payload length
mesh_send() currently bounds MGMT_OP_MESH_SEND by total command length, but it never verifies that the bytes supplied for the flexible adv_data[] array actually match the embedded adv_data_len field. MGMT_MESH_SEND_SIZE only covers the fixed header, so a truncated command can still pass the existing 20..50 byte range check and later drive the async mesh send path past the end of the queued command buffer.
Keep rejecting zero-length and oversized advertising payloads, but validate adv_data_len explicitly and require the command length to exactly match the flexible array size before queueing the request.(CVE-2026-43017)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_event: fix potential UAF in hci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt
hci_conn lookup and field access must be covered by hdev lock in hci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt, otherwise it's possible it is freed concurrently.
Extend the hci_dev_lock critical section to cover all conn usage.(CVE-2026-43018)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_conn: fix potential UAF in set_cig_params_sync
hci_conn lookup and field access must be covered by hdev lock in set_cig_params_sync, otherwise it's possible it is freed concurrently.
Take hdev lock to prevent hci_conn from being deleted or modified concurrently. Just RCU lock is not suitable here, as we also want to avoid "tearing" in the configuration.(CVE-2026-43019)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: Add SRCU protection for reading PDPTRs in __get_sregs2()
Add SRCU read-side protection when reading PDPTR registers in __get_sregs2().
Reading PDPTRs may trigger access to guest memory: kvm_pdptr_read() -> svm_cache_reg() -> load_pdptrs() -> kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page() -> kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot()
kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot() dereferences memslots via __kvm_memslots(), which uses srcu_dereference_check() and requires either kvm->srcu or kvm->slots_lock to be held. Currently only vcpu->mutex is held, triggering lockdep warning:
============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot 6.12.59+ #3 Not tainted
include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by syz.5.1717/15100: #0: ff1100002f4b00b0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x1d5/0x1590
Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xf0/0x120 lib/dump_stack.c:120 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x1e3/0x270 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6824 __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 [inline] __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1059 [inline] kvm_vcpu_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1076 [inline] kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x518/0x5e0 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:2617 kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x27/0x50 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3302 load_pdptrs+0xff/0x4b0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1065 svm_cache_reg+0x1c9/0x230 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c:1688 kvm_pdptr_read arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h:141 [inline] __get_sregs2 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11784 [inline] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x3e20/0x4aa0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:6279 kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x856/0x1590 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4663 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:893 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18b/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xbd/0x1d0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2026-43214)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events from vcpu_block()
Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events after exiting a blocking state while L2 is active, as exiting to userspace will generate a spurious userspace exit, usually with KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN, and likely lead to the VM's demise. Continuing with the wakeup isn't perfect either, as something has gone sideways if a vCPU is awakened in L2 with an injected event (or worse, a nested run pending), but continuing on gives the VM a decent chance of surviving without any major side effects.
As explained in the Fixes commits, it should be impossible for a vCPU to be put into a blocking state with an already-injected event (exception, IRQ, or NMI). Unfortunately, userspace can stuff MP_STATE and/or injected events, and thus put the vCPU into what should be an impossible state.
Don't bother trying to preserve the WARN, e.g. with an anti-syzkaller Kconfig, as WARNs can (hopefully) be added in paths where KVM would be violating x86 architecture, e.g. by WARNing if KVM attempts to inject an exception or interrupt while the vCPU isn't running.(CVE-2026-43265)
In the Linux kernel xfrm/ESP (IPsec) subsystem, when appending pipe pages to network packets (skb) via zero-copy mechanisms such as splice() / MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, IPv4/IPv6 datagram paths are not correctly marked with the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG flag. The ESP receive path incorrectly treats these externally owned shared pages as private data, skipping the COW (copy-on-write) step and performing in-place decryption directly, allowing an attacker to pollute otherwise read-only pages in the page cache. Combined with CVE-2026-43500, a complete exploit chain can be formed, allowing local unprivileged users to obtain root privileges. This vulnerability affects almost all Linux distributions since 2017 (kernel ~ 4.10), including Ubuntu, RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian, Fedora, etc. A public PoC has been released and signs of active exploitation have been observed.(CVE-2026-43284)
A NULL-pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the ACPI processor driver of the Linux kernel. In the acpi_processor_errata_piix4() function, the pointer dev is first assigned an IDE device and then reassigned an ISA device. If the first lookup succeeds but the second fails, dev becomes NULL. This leads to a potential null-pointer dereference when dev_dbg() is called. The fix is to use two temporary pointers and retrieve each device independently, avoiding overwriting dev with a possible NULL value.(CVE-2026-43313)
In the Linux kernel x86 APIC (Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller) subsystem, when the system resumes from suspend (s2ram/suspend-to-RAM) state, if the kernel expects to disable x2APIC mode at startup, but the BIOS/firmware re-enables x2APIC during the recovery process, the kernel and hardware status will be inconsistent. This status mismatch may cause interrupt handling exceptions, system instability, or denial of service. The vulnerability belongs to CWE-372 (Internal State Corruption).(CVE-2026-43363)
In the Linux kernel, there is a race condition vulnerability in the Ceph filesystem. During async unlink, the i_nlink counter is dropped before receiving the completion (that will eventually update the i_nlink) because "we assume that the unlink will succeed". That is not a bad idea, but it races against deletions by other clients (or against the completion of our own unlink) and can lead to an underrun which emits a WARNING like this one:
WARNING: CPU: 85 PID: 25093 at fs/inode.c:407 drop_nlink+0x50/0x68 Modules linked in: CPU: 85 UID: 3221252029 PID: 25093 Comm: php-cgi8.1 Not tainted 6.14.11-cm4all1-ampere #655 Hardware name: Supermicro ARS-110M-NR/R12SPD-A, BIOS 1.1b 10/17/2023
In ceph_unlink(), a call to ceph_mdsc_submit_request() submits the CEPH_MDS_OP_UNLINK to the MDS, but does not wait for completion. Meanwhile, between this call and the following drop_nlink() call, a worker thread may process a CEPH_CAP_OP_IMPORT, CEPH_CAP_OP_GRANT or just a CEPH_MSG_CLIENT_REPLY (the latter of which could be our own completion). These will lead to a set_nlink() call, updating the i_nlink counter to the value received from the MDS. If that new i_nlink value happens to be zero, it is illegal to decrement it further. But that is exactly what ceph_unlink() will do then.
The root cause of this vulnerability is updating the i_nlink counter without proper lock protection, creating a TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) race condition. Since ceph_fill_inode() and handle_cap_grant() both hold the ceph_inode_info.i_ceph_lock spinlock while set_nlink() runs, this seems like the proper lock to protect the i_nlink updates.(CVE-2026-43420)
In the Linux kernel, there is a security vulnerability in the USB Test and Measurement Class driver (usbtmc). The driver accepts timeout values specified by the user via an ioctl command and uses these timeouts for usb_bulk_msg() calls. Since the user can specify arbitrarily long timeouts and usb_bulk_msg() uses unkillable waits, this may cause kernel threads to hang indefinitely.(CVE-2026-43429)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-145.0.10.149.oe2403sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndmaengine: idxd: fix possible wrong descriptor completion in llist_abort_desc()\n\nAt the end of this function, d is the traversal cursor of flist, but the\ncode completes found instead. This can lead to issues such as NULL pointer\ndereferences, double completion, or descriptor leaks.\n\nFix this by completing d instead of found in the final\nlist_for_each_entry_safe() loop.(CVE-2026-31436)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhwmon: (pmbus/core) Protect regulator operations with mutex\n\nThe regulator operations pmbus_regulator_get_voltage(),\npmbus_regulator_set_voltage(), and pmbus_regulator_list_voltage()\naccess PMBus registers and shared data but were not protected by\nthe update_lock mutex. This could lead to race conditions.\n\nHowever, adding mutex protection directly to these functions causes\na deadlock because pmbus_regulator_notify() (which calls\nregulator_notifier_call_chain()) is often called with the mutex\nalready held (e.g., from pmbus_fault_handler()). If a regulator\ncallback then calls one of the now-protected voltage functions,\nit will attempt to acquire the same mutex.\n\nRework pmbus_regulator_notify() to utilize a worker function to\nsend notifications outside of the mutex protection. Events are\nstored as atomics in a per-page bitmask and processed by the worker.\n\nInitialize the worker and its associated data during regulator\nregistration, and ensure it is cancelled on device removal using\ndevm_add_action_or_reset().\n\nWhile at it, remove the unnecessary include of linux/of.h.(CVE-2026-31486)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race\n\n`packet_release()` has a race window where `NETDEV_UP` can re-register a\nsocket into a fanout group\u0026apos;s `arr[]` array. The re-registration is not\ncleaned up by `fanout_release()`, leaving a dangling pointer in the fanout\narray.\n`packet_release()` does NOT zero `po-\u0026gt;num` in its `bind_lock` section.\nAfter releasing `bind_lock`, `po-\u0026gt;num` is still non-zero and `po-\u0026gt;ifindex`\nstill matches the bound device. A concurrent `packet_notifier(NETDEV_UP)`\nthat already found the socket in `sklist` can re-register the hook.\nFor fanout sockets, this re-registration calls `__fanout_link(sk, po)`\nwhich adds the socket back into `f-\u0026gt;arr[]` and increments `f-\u0026gt;num_members`,\nbut does NOT increment `f-\u0026gt;sk_ref`.\n\nThe fix sets `po-\u0026gt;num` to zero in `packet_release` while `bind_lock` is\nheld to prevent NETDEV_UP from linking, preventing the race window.\n\nThis bug was found following an additional audit with Claude Code based\non CVE-2025-38617.(CVE-2026-31504)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_key: validate families in pfkey_send_migrate()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger a crash in skb_put() [1]\n\nIssue is that pfkey_send_migrate() does not check old/new families,\nand that set_ipsecrequest() @family argument was truncated,\nthus possibly overfilling the skb.\n\nValidate families early, do not wait set_ipsecrequest().\n\n[1]\n\nskbuff: skb_over_panic: text:ffffffff8a752120 len:392 put:16 head:ffff88802a4ad040 data:ffff88802a4ad040 tail:0x188 end:0x180 dev:\u0026lt;NULL\u0026gt;\n kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214 !\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:219 [inline]\n skb_put+0x159/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:2655\n skb_put_zero include/linux/skbuff.h:2788 [inline]\n set_ipsecrequest net/key/af_key.c:3532 [inline]\n pfkey_send_migrate+0x1270/0x2e50 net/key/af_key.c:3636\n km_migrate+0x155/0x260 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2848\n xfrm_migrate+0x2140/0x2450 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4705\n xfrm_do_migrate+0x8ff/0xaa0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3150(CVE-2026-31515)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/userfaultfd: fix hugetlb fault mutex hash calculation\n\nIn mfill_atomic_hugetlb(), linear_page_index() is used to calculate the\npage index for hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(). However, linear_page_index()\nreturns the index in PAGE_SIZE units, while hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash()\nexpects the index in huge page units. This mismatch means that different\naddresses within the same huge page can produce different hash values,\nleading to the use of different mutexes for the same huge page. This can\ncause races between faulting threads, which can corrupt the reservation\nmap and trigger the BUG_ON in resv_map_release().\n\nFix this by introducing hugetlb_linear_page_index(), which returns the\npage index in huge page granularity, and using it in place of\nlinear_page_index().(CVE-2026-31575)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: core: clamp report_size in s32ton() to avoid undefined shift\n\ns32ton() shifts by n-1 where n is the field\u0026apos;s report_size, a value that\ncomes directly from a HID device. The HID parser bounds report_size\nonly to \u0026lt;= 256, so a broken HID device can supply a report descriptor\nwith a wide field that triggers shift exponents up to 256 on a 32-bit\ntype when an output report is built via hid_output_field() or\nhid_set_field().\n\nCommit ec61b41918587 (\u0026quot;HID: core: fix shift-out-of-bounds in\nhid_report_raw_event\u0026quot;) added the same n \u0026gt; 32 clamp to the function\nsnto32(), but s32ton() was never given the same fix as I guess syzbot\nhadn\u0026apos;t figured out how to fuzz a device the same way.\n\nFix this up by just clamping the max value of n, just like snto32()\ndoes.(CVE-2026-31624)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: alps: fix NULL pointer dereference in alps_raw_event()\n\nCommit ecfa6f34492c (\u0026quot;HID: Add HID_CLAIMED_INPUT guards in raw_event\ncallbacks missing them\u0026quot;) attempted to fix up the HID drivers that had\nmissed the previous fix that was done in 2ff5baa9b527 (\u0026quot;HID: appleir:\nFix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle\u0026quot;), but the alps\ndriver was missed.\n\nFix this up by properly checking in the hid-alps driver that it had been\nclaimed correctly before attempting to process the raw event.(CVE-2026-31625)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_unix: read UNIX_DIAG_VFS data under unix_state_lock\n\nExact UNIX diag lookups hold a reference to the socket, but not to\nu-\u0026gt;path. Meanwhile, unix_release_sock() clears u-\u0026gt;path under\nunix_state_lock() and drops the path reference after unlocking.\n\nRead the inode and device numbers for UNIX_DIAG_VFS while holding\nunix_state_lock(), then emit the netlink attribute after dropping the\nlock.\n\nThis keeps the VFS data stable while the reply is being built.(CVE-2026-31673)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ip6t_rt: reject oversized addrnr in rt_mt6_check()\n\nReject rt match rules whose addrnr exceeds IP6T_RT_HOPS.\n\nrt_mt6() expects addrnr to stay within the bounds of rtinfo-\u0026gt;addrs[].\nValidate addrnr during rule installation so malformed rules are rejected\nbefore the match logic can use an out-of-range value.(CVE-2026-31674)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: br_nd_send: linearize skb before parsing ND options\n\nbr_nd_send() parses neighbour discovery options from ns-\u0026gt;opt[] and\nassumes that these options are in the linear part of request.\n\nIts callers only guarantee that the ICMPv6 header and target address\nare available, so the option area can still be non-linear. Parsing\nns-\u0026gt;opt[] in that case can access data past the linear buffer.\n\nLinearize request before option parsing and derive ns from the linear\nnetwork header.(CVE-2026-31682)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5: lag: Check for LAG device before creating debugfs\n\n__mlx5_lag_dev_add_mdev() may return 0 (success) even when an error\noccurs that is handled gracefully. Consequently, the initialization\nflow proceeds to call mlx5_ldev_add_debugfs() even when there is no\nvalid LAG context.\n\nmlx5_ldev_add_debugfs() blindly created the debugfs directory and\nattributes. This exposed interfaces (like the members file) that rely on\na valid ldev pointer, leading to potential NULL pointer dereferences if\naccessed when ldev is NULL.\n\nAdd a check to verify that mlx5_lag_dev(dev) returns a valid pointer\nbefore attempting to create the debugfs entries.(CVE-2026-43013)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: MGMT: validate mesh send advertising payload length\n\nmesh_send() currently bounds MGMT_OP_MESH_SEND by total command\nlength, but it never verifies that the bytes supplied for the\nflexible adv_data[] array actually match the embedded adv_data_len\nfield. MGMT_MESH_SEND_SIZE only covers the fixed header, so a\ntruncated command can still pass the existing 20..50 byte range\ncheck and later drive the async mesh send path past the end of the\nqueued command buffer.\n\nKeep rejecting zero-length and oversized advertising payloads, but\nvalidate adv_data_len explicitly and require the command length to\nexactly match the flexible array size before queueing the request.(CVE-2026-43017)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: hci_event: fix potential UAF in hci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt\n\nhci_conn lookup and field access must be covered by hdev lock in\nhci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt, otherwise it\u0026apos;s possible it is freed\nconcurrently.\n\nExtend the hci_dev_lock critical section to cover all conn usage.(CVE-2026-43018)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: hci_conn: fix potential UAF in set_cig_params_sync\n\nhci_conn lookup and field access must be covered by hdev lock in\nset_cig_params_sync, otherwise it\u0026apos;s possible it is freed concurrently.\n\nTake hdev lock to prevent hci_conn from being deleted or modified\nconcurrently. Just RCU lock is not suitable here, as we also want to\navoid \u0026quot;tearing\u0026quot; in the configuration.(CVE-2026-43019)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86: Add SRCU protection for reading PDPTRs in __get_sregs2()\n\nAdd SRCU read-side protection when reading PDPTR registers in\n__get_sregs2().\n\nReading PDPTRs may trigger access to guest memory:\nkvm_pdptr_read() -\u0026gt; svm_cache_reg() -\u0026gt; load_pdptrs() -\u0026gt;\nkvm_vcpu_read_guest_page() -\u0026gt; kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot()\n\nkvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot() dereferences memslots via __kvm_memslots(),\nwhich uses srcu_dereference_check() and requires either kvm-\u0026gt;srcu or\nkvm-\u0026gt;slots_lock to be held. Currently only vcpu-\u0026gt;mutex is held,\ntriggering lockdep warning:\n\n=============================\nWARNING: suspicious RCU usage in kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot\n6.12.59+ #3 Not tainted\n\ninclude/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\nrcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n1 lock held by syz.5.1717/15100:\n #0: ff1100002f4b00b0 (\u0026amp;vcpu-\u0026gt;mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x1d5/0x1590\n\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xf0/0x120 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x1e3/0x270 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6824\n __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 [inline]\n __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1059 [inline]\n kvm_vcpu_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1076 [inline]\n kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x518/0x5e0 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:2617\n kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x27/0x50 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3302\n load_pdptrs+0xff/0x4b0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1065\n svm_cache_reg+0x1c9/0x230 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c:1688\n kvm_pdptr_read arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h:141 [inline]\n __get_sregs2 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11784 [inline]\n kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x3e20/0x4aa0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:6279\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x856/0x1590 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4663\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:893 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18b/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:893\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xbd/0x1d0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2026-43214)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86: Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events from vcpu_block()\n\nIgnore -EBUSY when checking nested events after exiting a blocking state\nwhile L2 is active, as exiting to userspace will generate a spurious\nuserspace exit, usually with KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN, and likely lead to the VM\u0026apos;s\ndemise. Continuing with the wakeup isn\u0026apos;t perfect either, as *something*\nhas gone sideways if a vCPU is awakened in L2 with an injected event (or\nworse, a nested run pending), but continuing on gives the VM a decent\nchance of surviving without any major side effects.\n\nAs explained in the Fixes commits, it _should_ be impossible for a vCPU to\nbe put into a blocking state with an already-injected event (exception,\nIRQ, or NMI). Unfortunately, userspace can stuff MP_STATE and/or injected\nevents, and thus put the vCPU into what should be an impossible state.\n\nDon\u0026apos;t bother trying to preserve the WARN, e.g. with an anti-syzkaller\nKconfig, as WARNs can (hopefully) be added in paths where _KVM_ would be\nviolating x86 architecture, e.g. by WARNing if KVM attempts to inject an\nexception or interrupt while the vCPU isn\u0026apos;t running.(CVE-2026-43265)\n\nIn the Linux kernel xfrm/ESP (IPsec) subsystem, when appending pipe pages to network packets (skb) via zero-copy mechanisms such as splice() / MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, IPv4/IPv6 datagram paths are not correctly marked with the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG flag. The ESP receive path incorrectly treats these externally owned shared pages as private data, skipping the COW (copy-on-write) step and performing in-place decryption directly, allowing an attacker to pollute otherwise read-only pages in the page cache. Combined with CVE-2026-43500, a complete exploit chain can be formed, allowing local unprivileged users to obtain root privileges. This vulnerability affects almost all Linux distributions since 2017 (kernel ~ 4.10), including Ubuntu, RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian, Fedora, etc. A public PoC has been released and signs of active exploitation have been observed.(CVE-2026-43284)\n\nA NULL-pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the ACPI processor driver of the Linux kernel. In the acpi_processor_errata_piix4() function, the pointer dev is first assigned an IDE device and then reassigned an ISA device. If the first lookup succeeds but the second fails, dev becomes NULL. This leads to a potential null-pointer dereference when dev_dbg() is called. The fix is to use two temporary pointers and retrieve each device independently, avoiding overwriting dev with a possible NULL value.(CVE-2026-43313)\n\nIn the Linux kernel x86 APIC (Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller) subsystem, when the system resumes from suspend (s2ram/suspend-to-RAM) state, if the kernel expects to disable x2APIC mode at startup, but the BIOS/firmware re-enables x2APIC during the recovery process, the kernel and hardware status will be inconsistent. This status mismatch may cause interrupt handling exceptions, system instability, or denial of service. The vulnerability belongs to CWE-372 (Internal State Corruption).(CVE-2026-43363)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, there is a race condition vulnerability in the Ceph filesystem. During async unlink, the `i_nlink` counter is dropped before receiving the completion (that will eventually update the `i_nlink`) because \u0026quot;we assume that the unlink will succeed\u0026quot;. That is not a bad idea, but it races against deletions by other clients (or against the completion of our own unlink) and can lead to an underrun which emits a WARNING like this one:\n\nWARNING: CPU: 85 PID: 25093 at fs/inode.c:407 drop_nlink+0x50/0x68\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 85 UID: 3221252029 PID: 25093 Comm: php-cgi8.1 Not tainted 6.14.11-cm4all1-ampere #655\nHardware name: Supermicro ARS-110M-NR/R12SPD-A, BIOS 1.1b 10/17/2023\n\nIn ceph_unlink(), a call to ceph_mdsc_submit_request() submits the CEPH_MDS_OP_UNLINK to the MDS, but does not wait for completion. Meanwhile, between this call and the following drop_nlink() call, a worker thread may process a CEPH_CAP_OP_IMPORT, CEPH_CAP_OP_GRANT or just a CEPH_MSG_CLIENT_REPLY (the latter of which could be our own completion). These will lead to a set_nlink() call, updating the `i_nlink` counter to the value received from the MDS. If that new `i_nlink` value happens to be zero, it is illegal to decrement it further. But that is exactly what ceph_unlink() will do then.\n\nThe root cause of this vulnerability is updating the `i_nlink` counter without proper lock protection, creating a TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) race condition. Since ceph_fill_inode() and handle_cap_grant() both hold the `ceph_inode_info.i_ceph_lock` spinlock while set_nlink() runs, this seems like the proper lock to protect the `i_nlink` updates.(CVE-2026-43420)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, there is a security vulnerability in the USB Test and Measurement Class driver (usbtmc). The driver accepts timeout values specified by the user via an ioctl command and uses these timeouts for usb_bulk_msg() calls. Since the user can specify arbitrarily long timeouts and usb_bulk_msg() uses unkillable waits, this may cause kernel threads to hang indefinitely.(CVE-2026-43429)",
"id": "OESA-2026-2313",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:11:17Z",
"published": "2026-05-15T11:11:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31436"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31486"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31504"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31575"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31624"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31625"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31673"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31674"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31682"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43013"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43017"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43018"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43019"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43214"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43284"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43363"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43420"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43429"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-31436",
"CVE-2026-31486",
"CVE-2026-31504",
"CVE-2026-31515",
"CVE-2026-31575",
"CVE-2026-31624",
"CVE-2026-31625",
"CVE-2026-31673",
"CVE-2026-31674",
"CVE-2026-31682",
"CVE-2026-43013",
"CVE-2026-43017",
"CVE-2026-43018",
"CVE-2026-43019",
"CVE-2026-43214",
"CVE-2026-43265",
"CVE-2026-43284",
"CVE-2026-43313",
"CVE-2026-43363",
"CVE-2026-43420",
"CVE-2026-43429"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.