CVE-2026-30827 (GCVE-0-2026-30827)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-07 05:19 – Updated: 2026-03-09 20:44
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
express-rate-limit: IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses bypass per-client rate limiting (all IPv4 clients share one bucket on dual-stack servers)
Summary
express-rate-limit is a basic rate-limiting middleware for Express. In versions starting from 8.0.0 and prior to versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0, the default keyGenerator in express-rate-limit applies IPv6 subnet masking (/56 by default) to all addresses that net.isIPv6() returns true for. This includes IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (::ffff:x.x.x.x), which Node.js returns as request.ip on dual-stack servers. Because the first 80 bits of all IPv4-mapped addresses are zero, a /56 (or any /32 to /80) subnet mask produces the same network key (::/56) for every IPv4 client. This collapses all IPv4 traffic into a single rate-limit bucket: one client exhausting the limit causes HTTP 429 for all other IPv4 clients. This issue has been patched in versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-03-09 20:40 UTC
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rat… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rat… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| express-rate-limit | express-rate-limit |
Affected:
>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2
Affected: >= 8.1.0, < 8.1.1 Affected: >= 8.2.0, < 8.2.2 |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30827",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-09T20:40:59.712815Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T20:44:25.979Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "express-rate-limit",
"vendor": "express-rate-limit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c 8.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.1.0, \u003c 8.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.2.0, \u003c 8.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "express-rate-limit is a basic rate-limiting middleware for Express. In versions starting from 8.0.0 and prior to versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0, the default keyGenerator in express-rate-limit applies IPv6 subnet masking (/56 by default) to all addresses that net.isIPv6() returns true for. This includes IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (::ffff:x.x.x.x), which Node.js returns as request.ip on dual-stack servers. Because the first 80 bits of all IPv4-mapped addresses are zero, a /56 (or any /32 to /80) subnet mask produces the same network key (::/56) for every IPv4 client. This collapses all IPv4 traffic into a single rate-limit bucket: one client exhausting the limit causes HTTP 429 for all other IPv4 clients. This issue has been patched in versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-07T05:19:53.932Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/commit/14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/commit/14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "express-rate-limit: IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses bypass per-client rate limiting (all IPv4 clients share one bucket on dual-stack servers)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30827",
"datePublished": "2026-03-07T05:19:08.206Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T21:06:44.606Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T20:44:25.979Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-30827",
"date": "2026-11-01",
"epss": "0.00483",
"percentile": "0.41645"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "express-rate-limit",
"vendor": "express-rate-limit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c 8.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.1.0, \u003c 8.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.2.0, \u003c 8.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:express-rate-limit_project:express-rate-limit:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AE5ED6AB-D445-4E61-86B1-FBC0659382A0",
"versionEndExcluding": "8.0.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "8.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:express-rate-limit_project:express-rate-limit:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F501D9EB-DFE4-496D-8471-61DE755B9E05",
"versionEndExcluding": "8.2.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "8.2.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:express-rate-limit_project:express-rate-limit:8.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C56713D6-533F-424A-B511-5E63014709D8",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "express-rate-limit is a basic rate-limiting middleware for Express. In versions starting from 8.0.0 and prior to versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0, the default keyGenerator in express-rate-limit applies IPv6 subnet masking (/56 by default) to all addresses that net.isIPv6() returns true for. This includes IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (::ffff:x.x.x.x), which Node.js returns as request.ip on dual-stack servers. Because the first 80 bits of all IPv4-mapped addresses are zero, a /56 (or any /32 to /80) subnet mask produces the same network key (::/56) for every IPv4 client. This collapses all IPv4 traffic into a single rate-limit bucket: one client exhausting the limit causes HTTP 429 for all other IPv4 clients. This issue has been patched in versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "express-rate-limit es un middleware b\u00e1sico de limitaci\u00f3n de tasa para Express. En versiones a partir de la 8.0.0 y anteriores a las versiones 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2 y 8.3.0, el keyGenerator predeterminado en express-rate-limit aplica enmascaramiento de subred IPv6 (/56 por defecto) a todas las direcciones para las que net.isIPv6() devuelve verdadero. Esto incluye direcciones IPv6 mapeadas a IPv4 (::ffff:x.x.x.x), que Node.js devuelve como request.ip en servidores de doble pila. Debido a que los primeros 80 bits de todas las direcciones mapeadas a IPv4 son cero, una m\u00e1scara de subred /56 (o cualquier /32 a /80) produce la misma clave de red (::/56) para cada cliente IPv4. Esto colapsa todo el tr\u00e1fico IPv4 en un \u00fanico cubo de limitaci\u00f3n de tasa: un cliente que agota el l\u00edmite causa HTTP 429 para todos los dem\u00e1s clientes IPv4. Este problema ha sido parcheado en las versiones 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2 y 8.3.0."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-30827",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:32:59.050",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30827",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-09T20:40:59.712815Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-07T06:16:10.507",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/commit/14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-770"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-10-27T05:07:52+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-30827",
"id": "CVE-2026-30827",
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-07T05:19:08.206000+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "8",
"product_status:known_affected": "2",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "163",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "express-rate-limit: express-rate-limit: Denial of Service for IPv4 clients due to incorrect IPv6 subnet masking",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-30827.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30827",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-09T20:40:59.712815Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T20:42:01.780Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "express-rate-limit",
"vendor": "express-rate-limit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c 8.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.1.0, \u003c 8.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.2.0, \u003c 8.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "express-rate-limit is a basic rate-limiting middleware for Express. In versions starting from 8.0.0 and prior to versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0, the default keyGenerator in express-rate-limit applies IPv6 subnet masking (/56 by default) to all addresses that net.isIPv6() returns true for. This includes IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (::ffff:x.x.x.x), which Node.js returns as request.ip on dual-stack servers. Because the first 80 bits of all IPv4-mapped addresses are zero, a /56 (or any /32 to /80) subnet mask produces the same network key (::/56) for every IPv4 client. This collapses all IPv4 traffic into a single rate-limit bucket: one client exhausting the limit causes HTTP 429 for all other IPv4 clients. This issue has been patched in versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-07T05:19:53.932Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/commit/14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/commit/14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "express-rate-limit: IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses bypass per-client rate limiting (all IPv4 clients share one bucket on dual-stack servers)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30827",
"datePublished": "2026-03-07T05:19:08.206Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T21:06:44.606Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T20:44:25.979Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.