Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2026-23269 (GCVE-0-2026-23269)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-18 17:54 – Updated: 2026-08-05 12:20| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592 , < f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19
(git)
Affected: ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592 , < 5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df (git) Affected: ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592 , < 5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a (git) Affected: ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592 , < 07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da (git) Affected: ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592 , < 15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c (git) Affected: ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592 , < 0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58 (git) Affected: ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592 , < 3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184 (git) Affected: ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592 , < 9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
3.4
Unaffected: 0 , < 3.4 (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.253 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.203 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.169 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.130 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.77 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.18.18 , ≤ 6.18.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.19.8 , ≤ 6.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 7.0 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.253",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.203",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.169",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.130",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.77",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.18",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.253",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.203",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.169",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.130",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.77",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.18",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb\n\nStart states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the\nDFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will\naccess dfa-\u003etables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds\nthe number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.\n\n==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\n Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097\n ...\n\nReject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking\nto prevent the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - Exploitation requires writing to the local AppArmor policy interface at /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/.load, which is a local filesystem operation.\nAC:L - The attacker fully controls the crafted policy data containing the out-of-bounds start state values. No race condition or special conditions beyond the attacker\u0027s control are needed.\nPR:L - Loading AppArmor policy requires CAP_MAC_ADMIN, but since unprivileged_userns_apparmor_policy defaults to 1, an unprivileged local user can obtain this capability by creating a user namespace.\nUI:N - No user interaction is needed; the attacker can craft and load the malicious policy autonomously.\nS:U - The vulnerability operates within the kernel security scope; there is no crossing of a virtualization or sandbox boundary.\nC:H - The OOB read from slab memory uses an attacker-controlled offset (u32 start state) that is not bounded to a few bytes, allowing potential disclosure of arbitrary kernel heap data through cascading reads in match_char.\nI:N - This is strictly an out-of-bounds read vulnerability; there is no write primitive or direct data modification capability.\nA:H - The OOB slab read triggers a kernel crash/oops as confirmed by the KASAN report in the commit message, causing a denial of service."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:20:59.546Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816"
},
{
"url": "https://www.qualys.com/2026/03/10/crack-armor.txt"
}
],
"title": "apparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-23269",
"datePublished": "2026-03-18T17:54:42.988Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-13T15:37:45.991Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:20:59.546Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-23269",
"date": "2026-09-20",
"epss": "0.00131",
"percentile": "0.03047"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T14:38:29.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2026-23269",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2026-23269",
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "1",
"product_status:known_affected": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "apparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-23269.json",
"version": "2"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.253",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.203",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.169",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.130",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.77",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.18",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "03AA2AFE-AC99-404E-AC4B-A0491F298002",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.253",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "20DDB3E9-AABF-4107-ADB0-5362AA067045",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.203",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DBEC0E5D-641C-4E98-A6D9-5799B10CE451",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.169",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C57BB918-DF28-46B3-94F7-144176841267",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.130",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B3D12E00-E42D-4056-B354-BAD4903C03A5",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.77",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "346AD1FB-0CE8-4D9D-8E56-5EB1A4D06199",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.18",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C65A7D85-C7C6-485E-AC35-66A374C73FAC",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb\n\nStart states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the\nDFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will\naccess dfa-\u003etables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds\nthe number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.\n\n==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\n Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097\n ...\n\nReject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking\nto prevent the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\napparmor: validar que los estados iniciales de DFA est\u00e1n dentro de los l\u00edmites en unpack_pdb\n\nLos estados iniciales se leen de datos no confiables y se usan como \u00edndices en las tablas de estados de DFA. La llamada a la funci\u00f3n aa_dfa_next() en unpack_pdb() acceder\u00e1 a dfa-\u0026gt;tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], y si el estado inicial excede el n\u00famero de estados en el DFA, esto resulta en una lectura fuera de l\u00edmites.\n\n==================================================================\nERROR: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds en aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\nLectura de tama\u00f1o 4 en la direcci\u00f3n ffff88811956fb90 por la tarea su/1097\n...\n\nRechazar pol\u00edticas con estados iniciales fuera de l\u00edmites durante el desempaquetado para prevenir el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-23269",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:21:13.413",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-18T18:16:25.907",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.qualys.com/2026/03/10/crack-armor.txt"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Important",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-20T13:42:26+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-23269",
"id": "CVE-2026-23269",
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-18T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "274",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: Linux kernel: AppArmor out-of-bounds read via crafted policy",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-23269.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-05-15 - Updated: 2026-05-15
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8261-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8261-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8266-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8266-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8180-6",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-6"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8254-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8254-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8265-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8265-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8260-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8260-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8258-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8258-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8267-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8267-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8200-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8200-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8255-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8255-2"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0664
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-05-29 - Updated: 2026-05-29
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro 6.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro 6.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-20585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-05-29T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-05-29T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0664",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-05-29T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21818-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621818-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21816-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621816-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE suse-su-202621720-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621720-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21775-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621775-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2068-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262068-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21771-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621771-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21777-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621777-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21772-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621772-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21743-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621743-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE suse-su-202621721-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621721-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21774-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621774-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21766-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621766-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21767-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621767-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE suse-su-202621723-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621723-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21817-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621817-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21765-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621765-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21745-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621745-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21778-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621778-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21734-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621734-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE suse-su-202621719-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621719-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21773-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621773-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21776-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621776-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE suse-su-202621724-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621724-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21735-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621735-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-06-05 - Updated: 2026-06-05
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | Public Cloud Module | Public Cloud Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Proxy | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Micro Extras | SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | Basesystem Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Micro | SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Micro | SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | ||
| SUSE | Legacy Module | Legacy Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Micro | SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Server | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Real Time Module | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | Development Tools Module | Development Tools Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "Public Cloud Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Proxy",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Micro Extras",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro 6.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro 6.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Legacy Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "Legacy Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro 6.0",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Real Time Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Development Tools Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "Development Tools Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-20585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-14027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-14027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-06-05T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-06-05T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-06-05T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es, une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et un contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21930-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621930-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21841-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621841-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-03",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2238-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262238-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21974-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621974-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2217-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262217-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21979-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621979-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2149-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262149-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2158-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262158-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21973-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621973-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2189-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262189-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2159-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262159-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21942-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621942-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21964-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621964-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21939-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621939-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2202-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262202-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21910-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621910-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2134-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262134-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2137-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262137-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21963-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621963-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21978-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621978-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2191-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262191-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21972-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621972-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2207-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262207-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21969-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621969-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21983-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621983-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21982-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621982-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2141-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262141-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21936-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621936-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2148-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262148-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2131-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262131-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2133-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262133-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21968-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621968-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21909-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621909-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2176-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262176-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21941-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621941-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21932-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621932-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21929-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621929-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2212-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262212-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2153-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262153-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2199-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262199-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2168-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262168-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21940-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621940-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2178-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262178-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2181-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262181-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2200-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262200-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2214-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262214-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21938-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621938-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2216-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262216-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21931-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621931-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21933-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621933-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21896-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621896-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2111-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262111-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2172-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262172-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21975-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621975-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21971-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621971-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21935-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621935-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21937-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621937-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2215-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262215-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21834-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621834-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21962-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621962-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21970-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621970-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21934-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621934-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-06-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2195-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262195-1"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2026-23269
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-18 18:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:21| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://www.qualys.com/2026/03/10/crack-armor.txt | Third Party Advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ad5ff3db53c68c2f12936bc74ea5dfe0af943592",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.253",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.203",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.169",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.130",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.77",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.18",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "03AA2AFE-AC99-404E-AC4B-A0491F298002",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.253",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "20DDB3E9-AABF-4107-ADB0-5362AA067045",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.203",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DBEC0E5D-641C-4E98-A6D9-5799B10CE451",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.169",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C57BB918-DF28-46B3-94F7-144176841267",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.130",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B3D12E00-E42D-4056-B354-BAD4903C03A5",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.77",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "346AD1FB-0CE8-4D9D-8E56-5EB1A4D06199",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.18",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C65A7D85-C7C6-485E-AC35-66A374C73FAC",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb\n\nStart states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the\nDFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will\naccess dfa-\u003etables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds\nthe number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.\n\n==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\n Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097\n ...\n\nReject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking\nto prevent the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\napparmor: validar que los estados iniciales de DFA est\u00e1n dentro de los l\u00edmites en unpack_pdb\n\nLos estados iniciales se leen de datos no confiables y se usan como \u00edndices en las tablas de estados de DFA. La llamada a la funci\u00f3n aa_dfa_next() en unpack_pdb() acceder\u00e1 a dfa-\u0026gt;tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], y si el estado inicial excede el n\u00famero de estados en el DFA, esto resulta en una lectura fuera de l\u00edmites.\n\n==================================================================\nERROR: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds en aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\nLectura de tama\u00f1o 4 en la direcci\u00f3n ffff88811956fb90 por la tarea su/1097\n...\n\nRechazar pol\u00edticas con estados iniciales fuera de l\u00edmites durante el desempaquetado para prevenir el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-23269",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:21:13.413",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-18T18:16:25.907",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.qualys.com/2026/03/10/crack-armor.txt"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-CQ3W-R62M-5JVQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-18 09:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb
Start states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the DFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will access dfa->tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds the number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097 ...
Reject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking to prevent the issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-23269"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-18T18:16:25Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb\n\nStart states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the\nDFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will\naccess dfa-\u003etables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds\nthe number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.\n\n==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\n Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097\n ...\n\nReject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking\nto prevent the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-cq3w-r62m-5jvq",
"modified": "2026-04-18T09:30:17Z",
"published": "2026-03-18T18:31:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07cf6320f40ea2ccfad63728cff34ecb309d03da"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0baadb0eece2c4d939db10d3c323b4652ac79a58"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15c3eb8916e7db01cb246d04a1fe6f0fdc065b0c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bb7db43e32190c973d4019037cedb7895920184"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5443c027ec16afa55b1b8a3e7a1ab2ea3c77767a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5487871b2b56c19d26936ed6fdc62652b30941df"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9063d7e2615f4a7ab321de6b520e23d370e58816"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f43eea8ae0102ea198da211ef7f5ce83725ecf19"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.qualys.com/2026/03/10/crack-armor.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
MSRC_CVE-2026-23269
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2026-03-02 00:00 - Updated: 2026-03-27 14:38OESA-2026-1946 (CVE-2025-68291)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-04-17 11:10 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:10 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: Initialise rcv_mss before calling tcp_send_active_reset() in mptcp_do_fastclose().
syzbot reported divide-by-zero in __tcp_select_window() by MPTCP socket. [0]
We had a similar issue for the bare TCP and fixed in commit 499350a5a6e7 ("tcp: initialize rcv_mss to TCP_MIN_MSS instead of 0").
Let's apply the same fix to mptcp_do_fastclose().
[0]: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6068 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025 RIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x824/0x1320 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3336 Code: ff ff ff 44 89 f1 d3 e0 89 c1 f7 d1 41 01 cc 41 21 c4 e9 a9 00 00 00 e8 ca 49 01 f8 e9 9c 00 00 00 e8 c0 49 01 f8 44 89 e0 99 <f7> 7c 24 1c 41 29 d4 48 bb 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df e9 80 00 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003017640 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88807b469e40 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc90003017730 R08: ffff888033268143 R09: 1ffff1100664d028 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100664d029 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 000055557faa0500(0000) GS:ffff888126135000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f64a1912ff8 CR3: 0000000072122000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_select_window net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:281 [inline] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xbc7/0x3aa0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1568 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1649 [inline] tcp_send_active_reset+0x2d1/0x5b0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3836 mptcp_do_fastclose+0x27e/0x380 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2793 mptcp_disconnect+0x238/0x710 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3253 mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x2f8/0x580 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1776 mptcp_sendmsg+0x1774/0x1980 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1855 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0xe5/0x270 net/socket.c:742 __sys_sendto+0x3bd/0x520 net/socket.c:2244 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2251 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2247 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2247 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f66e998f749 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffff9acedb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f66e9be5fa0 RCX: 00007f66e998f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffff9acee10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R14: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R15: 0000000000000006 </TASK>(CVE-2025-68291)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: secure_seq: add back ports to TS offset
This reverts 28ee1b746f49 ("secure_seq: downgrade to per-host timestamp offsets")
tcp_tw_recycle went away in 2017.
Zhouyan Deng reported off-path TCP source port leakage via SYN cookie side-channel that can be fixed in multiple ways.
One of them is to bring back TCP ports in TS offset randomization.
As a bonus, we perform a single siphash() computation to provide both an ISN and a TS offset.(CVE-2026-23247)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb
Start states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the DFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will access dfa->tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds the number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097 ...
Reject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking to prevent the issue.(CVE-2026-23269)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Fix memory leak in ice_set_ringparam()
In ice_set_ringparam, tx_rings and xdp_rings are allocated before rx_rings. If the allocation of rx_rings fails, the code jumps to the done label leaking both tx_rings and xdp_rings. Furthermore, if the setup of an individual Rx ring fails during the loop, the code jumps to the free_tx label which releases tx_rings but leaks xdp_rings.
Fix this by introducing a free_xdp label and updating the error paths to ensure both xdp_rings and tx_rings are properly freed if rx_rings allocation or setup fails.
Compile tested only. Issue found using a prototype static analysis tool and code review.(CVE-2026-23389)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix race condition during IPSec ESN update
In IPSec full offload mode, the device reports an ESN (Extended Sequence Number) wrap event to the driver. The driver validates this event by querying the IPSec ASO and checking that the esn_event_arm field is 0x0, which indicates an event has occurred. After handling the event, the driver must re-arm the context by setting esn_event_arm back to 0x1.
A race condition exists in this handling path. After validating the event, the driver calls mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm() to update the kernel's xfrm state. This function temporarily releases and re-acquires the xfrm state lock.
So, need to acknowledge the event first by setting esn_event_arm to 0x1. This prevents the driver from reprocessing the same ESN update if the hardware sends events for other reason. Since the next ESN update only occurs after nearly 2^31 packets are received, there's no risk of missing an update, as it will happen long after this handling has finished.
Processing the event twice causes the ESN high-order bits (esn_msb) to be incremented incorrectly. The driver then programs the hardware with this invalid ESN state, which leads to anti-replay failures and a complete halt of IPSec traffic.
Fix this by re-arming the ESN event immediately after it is validated, before calling mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm(). This ensures that any spurious, duplicate events are correctly ignored, closing the race window.(CVE-2026-23440)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Prevent concurrent access to IPSec ASO context
The query or updating IPSec offload object is through Access ASO WQE. The driver uses a single mlx5e_ipsec_aso struct for each PF, which contains a shared DMA-mapped context for all ASO operations.
A race condition exists because the ASO spinlock is released before the hardware has finished processing WQE. If a second operation is initiated immediately after, it overwrites the shared context in the DMA area.
When the first operation's completion is processed later, it reads this corrupted context, leading to unexpected behavior and incorrect results.
This commit fixes the race by introducing a private context within each IPSec offload object. The shared ASO context is now copied to this private context while the ASO spinlock is held. Subsequent processing uses this saved, per-object context, ensuring its integrity is maintained.(CVE-2026-23441)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: always free skb on ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() failure
ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() has three error paths, but only two of them free the skb. The first error path (ieee80211_tx_prepare() returning TX_DROP) does not free it, while invoke_tx_handlers() failure and the fragmentation check both do.
Add kfree_skb() to the first error path so all three are consistent, and remove the now-redundant frees in callers (ath9k, mt76, mac80211_hwsim) to avoid double-free.
Document the skb ownership guarantee in the function's kdoc.(CVE-2026-23444)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_unregister_user
After commit ab4eedb790ca ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix corrupted list in hci_chan_del"), l2cap_conn_del() uses conn->lock to protect access to conn->users. However, l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user() don't use conn->lock, creating a race condition where these functions can access conn->users and conn->hchan concurrently with l2cap_conn_del().
This can lead to use-after-free and list corruption bugs, as reported by syzbot.
Fix this by changing l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user() to use conn->lock instead of hci_dev_lock(), ensuring consistent locking for the l2cap_conn structure.(CVE-2026-23461)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Validate L2CAP_INFO_RSP payload length before access
l2cap_information_rsp() checks that cmd_len covers the fixed l2cap_info_rsp header (type + result, 4 bytes) but then reads rsp->data without verifying that the payload is present:
-
L2CAP_IT_FEAT_MASK calls get_unaligned_le32(rsp->data), which reads 4 bytes past the header (needs cmd_len >= 8).
-
L2CAP_IT_FIXED_CHAN reads rsp->data[0], 1 byte past the header (needs cmd_len >= 5).
A truncated L2CAP_INFO_RSP with result == L2CAP_IR_SUCCESS triggers an out-of-bounds read of adjacent skb data.
Guard each data access with the required payload length check. If the payload is too short, skip the read and let the state machine complete with safe defaults (feat_mask and remote_fixed_chan remain zero from kzalloc), so the info timer cleanup and l2cap_conn_start() still run and the connection is not stalled.(CVE-2026-31393)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvdimm/bus: Fix potential use after free in asynchronous initialization
Dingisoul with KASAN reports a use after free if device_add() fails in nd_async_device_register().
Commit b6eae0f61db2 ("libnvdimm: Hold reference on parent while scheduling async init") correctly added a reference on the parent device to be held until asynchronous initialization was complete. However, if device_add() results in an allocation failure the ref count of the device drops to 0 prior to the parent pointer being accessed. Thus resulting in use after free.
The bug bot AI correctly identified the fix. Save a reference to the parent pointer to be used to drop the parent reference regardless of the outcome of device_add().(CVE-2026-31399)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: dvb-net: fix OOB access in ULE extension header tables
The ule_mandatory_ext_handlers[] and ule_optional_ext_handlers[] tables in handle_one_ule_extension() are declared with 255 elements (valid indices 0-254), but the index htype is derived from network-controlled data as (ule_sndu_type & 0x00FF), giving a range of 0-255. When htype equals 255, an out-of-bounds read occurs on the function pointer table, and the OOB value may be called as a function pointer.
Add a bounds check on htype against the array size before either table is accessed. Out-of-range values now cause the SNDU to be discarded.(CVE-2026-31405)
In the Linux kernel, the Bluetooth SCO module's sco_recv_frame() function contains a use-after-free vulnerability. The function reads conn->sk under sco_conn_lock() but immediately releases the lock without holding a reference to the socket. A concurrent close() operation can free the socket between the lock release and the subsequent sk->sk_state access, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability. Other functions in the same file (sco_sock_timeout(), sco_conn_del()) correctly use sco_sock_hold() to safely hold references under the lock. The vulnerability is fixed by using sco_sock_hold() to acquire a reference before releasing the lock and adding sock_put() on all exit paths.(CVE-2026-31408)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-145.0.3.131.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: Initialise rcv_mss before calling tcp_send_active_reset() in mptcp_do_fastclose().\n\nsyzbot reported divide-by-zero in __tcp_select_window() by\nMPTCP socket. [0]\n\nWe had a similar issue for the bare TCP and fixed in commit\n499350a5a6e7 (\u0026quot;tcp: initialize rcv_mss to TCP_MIN_MSS instead\nof 0\u0026quot;).\n\nLet\u0026apos;s apply the same fix to mptcp_do_fastclose().\n\n[0]:\nOops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6068 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025\nRIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x824/0x1320 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3336\nCode: ff ff ff 44 89 f1 d3 e0 89 c1 f7 d1 41 01 cc 41 21 c4 e9 a9 00 00 00 e8 ca 49 01 f8 e9 9c 00 00 00 e8 c0 49 01 f8 44 89 e0 99 \u0026lt;f7\u0026gt; 7c 24 1c 41 29 d4 48 bb 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df e9 80 00 00 00\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90003017640 EFLAGS: 00010293\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88807b469e40\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: ffffc90003017730 R08: ffff888033268143 R09: 1ffff1100664d028\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100664d029 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 000055557faa0500(0000) GS:ffff888126135000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f64a1912ff8 CR3: 0000000072122000 CR4: 00000000003526f0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n tcp_select_window net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:281 [inline]\n __tcp_transmit_skb+0xbc7/0x3aa0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1568\n tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1649 [inline]\n tcp_send_active_reset+0x2d1/0x5b0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3836\n mptcp_do_fastclose+0x27e/0x380 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2793\n mptcp_disconnect+0x238/0x710 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3253\n mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x2f8/0x580 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1776\n mptcp_sendmsg+0x1774/0x1980 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1855\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0xe5/0x270 net/socket.c:742\n __sys_sendto+0x3bd/0x520 net/socket.c:2244\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2251 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2247 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2247\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f66e998f749\nCode: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffff9acedb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f66e9be5fa0 RCX: 00007f66e998f749\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007ffff9acee10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001\nR13: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R14: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R15: 0000000000000006\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2025-68291)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntcp: secure_seq: add back ports to TS offset\n\nThis reverts 28ee1b746f49 (\u0026quot;secure_seq: downgrade to per-host timestamp offsets\u0026quot;)\n\ntcp_tw_recycle went away in 2017.\n\nZhouyan Deng reported off-path TCP source port leakage via\nSYN cookie side-channel that can be fixed in multiple ways.\n\nOne of them is to bring back TCP ports in TS offset randomization.\n\nAs a bonus, we perform a single siphash() computation\nto provide both an ISN and a TS offset.(CVE-2026-23247)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb\n\nStart states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the\nDFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will\naccess dfa-\u0026gt;tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds\nthe number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.\n\n==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\n Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097\n ...\n\nReject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking\nto prevent the issue.(CVE-2026-23269)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nice: Fix memory leak in ice_set_ringparam()\n\nIn ice_set_ringparam, tx_rings and xdp_rings are allocated before\nrx_rings. If the allocation of rx_rings fails, the code jumps to\nthe done label leaking both tx_rings and xdp_rings. Furthermore, if\nthe setup of an individual Rx ring fails during the loop, the code jumps\nto the free_tx label which releases tx_rings but leaks xdp_rings.\n\nFix this by introducing a free_xdp label and updating the error paths to\nensure both xdp_rings and tx_rings are properly freed if rx_rings\nallocation or setup fails.\n\nCompile tested only. Issue found using a prototype static analysis tool\nand code review.(CVE-2026-23389)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Fix race condition during IPSec ESN update\n\nIn IPSec full offload mode, the device reports an ESN (Extended\nSequence Number) wrap event to the driver. The driver validates this\nevent by querying the IPSec ASO and checking that the esn_event_arm\nfield is 0x0, which indicates an event has occurred. After handling\nthe event, the driver must re-arm the context by setting esn_event_arm\nback to 0x1.\n\nA race condition exists in this handling path. After validating the\nevent, the driver calls mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm() to update the\nkernel\u0026apos;s xfrm state. This function temporarily releases and\nre-acquires the xfrm state lock.\n\nSo, need to acknowledge the event first by setting esn_event_arm to\n0x1. This prevents the driver from reprocessing the same ESN update if\nthe hardware sends events for other reason. Since the next ESN update\nonly occurs after nearly 2^31 packets are received, there\u0026apos;s no risk of\nmissing an update, as it will happen long after this handling has\nfinished.\n\nProcessing the event twice causes the ESN high-order bits (esn_msb) to\nbe incremented incorrectly. The driver then programs the hardware with\nthis invalid ESN state, which leads to anti-replay failures and a\ncomplete halt of IPSec traffic.\n\nFix this by re-arming the ESN event immediately after it is validated,\nbefore calling mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm(). This ensures that any\nspurious, duplicate events are correctly ignored, closing the race\nwindow.(CVE-2026-23440)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Prevent concurrent access to IPSec ASO context\n\nThe query or updating IPSec offload object is through Access ASO WQE.\nThe driver uses a single mlx5e_ipsec_aso struct for each PF, which\ncontains a shared DMA-mapped context for all ASO operations.\n\nA race condition exists because the ASO spinlock is released before\nthe hardware has finished processing WQE. If a second operation is\ninitiated immediately after, it overwrites the shared context in the\nDMA area.\n\nWhen the first operation\u0026apos;s completion is processed later, it reads\nthis corrupted context, leading to unexpected behavior and incorrect\nresults.\n\nThis commit fixes the race by introducing a private context within\neach IPSec offload object. The shared ASO context is now copied to\nthis private context while the ASO spinlock is held. Subsequent\nprocessing uses this saved, per-object context, ensuring its integrity\nis maintained.(CVE-2026-23441)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: mac80211: always free skb on ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() failure\n\nieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() has three error paths, but only two of them\nfree the skb. The first error path (ieee80211_tx_prepare() returning\nTX_DROP) does not free it, while invoke_tx_handlers() failure and the\nfragmentation check both do.\n\nAdd kfree_skb() to the first error path so all three are consistent,\nand remove the now-redundant frees in callers (ath9k, mt76,\nmac80211_hwsim) to avoid double-free.\n\nDocument the skb ownership guarantee in the function\u0026apos;s kdoc.(CVE-2026-23444)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_unregister_user\n\nAfter commit ab4eedb790ca (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix corrupted list in\nhci_chan_del\u0026quot;), l2cap_conn_del() uses conn-\u0026gt;lock to protect access to\nconn-\u0026gt;users. However, l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user()\ndon\u0026apos;t use conn-\u0026gt;lock, creating a race condition where these functions can\naccess conn-\u0026gt;users and conn-\u0026gt;hchan concurrently with l2cap_conn_del().\n\nThis can lead to use-after-free and list corruption bugs, as reported\nby syzbot.\n\nFix this by changing l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user()\nto use conn-\u0026gt;lock instead of hci_dev_lock(), ensuring consistent locking\nfor the l2cap_conn structure.(CVE-2026-23461)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Validate L2CAP_INFO_RSP payload length before access\n\nl2cap_information_rsp() checks that cmd_len covers the fixed\nl2cap_info_rsp header (type + result, 4 bytes) but then reads\nrsp-\u0026gt;data without verifying that the payload is present:\n\n - L2CAP_IT_FEAT_MASK calls get_unaligned_le32(rsp-\u0026gt;data), which reads\n 4 bytes past the header (needs cmd_len \u0026gt;= 8).\n\n - L2CAP_IT_FIXED_CHAN reads rsp-\u0026gt;data[0], 1 byte past the header\n (needs cmd_len \u0026gt;= 5).\n\nA truncated L2CAP_INFO_RSP with result == L2CAP_IR_SUCCESS triggers an\nout-of-bounds read of adjacent skb data.\n\nGuard each data access with the required payload length check. If the\npayload is too short, skip the read and let the state machine complete\nwith safe defaults (feat_mask and remote_fixed_chan remain zero from\nkzalloc), so the info timer cleanup and l2cap_conn_start() still run\nand the connection is not stalled.(CVE-2026-31393)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvdimm/bus: Fix potential use after free in asynchronous initialization\n\nDingisoul with KASAN reports a use after free if device_add() fails in\nnd_async_device_register().\n\nCommit b6eae0f61db2 (\u0026quot;libnvdimm: Hold reference on parent while\nscheduling async init\u0026quot;) correctly added a reference on the parent device\nto be held until asynchronous initialization was complete. However, if\ndevice_add() results in an allocation failure the ref count of the\ndevice drops to 0 prior to the parent pointer being accessed. Thus\nresulting in use after free.\n\nThe bug bot AI correctly identified the fix. Save a reference to the\nparent pointer to be used to drop the parent reference regardless of the\noutcome of device_add().(CVE-2026-31399)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: dvb-net: fix OOB access in ULE extension header tables\n\nThe ule_mandatory_ext_handlers[] and ule_optional_ext_handlers[] tables\nin handle_one_ule_extension() are declared with 255 elements (valid\nindices 0-254), but the index htype is derived from network-controlled\ndata as (ule_sndu_type \u0026amp; 0x00FF), giving a range of 0-255. When\nhtype equals 255, an out-of-bounds read occurs on the function pointer\ntable, and the OOB value may be called as a function pointer.\n\nAdd a bounds check on htype against the array size before either table\nis accessed. Out-of-range values now cause the SNDU to be discarded.(CVE-2026-31405)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the Bluetooth SCO module\u0026apos;s sco_recv_frame() function contains a use-after-free vulnerability. The function reads conn-\u0026gt;sk under sco_conn_lock() but immediately releases the lock without holding a reference to the socket. A concurrent close() operation can free the socket between the lock release and the subsequent sk-\u0026gt;sk_state access, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability. Other functions in the same file (sco_sock_timeout(), sco_conn_del()) correctly use sco_sock_hold() to safely hold references under the lock. The vulnerability is fixed by using sco_sock_hold() to acquire a reference before releasing the lock and adding sock_put() on all exit paths.(CVE-2026-31408)",
"id": "OESA-2026-1946",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:10:57Z",
"published": "2026-04-17T11:10:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-1946"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68291"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23247"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23389"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23440"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23441"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23444"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23461"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31393"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31399"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31405"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31408"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-68291",
"CVE-2026-23247",
"CVE-2026-23269",
"CVE-2026-23389",
"CVE-2026-23440",
"CVE-2026-23441",
"CVE-2026-23444",
"CVE-2026-23461",
"CVE-2026-31393",
"CVE-2026-31399",
"CVE-2026-31405",
"CVE-2026-31408"
]
}
OESA-2026-1947 (CVE-2025-68291)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-04-17 11:10 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:10 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: Initialise rcv_mss before calling tcp_send_active_reset() in mptcp_do_fastclose().
syzbot reported divide-by-zero in __tcp_select_window() by MPTCP socket. [0]
We had a similar issue for the bare TCP and fixed in commit 499350a5a6e7 ("tcp: initialize rcv_mss to TCP_MIN_MSS instead of 0").
Let's apply the same fix to mptcp_do_fastclose().
[0]: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6068 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025 RIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x824/0x1320 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3336 Code: ff ff ff 44 89 f1 d3 e0 89 c1 f7 d1 41 01 cc 41 21 c4 e9 a9 00 00 00 e8 ca 49 01 f8 e9 9c 00 00 00 e8 c0 49 01 f8 44 89 e0 99 <f7> 7c 24 1c 41 29 d4 48 bb 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df e9 80 00 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003017640 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88807b469e40 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc90003017730 R08: ffff888033268143 R09: 1ffff1100664d028 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100664d029 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 000055557faa0500(0000) GS:ffff888126135000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f64a1912ff8 CR3: 0000000072122000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_select_window net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:281 [inline] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xbc7/0x3aa0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1568 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1649 [inline] tcp_send_active_reset+0x2d1/0x5b0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3836 mptcp_do_fastclose+0x27e/0x380 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2793 mptcp_disconnect+0x238/0x710 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3253 mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x2f8/0x580 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1776 mptcp_sendmsg+0x1774/0x1980 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1855 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0xe5/0x270 net/socket.c:742 __sys_sendto+0x3bd/0x520 net/socket.c:2244 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2251 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2247 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2247 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f66e998f749 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffff9acedb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f66e9be5fa0 RCX: 00007f66e998f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffff9acee10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R14: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R15: 0000000000000006 </TASK>(CVE-2025-68291)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: secure_seq: add back ports to TS offset
This reverts 28ee1b746f49 ("secure_seq: downgrade to per-host timestamp offsets")
tcp_tw_recycle went away in 2017.
Zhouyan Deng reported off-path TCP source port leakage via SYN cookie side-channel that can be fixed in multiple ways.
One of them is to bring back TCP ports in TS offset randomization.
As a bonus, we perform a single siphash() computation to provide both an ISN and a TS offset.(CVE-2026-23247)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb
Start states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the DFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will access dfa->tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds the number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097 ...
Reject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking to prevent the issue.(CVE-2026-23269)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Fix memory leak in ice_set_ringparam()
In ice_set_ringparam, tx_rings and xdp_rings are allocated before rx_rings. If the allocation of rx_rings fails, the code jumps to the done label leaking both tx_rings and xdp_rings. Furthermore, if the setup of an individual Rx ring fails during the loop, the code jumps to the free_tx label which releases tx_rings but leaks xdp_rings.
Fix this by introducing a free_xdp label and updating the error paths to ensure both xdp_rings and tx_rings are properly freed if rx_rings allocation or setup fails.
Compile tested only. Issue found using a prototype static analysis tool and code review.(CVE-2026-23389)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix race condition during IPSec ESN update
In IPSec full offload mode, the device reports an ESN (Extended Sequence Number) wrap event to the driver. The driver validates this event by querying the IPSec ASO and checking that the esn_event_arm field is 0x0, which indicates an event has occurred. After handling the event, the driver must re-arm the context by setting esn_event_arm back to 0x1.
A race condition exists in this handling path. After validating the event, the driver calls mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm() to update the kernel's xfrm state. This function temporarily releases and re-acquires the xfrm state lock.
So, need to acknowledge the event first by setting esn_event_arm to 0x1. This prevents the driver from reprocessing the same ESN update if the hardware sends events for other reason. Since the next ESN update only occurs after nearly 2^31 packets are received, there's no risk of missing an update, as it will happen long after this handling has finished.
Processing the event twice causes the ESN high-order bits (esn_msb) to be incremented incorrectly. The driver then programs the hardware with this invalid ESN state, which leads to anti-replay failures and a complete halt of IPSec traffic.
Fix this by re-arming the ESN event immediately after it is validated, before calling mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm(). This ensures that any spurious, duplicate events are correctly ignored, closing the race window.(CVE-2026-23440)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Prevent concurrent access to IPSec ASO context
The query or updating IPSec offload object is through Access ASO WQE. The driver uses a single mlx5e_ipsec_aso struct for each PF, which contains a shared DMA-mapped context for all ASO operations.
A race condition exists because the ASO spinlock is released before the hardware has finished processing WQE. If a second operation is initiated immediately after, it overwrites the shared context in the DMA area.
When the first operation's completion is processed later, it reads this corrupted context, leading to unexpected behavior and incorrect results.
This commit fixes the race by introducing a private context within each IPSec offload object. The shared ASO context is now copied to this private context while the ASO spinlock is held. Subsequent processing uses this saved, per-object context, ensuring its integrity is maintained.(CVE-2026-23441)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: always free skb on ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() failure
ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() has three error paths, but only two of them free the skb. The first error path (ieee80211_tx_prepare() returning TX_DROP) does not free it, while invoke_tx_handlers() failure and the fragmentation check both do.
Add kfree_skb() to the first error path so all three are consistent, and remove the now-redundant frees in callers (ath9k, mt76, mac80211_hwsim) to avoid double-free.
Document the skb ownership guarantee in the function's kdoc.(CVE-2026-23444)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_unregister_user
After commit ab4eedb790ca ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix corrupted list in hci_chan_del"), l2cap_conn_del() uses conn->lock to protect access to conn->users. However, l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user() don't use conn->lock, creating a race condition where these functions can access conn->users and conn->hchan concurrently with l2cap_conn_del().
This can lead to use-after-free and list corruption bugs, as reported by syzbot.
Fix this by changing l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user() to use conn->lock instead of hci_dev_lock(), ensuring consistent locking for the l2cap_conn structure.(CVE-2026-23461)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Validate L2CAP_INFO_RSP payload length before access
l2cap_information_rsp() checks that cmd_len covers the fixed l2cap_info_rsp header (type + result, 4 bytes) but then reads rsp->data without verifying that the payload is present:
-
L2CAP_IT_FEAT_MASK calls get_unaligned_le32(rsp->data), which reads 4 bytes past the header (needs cmd_len >= 8).
-
L2CAP_IT_FIXED_CHAN reads rsp->data[0], 1 byte past the header (needs cmd_len >= 5).
A truncated L2CAP_INFO_RSP with result == L2CAP_IR_SUCCESS triggers an out-of-bounds read of adjacent skb data.
Guard each data access with the required payload length check. If the payload is too short, skip the read and let the state machine complete with safe defaults (feat_mask and remote_fixed_chan remain zero from kzalloc), so the info timer cleanup and l2cap_conn_start() still run and the connection is not stalled.(CVE-2026-31393)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvdimm/bus: Fix potential use after free in asynchronous initialization
Dingisoul with KASAN reports a use after free if device_add() fails in nd_async_device_register().
Commit b6eae0f61db2 ("libnvdimm: Hold reference on parent while scheduling async init") correctly added a reference on the parent device to be held until asynchronous initialization was complete. However, if device_add() results in an allocation failure the ref count of the device drops to 0 prior to the parent pointer being accessed. Thus resulting in use after free.
The bug bot AI correctly identified the fix. Save a reference to the parent pointer to be used to drop the parent reference regardless of the outcome of device_add().(CVE-2026-31399)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: dvb-net: fix OOB access in ULE extension header tables
The ule_mandatory_ext_handlers[] and ule_optional_ext_handlers[] tables in handle_one_ule_extension() are declared with 255 elements (valid indices 0-254), but the index htype is derived from network-controlled data as (ule_sndu_type & 0x00FF), giving a range of 0-255. When htype equals 255, an out-of-bounds read occurs on the function pointer table, and the OOB value may be called as a function pointer.
Add a bounds check on htype against the array size before either table is accessed. Out-of-range values now cause the SNDU to be discarded.(CVE-2026-31405)
In the Linux kernel, the Bluetooth SCO module's sco_recv_frame() function contains a use-after-free vulnerability. The function reads conn->sk under sco_conn_lock() but immediately releases the lock without holding a reference to the socket. A concurrent close() operation can free the socket between the lock release and the subsequent sk->sk_state access, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability. Other functions in the same file (sco_sock_timeout(), sco_conn_del()) correctly use sco_sock_hold() to safely hold references under the lock. The vulnerability is fixed by using sco_sock_hold() to acquire a reference before releasing the lock and adding sock_put() on all exit paths.(CVE-2026-31408)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-145.0.3.143.oe2403sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: Initialise rcv_mss before calling tcp_send_active_reset() in mptcp_do_fastclose().\n\nsyzbot reported divide-by-zero in __tcp_select_window() by\nMPTCP socket. [0]\n\nWe had a similar issue for the bare TCP and fixed in commit\n499350a5a6e7 (\u0026quot;tcp: initialize rcv_mss to TCP_MIN_MSS instead\nof 0\u0026quot;).\n\nLet\u0026apos;s apply the same fix to mptcp_do_fastclose().\n\n[0]:\nOops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6068 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025\nRIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x824/0x1320 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3336\nCode: ff ff ff 44 89 f1 d3 e0 89 c1 f7 d1 41 01 cc 41 21 c4 e9 a9 00 00 00 e8 ca 49 01 f8 e9 9c 00 00 00 e8 c0 49 01 f8 44 89 e0 99 \u0026lt;f7\u0026gt; 7c 24 1c 41 29 d4 48 bb 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df e9 80 00 00 00\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90003017640 EFLAGS: 00010293\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88807b469e40\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: ffffc90003017730 R08: ffff888033268143 R09: 1ffff1100664d028\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100664d029 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 000055557faa0500(0000) GS:ffff888126135000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f64a1912ff8 CR3: 0000000072122000 CR4: 00000000003526f0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n tcp_select_window net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:281 [inline]\n __tcp_transmit_skb+0xbc7/0x3aa0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1568\n tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1649 [inline]\n tcp_send_active_reset+0x2d1/0x5b0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3836\n mptcp_do_fastclose+0x27e/0x380 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2793\n mptcp_disconnect+0x238/0x710 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3253\n mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x2f8/0x580 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1776\n mptcp_sendmsg+0x1774/0x1980 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1855\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0xe5/0x270 net/socket.c:742\n __sys_sendto+0x3bd/0x520 net/socket.c:2244\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2251 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2247 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2247\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f66e998f749\nCode: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffff9acedb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f66e9be5fa0 RCX: 00007f66e998f749\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007ffff9acee10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001\nR13: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R14: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R15: 0000000000000006\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2025-68291)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntcp: secure_seq: add back ports to TS offset\n\nThis reverts 28ee1b746f49 (\u0026quot;secure_seq: downgrade to per-host timestamp offsets\u0026quot;)\n\ntcp_tw_recycle went away in 2017.\n\nZhouyan Deng reported off-path TCP source port leakage via\nSYN cookie side-channel that can be fixed in multiple ways.\n\nOne of them is to bring back TCP ports in TS offset randomization.\n\nAs a bonus, we perform a single siphash() computation\nto provide both an ISN and a TS offset.(CVE-2026-23247)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb\n\nStart states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the\nDFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will\naccess dfa-\u0026gt;tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds\nthe number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.\n\n==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\n Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097\n ...\n\nReject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking\nto prevent the issue.(CVE-2026-23269)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nice: Fix memory leak in ice_set_ringparam()\n\nIn ice_set_ringparam, tx_rings and xdp_rings are allocated before\nrx_rings. If the allocation of rx_rings fails, the code jumps to\nthe done label leaking both tx_rings and xdp_rings. Furthermore, if\nthe setup of an individual Rx ring fails during the loop, the code jumps\nto the free_tx label which releases tx_rings but leaks xdp_rings.\n\nFix this by introducing a free_xdp label and updating the error paths to\nensure both xdp_rings and tx_rings are properly freed if rx_rings\nallocation or setup fails.\n\nCompile tested only. Issue found using a prototype static analysis tool\nand code review.(CVE-2026-23389)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Fix race condition during IPSec ESN update\n\nIn IPSec full offload mode, the device reports an ESN (Extended\nSequence Number) wrap event to the driver. The driver validates this\nevent by querying the IPSec ASO and checking that the esn_event_arm\nfield is 0x0, which indicates an event has occurred. After handling\nthe event, the driver must re-arm the context by setting esn_event_arm\nback to 0x1.\n\nA race condition exists in this handling path. After validating the\nevent, the driver calls mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm() to update the\nkernel\u0026apos;s xfrm state. This function temporarily releases and\nre-acquires the xfrm state lock.\n\nSo, need to acknowledge the event first by setting esn_event_arm to\n0x1. This prevents the driver from reprocessing the same ESN update if\nthe hardware sends events for other reason. Since the next ESN update\nonly occurs after nearly 2^31 packets are received, there\u0026apos;s no risk of\nmissing an update, as it will happen long after this handling has\nfinished.\n\nProcessing the event twice causes the ESN high-order bits (esn_msb) to\nbe incremented incorrectly. The driver then programs the hardware with\nthis invalid ESN state, which leads to anti-replay failures and a\ncomplete halt of IPSec traffic.\n\nFix this by re-arming the ESN event immediately after it is validated,\nbefore calling mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm(). This ensures that any\nspurious, duplicate events are correctly ignored, closing the race\nwindow.(CVE-2026-23440)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Prevent concurrent access to IPSec ASO context\n\nThe query or updating IPSec offload object is through Access ASO WQE.\nThe driver uses a single mlx5e_ipsec_aso struct for each PF, which\ncontains a shared DMA-mapped context for all ASO operations.\n\nA race condition exists because the ASO spinlock is released before\nthe hardware has finished processing WQE. If a second operation is\ninitiated immediately after, it overwrites the shared context in the\nDMA area.\n\nWhen the first operation\u0026apos;s completion is processed later, it reads\nthis corrupted context, leading to unexpected behavior and incorrect\nresults.\n\nThis commit fixes the race by introducing a private context within\neach IPSec offload object. The shared ASO context is now copied to\nthis private context while the ASO spinlock is held. Subsequent\nprocessing uses this saved, per-object context, ensuring its integrity\nis maintained.(CVE-2026-23441)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: mac80211: always free skb on ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() failure\n\nieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() has three error paths, but only two of them\nfree the skb. The first error path (ieee80211_tx_prepare() returning\nTX_DROP) does not free it, while invoke_tx_handlers() failure and the\nfragmentation check both do.\n\nAdd kfree_skb() to the first error path so all three are consistent,\nand remove the now-redundant frees in callers (ath9k, mt76,\nmac80211_hwsim) to avoid double-free.\n\nDocument the skb ownership guarantee in the function\u0026apos;s kdoc.(CVE-2026-23444)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_unregister_user\n\nAfter commit ab4eedb790ca (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix corrupted list in\nhci_chan_del\u0026quot;), l2cap_conn_del() uses conn-\u0026gt;lock to protect access to\nconn-\u0026gt;users. However, l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user()\ndon\u0026apos;t use conn-\u0026gt;lock, creating a race condition where these functions can\naccess conn-\u0026gt;users and conn-\u0026gt;hchan concurrently with l2cap_conn_del().\n\nThis can lead to use-after-free and list corruption bugs, as reported\nby syzbot.\n\nFix this by changing l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user()\nto use conn-\u0026gt;lock instead of hci_dev_lock(), ensuring consistent locking\nfor the l2cap_conn structure.(CVE-2026-23461)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Validate L2CAP_INFO_RSP payload length before access\n\nl2cap_information_rsp() checks that cmd_len covers the fixed\nl2cap_info_rsp header (type + result, 4 bytes) but then reads\nrsp-\u0026gt;data without verifying that the payload is present:\n\n - L2CAP_IT_FEAT_MASK calls get_unaligned_le32(rsp-\u0026gt;data), which reads\n 4 bytes past the header (needs cmd_len \u0026gt;= 8).\n\n - L2CAP_IT_FIXED_CHAN reads rsp-\u0026gt;data[0], 1 byte past the header\n (needs cmd_len \u0026gt;= 5).\n\nA truncated L2CAP_INFO_RSP with result == L2CAP_IR_SUCCESS triggers an\nout-of-bounds read of adjacent skb data.\n\nGuard each data access with the required payload length check. If the\npayload is too short, skip the read and let the state machine complete\nwith safe defaults (feat_mask and remote_fixed_chan remain zero from\nkzalloc), so the info timer cleanup and l2cap_conn_start() still run\nand the connection is not stalled.(CVE-2026-31393)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvdimm/bus: Fix potential use after free in asynchronous initialization\n\nDingisoul with KASAN reports a use after free if device_add() fails in\nnd_async_device_register().\n\nCommit b6eae0f61db2 (\u0026quot;libnvdimm: Hold reference on parent while\nscheduling async init\u0026quot;) correctly added a reference on the parent device\nto be held until asynchronous initialization was complete. However, if\ndevice_add() results in an allocation failure the ref count of the\ndevice drops to 0 prior to the parent pointer being accessed. Thus\nresulting in use after free.\n\nThe bug bot AI correctly identified the fix. Save a reference to the\nparent pointer to be used to drop the parent reference regardless of the\noutcome of device_add().(CVE-2026-31399)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: dvb-net: fix OOB access in ULE extension header tables\n\nThe ule_mandatory_ext_handlers[] and ule_optional_ext_handlers[] tables\nin handle_one_ule_extension() are declared with 255 elements (valid\nindices 0-254), but the index htype is derived from network-controlled\ndata as (ule_sndu_type \u0026amp; 0x00FF), giving a range of 0-255. When\nhtype equals 255, an out-of-bounds read occurs on the function pointer\ntable, and the OOB value may be called as a function pointer.\n\nAdd a bounds check on htype against the array size before either table\nis accessed. Out-of-range values now cause the SNDU to be discarded.(CVE-2026-31405)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the Bluetooth SCO module\u0026apos;s sco_recv_frame() function contains a use-after-free vulnerability. The function reads conn-\u0026gt;sk under sco_conn_lock() but immediately releases the lock without holding a reference to the socket. A concurrent close() operation can free the socket between the lock release and the subsequent sk-\u0026gt;sk_state access, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability. Other functions in the same file (sco_sock_timeout(), sco_conn_del()) correctly use sco_sock_hold() to safely hold references under the lock. The vulnerability is fixed by using sco_sock_hold() to acquire a reference before releasing the lock and adding sock_put() on all exit paths.(CVE-2026-31408)",
"id": "OESA-2026-1947",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:10:57Z",
"published": "2026-04-17T11:10:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-1947"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68291"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23247"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23389"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23440"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23441"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23444"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23461"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31393"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31399"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31405"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31408"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-68291",
"CVE-2026-23247",
"CVE-2026-23269",
"CVE-2026-23389",
"CVE-2026-23440",
"CVE-2026-23441",
"CVE-2026-23444",
"CVE-2026-23461",
"CVE-2026-31393",
"CVE-2026-31399",
"CVE-2026-31405",
"CVE-2026-31408"
]
}
OESA-2026-1948 (CVE-2025-68291)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-04-17 11:10 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:10 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: Initialise rcv_mss before calling tcp_send_active_reset() in mptcp_do_fastclose().
syzbot reported divide-by-zero in __tcp_select_window() by MPTCP socket. [0]
We had a similar issue for the bare TCP and fixed in commit 499350a5a6e7 ("tcp: initialize rcv_mss to TCP_MIN_MSS instead of 0").
Let's apply the same fix to mptcp_do_fastclose().
[0]: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6068 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025 RIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x824/0x1320 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3336 Code: ff ff ff 44 89 f1 d3 e0 89 c1 f7 d1 41 01 cc 41 21 c4 e9 a9 00 00 00 e8 ca 49 01 f8 e9 9c 00 00 00 e8 c0 49 01 f8 44 89 e0 99 <f7> 7c 24 1c 41 29 d4 48 bb 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df e9 80 00 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003017640 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88807b469e40 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc90003017730 R08: ffff888033268143 R09: 1ffff1100664d028 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100664d029 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 000055557faa0500(0000) GS:ffff888126135000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f64a1912ff8 CR3: 0000000072122000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_select_window net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:281 [inline] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xbc7/0x3aa0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1568 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1649 [inline] tcp_send_active_reset+0x2d1/0x5b0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3836 mptcp_do_fastclose+0x27e/0x380 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2793 mptcp_disconnect+0x238/0x710 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3253 mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x2f8/0x580 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1776 mptcp_sendmsg+0x1774/0x1980 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1855 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0xe5/0x270 net/socket.c:742 __sys_sendto+0x3bd/0x520 net/socket.c:2244 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2251 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2247 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2247 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f66e998f749 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffff9acedb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f66e9be5fa0 RCX: 00007f66e998f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffff9acee10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R14: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R15: 0000000000000006 </TASK>(CVE-2025-68291)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: secure_seq: add back ports to TS offset
This reverts 28ee1b746f49 ("secure_seq: downgrade to per-host timestamp offsets")
tcp_tw_recycle went away in 2017.
Zhouyan Deng reported off-path TCP source port leakage via SYN cookie side-channel that can be fixed in multiple ways.
One of them is to bring back TCP ports in TS offset randomization.
As a bonus, we perform a single siphash() computation to provide both an ISN and a TS offset.(CVE-2026-23247)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb
Start states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the DFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will access dfa->tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds the number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097 ...
Reject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking to prevent the issue.(CVE-2026-23269)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Fix memory leak in ice_set_ringparam()
In ice_set_ringparam, tx_rings and xdp_rings are allocated before rx_rings. If the allocation of rx_rings fails, the code jumps to the done label leaking both tx_rings and xdp_rings. Furthermore, if the setup of an individual Rx ring fails during the loop, the code jumps to the free_tx label which releases tx_rings but leaks xdp_rings.
Fix this by introducing a free_xdp label and updating the error paths to ensure both xdp_rings and tx_rings are properly freed if rx_rings allocation or setup fails.
Compile tested only. Issue found using a prototype static analysis tool and code review.(CVE-2026-23389)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix race condition during IPSec ESN update
In IPSec full offload mode, the device reports an ESN (Extended Sequence Number) wrap event to the driver. The driver validates this event by querying the IPSec ASO and checking that the esn_event_arm field is 0x0, which indicates an event has occurred. After handling the event, the driver must re-arm the context by setting esn_event_arm back to 0x1.
A race condition exists in this handling path. After validating the event, the driver calls mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm() to update the kernel's xfrm state. This function temporarily releases and re-acquires the xfrm state lock.
So, need to acknowledge the event first by setting esn_event_arm to 0x1. This prevents the driver from reprocessing the same ESN update if the hardware sends events for other reason. Since the next ESN update only occurs after nearly 2^31 packets are received, there's no risk of missing an update, as it will happen long after this handling has finished.
Processing the event twice causes the ESN high-order bits (esn_msb) to be incremented incorrectly. The driver then programs the hardware with this invalid ESN state, which leads to anti-replay failures and a complete halt of IPSec traffic.
Fix this by re-arming the ESN event immediately after it is validated, before calling mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm(). This ensures that any spurious, duplicate events are correctly ignored, closing the race window.(CVE-2026-23440)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Prevent concurrent access to IPSec ASO context
The query or updating IPSec offload object is through Access ASO WQE. The driver uses a single mlx5e_ipsec_aso struct for each PF, which contains a shared DMA-mapped context for all ASO operations.
A race condition exists because the ASO spinlock is released before the hardware has finished processing WQE. If a second operation is initiated immediately after, it overwrites the shared context in the DMA area.
When the first operation's completion is processed later, it reads this corrupted context, leading to unexpected behavior and incorrect results.
This commit fixes the race by introducing a private context within each IPSec offload object. The shared ASO context is now copied to this private context while the ASO spinlock is held. Subsequent processing uses this saved, per-object context, ensuring its integrity is maintained.(CVE-2026-23441)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: always free skb on ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() failure
ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() has three error paths, but only two of them free the skb. The first error path (ieee80211_tx_prepare() returning TX_DROP) does not free it, while invoke_tx_handlers() failure and the fragmentation check both do.
Add kfree_skb() to the first error path so all three are consistent, and remove the now-redundant frees in callers (ath9k, mt76, mac80211_hwsim) to avoid double-free.
Document the skb ownership guarantee in the function's kdoc.(CVE-2026-23444)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_unregister_user
After commit ab4eedb790ca ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix corrupted list in hci_chan_del"), l2cap_conn_del() uses conn->lock to protect access to conn->users. However, l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user() don't use conn->lock, creating a race condition where these functions can access conn->users and conn->hchan concurrently with l2cap_conn_del().
This can lead to use-after-free and list corruption bugs, as reported by syzbot.
Fix this by changing l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user() to use conn->lock instead of hci_dev_lock(), ensuring consistent locking for the l2cap_conn structure.(CVE-2026-23461)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Validate L2CAP_INFO_RSP payload length before access
l2cap_information_rsp() checks that cmd_len covers the fixed l2cap_info_rsp header (type + result, 4 bytes) but then reads rsp->data without verifying that the payload is present:
-
L2CAP_IT_FEAT_MASK calls get_unaligned_le32(rsp->data), which reads 4 bytes past the header (needs cmd_len >= 8).
-
L2CAP_IT_FIXED_CHAN reads rsp->data[0], 1 byte past the header (needs cmd_len >= 5).
A truncated L2CAP_INFO_RSP with result == L2CAP_IR_SUCCESS triggers an out-of-bounds read of adjacent skb data.
Guard each data access with the required payload length check. If the payload is too short, skip the read and let the state machine complete with safe defaults (feat_mask and remote_fixed_chan remain zero from kzalloc), so the info timer cleanup and l2cap_conn_start() still run and the connection is not stalled.(CVE-2026-31393)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvdimm/bus: Fix potential use after free in asynchronous initialization
Dingisoul with KASAN reports a use after free if device_add() fails in nd_async_device_register().
Commit b6eae0f61db2 ("libnvdimm: Hold reference on parent while scheduling async init") correctly added a reference on the parent device to be held until asynchronous initialization was complete. However, if device_add() results in an allocation failure the ref count of the device drops to 0 prior to the parent pointer being accessed. Thus resulting in use after free.
The bug bot AI correctly identified the fix. Save a reference to the parent pointer to be used to drop the parent reference regardless of the outcome of device_add().(CVE-2026-31399)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: dvb-net: fix OOB access in ULE extension header tables
The ule_mandatory_ext_handlers[] and ule_optional_ext_handlers[] tables in handle_one_ule_extension() are declared with 255 elements (valid indices 0-254), but the index htype is derived from network-controlled data as (ule_sndu_type & 0x00FF), giving a range of 0-255. When htype equals 255, an out-of-bounds read occurs on the function pointer table, and the OOB value may be called as a function pointer.
Add a bounds check on htype against the array size before either table is accessed. Out-of-range values now cause the SNDU to be discarded.(CVE-2026-31405)
In the Linux kernel, the Bluetooth SCO module's sco_recv_frame() function contains a use-after-free vulnerability. The function reads conn->sk under sco_conn_lock() but immediately releases the lock without holding a reference to the socket. A concurrent close() operation can free the socket between the lock release and the subsequent sk->sk_state access, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability. Other functions in the same file (sco_sock_timeout(), sco_conn_del()) correctly use sco_sock_hold() to safely hold references under the lock. The vulnerability is fixed by using sco_sock_hold() to acquire a reference before releasing the lock and adding sock_put() on all exit paths.(CVE-2026-31408)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-extra-modules-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-extra-modules-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP2",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-145.0.3.144.oe2403sp2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: Initialise rcv_mss before calling tcp_send_active_reset() in mptcp_do_fastclose().\n\nsyzbot reported divide-by-zero in __tcp_select_window() by\nMPTCP socket. [0]\n\nWe had a similar issue for the bare TCP and fixed in commit\n499350a5a6e7 (\u0026quot;tcp: initialize rcv_mss to TCP_MIN_MSS instead\nof 0\u0026quot;).\n\nLet\u0026apos;s apply the same fix to mptcp_do_fastclose().\n\n[0]:\nOops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6068 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025\nRIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x824/0x1320 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3336\nCode: ff ff ff 44 89 f1 d3 e0 89 c1 f7 d1 41 01 cc 41 21 c4 e9 a9 00 00 00 e8 ca 49 01 f8 e9 9c 00 00 00 e8 c0 49 01 f8 44 89 e0 99 \u0026lt;f7\u0026gt; 7c 24 1c 41 29 d4 48 bb 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df e9 80 00 00 00\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90003017640 EFLAGS: 00010293\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88807b469e40\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: ffffc90003017730 R08: ffff888033268143 R09: 1ffff1100664d028\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100664d029 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 000055557faa0500(0000) GS:ffff888126135000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f64a1912ff8 CR3: 0000000072122000 CR4: 00000000003526f0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n tcp_select_window net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:281 [inline]\n __tcp_transmit_skb+0xbc7/0x3aa0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1568\n tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1649 [inline]\n tcp_send_active_reset+0x2d1/0x5b0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3836\n mptcp_do_fastclose+0x27e/0x380 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2793\n mptcp_disconnect+0x238/0x710 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3253\n mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x2f8/0x580 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1776\n mptcp_sendmsg+0x1774/0x1980 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1855\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0xe5/0x270 net/socket.c:742\n __sys_sendto+0x3bd/0x520 net/socket.c:2244\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2251 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2247 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2247\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f66e998f749\nCode: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffff9acedb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f66e9be5fa0 RCX: 00007f66e998f749\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007ffff9acee10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001\nR13: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R14: 00007f66e9be5fa0 R15: 0000000000000006\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2025-68291)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntcp: secure_seq: add back ports to TS offset\n\nThis reverts 28ee1b746f49 (\u0026quot;secure_seq: downgrade to per-host timestamp offsets\u0026quot;)\n\ntcp_tw_recycle went away in 2017.\n\nZhouyan Deng reported off-path TCP source port leakage via\nSYN cookie side-channel that can be fixed in multiple ways.\n\nOne of them is to bring back TCP ports in TS offset randomization.\n\nAs a bonus, we perform a single siphash() computation\nto provide both an ISN and a TS offset.(CVE-2026-23247)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb\n\nStart states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the\nDFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will\naccess dfa-\u0026gt;tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds\nthe number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.\n\n==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\n Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097\n ...\n\nReject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking\nto prevent the issue.(CVE-2026-23269)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nice: Fix memory leak in ice_set_ringparam()\n\nIn ice_set_ringparam, tx_rings and xdp_rings are allocated before\nrx_rings. If the allocation of rx_rings fails, the code jumps to\nthe done label leaking both tx_rings and xdp_rings. Furthermore, if\nthe setup of an individual Rx ring fails during the loop, the code jumps\nto the free_tx label which releases tx_rings but leaks xdp_rings.\n\nFix this by introducing a free_xdp label and updating the error paths to\nensure both xdp_rings and tx_rings are properly freed if rx_rings\nallocation or setup fails.\n\nCompile tested only. Issue found using a prototype static analysis tool\nand code review.(CVE-2026-23389)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Fix race condition during IPSec ESN update\n\nIn IPSec full offload mode, the device reports an ESN (Extended\nSequence Number) wrap event to the driver. The driver validates this\nevent by querying the IPSec ASO and checking that the esn_event_arm\nfield is 0x0, which indicates an event has occurred. After handling\nthe event, the driver must re-arm the context by setting esn_event_arm\nback to 0x1.\n\nA race condition exists in this handling path. After validating the\nevent, the driver calls mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm() to update the\nkernel\u0026apos;s xfrm state. This function temporarily releases and\nre-acquires the xfrm state lock.\n\nSo, need to acknowledge the event first by setting esn_event_arm to\n0x1. This prevents the driver from reprocessing the same ESN update if\nthe hardware sends events for other reason. Since the next ESN update\nonly occurs after nearly 2^31 packets are received, there\u0026apos;s no risk of\nmissing an update, as it will happen long after this handling has\nfinished.\n\nProcessing the event twice causes the ESN high-order bits (esn_msb) to\nbe incremented incorrectly. The driver then programs the hardware with\nthis invalid ESN state, which leads to anti-replay failures and a\ncomplete halt of IPSec traffic.\n\nFix this by re-arming the ESN event immediately after it is validated,\nbefore calling mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm(). This ensures that any\nspurious, duplicate events are correctly ignored, closing the race\nwindow.(CVE-2026-23440)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Prevent concurrent access to IPSec ASO context\n\nThe query or updating IPSec offload object is through Access ASO WQE.\nThe driver uses a single mlx5e_ipsec_aso struct for each PF, which\ncontains a shared DMA-mapped context for all ASO operations.\n\nA race condition exists because the ASO spinlock is released before\nthe hardware has finished processing WQE. If a second operation is\ninitiated immediately after, it overwrites the shared context in the\nDMA area.\n\nWhen the first operation\u0026apos;s completion is processed later, it reads\nthis corrupted context, leading to unexpected behavior and incorrect\nresults.\n\nThis commit fixes the race by introducing a private context within\neach IPSec offload object. The shared ASO context is now copied to\nthis private context while the ASO spinlock is held. Subsequent\nprocessing uses this saved, per-object context, ensuring its integrity\nis maintained.(CVE-2026-23441)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: mac80211: always free skb on ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() failure\n\nieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() has three error paths, but only two of them\nfree the skb. The first error path (ieee80211_tx_prepare() returning\nTX_DROP) does not free it, while invoke_tx_handlers() failure and the\nfragmentation check both do.\n\nAdd kfree_skb() to the first error path so all three are consistent,\nand remove the now-redundant frees in callers (ath9k, mt76,\nmac80211_hwsim) to avoid double-free.\n\nDocument the skb ownership guarantee in the function\u0026apos;s kdoc.(CVE-2026-23444)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_unregister_user\n\nAfter commit ab4eedb790ca (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix corrupted list in\nhci_chan_del\u0026quot;), l2cap_conn_del() uses conn-\u0026gt;lock to protect access to\nconn-\u0026gt;users. However, l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user()\ndon\u0026apos;t use conn-\u0026gt;lock, creating a race condition where these functions can\naccess conn-\u0026gt;users and conn-\u0026gt;hchan concurrently with l2cap_conn_del().\n\nThis can lead to use-after-free and list corruption bugs, as reported\nby syzbot.\n\nFix this by changing l2cap_register_user() and l2cap_unregister_user()\nto use conn-\u0026gt;lock instead of hci_dev_lock(), ensuring consistent locking\nfor the l2cap_conn structure.(CVE-2026-23461)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Validate L2CAP_INFO_RSP payload length before access\n\nl2cap_information_rsp() checks that cmd_len covers the fixed\nl2cap_info_rsp header (type + result, 4 bytes) but then reads\nrsp-\u0026gt;data without verifying that the payload is present:\n\n - L2CAP_IT_FEAT_MASK calls get_unaligned_le32(rsp-\u0026gt;data), which reads\n 4 bytes past the header (needs cmd_len \u0026gt;= 8).\n\n - L2CAP_IT_FIXED_CHAN reads rsp-\u0026gt;data[0], 1 byte past the header\n (needs cmd_len \u0026gt;= 5).\n\nA truncated L2CAP_INFO_RSP with result == L2CAP_IR_SUCCESS triggers an\nout-of-bounds read of adjacent skb data.\n\nGuard each data access with the required payload length check. If the\npayload is too short, skip the read and let the state machine complete\nwith safe defaults (feat_mask and remote_fixed_chan remain zero from\nkzalloc), so the info timer cleanup and l2cap_conn_start() still run\nand the connection is not stalled.(CVE-2026-31393)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvdimm/bus: Fix potential use after free in asynchronous initialization\n\nDingisoul with KASAN reports a use after free if device_add() fails in\nnd_async_device_register().\n\nCommit b6eae0f61db2 (\u0026quot;libnvdimm: Hold reference on parent while\nscheduling async init\u0026quot;) correctly added a reference on the parent device\nto be held until asynchronous initialization was complete. However, if\ndevice_add() results in an allocation failure the ref count of the\ndevice drops to 0 prior to the parent pointer being accessed. Thus\nresulting in use after free.\n\nThe bug bot AI correctly identified the fix. Save a reference to the\nparent pointer to be used to drop the parent reference regardless of the\noutcome of device_add().(CVE-2026-31399)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: dvb-net: fix OOB access in ULE extension header tables\n\nThe ule_mandatory_ext_handlers[] and ule_optional_ext_handlers[] tables\nin handle_one_ule_extension() are declared with 255 elements (valid\nindices 0-254), but the index htype is derived from network-controlled\ndata as (ule_sndu_type \u0026amp; 0x00FF), giving a range of 0-255. When\nhtype equals 255, an out-of-bounds read occurs on the function pointer\ntable, and the OOB value may be called as a function pointer.\n\nAdd a bounds check on htype against the array size before either table\nis accessed. Out-of-range values now cause the SNDU to be discarded.(CVE-2026-31405)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the Bluetooth SCO module\u0026apos;s sco_recv_frame() function contains a use-after-free vulnerability. The function reads conn-\u0026gt;sk under sco_conn_lock() but immediately releases the lock without holding a reference to the socket. A concurrent close() operation can free the socket between the lock release and the subsequent sk-\u0026gt;sk_state access, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability. Other functions in the same file (sco_sock_timeout(), sco_conn_del()) correctly use sco_sock_hold() to safely hold references under the lock. The vulnerability is fixed by using sco_sock_hold() to acquire a reference before releasing the lock and adding sock_put() on all exit paths.(CVE-2026-31408)",
"id": "OESA-2026-1948",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:10:57Z",
"published": "2026-04-17T11:10:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-1948"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68291"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23247"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23389"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23440"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23441"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23444"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23461"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31393"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31399"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31405"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31408"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-68291",
"CVE-2026-23247",
"CVE-2026-23269",
"CVE-2026-23389",
"CVE-2026-23440",
"CVE-2026-23441",
"CVE-2026-23444",
"CVE-2026-23461",
"CVE-2026-31393",
"CVE-2026-31399",
"CVE-2026-31405",
"CVE-2026-31408"
]
}
OESA-2026-1950 (CVE-2022-50300)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-04-17 11:10 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:10 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix extent map use-after-free when handling missing device in read_one_chunk
Store the error code before freeing the extent_map. Though it's reference counted structure, in that function it's the first and last allocation so this would lead to a potential use-after-free.
The error can happen eg. when chunk is stored on a missing device and the degraded mount option is missing.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216721(CVE-2022-50300)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
parisc: Fix locking in pdc_iodc_print() firmware call
Utilize pdc_lock spinlock to protect parallel modifications of the iodc_dbuf[] buffer, check length to prevent buffer overflow of iodc_dbuf[], drop the iodc_retbuf[] buffer and fix some wrong indentings.(CVE-2022-50518)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Add length check in indx_get_root
This adds a length check to guarantee the retrieved index root is legit.
[ 162.459513] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in hdr_find_e.isra.0+0x10c/0x320 [ 162.460176] Read of size 2 at addr ffff8880037bca99 by task mount/243 [ 162.460851] [ 162.461252] CPU: 0 PID: 243 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7 #42 [ 162.461744] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 162.462609] Call Trace: [ 162.462954] <TASK> [ 162.463276] dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 [ 162.463822] print_report.cold+0xf5/0x689 [ 162.464608] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x3a/0x60 [ 162.465766] ? hdr_find_e.isra.0+0x10c/0x320 [ 162.466975] kasan_report+0xa7/0x130 [ 162.467506] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xc0/0xf0 [ 162.467998] ? hdr_find_e.isra.0+0x10c/0x320 [ 162.468536] __asan_load2+0x68/0x90 [ 162.468923] hdr_find_e.isra.0+0x10c/0x320 [ 162.469282] ? cmp_uints+0xe0/0xe0 [ 162.469557] ? cmp_sdh+0x90/0x90 [ 162.469864] ? ni_find_attr+0x214/0x300 [ 162.470217] ? ni_load_mi+0x80/0x80 [ 162.470479] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 162.470931] ? ntfs_bread_run+0x190/0x190 [ 162.471307] ? indx_get_root+0xe4/0x190 [ 162.471556] ? indx_get_root+0x140/0x190 [ 162.471833] ? indx_init+0x1e0/0x1e0 [ 162.472069] ? fnd_clear+0x115/0x140 [ 162.472363] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x100/0x100 [ 162.472731] indx_find+0x184/0x470 [ 162.473461] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x57/0xc0 [ 162.474429] ? indx_find_buffer+0x2d0/0x2d0 [ 162.474704] ? do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 162.474962] dir_search_u+0x196/0x2f0 [ 162.475381] ? ntfs_nls_to_utf16+0x450/0x450 [ 162.475661] ? ntfs_security_init+0x3d6/0x440 [ 162.475906] ? is_sd_valid+0x180/0x180 [ 162.476191] ntfs_extend_init+0x13f/0x2c0 [ 162.476496] ? ntfs_fix_post_read+0x130/0x130 [ 162.476861] ? iput.part.0+0x286/0x320 [ 162.477325] ntfs_fill_super+0x11e0/0x1b50 [ 162.477709] ? put_ntfs+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 162.477970] ? vsprintf+0x20/0x20 [ 162.478258] ? set_blocksize+0x95/0x150 [ 162.478538] get_tree_bdev+0x232/0x370 [ 162.478789] ? put_ntfs+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 162.479038] ntfs_fs_get_tree+0x15/0x20 [ 162.479374] vfs_get_tree+0x4c/0x130 [ 162.479729] path_mount+0x654/0xfe0 [ 162.480124] ? putname+0x80/0xa0 [ 162.480484] ? finish_automount+0x2e0/0x2e0 [ 162.480894] ? putname+0x80/0xa0 [ 162.481467] ? kmem_cache_free+0x1c4/0x440 [ 162.482280] ? putname+0x80/0xa0 [ 162.482714] do_mount+0xd6/0xf0 [ 162.483264] ? path_mount+0xfe0/0xfe0 [ 162.484782] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 [ 162.485593] __x64_sys_mount+0xca/0x110 [ 162.486024] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 162.486543] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 162.487141] RIP: 0033:0x7f9d374e948a [ 162.488324] Code: 48 8b 0d 11 fa 2a 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 008 [ 162.489728] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30e73d18 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 [ 162.490971] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000561cdb43a060 RCX: 00007f9d374e948a [ 162.491669] RDX: 0000561cdb43a260 RSI: 0000561cdb43a2e0 RDI: 0000561cdb442af0 [ 162.492050] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000561cdb43a280 R09: 0000000000000020 [ 162.492459] R10: 00000000c0ed0000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000561cdb442af0 [ 162.493183] R13: 0000561cdb43a260 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000ffffffff [ 162.493644] </TASK> [ 162.493908] [ 162.494214] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [ 162.494761] page:000000003e38a3d5 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x37bc [ 162.496064] flags: 0xfffffc0000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) [ 162.497278] raw: 000fffffc0000000 ffffea00000df1c8 ffffea00000df008 0000000000000000 [ 162.498928] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000240000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 162.500542] page dumped becau ---truncated---(CVE-2023-53194)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rpl: Fix use-after-free in rpl_do_srh_inline().
Running lwt_dst_cache_ref_loop.sh in selftest with KASAN triggers the splat below [0].
rpl_do_srh_inline() fetches ipv6_hdr(skb) and accesses it after skb_cow_head(), which is illegal as the header could be freed then.
Let's fix it by making oldhdr to a local struct instead of a pointer.
[0]: [root@fedora net]# ./lwt_dst_cache_ref_loop.sh ... TEST: rpl (input) [ 57.631529] ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rpl_do_srh_inline.isra.0 (net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:174) Read of size 40 at addr ffff888122bf96d8 by task ping6/1543
CPU: 50 UID: 0 PID: 1543 Comm: ping6 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-01302-gfadd1e6231b1 #23 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:122) print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:409 mm/kasan/report.c:521) kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:221 mm/kasan/report.c:636) kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:175 (discriminator 1) mm/kasan/generic.c:189 (discriminator 1)) __asan_memmove (mm/kasan/shadow.c:94 (discriminator 2)) rpl_do_srh_inline.isra.0 (net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:174) rpl_input (net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:201 net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:282) lwtunnel_input (net/core/lwtunnel.c:459) ipv6_rcv (./include/net/dst.h:471 (discriminator 1) ./include/net/dst.h:469 (discriminator 1) net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79 (discriminator 1) ./include/linux/netfilter.h:317 (discriminator 1) ./include/linux/netfilter.h:311 (discriminator 1) net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:311 (discriminator 1)) __netif_receive_skb_one_core (net/core/dev.c:5967) process_backlog (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:869 net/core/dev.c:6440) __napi_poll.constprop.0 (net/core/dev.c:7452) net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:7518 net/core/dev.c:7643) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:579) do_softirq (kernel/softirq.c:480 (discriminator 20)) </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip (kernel/softirq.c:407) __dev_queue_xmit (net/core/dev.c:4740) ip6_finish_output2 (./include/linux/netdevice.h:3358 ./include/net/neighbour.h:526 ./include/net/neighbour.h:540 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:141) ip6_finish_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:215 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:226) ip6_output (./include/linux/netfilter.h:306 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:248) ip6_send_skb (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1983) rawv6_sendmsg (net/ipv6/raw.c:588 net/ipv6/raw.c:918) __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:714 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:729 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:2228 (discriminator 1)) __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2231) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) RIP: 0033:0x7f68cffb2a06 Code: 5d e8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 75 19 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 11 e8 26 ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <48> 8b 5d f8 c9 c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 08 RSP: 002b:00007ffefb7c53d0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000564cd69f10a0 RCX: 00007f68cffb2a06 RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000564cd69f10a4 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffefb7c53f0 R08: 0000564cd6a032ac R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000564cd69f10a4 R13: 0000000000000040 R14: 00007ffefb7c66e0 R15: 0000564cd69f10a0 </TASK>
Allocated by task 1543: kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:48) kasan_save_track (mm/kasan/common.c:60 (discriminator 1) mm/kasan/common.c:69 (discriminator 1)) __kasan_slab_alloc (mm/kasan/common.c:319 mm/kasan/common.c:345) kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof (./include/linux/kasan.h:250 mm/slub.c:4148 mm/slub.c:4197 mm/slub.c:4249) kmalloc_reserve (net/core/skbuff.c:581 (discriminator 88)) __alloc_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:669) __ip6_append_data (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1672 (discriminator 1)) ip6_ ---truncated---(CVE-2025-38476)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ARM: tegra: Use I/O memcpy to write to IRAM
Kasan crashes the kernel trying to check boundaries when using the normal memcpy.(CVE-2025-39794)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: avoid potential out-of-bounds in btrfs_encode_fh()
The function btrfs_encode_fh() does not properly account for the three cases it handles.
Before writing to the file handle (fh), the function only returns to the user BTRFS_FID_SIZE_NON_CONNECTABLE (5 dwords, 20 bytes) or BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE (8 dwords, 32 bytes).
However, when a parent exists and the root ID of the parent and the inode are different, the function writes BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT (10 dwords, 40 bytes).
If *max_len is not large enough, this write goes out of bounds because BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT is greater than BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE originally returned.
This results in an 8-byte out-of-bounds write at fid->parent_root_objectid = parent_root_id.
A previous attempt to fix this issue was made but was lost.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/(CVE-2025-40205)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: dvb-core: fix wrong reinitialization of ringbuffer on reopen
dvb_dvr_open() calls dvb_ringbuffer_init() when a new reader opens the DVR device. dvb_ringbuffer_init() calls init_waitqueue_head(), which reinitializes the waitqueue list head to empty.
Since dmxdev->dvr_buffer.queue is a shared waitqueue (all opens of the same DVR device share it), this orphans any existing waitqueue entries from io_uring poll or epoll, leaving them with stale prev/next pointers while the list head is reset to {self, self}.
The waitqueue and spinlock in dvr_buffer are already properly initialized once in dvb_dmxdev_init(). The open path only needs to reset the buffer data pointer, size, and read/write positions.
Replace the dvb_ringbuffer_init() call in dvb_dvr_open() with direct assignment of data/size and a call to dvb_ringbuffer_reset(), which properly resets pread, pwrite, and error with correct memory ordering without touching the waitqueue or spinlock.(CVE-2026-23253)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb
Start states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the DFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will access dfa->tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds the number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097 ...
Reject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking to prevent the issue.(CVE-2026-23269)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Fix memory leak in ice_set_ringparam()
In ice_set_ringparam, tx_rings and xdp_rings are allocated before rx_rings. If the allocation of rx_rings fails, the code jumps to the done label leaking both tx_rings and xdp_rings. Furthermore, if the setup of an individual Rx ring fails during the loop, the code jumps to the free_tx label which releases tx_rings but leaks xdp_rings.
Fix this by introducing a free_xdp label and updating the error paths to ensure both xdp_rings and tx_rings are properly freed if rx_rings allocation or setup fails.
Compile tested only. Issue found using a prototype static analysis tool and code review.(CVE-2026-23389)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: replace recursive profile removal with iterative approach
The profile removal code uses recursion when removing nested profiles, which can lead to kernel stack exhaustion and system crashes.
Reproducer: $ pf='a'; for ((i=0; i<1024; i++)); do echo -e "profile $pf { \n }" | apparmor_parser -K -a; pf="$pf//x"; done $ echo -n a > /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/.remove
Replace the recursive __aa_profile_list_release() approach with an iterative approach in __remove_profile(). The function repeatedly finds and removes leaf profiles until the entire subtree is removed, maintaining the same removal semantic without recursion.(CVE-2026-23404)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: fix: limit the number of levels of policy namespaces
Currently the number of policy namespaces is not bounded relying on the user namespace limit. However policy namespaces aren't strictly tied to user namespaces and it is possible to create them and nest them arbitrarily deep which can be used to exhaust system resource.
Hard cap policy namespaces to the same depth as user namespaces.(CVE-2026-23405)
A vulnerability exists in the AppArmor security module of the Linux kernel, stemming from a side-effect bug in the usage of the match_char macro. This macro evaluates its character parameter multiple times when traversing differential encoding chains. When invoked with *str++, the string pointer advances on each iteration of the inner do-while loop, causing the Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) to check different characters at each iteration and therefore skip input characters. This results in out-of-bounds reads when the pointer advances past the input buffer boundary. This vulnerability may impact the confidentiality of the kernel.(CVE-2026-23406)
An out-of-bounds read and write vulnerability exists in the AppArmor security module of the Linux kernel. In the verify_dfa() function, while traversing the differential encoding chain, it reads k = DEFAULT_TABLE[j] and uses k as an array index without validating whether k is within the bounds of the valid state count (state_count). If an attacker can supply a malicious Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) with a crafted value where DEFAULT_TABLE[j] >= state_count, it will lead to out-of-bounds reads and writes. This vulnerability may impact the confidentiality and stability of the kernel.(CVE-2026-23407)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: Fix double free of ns_name in aa_replace_profiles()
if ns_name is NULL after 1071 error = aa_unpack(udata, &lh, &ns_name);
and if ent->ns_name contains an ns_name in 1089 } else if (ent->ns_name) {
then ns_name is assigned the ent->ns_name 1095 ns_name = ent->ns_name;
however ent->ns_name is freed at 1262 aa_load_ent_free(ent);
and then again when freeing ns_name at 1270 kfree(ns_name);
Fix this by NULLing out ent->ns_name after it is transferred to ns_name
")(CVE-2026-23408)
A race condition vulnerability exists in the AppArmor security module of the Linux kernel, leading to a use-after-free issue. This vulnerability can be triggered when an attacker simultaneously opens rawdata files and removes an associated AppArmor profile. Since rawdata inodes are not refcounted, there is a time window during profile removal where the i_private pointer may reference freed memory, causing the system to access freed memory regions. This can result in program crashes, unexpected value usage, or arbitrary code execution, threatening the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system.(CVE-2026-23410)
A vulnerability exists in the AppArmor security module of the Linux kernel when handling the i_private field of the inode structure. AppArmor was putting the reference to i_private data on its end after removing the original entry from the file system. However the inode can and does live beyond that point and it is possible that some of the fs callback functions will be invoked after the reference has been put, which results in a race between freeing the data and accessing it through the fs. While the rawdata/loaddata is the most likely candidate to fail the race, as it has the fewest references. If properly crafted it might be possible to trigger a race for the other types stored in i_private. This vulnerability could allow a local attacker to bypass AppArmor's access control policies through a specially crafted request, leading to privilege escalation and impacting system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.(CVE-2026-23411)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PM: runtime: Fix a race condition related to device removal
The following code in pm_runtime_work() may dereference the dev->parent pointer after the parent device has been freed:
/* Maybe the parent is now able to suspend. */
if (parent && !parent->power.ignore_children) {
spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
spin_lock(&parent->power.lock);
rpm_idle(parent, RPM_ASYNC);
spin_unlock(&parent->power.lock);
spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
}
Fix this by inserting a flush_work() call in pm_runtime_remove().
Without this patch blktest block/001 triggers the following complaint sporadically:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in lock_acquire+0x70/0x160 Read of size 1 at addr ffff88812bef7198 by task kworker/u553:1/3081 Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x61/0x80 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x8b/0x310 print_report+0xfd/0x1d7 kasan_report+0xd8/0x1d0 __kasan_check_byte+0x42/0x60 lock_acquire.part.0+0x38/0x230 lock_acquire+0x70/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x50 rpm_suspend+0xc6a/0xfe0 rpm_idle+0x578/0x770 pm_runtime_work+0xee/0x120 process_one_work+0xde3/0x1410 worker_thread+0x5eb/0xfe0 kthread+0x37b/0x480 ret_from_fork+0x6cb/0x920 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK>
Allocated by task 4314: kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x18/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x3d/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xb0 __kmalloc_noprof+0x311/0x990 scsi_alloc_target+0x122/0xb60 [scsi_mod] __scsi_scan_target+0x101/0x460 [scsi_mod] scsi_scan_channel+0x179/0x1c0 [scsi_mod] scsi_scan_host_selected+0x259/0x2d0 [scsi_mod] store_scan+0x2d2/0x390 [scsi_mod] dev_attr_store+0x43/0x80 sysfs_kf_write+0xde/0x140 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3ef/0x670 vfs_write+0x506/0x1470 ksys_write+0xfd/0x230 __x64_sys_write+0x76/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x213/0x1810 do_syscall_64+0xee/0xfc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
Freed by task 4314: kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x18/0x40 kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0x67/0x80 kfree+0x225/0x6c0 scsi_target_dev_release+0x3d/0x60 [scsi_mod] device_release+0xa3/0x220 kobject_cleanup+0x105/0x3a0 kobject_put+0x72/0xd0 put_device+0x17/0x20 scsi_device_dev_release+0xacf/0x12c0 [scsi_mod] device_release+0xa3/0x220 kobject_cleanup+0x105/0x3a0 kobject_put+0x72/0xd0 put_device+0x17/0x20 scsi_device_put+0x7f/0xc0 [scsi_mod] sdev_store_delete+0xa5/0x120 [scsi_mod] dev_attr_store+0x43/0x80 sysfs_kf_write+0xde/0x140 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3ef/0x670 vfs_write+0x506/0x1470 ksys_write+0xfd/0x230 __x64_sys_write+0x76/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x213/0x1810(CVE-2026-23452)
In the Linux kernel, the Bluetooth SCO module's sco_recv_frame() function contains a use-after-free vulnerability. The function reads conn->sk under sco_conn_lock() but immediately releases the lock without holding a reference to the socket. A concurrent close() operation can free the socket between the lock release and the subsequent sk->sk_state access, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability. Other functions in the same file (sco_sock_timeout(), sco_conn_del()) correctly use sco_sock_hold() to safely hold references under the lock. The vulnerability is fixed by using sco_sock_hold() to acquire a reference before releasing the lock and adding sock_put() on all exit paths.(CVE-2026-31408)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xen/privcmd: restrict usage in unprivileged domU
The Xen privcmd driver allows to issue arbitrary hypercalls from user space processes. This is normally no problem, as access is usually limited to root and the hypervisor will deny any hypercalls affecting other domains.
In case the guest is booted using secure boot, however, the privcmd driver would be enabling a root user process to modify e.g. kernel memory contents, thus breaking the secure boot feature.
The only known case where an unprivileged domU is really needing to use the privcmd driver is the case when it is acting as the device model for another guest. In this case all hypercalls issued via the privcmd driver will target that other guest.
Fortunately the privcmd driver can already be locked down to allow only hypercalls targeting a specific domain, but this mode can be activated from user land only today.
The target domain can be obtained from Xenstore, so when not running in dom0 restrict the privcmd driver to that target domain from the beginning, resolving the potential problem of breaking secure boot.
This is XSA-482
V2: - defer reading from Xenstore if Xenstore isn't ready yet (Jan Beulich) - wait in open() if target domain isn't known yet - issue message in case no target domain found (Jan Beulich)(CVE-2026-31788)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-309.0.0.212.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: fix extent map use-after-free when handling missing device in read_one_chunk\n\nStore the error code before freeing the extent_map. Though it\u0026apos;s\nreference counted structure, in that function it\u0026apos;s the first and last\nallocation so this would lead to a potential use-after-free.\n\nThe error can happen eg. when chunk is stored on a missing device and\nthe degraded mount option is missing.\n\nBugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216721(CVE-2022-50300)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nparisc: Fix locking in pdc_iodc_print() firmware call\n\nUtilize pdc_lock spinlock to protect parallel modifications of the\niodc_dbuf[] buffer, check length to prevent buffer overflow of\niodc_dbuf[], drop the iodc_retbuf[] buffer and fix some wrong\nindentings.(CVE-2022-50518)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/ntfs3: Add length check in indx_get_root\n\nThis adds a length check to guarantee the retrieved index root is legit.\n\n[ 162.459513] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in hdr_find_e.isra.0+0x10c/0x320\n[ 162.460176] Read of size 2 at addr ffff8880037bca99 by task mount/243\n[ 162.460851]\n[ 162.461252] CPU: 0 PID: 243 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7 #42\n[ 162.461744] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\n[ 162.462609] Call Trace:\n[ 162.462954] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 162.463276] dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63\n[ 162.463822] print_report.cold+0xf5/0x689\n[ 162.464608] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x3a/0x60\n[ 162.465766] ? hdr_find_e.isra.0+0x10c/0x320\n[ 162.466975] kasan_report+0xa7/0x130\n[ 162.467506] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xc0/0xf0\n[ 162.467998] ? hdr_find_e.isra.0+0x10c/0x320\n[ 162.468536] __asan_load2+0x68/0x90\n[ 162.468923] hdr_find_e.isra.0+0x10c/0x320\n[ 162.469282] ? cmp_uints+0xe0/0xe0\n[ 162.469557] ? cmp_sdh+0x90/0x90\n[ 162.469864] ? ni_find_attr+0x214/0x300\n[ 162.470217] ? ni_load_mi+0x80/0x80\n[ 162.470479] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n[ 162.470931] ? ntfs_bread_run+0x190/0x190\n[ 162.471307] ? indx_get_root+0xe4/0x190\n[ 162.471556] ? indx_get_root+0x140/0x190\n[ 162.471833] ? indx_init+0x1e0/0x1e0\n[ 162.472069] ? fnd_clear+0x115/0x140\n[ 162.472363] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x100/0x100\n[ 162.472731] indx_find+0x184/0x470\n[ 162.473461] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x57/0xc0\n[ 162.474429] ? indx_find_buffer+0x2d0/0x2d0\n[ 162.474704] ? do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90\n[ 162.474962] dir_search_u+0x196/0x2f0\n[ 162.475381] ? ntfs_nls_to_utf16+0x450/0x450\n[ 162.475661] ? ntfs_security_init+0x3d6/0x440\n[ 162.475906] ? is_sd_valid+0x180/0x180\n[ 162.476191] ntfs_extend_init+0x13f/0x2c0\n[ 162.476496] ? ntfs_fix_post_read+0x130/0x130\n[ 162.476861] ? iput.part.0+0x286/0x320\n[ 162.477325] ntfs_fill_super+0x11e0/0x1b50\n[ 162.477709] ? put_ntfs+0x1d0/0x1d0\n[ 162.477970] ? vsprintf+0x20/0x20\n[ 162.478258] ? set_blocksize+0x95/0x150\n[ 162.478538] get_tree_bdev+0x232/0x370\n[ 162.478789] ? put_ntfs+0x1d0/0x1d0\n[ 162.479038] ntfs_fs_get_tree+0x15/0x20\n[ 162.479374] vfs_get_tree+0x4c/0x130\n[ 162.479729] path_mount+0x654/0xfe0\n[ 162.480124] ? putname+0x80/0xa0\n[ 162.480484] ? finish_automount+0x2e0/0x2e0\n[ 162.480894] ? putname+0x80/0xa0\n[ 162.481467] ? kmem_cache_free+0x1c4/0x440\n[ 162.482280] ? putname+0x80/0xa0\n[ 162.482714] do_mount+0xd6/0xf0\n[ 162.483264] ? path_mount+0xfe0/0xfe0\n[ 162.484782] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20\n[ 162.485593] __x64_sys_mount+0xca/0x110\n[ 162.486024] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90\n[ 162.486543] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n[ 162.487141] RIP: 0033:0x7f9d374e948a\n[ 162.488324] Code: 48 8b 0d 11 fa 2a 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 008\n[ 162.489728] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30e73d18 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5\n[ 162.490971] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000561cdb43a060 RCX: 00007f9d374e948a\n[ 162.491669] RDX: 0000561cdb43a260 RSI: 0000561cdb43a2e0 RDI: 0000561cdb442af0\n[ 162.492050] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000561cdb43a280 R09: 0000000000000020\n[ 162.492459] R10: 00000000c0ed0000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000561cdb442af0\n[ 162.493183] R13: 0000561cdb43a260 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000ffffffff\n[ 162.493644] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 162.493908]\n[ 162.494214] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:\n[ 162.494761] page:000000003e38a3d5 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x37bc\n[ 162.496064] flags: 0xfffffc0000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)\n[ 162.497278] raw: 000fffffc0000000 ffffea00000df1c8 ffffea00000df008 0000000000000000\n[ 162.498928] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000240000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000\n[ 162.500542] page dumped becau\n---truncated---(CVE-2023-53194)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrpl: Fix use-after-free in rpl_do_srh_inline().\n\nRunning lwt_dst_cache_ref_loop.sh in selftest with KASAN triggers\nthe splat below [0].\n\nrpl_do_srh_inline() fetches ipv6_hdr(skb) and accesses it after\nskb_cow_head(), which is illegal as the header could be freed then.\n\nLet\u0026apos;s fix it by making oldhdr to a local struct instead of a pointer.\n\n[0]:\n[root@fedora net]# ./lwt_dst_cache_ref_loop.sh\n...\nTEST: rpl (input)\n[ 57.631529] ==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rpl_do_srh_inline.isra.0 (net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:174)\nRead of size 40 at addr ffff888122bf96d8 by task ping6/1543\n\nCPU: 50 UID: 0 PID: 1543 Comm: ping6 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-01302-gfadd1e6231b1 #23 PREEMPT(voluntary)\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:122)\n print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:409 mm/kasan/report.c:521)\n kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:221 mm/kasan/report.c:636)\n kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:175 (discriminator 1) mm/kasan/generic.c:189 (discriminator 1))\n __asan_memmove (mm/kasan/shadow.c:94 (discriminator 2))\n rpl_do_srh_inline.isra.0 (net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:174)\n rpl_input (net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:201 net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:282)\n lwtunnel_input (net/core/lwtunnel.c:459)\n ipv6_rcv (./include/net/dst.h:471 (discriminator 1) ./include/net/dst.h:469 (discriminator 1) net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79 (discriminator 1) ./include/linux/netfilter.h:317 (discriminator 1) ./include/linux/netfilter.h:311 (discriminator 1) net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:311 (discriminator 1))\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core (net/core/dev.c:5967)\n process_backlog (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:869 net/core/dev.c:6440)\n __napi_poll.constprop.0 (net/core/dev.c:7452)\n net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:7518 net/core/dev.c:7643)\n handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:579)\n do_softirq (kernel/softirq.c:480 (discriminator 20))\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __local_bh_enable_ip (kernel/softirq.c:407)\n __dev_queue_xmit (net/core/dev.c:4740)\n ip6_finish_output2 (./include/linux/netdevice.h:3358 ./include/net/neighbour.h:526 ./include/net/neighbour.h:540 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:141)\n ip6_finish_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:215 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:226)\n ip6_output (./include/linux/netfilter.h:306 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:248)\n ip6_send_skb (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1983)\n rawv6_sendmsg (net/ipv6/raw.c:588 net/ipv6/raw.c:918)\n __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:714 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:729 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:2228 (discriminator 1))\n __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2231)\n do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 (discriminator 1))\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\nRIP: 0033:0x7f68cffb2a06\nCode: 5d e8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 75 19 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 11 e8 26 ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 8b 5d f8 c9 c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 08\nRSP: 002b:00007ffefb7c53d0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000564cd69f10a0 RCX: 00007f68cffb2a06\nRDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000564cd69f10a4 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007ffefb7c53f0 R08: 0000564cd6a032ac R09: 000000000000001c\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000564cd69f10a4\nR13: 0000000000000040 R14: 00007ffefb7c66e0 R15: 0000564cd69f10a0\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nAllocated by task 1543:\n kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:48)\n kasan_save_track (mm/kasan/common.c:60 (discriminator 1) mm/kasan/common.c:69 (discriminator 1))\n __kasan_slab_alloc (mm/kasan/common.c:319 mm/kasan/common.c:345)\n kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof (./include/linux/kasan.h:250 mm/slub.c:4148 mm/slub.c:4197 mm/slub.c:4249)\n kmalloc_reserve (net/core/skbuff.c:581 (discriminator 88))\n __alloc_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:669)\n __ip6_append_data (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1672 (discriminator 1))\n ip6_\n---truncated---(CVE-2025-38476)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nARM: tegra: Use I/O memcpy to write to IRAM\n\nKasan crashes the kernel trying to check boundaries when using the\nnormal memcpy.(CVE-2025-39794)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: avoid potential out-of-bounds in btrfs_encode_fh()\n\nThe function btrfs_encode_fh() does not properly account for the three\ncases it handles.\n\nBefore writing to the file handle (fh), the function only returns to the\nuser BTRFS_FID_SIZE_NON_CONNECTABLE (5 dwords, 20 bytes) or\nBTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE (8 dwords, 32 bytes).\n\nHowever, when a parent exists and the root ID of the parent and the\ninode are different, the function writes BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT\n(10 dwords, 40 bytes).\n\nIf *max_len is not large enough, this write goes out of bounds because\nBTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT is greater than\nBTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE originally returned.\n\nThis results in an 8-byte out-of-bounds write at\nfid-\u0026gt;parent_root_objectid = parent_root_id.\n\nA previous attempt to fix this issue was made but was lost.\n\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/all/(CVE-2025-40205)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: dvb-core: fix wrong reinitialization of ringbuffer on reopen\n\ndvb_dvr_open() calls dvb_ringbuffer_init() when a new reader opens the\nDVR device. dvb_ringbuffer_init() calls init_waitqueue_head(), which\nreinitializes the waitqueue list head to empty.\n\nSince dmxdev-\u0026gt;dvr_buffer.queue is a shared waitqueue (all opens of the\nsame DVR device share it), this orphans any existing waitqueue entries\nfrom io_uring poll or epoll, leaving them with stale prev/next pointers\nwhile the list head is reset to {self, self}.\n\nThe waitqueue and spinlock in dvr_buffer are already properly\ninitialized once in dvb_dmxdev_init(). The open path only needs to\nreset the buffer data pointer, size, and read/write positions.\n\nReplace the dvb_ringbuffer_init() call in dvb_dvr_open() with direct\nassignment of data/size and a call to dvb_ringbuffer_reset(), which\nproperly resets pread, pwrite, and error with correct memory ordering\nwithout touching the waitqueue or spinlock.(CVE-2026-23253)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: validate DFA start states are in bounds in unpack_pdb\n\nStart states are read from untrusted data and used as indexes into the\nDFA state tables. The aa_dfa_next() function call in unpack_pdb() will\naccess dfa-\u0026gt;tables[YYTD_ID_BASE][start], and if the start state exceeds\nthe number of states in the DFA, this results in an out-of-bound read.\n\n==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in aa_dfa_next+0x2a1/0x360\n Read of size 4 at addr ffff88811956fb90 by task su/1097\n ...\n\nReject policies with out-of-bounds start states during unpacking\nto prevent the issue.(CVE-2026-23269)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nice: Fix memory leak in ice_set_ringparam()\n\nIn ice_set_ringparam, tx_rings and xdp_rings are allocated before\nrx_rings. If the allocation of rx_rings fails, the code jumps to\nthe done label leaking both tx_rings and xdp_rings. Furthermore, if\nthe setup of an individual Rx ring fails during the loop, the code jumps\nto the free_tx label which releases tx_rings but leaks xdp_rings.\n\nFix this by introducing a free_xdp label and updating the error paths to\nensure both xdp_rings and tx_rings are properly freed if rx_rings\nallocation or setup fails.\n\nCompile tested only. Issue found using a prototype static analysis tool\nand code review.(CVE-2026-23389)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: replace recursive profile removal with iterative approach\n\nThe profile removal code uses recursion when removing nested profiles,\nwhich can lead to kernel stack exhaustion and system crashes.\n\nReproducer:\n $ pf=\u0026apos;a\u0026apos;; for ((i=0; i\u0026lt;1024; i++)); do\n echo -e \u0026quot;profile $pf { \\n }\u0026quot; | apparmor_parser -K -a;\n pf=\u0026quot;$pf//x\u0026quot;;\n done\n $ echo -n a \u0026gt; /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/.remove\n\nReplace the recursive __aa_profile_list_release() approach with an\niterative approach in __remove_profile(). The function repeatedly\nfinds and removes leaf profiles until the entire subtree is removed,\nmaintaining the same removal semantic without recursion.(CVE-2026-23404)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: fix: limit the number of levels of policy namespaces\n\nCurrently the number of policy namespaces is not bounded relying on\nthe user namespace limit. However policy namespaces aren\u0026apos;t strictly\ntied to user namespaces and it is possible to create them and nest\nthem arbitrarily deep which can be used to exhaust system resource.\n\nHard cap policy namespaces to the same depth as user namespaces.(CVE-2026-23405)\n\nA vulnerability exists in the AppArmor security module of the Linux kernel, stemming from a side-effect bug in the usage of the match_char macro. This macro evaluates its character parameter multiple times when traversing differential encoding chains. When invoked with *str++, the string pointer advances on each iteration of the inner do-while loop, causing the Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) to check different characters at each iteration and therefore skip input characters. This results in out-of-bounds reads when the pointer advances past the input buffer boundary. This vulnerability may impact the confidentiality of the kernel.(CVE-2026-23406)\n\nAn out-of-bounds read and write vulnerability exists in the AppArmor security module of the Linux kernel. In the verify_dfa() function, while traversing the differential encoding chain, it reads `k = DEFAULT_TABLE[j]` and uses `k` as an array index without validating whether `k` is within the bounds of the valid state count (state_count). If an attacker can supply a malicious Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) with a crafted value where `DEFAULT_TABLE[j] \u0026gt;= state_count`, it will lead to out-of-bounds reads and writes. This vulnerability may impact the confidentiality and stability of the kernel.(CVE-2026-23407)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: Fix double free of ns_name in aa_replace_profiles()\n\nif ns_name is NULL after\n1071 error = aa_unpack(udata, \u0026amp;lh, \u0026amp;ns_name);\n\nand if ent-\u0026gt;ns_name contains an ns_name in\n1089 } else if (ent-\u0026gt;ns_name) {\n\nthen ns_name is assigned the ent-\u0026gt;ns_name\n1095 ns_name = ent-\u0026gt;ns_name;\n\nhowever ent-\u0026gt;ns_name is freed at\n1262 aa_load_ent_free(ent);\n\nand then again when freeing ns_name at\n1270 kfree(ns_name);\n\nFix this by NULLing out ent-\u0026gt;ns_name after it is transferred to ns_name\n\n\u0026quot;)(CVE-2026-23408)\n\nA race condition vulnerability exists in the AppArmor security module of the Linux kernel, leading to a use-after-free issue. This vulnerability can be triggered when an attacker simultaneously opens rawdata files and removes an associated AppArmor profile. Since rawdata inodes are not refcounted, there is a time window during profile removal where the i_private pointer may reference freed memory, causing the system to access freed memory regions. This can result in program crashes, unexpected value usage, or arbitrary code execution, threatening the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system.(CVE-2026-23410)\n\nA vulnerability exists in the AppArmor security module of the Linux kernel when handling the i_private field of the inode structure. AppArmor was putting the reference to i_private data on its end after removing the original entry from the file system. However the inode can and does live beyond that point and it is possible that some of the fs callback functions will be invoked after the reference has been put, which results in a race between freeing the data and accessing it through the fs. While the rawdata/loaddata is the most likely candidate to fail the race, as it has the fewest references. If properly crafted it might be possible to trigger a race for the other types stored in i_private. This vulnerability could allow a local attacker to bypass AppArmor\u0026apos;s access control policies through a specially crafted request, leading to privilege escalation and impacting system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.(CVE-2026-23411)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPM: runtime: Fix a race condition related to device removal\n\nThe following code in pm_runtime_work() may dereference the dev-\u0026gt;parent\npointer after the parent device has been freed:\n\n\t/* Maybe the parent is now able to suspend. */\n\tif (parent \u0026amp;\u0026amp; !parent-\u0026gt;power.ignore_children) {\n\t\tspin_unlock(\u0026amp;dev-\u0026gt;power.lock);\n\n\t\tspin_lock(\u0026amp;parent-\u0026gt;power.lock);\n\t\trpm_idle(parent, RPM_ASYNC);\n\t\tspin_unlock(\u0026amp;parent-\u0026gt;power.lock);\n\n\t\tspin_lock(\u0026amp;dev-\u0026gt;power.lock);\n\t}\n\nFix this by inserting a flush_work() call in pm_runtime_remove().\n\nWithout this patch blktest block/001 triggers the following complaint\nsporadically:\n\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in lock_acquire+0x70/0x160\nRead of size 1 at addr ffff88812bef7198 by task kworker/u553:1/3081\nWorkqueue: pm pm_runtime_work\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x61/0x80\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x8b/0x310\n print_report+0xfd/0x1d7\n kasan_report+0xd8/0x1d0\n __kasan_check_byte+0x42/0x60\n lock_acquire.part.0+0x38/0x230\n lock_acquire+0x70/0x160\n _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x50\n rpm_suspend+0xc6a/0xfe0\n rpm_idle+0x578/0x770\n pm_runtime_work+0xee/0x120\n process_one_work+0xde3/0x1410\n worker_thread+0x5eb/0xfe0\n kthread+0x37b/0x480\n ret_from_fork+0x6cb/0x920\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nAllocated by task 4314:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50\n kasan_save_track+0x18/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x3d/0x50\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xb0\n __kmalloc_noprof+0x311/0x990\n scsi_alloc_target+0x122/0xb60 [scsi_mod]\n __scsi_scan_target+0x101/0x460 [scsi_mod]\n scsi_scan_channel+0x179/0x1c0 [scsi_mod]\n scsi_scan_host_selected+0x259/0x2d0 [scsi_mod]\n store_scan+0x2d2/0x390 [scsi_mod]\n dev_attr_store+0x43/0x80\n sysfs_kf_write+0xde/0x140\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3ef/0x670\n vfs_write+0x506/0x1470\n ksys_write+0xfd/0x230\n __x64_sys_write+0x76/0xc0\n x64_sys_call+0x213/0x1810\n do_syscall_64+0xee/0xfc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n\nFreed by task 4314:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50\n kasan_save_track+0x18/0x40\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x50\n __kasan_slab_free+0x67/0x80\n kfree+0x225/0x6c0\n scsi_target_dev_release+0x3d/0x60 [scsi_mod]\n device_release+0xa3/0x220\n kobject_cleanup+0x105/0x3a0\n kobject_put+0x72/0xd0\n put_device+0x17/0x20\n scsi_device_dev_release+0xacf/0x12c0 [scsi_mod]\n device_release+0xa3/0x220\n kobject_cleanup+0x105/0x3a0\n kobject_put+0x72/0xd0\n put_device+0x17/0x20\n scsi_device_put+0x7f/0xc0 [scsi_mod]\n sdev_store_delete+0xa5/0x120 [scsi_mod]\n dev_attr_store+0x43/0x80\n sysfs_kf_write+0xde/0x140\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3ef/0x670\n vfs_write+0x506/0x1470\n ksys_write+0xfd/0x230\n __x64_sys_write+0x76/0xc0\n x64_sys_call+0x213/0x1810(CVE-2026-23452)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the Bluetooth SCO module\u0026apos;s sco_recv_frame() function contains a use-after-free vulnerability. The function reads conn-\u0026gt;sk under sco_conn_lock() but immediately releases the lock without holding a reference to the socket. A concurrent close() operation can free the socket between the lock release and the subsequent sk-\u0026gt;sk_state access, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability. Other functions in the same file (sco_sock_timeout(), sco_conn_del()) correctly use sco_sock_hold() to safely hold references under the lock. The vulnerability is fixed by using sco_sock_hold() to acquire a reference before releasing the lock and adding sock_put() on all exit paths.(CVE-2026-31408)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxen/privcmd: restrict usage in unprivileged domU\n\nThe Xen privcmd driver allows to issue arbitrary hypercalls from\nuser space processes. This is normally no problem, as access is\nusually limited to root and the hypervisor will deny any hypercalls\naffecting other domains.\n\nIn case the guest is booted using secure boot, however, the privcmd\ndriver would be enabling a root user process to modify e.g. kernel\nmemory contents, thus breaking the secure boot feature.\n\nThe only known case where an unprivileged domU is really needing to\nuse the privcmd driver is the case when it is acting as the device\nmodel for another guest. In this case all hypercalls issued via the\nprivcmd driver will target that other guest.\n\nFortunately the privcmd driver can already be locked down to allow\nonly hypercalls targeting a specific domain, but this mode can be\nactivated from user land only today.\n\nThe target domain can be obtained from Xenstore, so when not running\nin dom0 restrict the privcmd driver to that target domain from the\nbeginning, resolving the potential problem of breaking secure boot.\n\nThis is XSA-482\n\n---\nV2:\n- defer reading from Xenstore if Xenstore isn\u0026apos;t ready yet (Jan Beulich)\n- wait in open() if target domain isn\u0026apos;t known yet\n- issue message in case no target domain found (Jan Beulich)(CVE-2026-31788)",
"id": "OESA-2026-1950",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:10:57Z",
"published": "2026-04-17T11:10:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-1950"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50300"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50518"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53194"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38476"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39794"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23253"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23389"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23404"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23405"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23406"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23407"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23408"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23410"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23411"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23452"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31408"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31788"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-50300",
"CVE-2022-50518",
"CVE-2023-53194",
"CVE-2025-38476",
"CVE-2025-39794",
"CVE-2025-40205",
"CVE-2026-23253",
"CVE-2026-23269",
"CVE-2026-23389",
"CVE-2026-23404",
"CVE-2026-23405",
"CVE-2026-23406",
"CVE-2026-23407",
"CVE-2026-23408",
"CVE-2026-23410",
"CVE-2026-23411",
"CVE-2026-23452",
"CVE-2026-31408",
"CVE-2026-31788"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.