CVE-2026-15920 (GCVE-0-2026-15920)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-04 15:48 – Updated: 2026-08-04 17:21- CWE-83 - Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| djangoproject | Django |
Affected:
6.0 , < 6.0.8
(python)
Unaffected: 6.0.8 (python) Affected: 5.2 , < 5.2.17 (python) Unaffected: 5.2.17 (python) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-15920",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-04T17:16:24.319084Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T17:21:13.428Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/Django/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "django",
"product": "Django",
"repo": "https://github.com/django/django/",
"vendor": "djangoproject",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.0.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.0.8",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.2.17",
"versionType": "python"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Egor Saltykov"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Natalia Bidart"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Natalia Bidart"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-04T10:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003edjango.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()\u003c/code\u003e renders \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e validation through a \u003ccode\u003eModelForm\u003c/code\u003e or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\n`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\r\nExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\nDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-244",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-244: XSS Targeting URI Placeholders"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/security/#security-issue-severity-levels",
"value": "moderate"
},
"type": "Django severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-83",
"description": "CWE-83: Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T15:48:40.537Z",
"orgId": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"shortName": "DSF"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Django security archive",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
},
{
"name": "Django releases announcements",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/47511a21026cdd721d8fbf8571cc079bc38bb46d"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/5a260d309a4c8010c2ebda24eb758a5d95e2508a"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/13debb622a32720bda1bccda7622fd14fbf3931b"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/b9adb81339cc418f8f56b1050cca6dfec3ab6349"
},
{
"name": "Django security releases issued: 6.0.8 and 5.2.17",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/aug/04/security-releases/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial report received."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability confirmed."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-08-04T10:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Security release issued."
}
],
"title": "Potential cross-site scripting via URLField values in the admin",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"assignerShortName": "DSF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-15920",
"datePublished": "2026-08-04T15:48:40.537Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-15T20:32:49.882Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T17:21:13.428Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-15920",
"date": "2026-11-09",
"epss": "0.00354",
"percentile": "0.29396"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/Django/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "django",
"product": "Django",
"repo": "https://github.com/django/django/",
"vendor": "djangoproject",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.0.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.0.8",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.2.17",
"versionType": "python"
}
]
}
],
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E20DAA60-EC17-41F8-A6F0-C6F42F887FE6",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.2.17",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D2E4E199-5735-4911-92F2-73B0AA1D173E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.0.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\n`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\r\nExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\nDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en Django 5.2 anterior a 5.2.17 y 6.0 anterior a 6.0.8.\n\u2019django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()\u2019 renderiza los valores de \u2019URLField\u2019 como enlaces clicables en el administrador sin validar la URL. Un valor almacenado con un esquema inseguro se muestra como un enlace en las p\u00e1ginas de lista de cambios y de administraci\u00f3n de solo lectura, lo que permite cross-site scripting contra los usuarios del personal que hacen clic en el enlace.\nLa explotaci\u00f3n requiere que el valor inseguro ya est\u00e9 almacenado en la base de datos. La validaci\u00f3n de \u2019URLField\u2019 a trav\u00e9s de un \u2019ModelForm\u2019 o el administrador rechaza los esquemas inseguros, por lo que esto afecta a las aplicaciones que persisten datos de \u2019URLField\u2019 sin ejecutar la validaci\u00f3n del modelo, por ejemplo, mediante escrituras directas de queryset, deserializaci\u00f3n o importaci\u00f3n masiva de entrada no confiable.\nDjango desea agradecer a Egor Saltykov por informar de este problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-15920",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T16:10:00.153",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 2.7,
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-15920",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-04T17:16:24.319084Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-04T17:16:46.733",
"references": [
{
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
},
{
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/13debb622a32720bda1bccda7622fd14fbf3931b"
},
{
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/47511a21026cdd721d8fbf8571cc079bc38bb46d"
},
{
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/5a260d309a4c8010c2ebda24eb758a5d95e2508a"
},
{
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/b9adb81339cc418f8f56b1050cca6dfec3ab6349"
},
{
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"tags": [
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
},
{
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/aug/04/security-releases/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-83"
}
],
"source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-11-05T16:43:06+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-15920",
"id": "CVE-2026-15920",
"initial_release_date": "2026-08-04T15:48:40.537000+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "47",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "django: Django: Cross-site scripting via unvalidated URLField values in the admin",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-15920.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-15920",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-04T17:16:24.319084Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T17:21:05.231Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/Django/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "django",
"product": "Django",
"repo": "https://github.com/django/django/",
"vendor": "djangoproject",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.0.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.0.8",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.2.17",
"versionType": "python"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Egor Saltykov"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Natalia Bidart"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Natalia Bidart"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-04T10:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003edjango.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()\u003c/code\u003e renders \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e validation through a \u003ccode\u003eModelForm\u003c/code\u003e or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\n`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\r\nExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\nDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-244",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-244: XSS Targeting URI Placeholders"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/security/#security-issue-severity-levels",
"value": "moderate"
},
"type": "Django severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-83",
"description": "CWE-83: Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T15:48:40.537Z",
"orgId": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"shortName": "DSF"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Django security archive",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
},
{
"name": "Django releases announcements",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/47511a21026cdd721d8fbf8571cc079bc38bb46d"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/5a260d309a4c8010c2ebda24eb758a5d95e2508a"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/13debb622a32720bda1bccda7622fd14fbf3931b"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/b9adb81339cc418f8f56b1050cca6dfec3ab6349"
},
{
"name": "Django security releases issued: 6.0.8 and 5.2.17",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/aug/04/security-releases/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial report received."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability confirmed."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-08-04T10:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Security release issued."
}
],
"title": "Potential cross-site scripting via URLField values in the admin",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"assignerShortName": "DSF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-15920",
"datePublished": "2026-08-04T15:48:40.537Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-15T20:32:49.882Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T17:21:13.428Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.