CVE-2026-13165 (GCVE-0-2026-13165)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-29 12:16 – Updated: 2026-06-29 13:58
VLAI
Title
Remote Code Execution in SzafirHost
Summary
SzafirHost verifies the downloaded native library archive with one JarFile parser (reading the Central Directory) but extracts native libraries with JarInputStream parser (reading sequentially from local file headers). An attacker who controls the served archive can insert a malicious DLL/SO/DYLIB as a local-file-header entry between the last legitimate entry and the Central Directory, without adding it to the Central Directory. The signature verifier never sees the injected entry and accepts the archive as validly signed; the extractor reads it sequentially and writes the attacker library to the native temp directory with no hash check), while the archive-size check still passes. This can lead to remote code execution.
This issue was fixed in version 1.2.2.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-434 - Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/posts/2026/06/CVE-2026-13165 | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa | SzafirHost |
Affected:
0 , < 1.2.2
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-06-29 12:15
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-13165",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-29T13:58:08.681080Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-29T13:58:14.780Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SzafirHost",
"vendor": "Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Mariusz Maik"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-29T12:15:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eSzafirHost \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003everifies the downloaded native library archive with one \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eJarFile\u003c/span\u003e parser (reading the Central Directory) but extracts native libraries with \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eJarInputStream parser\u003c/span\u003e (reading sequentially from local file headers).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eAn attacker who controls the served archive can insert a malicious DLL/SO/DYLIB as a local-file-header entry between the last legitimate entry and the Central Directory, without adding it to the Central Directory. The signature verifier never sees the injected entry and accepts the archive as validly signed; the extractor reads it sequentially and writes the attacker library to the native temp directory with no hash check), while the archive-size check still passes. This\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003ecan lead to remote code execution.\u003c/p\u003eThis issue was fixed in version 1.2.2.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "SzafirHost verifies the downloaded native library archive with one JarFile parser (reading the Central Directory) but extracts native libraries with JarInputStream parser (reading sequentially from local file headers).\u00a0An attacker who controls the served archive can insert a malicious DLL/SO/DYLIB as a local-file-header entry between the last legitimate entry and the Central Directory, without adding it to the Central Directory. The signature verifier never sees the injected entry and accepts the archive as validly signed; the extractor reads it sequentially and writes the attacker library to the native temp directory with no hash check), while the archive-size check still passes. This\u00a0can lead to remote code execution.\n\nThis issue was fixed in version 1.2.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-434",
"description": "CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-29T12:16:55.559Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/06/CVE-2026-13165"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Remote Code Execution in SzafirHost",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-13165",
"datePublished": "2026-06-29T12:16:55.559Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-24T13:07:31.310Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-29T13:58:14.780Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-13165",
"date": "2026-06-30",
"epss": "0.00418",
"percentile": "0.33516"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-13165\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cvd@cert.pl\",\"published\":\"2026-06-29T14:16:41.647\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-29T19:13:31.073\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"SzafirHost verifies the downloaded native library archive with one JarFile parser (reading the Central Directory) but extracts native libraries with JarInputStream parser (reading sequentially from local file headers).\u00a0An attacker who controls the served archive can insert a malicious DLL/SO/DYLIB as a local-file-header entry between the last legitimate entry and the Central Directory, without adding it to the Central Directory. The signature verifier never sees the injected entry and accepts the archive as validly signed; the extractor reads it sequentially and writes the attacker library to the native temp directory with no hash check), while the archive-size check still passes. This\u00a0can lead to remote code execution.\\n\\nThis issue was fixed in version 1.2.2.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"cvd@cert.pl\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa\",\"product\":\"SzafirHost\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"1.2.2\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"cvd@cert.pl\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"ACTIVE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-06-29T13:58:08.681080Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-13165\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cvd@cert.pl\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-434\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://cert.pl/posts/2026/06/CVE-2026-13165\",\"source\":\"cvd@cert.pl\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/\",\"source\":\"cvd@cert.pl\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…