CVE-2026-12071 (GCVE-0-2026-12071)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-07 09:40 – Updated: 2026-09-07 12:40- CWE-601 - URL redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://chayns.net/77892-10814/tapp/763210?postId=11454 | release-notes |
| https://labs.infoguard.ch/posts/22-cves-in-david-… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobit Laboratories AG | TeamDavid |
Affected:
0 , < Rollout 528
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12071",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-10T11:19:50.374307Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-10T11:21:46.019Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Webbox"
],
"product": "TeamDavid",
"vendor": "Tobit Laboratories AG",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "Rollout 528",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dario Weiss of InfoGuard Labs"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Olivier Becker of InfoGuard Labs"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Lucas Dodgson of InfoGuard Labs"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003eThe Webbox of TeamDavid by\u0026nbsp;Tobit Laboratories AG\u0026nbsp;constructs redirect URLs using user-supplied input, \nwhich is appended to the redirect target in a 302 HTTP response. By \nusing URL-encoded characters such as \u201c%2e\u201d (representing a dot), an \nattacker can manipulate the portion of the URL following the top-level \ndomain (TLD). If a similar, registerable TLD exists (for example, if \n\u201c.com\u201d is the application\u2019s domain, and \u201c.company\u201d is available for \nregistration), an attacker can craft a URL to redirect users to a \nmalicious \u201c.company\u201d domain. By using URL-encoded line feeds, it becomes\n possible to insert arbitrary response headers in the server\u0027s HTTP \nresponse.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStarting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The Webbox of TeamDavid by\u00a0Tobit Laboratories AG\u00a0constructs redirect URLs using user-supplied input, \nwhich is appended to the redirect target in a 302 HTTP response. By \nusing URL-encoded characters such as \u201c%2e\u201d (representing a dot), an \nattacker can manipulate the portion of the URL following the top-level \ndomain (TLD). If a similar, registerable TLD exists (for example, if \n\u201c.com\u201d is the application\u2019s domain, and \u201c.company\u201d is available for \nregistration), an attacker can craft a URL to redirect users to a \nmalicious \u201c.company\u201d domain. By using URL-encoded line feeds, it becomes\n possible to insert arbitrary response headers in the server\u0027s HTTP \nresponse.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528.\n\nStarting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-601",
"description": "CWE-601 URL redirection to untrusted site (\u0027open redirect\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T12:40:34.507Z",
"orgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"shortName": "NCSC.ch"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://chayns.net/77892-10814/tapp/763210?postId=11454"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://labs.infoguard.ch/posts/22-cves-in-david-a-secure-m365-alternative/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "TeamDavid: Header Injection leading to Open Redirect via URL-encoded characters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"assignerShortName": "NCSC.ch",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12071",
"datePublished": "2026-08-07T09:40:52.596Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-12T09:32:52.061Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T12:40:34.507Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-12071",
"date": "2026-11-08",
"epss": "0.00458",
"percentile": "0.39993"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Webbox"
],
"product": "TeamDavid",
"vendor": "Tobit Laboratories AG",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "Rollout 528",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Webbox of TeamDavid by\u00a0Tobit Laboratories AG\u00a0constructs redirect URLs using user-supplied input, \nwhich is appended to the redirect target in a 302 HTTP response. By \nusing URL-encoded characters such as \u201c%2e\u201d (representing a dot), an \nattacker can manipulate the portion of the URL following the top-level \ndomain (TLD). If a similar, registerable TLD exists (for example, if \n\u201c.com\u201d is the application\u2019s domain, and \u201c.company\u201d is available for \nregistration), an attacker can craft a URL to redirect users to a \nmalicious \u201c.company\u201d domain. By using URL-encoded line feeds, it becomes\n possible to insert arbitrary response headers in the server\u0027s HTTP \nresponse.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528.\n\nStarting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El Webbox de TeamDavid de Tobit Laboratories AG construye URLs de redirecci\u00f3n utilizando entrada proporcionada por el usuario, que se a\u00f1ade al objetivo de redirecci\u00f3n en una respuesta HTTP 302. Al utilizar caracteres codificados en URL como \u2019%2e\u2019 (que representa un punto), un atacante puede manipular la porci\u00f3n de la URL que sigue al dominio de nivel superior (TLD). Si existe un TLD similar y registrable (por ejemplo, si \u2019.com\u2019 es el dominio de la aplicaci\u00f3n y \u2019.company\u2019 est\u00e1 disponible para registro), un atacante puede elaborar una URL para redirigir a los usuarios a un dominio \u2019.company\u2019 malicioso. Al utilizar saltos de l\u00ednea codificados en URL, se hace posible insertar encabezados de respuesta arbitrarios en la respuesta HTTP del servidor.\n\nEste problema afecta a TeamDavid hasta el Rollout 524."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-12071",
"lastModified": "2026-10-23T21:10:00.157",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12071",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-10T11:19:50.374307Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-07T10:16:56.297",
"references": [
{
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"url": "https://chayns.net/77892-10814/tapp/763210?postId=11454"
},
{
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"url": "https://labs.infoguard.ch/posts/22-cves-in-david-a-secure-m365-alternative/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-601"
}
],
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12071",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-10T11:19:50.374307Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-10T11:21:41.341Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Webbox"
],
"product": "TeamDavid",
"vendor": "Tobit Laboratories AG",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "Rollout 528",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dario Weiss of InfoGuard Labs"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Olivier Becker of InfoGuard Labs"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Lucas Dodgson of InfoGuard Labs"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003eThe Webbox of TeamDavid by\u0026nbsp;Tobit Laboratories AG\u0026nbsp;constructs redirect URLs using user-supplied input, \nwhich is appended to the redirect target in a 302 HTTP response. By \nusing URL-encoded characters such as \u201c%2e\u201d (representing a dot), an \nattacker can manipulate the portion of the URL following the top-level \ndomain (TLD). If a similar, registerable TLD exists (for example, if \n\u201c.com\u201d is the application\u2019s domain, and \u201c.company\u201d is available for \nregistration), an attacker can craft a URL to redirect users to a \nmalicious \u201c.company\u201d domain. By using URL-encoded line feeds, it becomes\n possible to insert arbitrary response headers in the server\u0027s HTTP \nresponse.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStarting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The Webbox of TeamDavid by\u00a0Tobit Laboratories AG\u00a0constructs redirect URLs using user-supplied input, \nwhich is appended to the redirect target in a 302 HTTP response. By \nusing URL-encoded characters such as \u201c%2e\u201d (representing a dot), an \nattacker can manipulate the portion of the URL following the top-level \ndomain (TLD). If a similar, registerable TLD exists (for example, if \n\u201c.com\u201d is the application\u2019s domain, and \u201c.company\u201d is available for \nregistration), an attacker can craft a URL to redirect users to a \nmalicious \u201c.company\u201d domain. By using URL-encoded line feeds, it becomes\n possible to insert arbitrary response headers in the server\u0027s HTTP \nresponse.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528.\n\nStarting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-601",
"description": "CWE-601 URL redirection to untrusted site (\u0027open redirect\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T12:40:34.507Z",
"orgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"shortName": "NCSC.ch"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://chayns.net/77892-10814/tapp/763210?postId=11454"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://labs.infoguard.ch/posts/22-cves-in-david-a-secure-m365-alternative/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "TeamDavid: Header Injection leading to Open Redirect via URL-encoded characters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"assignerShortName": "NCSC.ch",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12071",
"datePublished": "2026-08-07T09:40:52.596Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-12T09:32:52.061Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T12:40:34.507Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.