CVE-2026-114620 (GCVE-0-2026-114620)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-22 21:34 – Updated: 2026-10-22 21:34
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Authlib: Unvalidated request_uri fetch in JWT-secured authorization request (JAR) leading to SSRF
Summary
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.9.0, Authlib's RFC 9101 JWTAuthenticationRequest passes the unauthenticated, client-controlled request_uri parameter to the abstract get_request_object() hook before applying a destination or registration policy; the hook itself performs no network request, while the documentation demonstrates an unrestricted HTTP fetch. In deployments whose integrator implements that hook as an unrestricted outbound fetch, a remote attacker who knows a valid public client identifier can make the authorization server request internal, link-local, or otherwise unintended URLs and can distinguish fetch outcomes through different error responses and timing. Deployments whose custom hook already applies a secure allowlist, destination controls, and retrieval limits are not affected. The JWTAuthenticationRequest implementation in authlib/oauth2/rfc9101/authorization_server.py forwards request_uri to get_request_object() before an application-approved retrieval policy accepts the destination. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.0.
Severity
5.4 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/authlib/authlib/pull/949 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/6563f6f… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/891e3f1… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.9.0 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "authlib",
"vendor": "authlib",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.9.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.9.0, Authlib\u0027s RFC 9101 JWTAuthenticationRequest passes the unauthenticated, client-controlled request_uri parameter to the abstract get_request_object() hook before applying a destination or registration policy; the hook itself performs no network request, while the documentation demonstrates an unrestricted HTTP fetch. In deployments whose integrator implements that hook as an unrestricted outbound fetch, a remote attacker who knows a valid public client identifier can make the authorization server request internal, link-local, or otherwise unintended URLs and can distinguish fetch outcomes through different error responses and timing. Deployments whose custom hook already applies a secure allowlist, destination controls, and retrieval limits are not affected. The JWTAuthenticationRequest implementation in authlib/oauth2/rfc9101/authorization_server.py forwards request_uri to get_request_object() before an application-approved retrieval policy accepts the destination. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-22T21:34:11.909Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-x4rv-c3wx-4cr8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-x4rv-c3wx-4cr8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/pull/949",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/pull/949"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/6563f6f7a8c2f71d2f85ee7511d72a4fbae3acc0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/6563f6f7a8c2f71d2f85ee7511d72a4fbae3acc0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/891e3f10ae5989176211f8be35dcc7cd40aa92c6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/891e3f10ae5989176211f8be35dcc7cd40aa92c6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.9.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.9.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-x4rv-c3wx-4cr8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Authlib: Unvalidated request_uri fetch in JWT-secured authorization request (JAR) leading to SSRF"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-114620",
"datePublished": "2026-10-22T21:34:11.909Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-21T20:34:25.600Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-22T21:34:11.909Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-114620",
"date": "2026-10-28",
"epss": "0.0029",
"percentile": "0.21536"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "authlib",
"vendor": "authlib",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.9.0"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.9.0, Authlib\u0027s RFC 9101 JWTAuthenticationRequest passes the unauthenticated, client-controlled request_uri parameter to the abstract get_request_object() hook before applying a destination or registration policy; the hook itself performs no network request, while the documentation demonstrates an unrestricted HTTP fetch. In deployments whose integrator implements that hook as an unrestricted outbound fetch, a remote attacker who knows a valid public client identifier can make the authorization server request internal, link-local, or otherwise unintended URLs and can distinguish fetch outcomes through different error responses and timing. Deployments whose custom hook already applies a secure allowlist, destination controls, and retrieval limits are not affected. The JWTAuthenticationRequest implementation in authlib/oauth2/rfc9101/authorization_server.py forwards request_uri to get_request_object() before an application-approved retrieval policy accepts the destination. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.0."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-114620",
"lastModified": "2026-10-23T19:34:14.170",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 2.7,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-22T22:18:05.090",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/6563f6f7a8c2f71d2f85ee7511d72a4fbae3acc0"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/891e3f10ae5989176211f8be35dcc7cd40aa92c6"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/pull/949"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.9.0"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-x4rv-c3wx-4cr8"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-10-23T00:37:52+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-114620",
"id": "CVE-2026-114620",
"initial_release_date": "2026-10-22T21:34:11.909000+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "11",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "authlib: Authlib: Server-Side Request Forgery via unvalidated request URI",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-114620.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.